STRIMA Conference

Download Report

Transcript STRIMA Conference

Troubled Waters
Discussion Outline

Enterprise Risk Management
What is ERM and why is it important?
Differences between ERM and Risk Management
Benefits and Obstacles of implementing an ERM Program

ERM Process Overview
Sarbanes-Oxley and COSO
Financial Aspects of ERM
ERM Risk Management
Property Risks-Exposures & Controls
Linking Risks and Processes

Implementing an ERM Program
Risk identification & Mapping
Risk response paths
Resources and Tools
Sample Case Study

Questions & Discussion
What is ERM?
“… a process, effected by an entity’s board of
directors, management and other personnel,
applied in strategy setting and across the
enterprise, designed to identify potential events
that may affect the entity, and manage risks to
be within its risk appetite, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the achievement of entity
objectives.”
Source: COSO Enterprise Risk Management-Integrated Framework. 2004
Enterprise Risk Management
 enables management to effectively deal with
uncertainty and associated risks and opportunities
 creates Stakeholder value through leveraging of risks
and opportunities
 identifies potential events that may affect an entity
 aligns risk appetite and strategy through risk
quantification and risk mapping
 leverages collaborative “knowledge” to enhance risk
response decisions
 reduces operational surprises and losses
 improves deployment of capital
 allows proactively realizing opportunities
 supports achievement of key objectives
Why is ERM important?
 every entity, whether for profit or not, exists to realize
value for its stakeholders
 value is created, preserved or eroded by
management decisions in all activities, from setting
strategy to operating the enterprise day to day.
 business risks are increasing
 changing regulatory requirements
 boards not performing optimally in risk oversight
 corporate governance needs to be improved
Comparison of Traditional & Enterprise
Risk Management Characteristics
Old Risk Paradigm (RM)
New Risk Paradigm (ERM)
 Risk is defined as the probability
of an identified adverse financial
or operational event.
 Risk management is capital
management.
 Risks within an organization can
be identified and managed within
functional silos:
- Insurance
- Human Resources
- Finance
- Safety/Loss Control
 Partial or full risk transfer
maximizes shareholder value.
 Risk has both an upside and
downside potential.
 Risks do not exist in isolation; they
often cross artificial organizational
structures.
 Risks are better managed in
portfolios. This perspective opens
new possibilities.
 There exists an “Efficient Frontier”
for risk decisions, balancing
expected risk and return.
ERM and Risk Management
Differences between ERM and RM
 RM deals primarily with operational risks
• developing risk transfer/financing solutions
• funding for losses
• mitigating risk
• loss control
• claims management
ERM and Risk Management
ERM deals with broader risks including:
 strategic-mergers & acquisitions, business
execution, research & development, customers
 operational-business interruption, supply chain,
fraud, efficiency, safety
 human capital-employment practices, turnover,
leadership, absence management
 legal/regulatory-compliance
 technology- intellectual property, information
security
 financial- foreign exchange, credit
 reputation- market share
Charting the Course
Driving Forces Behind ERM
Investors
Market/Credit Analysts
Demand increased financial
disclosure and regulatory
compliance
Require that management
strengthen its risk
disclosure capabilities
Organization
Stakeholders
Demand that management
adequately identify all material
risks that impact cash flow,
capital and mission
Auditors
Current protocols require
organizations to report risks
in a forward-looking context
ERM Benefits and Obstacles
Obstacle
Benefit
 inadequate senior
management support
 aligns management
consensus and buy in
 inability to show immediate
ROI
