Transcript Agenda for 2006-2007 - Academy of Management

2011 Awards & Business Meeting
Neil Boyd
Division Chair

Welcome

Awards Ceremony

Committee/Officer Reports

New Business

PNP Social
Best Dissertation
Sponsored by Jossey-Bass
Sue Faerman - Chair
Sources of Organizational Similarity and Divergence: Essays on
Decision Making and Change in Danish Municipalities Using
Organizational Institutionalism
Anders Ryom Villadsen
University of Twente, Netherlands
Best Book
Don Moynihan - Chair
Accountability, Legitimacy and
the Design of Global Governance
Jonathan Koppell
Arizona State University
Best Article
Branda Nowell- Chair
Is Private Production of Public Services Cheaper than Public
Production? A Meta-regression Analysis
Germa Bel – Universitat de Barcelona
Xavier Fageda – Universitat de Barcelona
Mildred Warner – Cornell University
Charles H. Levine Best Conference Paper
Sponsored by the Routledge
The Italian Operatic Sector after
Privatization and HRM:
A Critical Reflection
Marcello Mariani
University of Bologna
Best Doctoral Student
Conference Paper
Sponsored by Sage
Donor Motivation and Recipient
Selection in Online Philanthropy:
A Case Study of Kiva.org
&
Walk on By: The Performance
Effects of Regulatory Oversight
Jessica Richman-Oxford Kristin Wilson-Harvard
Stan Veuger-Harvard
Carlo Masini Award for Innovative Scholarship
Committee
 Kim Isett, chair, Columbia University/Georgia Tech
 Elio Borgonovi, Bocconi University
 Stephen Osborne, Univ of Edinborough
 Gerhard Speckbacher, Vienna University of Economics and
Management
Carlo Masini Award for Innovative Scholarship
Sponsored by Bocconi University
Affective Commitment and Variability
in the Organizational Climate
of Government Offices
Russell Hassan – Ohio State University
John Rohrbaugh – Albany University
Carolyn Dexter Award Nominee
Organizing Prisons through Public-Private
Partnerships: A Cross-Country Investigation
Sandro Cabral
Stephane Saussier
2010-2011
2011 Program Chair Report
Avner Ben-Ner, University of Minnesota
Associate Editors
Jane Banaszak-Holl – University of Michigan – Ann Arbor
Kirsten Grønbjerg – Indiana University
Deneen Hatmaker – University of Connecticut
Kim Isett – Columbia University/Georgia Tech
Jeryl Mumpower – Texas A& M University
May Seitanidi - The University of Nottingham
Amy E. Smith – University of Massachusetts
Program
2011 Program Chair Report
Avner Ben-Ner
2010
2011
All paper sessions
14
24
Paper Sessions (DP)
7
Roundtable Sessions (DRP)
5
Discussion Sessions (DISP)
2
Cross-divisional Sessions (CDP)
10
Symposia (SYMP)
6
7
Several sessions are joint with other divisions
Papers submitted
Papers accepted
Acceptance rate
140
68
48.5%
137
71
51.8%
2011 Program Chair Report
Avner Ben-Ner
-
12 Student papers were selected
14 International themed papers were selected
-
3 out of the 7 are internationally themed and represented
36 Accepted papers were submitted outside of the United States
(18 different countries)
2011 Program Chair Report
Avner Ben-Ner
Reviews
2009
2010
2011*
Reviews Submitted
445
411
459
Reviewers
148
235
160
*Including Associate Editor assignments
2011 PDW Chair Report
Eric Martin
8 great PDWs on:
Extreme Events
Managerial Flow
Haven for Hope
Cross-Sectoral Partnerships
Quality Improvement
Captains of Lives
Social Entrepreneurship
International Comparative Healthcare
Sponsored additional PDWs with ONE, MOC, SIM, ENT, PTC,
GDO, OM, OMT, and others
2011 PDW Chair Report
Eric Martin

