Protocols and Practice Support

Download Report

Transcript Protocols and Practice Support

RETURN TO MAIN
Ten Emerging
Trends in
E-Discovery
What’s New Since December 1?
RETURN TO MAIN
Presenters
• Browning Marean
• Attorney, DLA Piper, us, San Diego
• Stephen Dooley
• Electronic Discovery, Sullivan &
Cromwell, New York
• Arthur L. Smith
• Attorney, Husch & Eppenberger,
LLC., St. Louis
• Debbie McReynolds
• Legal Assistant, Husch &
Eppenberger, St. Louis
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
2
RETURN TO MAIN
New Rules, New Challenges
• F.R.Civ.P. Amendments
effective 12/1/06
– Basic Rule:
• “If relevant document exists in
electronic form, it must be located
and produced in electronic form”
– Paradigm Shift
• Early attention to discovery of
potential sources of relevant
Electronically Stored Information
(“ESI”)
• Early attention paid to preservation
obligations and implementation of
“legal hold”
– Several trends clearly emerge
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
3
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 1:
Courts Set Minimum Standards
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
4
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 1:
Courts Set Minimum Standards
• Rule 26(f) forces party to
confer early and reach
agreement on key ediscovery issues
• Courts issue guidelines
setting minimum standards
– Local court rules on discovery
and production of E.S.I.
supplementing FRCP
– Suggested protocols mandating
early discussions and
disclosures regarding E.S.I.
– Updated list at
www.ediscoverylaw.com
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
5
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 1:
Courts Set Minimum Standards
• Maryland District Court’s “Suggested
Protocol” represents best thinking
– Minimum standards for the kind of information
to be exchanged by the parties
– Suggests each party have ESI coordinator
– Developed by cross-sectional group led by
Magistrate Paul Grimm
– Sets defaults to be applied if parties can’t
agree
• Protocol followed by
– Northern District of Ohio
•
www.ohnd.uscourts.gov/Clerk_s_Office/Local_Rules/AppendixK.pdf
– Western District of North Carolina
•
O'Bar v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc., 2007 WL 1299180
(W.D.N.C. May 2, 2007)
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
6
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 1:
Courts Set Minimum Standards
• Protocol suggests that Rule 26(f) conference
include discussion of:
Scope of the litigation hold
Identification of key custodians
Nature and types of E.S.I. involved
Metadata concerns
Network infrastructure, back-ups etc.
Legacy systems with potentially discoverable E.S.I.
Records management policies
Form of production
De-duplication issues
Preservation of data on “dynamic” systems and
application of the Rule 37 “safe harbor”
Quick peek or claw back strategies for privileged
documents
E.S.I. “deemed not reasonable accessible”
Document tracking or Bates numbering
Cost sharing issues
Possibility of two-tiered discovery
Protective orders for confidential information
Earlier Rule 30(b)(6) depositions on IT systems
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
7
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 2:
Discovery Battles Take Center Stage
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
8
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 2:
Discovery Battles Take Center Stage
• “Attorneys who can build a
case of spoliation, therefore,
may gain a significant
advantage in the presentation
of his or her case to the jury,
even in the absence of a
separate cause of action or
formal sanction by the court.”
» From “Maximizing Damages from the
Defendant's Spoliation of Evidence”
by Maury and Steve Herman, Trial
Magazine May, 2005
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
9
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 2:
Discovery Battles Take Center Stage
• Why the interest in
sanctions?
• Consider the ease with
which electronically
stored information can
be lost
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
10
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 2:
Discovery Battles Take Center Stage
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
11
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 2:
Discovery Battles Take Center Stage
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
12
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 2:
Discovery Battles Take Center Stage
• Spoliation is the loss or
destruction of potentially
relevant evidence at a time
when the party was under a
duty to preserve
• Sanctions can include:
– Monetary penalties
– Preclusion of evidence
– Adverse inference instruction
– Default judgment
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
13
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 3:
Sanctions Become Meaningful Threat
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
14
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 3:
Sanctions Become Meaningful Threat
• Recent Case of Note
– United Medical Supply Co., Inc.
v. United States
– 2007 WL 1952680 (Fed. Cl.
June 27, 2007)
• Scholarly review of case law
among the circuits on the
imposition of sanctions under:
– Rule 11
– Rule 37
– Inherent Power of the Court
• Slaps sanctions on U.S. for
“reckless disregard of its duty to
preserve evidence”
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
15
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 3:
Sanctions Become Meaningful Threat
• Recent Case of Note
– In Re September 11th Liability
Insurance Coverage Cases
– 2007 WL 1739666 (S.D.N.Y.
June 18, 2007)
• Imposes Rule 11 Sanction of
$750,000 against attorneys and
insurer for asserting unfounded
denials and preventing
discovery
• Imposes Discovery Sanction of
$500,000 against attorneys and
insurer For delays in disclosing
relevant documents and
unjustifiably increasing cost of
discovery
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
16
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 4:
Erosion of the Attorney Client Privilege
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
17
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 4:
Erosion of the Attorney Client Privilege
• “[W]here legal advice of any kind is
sought from a professional legal
advisor in his capacity as such, the
communications relevant to that
purpose, made in confidence by the
client, are . . . permanently
protected from disclosure [unless]
the protection be waived.”
– Diversified Indus. v. Meredith,
572 F.2d 596, 602 (8th Cir. 1978).
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
18
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 4:
Erosion of the Attorney Client Privilege
•
