Why Product Stewardship? THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT PERSPECTIVE

Download Report

Transcript Why Product Stewardship? THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT PERSPECTIVE

Why Product
Stewardship?
THE LOCAL
GOVERNMENT PERSPECTIVE
Zack Hansen, Ramsey County
Leslie Wilson, Carver County
December 15, 2010
Overview
• Introduction - Why Product Stewardship?
• How Waste Has Changed
• The Impacts of Products and Packaging
• The Product Stewardship Approach
• SWMCB Roles and Activities
• The Future of Product Stewardship
Introduction:
Why Product Stewardship?
•
Local government “charge” for
environmental and public health
protection – the arm of the State.
•
Environmental impacts – GHG emissions,
water, landfills, toxicity.
•
Local government costs, such as
recycling and HHW management .
HOW WASTE HAS CHANGED
How Waste Has Changed
* Grey area includes household ash
How Waste Has Changed
Disposable By Design
THE IMPACTS OF PRODUCTS
AND PACKAGING
US Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Consumption View – Global
Non-local Passenger
Transport
9%
Local Passenger
Transport
13%
Infrastructure
1%
Provision
of Food
12%
Building HVAC
and Lighting
21%
Use *
Provision of Goods
37%
Products & Packaging
44%
* Use of Appliances
and Devices
7%
© 2009 Product Policy Institute
Source: PPI 2009 – Joshua Stolaroff
Our Waterways - Plastics
Plastic bottles thrown into the Mississippi in
Minnesota…
Our Waterways - Plastics
… flow downriver to the Gulf of Mexico and
into the ocean, circulate through ocean
currents…
Our Waterways - Plastics
…and eventually end up here.
Our Waterways Pharmaceuticals
• Small concentrations of
pharmaceuticals have been found in:
– Drinking water supplies of at least 41
million Americans.
– Water at landfills, also known as
leachate, which can eventually end up in
rivers.
CO$T
• All Minnesota solid waste costs are at least
$1 billion a year, which is impacted by:
– Clean up costs for 112 closed landfills.
– Costs to manage Household Hazardous Waste
(HHW).
• Counties in the SWMCB six-county metro area paid a
total of $8.6 million in 2008 to manage HHW.
– Mounting state budget deficits.
So Why Doesn’t the
Current System Work?
• Current government waste management
programs unwittingly contribute to:
– Manufacturer design of wasteful and
toxic products.
– Consumer acceptance of disposable
products.
• Convenient disposal perpetuates the
problem.
THE PRODUCT
STEWARDSHIP APPROACH
Product Stewardship Defined
SWMCB
“Product stewardship means that all parties
involved in designing, manufacturing,
selling, and using a product share in the
financial and physical responsibility for
collecting and recycling products at the end
of their useful lives.”
Today’s Linear
Waste Management System
Manufacturers
Retailers
Recycle &
Garbage
Bins
Consumers
Local
Government
Funded
Recycling
© 2009 by the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB)
Landfill and
Waste-to-Energy
Processes
Tomorrow’s
“Cradle to Cradle” System
Retailers
Consumers
Manufacturers
Materials are recycled
into new products
Take Back Programs
mail-back, collection sites,
haulers, local governments
© 2009 by the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB)
Current Minnesota Product
Stewardship Efforts
• Focus on specific products to reduce
government costs and remove them from
the waste stream.
– Includes e-waste, paint, CFLs, carpet,
beverage containers, telephone directories,
mercury auto switches, and thermostats.
• Products mostly with hazardous character.
• Significant investment of time.
• Some success, some failure.
SWMCB Initiatives
E-Waste
• Successful passage of legislation in 2007 after
several years.
• SWMCB and MPCA evaluating legislation in
2010.
Paint
• Minnesota was the site of an industry-led
statewide paint management model.
• Minnesota Paint Stewardship bill passed
legislature in 2008 & 2009, later vetoed.
Beverage Containers
• Currently recycling
35%.
• Collection needs to
more than double to
reach 80% goal by
2012 (unlikely).
• Many of the strategies
require legislative
action.
SWMCB ROLES AND
ACTIVITIES
SWMCB Roles
POLICY DEVELOPMENT
EDUCATION AND COMMUNICATION
ADVOCACY
RESEARCH
COORDINATION AND REGULATION
SWMCB Resolution
• On January 27, 2010
the SWMCB adopted
a resolution for
product stewardship.
SWMCB Product Stewardship
Resources
• Tool kit available at www.swmcb.org/toolkits
• Includes
– Presentation: Why Product Stewardship – The
Local Government Perspective
– 3 Fact Sheets
• What is Product Stewardship?
• Cost Considerations in Product Stewardship
Programs?
• Why a Product Stewardship Framework?
– Resolution of Support for local government
THE FUTURE OF PRODUCT
STEWARDSHIP
Product Stewardship
in the Future
• It could be:
– The foundation for waste management
policy;
– A means to increase efficiency (that is, less
waste) in business and government;
– A way for government to reduce its waste
management costs; and
– A movement towards less toxic products
(i.e. “green” chemistry or design for the
environment).
Next Steps
• SWMCB focus on advocacy - 2011
legislative package:
– Establish an Extended Producer
Responsibility Framework Approach
• Would create effective producer led reduction,
reuse and recycling programs, to deal with a
product’s lifecycle impacts
• Less need for government intervention and less
money spent by government to manage products
• SWMCB also supports specific product
stewardship efforts.