Doctoral Consortium



Deneen Hatmaker and Amy Smith, Coordinators
34 students from 28 universities and 7 countries
14 faculty from 11 universities
Craig Boardman
Sanjay Pandey
Sue Faerman
Keith Provan
Mary Feeney
Karl Rethemeyer
Russell Hassan
John Rohrbaugh
Kim Isett
Chris Silvia
Sonia Ospina
Jeannette Taylor
Laurie Paarlberg
Brad Wright
Sponsors
University of Massachusetts - Boston, McCormack Graduate School of Policy Studies
University at Albany - SUNY, Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy
University of Connecticut, Department of Public Policy
2010-11 Division Chair Report
Neil Boyd
Public & Non Profit Division PNP 5-Year Review Committee
Neil Boyd, Ph.D., Lycoming College
Division Chair & Past Program Chair, Public & NonProfit Division
Dean F. Eitel, Ph.D., DePaul University
Immediate Past Division Co-Chair, and Past Program Co-Chair, Public and Nonprofit Division
Gordon Kingsley, Ph.D., Georgia Institute of Technology
Past Division & Program Chair, Public and Nonprofit Division
Kimberley R. Isett, PhD, MPA, Columbia University
Immediate Past Program Chair, Public and Nonprofit Division
Bradley Wright, Ph.D., University of North Carolina, Charlotte
Past Division & Program Chair, Public and Nonprofit Division
Deborah Blackman, Ph.D, University of Canberra
Public & Nonprofit Division Member
Emanuele Vendramini, Ph.D., Catholic University, Milan, Italy
Immediate Past International Liaison, Public & Nonprofit Division
Erzsébet Fazekas, Ph.D., University at Albany, SUNY
Public & Nonprofit Division Member
Teresa Martinelli-Lee, DPA (ABD), University of La Verne
Public & Nonprofit Division Member
2010-11 Division Chair Report
Neil Boyd
5-Year Division Review
We coordinated and completed a review of our division, a strategic planning
exercise, and submitted a 5-Year Review Report to AOM. Based on
reviewing division statistics, a division survey to members, and experiential
knowledge we proposed the following:
2010-11 Division Chair Report
5-Year Division Review Committee Recommendations
Neil Boyd
 Recommendation #1: The PNP division should increase its focus on research, teaching, and
creating opportunities for social connections for our members.
 Recommendation #2: The PNP Division should attempt to increase participation rates in
reviewing, PDW creation, and serving as session chairs or discussants.
 Recommendation #3: The PNP Division should attempt to increase the number of traditional
and divisional paper sessions, modify the cross-divisional and divisional roundtable formats,
and significantly decrease or eliminate the poster and visual sessions.
 Recommendation #4: The PNP Division should incrementally tweak networking and
collaborative activities with AOM members outside of the division, and to continue working
on the same with international members.
 Recommendation #5: The PNP Division should study the issue of communication by
evaluating the function, content, and frequency of the newsletter, website, and listserv of
the division.
2010-11 Division Chair Report
We submitted our report to the Division & Interest Group Relations Committee Neil Boyd
and WE PASSED! We’re back in business for another 5 Years!
Here is what they said:
 Congratulations! The Division and Interest Group Relations (DIGR) Committee of the Academy
of Management is pleased to recommend the renewal of the Public and Nonprofit (PNP)
Division for another five years.
 In reviewing your division report, DIGR committee members were asked to identify what they
see as the Division’s strengths and challenges, and then to share recommendations that may
help the division improve services to its members.
 We hope that our feedback will help you continue to strengthen the Division and to accomplish
our shared goal of creating a strong Academy of Management that provides excellent
opportunities for its membership. Please recall that an important element of the review
process is for division leaders to share the report and review results in an open letter to their
membership, via the website or e-mail.
 Thank you again for your very well-done report. We were impressed with the energy and selfreflection that are evident here.
STRENGTHS
2010-11 Division Chair Report
Neil Boyd
The overall sentiment on the Division and Interest Group Relations (DIGR) Committee is that
the PNP Division is a strong, thriving division, with healthy membership growth and satisfied
members.
Steady and healthy growth over the past five years, with particularly increases in international,
new, and student membership.
The PNP division membership has increased by 19.56% over 5 years, compared with a 16.56% increase for the
Academy during that time. Both domestic (7.25% versus 1.59%) and International (50.45% versus 36.20%) 5 year
growth for PNP exceeds that of the Academy overall. Growth in students and new members also exceeds that of
the Academy overall.
Consistent with a relatively new division, most members are relatively new.
Sixty-seven percent of PNP Division members have been members 7 years or less. This indicates something
attracted them to join, rather than a mentality of simply always having been a member. This newness and possible
excitement is advantageous for generating commitment, volunteerism, and continued goodwill.
Members are quite satisfied with the division and the meeting program.
Eighty percent of the members are satisfied with the sense of community within the division. PNP members were