 provides process to measure
business threats & ROI
 time & resources required
 enhances capital allocation
process
 cultural incompatibilities
 inadequate IT systems
 risk silo thinking
 links operations, strategic
and financial decision
making via portfolio
management
 improves achievement of
business objectives
The COSO Framework
ERM as defined in the framework:
 Is a process
 Is effected by people
 Is applied in strategy setting
 Is applied across the enterprise
 Is designed to identify potential events
 Manages risks within risk appetite
 Provides “reasonable assurance”
 Supports achievement of key objectives
Source: COSO Enterprise Risk Management – Integrated Framework, 2004
ERM & Sarbanes-Oxley
 Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404
• focuses immediate management attention on financial reporting
risk and internal control systems
• sets forth an ongoing requirement for annual attestation
• financial reporting risks are closely linked to enterprise wide risk
monitoring and reporting
 COSO Framework
• provides a comprehensive framework for addressing risk across
the organization
• helps to organize project based initiatives surrounding
Sarbanes-Oxley towards a process oriented and sustainable
approach
Linking Risks & Processes
 Reduce Operational Surprises and Losses - Identify
• Weather
• Terrorism
• Skyrocketing Costs
- Workers’ Compensation
- Health Care
- Retirement Funding
- Insurance Cycles
• Major Transportation System Failures
• Economic Downturns
- Baby Boomers Retiring
- Fuel Prices
• Consent Decrees
pt
.
11
ro
r
A
ua
ke
tta
c
k
)
01
)
92
(2
0
(1
9
94
)
)
)
99
1
(1
9
(1
04
Seven of the ten most expensive
disasters is world history
occurred in the US: Two were
hurricanes in 2004.
A
nd
re
w
rth
q
ne
Te
r
ur
ric
a
Ea
ill
e
(2
0
)
$6.8
H
e
le
y
M
ire
ha
r
99
0
$6.4
or
th
rid
g
on
C
(1
$20
Se
N
ph
o
ne
ar
ia
)
$6.4
Ty
ur
ric
a
D
)
99
98
9
ar
(1
9
(1
$6.2
H
to
rm
Lo
th
ug
o
$6.0
W
in
ds
to
rm
H
$4.8
W
in
ds
00
4)
$25
ne
(2
)
$30
ur
ric
a
87
$5
Iv
an
(1
9
$10
ne
St
or
m
s
ur
ric
a
an
$35
H
H
Eu
ro
pe
$ Billions
Top 10 Insured Losses Worldwide,1970-2004
$32.5
$20.9
$17.3
$15
$7.6
$0
Handling Exposures
Financial Aspects
 Reduce Operational Surprises and Losses - Finance
• Retention
- Auto PD, Working layers for GL, EPL, LEL,
W/C, Property, Auto Liability
- Deductible/SIR
> Can you afford your SIR Program?
 Stop Loss
 Gaps
 Multiple Lines Loss
- Uninsurable Losses
Financial Aspects
 Reduce Operational Surprises and Losses - Finance
• Insure – A Financial Transfer
- Excess - Auto, GL, EPL, LEL, W/C,
PROPERTY
 Variable Attachment Points
 Aggregate Limits
 “Basket Aggregates”
 Blanket Property – Single Loss limits
- Auto Liability
Financial Aspects
 Reduce Operational Surprises and Losses - Controls
• Contractual Transfer
- Road Construction – “Big Dig”
- Prisons
- Medical Malpractice
- Sub-Contractors
- “State Bids”
Risk Management
 Reduce Operational Surprises and Losses - Controls
• Claim Management
- Third Party Administrators
- In-House
 Guardrail Reimbursement Program
 Workers’ Compensation Fraud Units
Risk Management
 Reduce Operational Surprises and Losses - Controls
• Prevention
- Investments
 Diversify
- Audits - Mandatory Vacations
- Safety Programs
Property Exposures- Natural
 Seismic
 Volcanic eruption
 Winter storms / Arctic Freeze
 Hurricane / Typhoon/ Windstorm
 Floods / Water Damage
 Landslide / Subsidence
 Wildfire
Property Exposures- Man Made
 Bomb threats / Terrorist
Attacks
 Civil disturbance
 Explosion
 Structural fire
 Sabotage
 Hazardous materials
release
 Theft
 Transportation accident
 Computer crime
 Utility failure
 Unauthorized access
 Machinery Breakdown
Property Risk Control
 Risk Assessments
 Systems
 Management Programs
• Security
 Management of Change
• Fire Protection
 Contingency Planning
 Training / Drills
 Recovery Planning
 Media Management
 Facility Location & Site
Features
 Physical / Construction
Features
 Communication
• Voice
• Data
Positive Change
Implementing an ERM Program