Courts lifting the veil of protection on
preservation and production
– Production of hold memos
– Depositions of house counsel on
production issues
– Depositions of witnesses on instructions
from counsel regarding document
collection
•
Transparency is the name of the game
–
See, e.g., Cache La Poudre Feeds, LLC v. Land
O’Lakes, Inc. et al., 2007 WL 684001 (D. Colo. March
2, 2007); School-Link Technologies, Inc. v. Applied
Resources, Inc., 2007 WL 677647 (D. Kan. Feb. 28,
2007)
–
See, also, Wachtel v. Guardian Life et al., 2007 US
Dist. LEXIS 43842 (D. N.J. 2007), applying the crime
fraud exception to the privilege to permit piercing the
privilege veil
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
19
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 5:
Inaccessible Data Not Really Inaccessible
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
20
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 5:
Inaccessible Data Not Really Inaccessible
• Rules permit part to object to
production of ESI “not
reasonably accessible by
reason of undue burden or
costs”
• For courts, this is really just
an opportunity to consider
cost shifting
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
21
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 6:
“Best Practices” Standards Begin to Emerge
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
22
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 6:
“Best Practices” Standards Begin to Emerge
• Sedona Principles Updated
– http://www.thesedonaconference.org/
– First issued 2004
• Often cited by the Courts
• Attempt to capsule the issues
involved in e-Discovery
• Major Changes:
– Original principles unchanged
– Case law annotations updated
– Explanatory notes updated
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
23
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 6:
“Best Practices” Standards Begin to Emerge
•
Electronic Discovery Reference Model
Project
–
Found At:
•
–
Multiple Modules
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
http://www.edrm.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
Main Page
Records Management
Identification
Preservation
Collection
Processing
Review
Analysis
Production
Presentation
Other EDRM Projects
–
–
–
Code of Conduct
Metrics
XML Schema for Metadata
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
24
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 6:
“Best Practices” Standards Begin to Emerge
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
25
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 7:
Electronic Resources Abound
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
26
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 7:
Electronic Resources Abound
• Lawyer blogs, vendor websites
and e-mail listservs making it
easy to stay current
• A few favorite sites:
• www.ediscoverylaw.com
• www.krollontrack.com
• www.applieddiscovery.com
• www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/
• www.discoveryresources.org
• www.craigball.com
• What the judges are reading:
• http://www.fjc.gov/public/pdf.nsf/lookup/eldscpkt.pdf/$file/eldscpkt.pdf
• What are your favorites?
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
27
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 8:
Firms Adopt New Approaches to Staffing
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
28
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 8:
Firms Adopt New Approaches to Staffing
• Firms form
interdisciplinary teams
– Lawyers, Lit Support
Professionals and Experts
– Blending expertise
• Goals
– Consistency
– Provide expert support for
all litigators
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
29
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 8:
Firms Adopt New Approaches to Staffing
• Firms turn to contract
lawyers to cut document
review costs
– Fighting the “boredom factor”
for young associates and
paralegals
• Firms look for ways to keep ediscovery processing inhouse
– Risk-reward analysis to handling
processing internally
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
30
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 8:
Firms Adopt New Approaches to Staffing
• Difficult
management lie
ahead to cope with
the demands of ediscovery
• Managing the many
challenges of ediscovery is “like
herding cats ”
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
31
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 9:
Corporations Finally Recognize the Risks
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
32
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 9:
Corporations Finally Recognize the Risks
• Early surveys showed
that most of corporate
America unprepared for
challenge of e-Discovery
• E-Discovery rarely an
issue in the 80’s and 90’s
• “Don’t ask, don’t tell”
agreements
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
33
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 9:
Corporations Finally Recognize the Risks
“The Motion has been made and seconded
that we stick our heads in the sand.”
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
34
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 9:
Corporations Finally Recognize the Risks
• Now they’re getting ready
– Appointing e-discovery liaison
within the corporate hierarchy
– Updating records retention
policies on electronic records
– Adopting new tools for data
recovery
• Installing apps like Encase
Enterprise, Veritas, Digit,
Kazeon, etc.
• Adopting new content
management strategies
– Selecting preferred vendors
– National e-Discovery counsel
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
35
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 10:
Vendors Consolidate and Expand
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
36
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. 10:
Vendors Consolidate and Expand
• Moving from specialty
vendors to full service firms
– From records creation and
retention to
• Collection
• Review
• Production
• Strengthening search
capabilities
• Meeting challenges of
extraterritorial discovery
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
37
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. ??:
What Lies Ahead?
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
38
RETURN TO MAIN
Trend No. ??:
What Lies Ahead
• Will there be unintended
consequences of eDiscovery and its costs?
– Moving business and
records off shore?
– Writing arbitration clauses
with strict limits on
discovery?
– Will litigation as we know it
collapse under the weight
of the e-Discovery burden?
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
39
RETURN TO MAIN
Your turn to share….
• What additional trends do
you see?
• What changes are on the
horizon?
Ten Emerging Trends in E-Discovery
40