very satisfied with social and networking opportunities with strong scores in satisfied to very satisfied (84%) and
the highest percent reporting extremely satisfied (18%). Paper sessions also achieved high ratings with 84%
reporting satisfied to extremely satisfied, and 14% reporting extremely satisfied. Symposia were rated very strongly
too with 76% stating they were satisfied to very satisfied.
2010-11 Division Chair Report
Neil Boyd
CHALLENGES
In an effort to help the PNP Division improve, the DIGR committee also notes several
challenges that may face the Division over the next five years:
Relatively low reviewer participation.
Twenty-one percent of respondents report reviewing every year and another 24% reviewed a few times during the last five years.
This somewhat low rate of reviewing may be a reflection of newness and lack of confidence in the relevant research, but bears
attention. Sixty-one percent of members have never volunteered in any manner to serve the division.
Many “neutral” ratings in the survey.
Although they are technically “satisfied” ratings, for most categories, the “satisfied” far outnumbers the “extremely” or “very”
satisfied individual ratings. For example, the sense of community, opportunity to influence division, opportunity to become
involved in the division, and efforts to reach out to international members are all in the mid-40%s range (for “satisfied”). As a new
and small division, seeing more of the latter ratings would be positive. What can be done to move these members to the more
satisfied categories?
RECOMMENDATIONS
2010-11 Division Chair Report
Neil Boyd
The DIGR Committee supports the very specific suggestions of the PNP Division leadership in their report. A few additional
thoughts from the committee:
Encourage members’ participation in reviewing and other service activities.
Volunteers are critical to the future success and growth of the division. Reviewing workshops may help those who
are unfamiliar with reviewing increase confidence, while also exposing them to existing research.
Consider ways to improve visibility of the division in the Academy. The domain of the division is increasingly
relevant in various contexts, and Academy members need to know about it. All-Academy session
submissions may be one such venue to increase awareness of the division and its intellectual contributions.
Increase sense of community through improved member communication, activities, and outreach.
Communication issues run through many of the areas of “satisfaction” from the member survey, and are already
present in many of the PNPs self-study report’s ideas for improvement. Professional Development Workshops,
open to participants may increase interest in the field as well.
As the division develops an action plan for the next five years, please consider where your plans might align
with the Academy’s strategic plan, or if you have projects or initiatives that support the four strategic intent
areas of Internationalism, State of the Profession, Professional Impact, and Academy Management.
Through the “Strategic Doing” proposal process, there is funding available to Divisions and Interest Groups to help
support initiatives and projects that advance member service and scholarly activity under these 4 strategic intent
areas. The Board encourages you to develop a proposal and apply for these available resources, and in so doing,
support not just the goals of your division, but the Academy community as a whole.
Neil Boyd
DIVISION PROGRAM CHAIR
Term: 4 years (8/15/2011 - 8/15/2015)
George Alexander Boyne, Cardiff University
Neil Boyd
MEMBERSHIP COMMITTEE MEMBER
Term: 3 years (8/15/2011 - 8/15/2014)
Rebecca Tekula, Pace University
CHAIR, BEST ARTICLE AWARD COMMITTEE
Term: 1 year (8/15/2011 - 8/15/2012)
Mary K. Feeney, University of Illinois Chicago
Neil Boyd
CHAIR, BEST BOOK AWARD COMMITTEE
Term: 1 year (8/15/2011 - 8/15/2012)
Ralph Brower, Florida State University
CHAIR, BEST DISSERTATION AWARD COMMITTEE
Term: 1 year (8/15/2011 - 8/15/2012)
W Bartley Hildreth, Georgia State University
Matthew Liao-Troth, Georgia College & State
University
 Our Spring/Summer 2011 Newsletter
is available on our website and on
AoM Connect
 Our Special Edition 2011 Newsletter
that contains the full program of PNP
activities at this year’s meeting is
available on our website and on AoM
Connect
 We would like to increase the
frequency with which our members’
work is cited so please let us know of
any publications that you have had
accepted or actually published in the
last year so that we may include
them in our newsletter.
 Please share other member-related
news such as job postings, career
moves, promotions, etc.
We look forward to hearing from you!
Joy Smith, treasurer
Beginning Balance
$ 5,322
Receipts
Membership Allocation
$ 8,807
Sponsorships and Pledges
$ 3,950
University at Albany, Rockefeller College- $1,000
University of Connecticut – Storrs – $300
University of Massachusetts-Boston – $150
University of Minnesota, Carlson School – $2500
Total Receipts
$ 18,079
Expenses
Award Plaques
Food and Beverages
Awards
$ 450 (est)
$10,200 (est)
$ 200
Total Expenses
Ending Balance*
*$2000 additional in prior unpaid pledges pending
$ 6,229.27
$11,200.00
$11,000.00
$10,800.00
$10,600.00
$10,400.00
$10,200.00
$10,000.00
$9,800.00
$9,600.00
$9,400.00
$9,200.00
Anaheim
Chicago
Montreal
San Antonio
$9,000.00
$8,800.00
$8,600.00
$8,400.00
$8,200.00
$8,000.00
$7,800.00
$7,600.00
2008
2009
2010
2011
 Donations