Establish a vision and plan with objectives
Develop a supporting business case
Obtain senior level support
Form a cross functional team to lead the process
Communicate activities and progress
Implementing an ERM Program
Step 1




Identify key risks via interviews and surveys
Link key risks to corporate strategic objectives
Benchmark risks
Map risks
Step 2


Quantify identified risks
Assess the entity’s risk appetite and operating environment
Step 3

Identify insurance and non-insurance risk responses
Step 4


Create specific, measurable and time-limited response plans that are
acceptable and realistic to control risks
Implement continuous monitoring and improvement processes
Output
Activities
Step
ERM Process
1. Risk
Identification
2. Risk
Quantification
3. Risk
Response
4. Implement
Solutions
• Seek perspectives of
entity and key
stakeholders
• Structured self
assessment
• Interviews/surveys
• Benchmarking
• Individual risk
categories (strategic,
operational, financial,
legal/regulatory,
technological or human
capital)
• Risk mapping
• Risk analysis/ modeling
•Financial impact
•Probability
•Interdependencies
• Actuarial analysis
• Risk portfolio modeling
• Risk bearing capacity /
corporate risk tolerance
• Optimize risk financing
•DFA models
•Alternative Risk
finance (captive,
finite, etc.)
•Pricing models
• Risk management
solutions / action plans
• Develop risk finance
marketing strategy and
select markets/trading
partners
• Implement risk
mitigation strategies
• Implementation of risk
financing strategies
• Ongoing ERM process
and organization
• RM Information
Systems and
monitoring capabilities
• Risk inventory
• Risk map (qualitative)
• Key risks determined
• Risk map (quantitative)
• Quantitative risk profile
• Advice to optimize
financial and
operational mitigation
strategies
• Risk finance programs
• Risk mitigation
programs
• Ongoing ERM process
Risk Identification: Risk Scorecards
Risk
Definition
Current State
Development and execution of succession plans for key employees
Ability to recruit and/or retain qualified employees
Development and execution of succession plans for key employees
Employee Retention
Ability to support growth initiatives
High Opportunity For
Improvement
Ability to support growth initiatives
Creation of work/life balance for key employees
Creation of work/life balance for key employees
Includes impact of stock option dilution on employee incentive plans
Current Metrics
Risk Owner(s)
• Human Resources
• Business Unit Leaders
•
Total compensation expense
• Voluntary and involuntary turnover
• Employee satisfaction survey metrics
Action Plans
Current:
Planned:
Recommended Action Plans:
• Stock option incentive plan
• Improve bench strength at VP level and
above through external hiring and increased
training
• Measure baseline employee commitment
• External recruiting initiatives
• Annual management process to identify
next level of leadership
• Outsourcing selected functions
• Cross-training initiatives
• Conduct exit interviews with all departing
employees
• Institute employee referral bonuses
• Develop total compensation statements
• Rollout formal succession planning
campaign holding key managers
accountable for their successors
Risk Identification-Risk Mapping
Risk Response Paths
Risk Response Strategies
Avoid Risk
Mitigate
Exit
risk area
Organizational
solutions
(Enhance management
processes to better
manage risk)
Strategy
People
Process
Mitigate,
then Transfer
Transfer
Risk management
Financing
solutions
and mitigation
Systems
Capital
Markets
Insurance
Hybrid
Case Study XYZ Company
 $4 Billion Financial Services & Publishing Company
 Wanted an Insurance-related Risk Assessment
 Driven by CFO, Treasurer and Risk Manager
 Interview Process to Obtain Information
 Scope Changed Immediately during Interview with
Chairman
XYZ Company - Parameters
Scope
Original:
 “Insurance-related risks to the organization.”
Revised:
 “Any business risk having an impact on the
organization exceeding a certain financial threshold.”
XYZ Company - Process
Team
Interview Candidates – 60 Corporate and Divisional Managers
Time Horizon
Perspective
Three to Five Years
None / Financial Impact on Organization
Structured Interview Process
 Cross Section of Senior Management
 Duration 1 to 1.5 Hours
 Topics - General, Function, Division, Company
 Follow-Up Required
Process Output
Business Profile
Company: XYZ Co
Scope:
Analysis Date
09/02/06
Corp Level Business Objectives
High
6
A
Financial
Threshold:
$20MM
Likelihood
B
2
C
D
5
E
4
F
Low
1
3
IV
III
Financial Impact
II
I High
XYZ Company - Results
 Identified and Quantified Risks; Developed Specific
Plans to Mitigate (Above Financial Threshold)
 IT and Facility Business Continuation Exposures for
Multiple Locations (One Representing >40% Net
Income)
 Chairman Set Up a Cross Functional Team to
Reduce the IT / Facility Exposure
 Insurance – Increase Limits for Two Major Coverages
Stakeholder Value
Advancing Along the ERM Continuum
Most organizations
currently reside
here on the
continuum
Value/Risk
Optimization
Risk Specialization
RM
Audit
Legal
HR
Ops.
IS
Indicators
Risk Specialization
• Independent risk management
activities, including insurance
purchasing and S-O 404
compliance
• Limited focus on the linkage
between enterprise-wide risks
and strategies
Enterprise Risk
Awareness
Risk Management
Integration
Risk Management Sophistication
Enterprise Wide Risk
Awareness
Risk Management
Integration
• Adoption of an ERM framework
• Fully integrated ERM structure
• Executive ownership of risk
based on an S-O 404/ approach
management
for all types of risk
• Communication of strategic risks to • Enterprise-wide risk monitoring
the Audit Committee
and reporting
• Routine risk assessments
• Coordinated ERM activities
Value/Risk Optimization
• Risk management embedded in strategic
decision making process
• Identification and monitoring of early
warning risk indicators based on key risk
indicators
• Linkage of risks to shareholder value
• Effective use of risk modeling tools
Security Blanket
ERM
 Questions and Discussion