Rockefeller College – University at Albany - $1,000
University of Connecticut – Storrs $300
University of Massachusetts-Boston – $150
Carlson School – University of Minnesota – $2,500
 Membership Allocation $8,807
 Balance forward $5,322
Beginning Balance
$23,305.38
Contributions
200.00
Interest Paid
483.87
Distributions
2,000.00
Ending Balance
$21,989.25
# members
# meeting
attendees
Anaheim
2008
914
255
Chicago
2009
920
334
Montreal
2010
936
337
San Antonio
2011
917
287
2010
Academic
Emeritus
Executive
Student
International
589
13
90
244
343
2011
561
14
95
247
338
Co-Membership
OMT
OB
ODC
BPS
235
195
179
164
Incoming Division Chair’s Report
Kim Isett
 5-Year Division Report
Leaving executive board
 Division chair – Neil Boyd
 Treasurer – Joy Turnheim Smith
 PDW Chair - Eric C. Martin
Leaving division committees – end of term
 Membership committee chair, Laurie Paarlberg
 PMRA Liaison 2008-2011, James Perry
 Best Article award committee, Branda Nowell
 Best Book award committee, Don Moynihan
 Best Dissertation award committee, Sue Faerman
 International Liaison, May Seitanidi, Nottingham University
Thanks to our sponsors
- Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota
- SDA, Bocconi University
- McCormack Graduate School of Policy Studies, University of
Massachusetts – Boston
- Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy, University at
Albany
- Department of Public Policy , University of Connecticut
PNP Social
6:30PM – 8:00PM
The Marriott Rivercenter
Salon A
See you
next year…
In boston