ECRP Advocacy Quarterly And Planning Meeting
Download
Report
Transcript ECRP Advocacy Quarterly And Planning Meeting
Civil Society Engagement in
Environmental Policy
Processes
2014 Inter-Parliamentary Hearing on Exemplary
Forest Policies in Africa
September 30th to 3rd October 2014
Nairobi, Kenya
Introduction
• Forests provides goods and services for
livelihoods in Malawi;
• Some of the species include Khaya
anthotheca
(Mbawa)
and
Pterocarpus
angolensis (Mlombwa), Eucalyptus, Gmelina,
Mahogany etc; and
• Regardless of the richness in species, Malawi
is facing one of the fastest deforestation rates
in Africa, highest in the SADC region;
Introduction (2)
• The main drivers of forest loss are
High incidence of poverty and food insecurity,
leading to increasing demand for land and
forest resources;
Population growth (average 2.8%); and
Agricultural
expansion
between
19912008..intensive agriculture had increased by
20%.
Introduction (3)
Tobacco growing (curing is a major nonhousehold user of firewood-2009).
High dependence on fuel wood as a source of
energy for cooking and heating (94%); and
Institutional weaknesses combined with poor
compliance of the law
Forces of Forestry Resources
Trends in Forest Cover
• In 1975, 47% of the territory in Malawi was
classified as forest;
• In 2010, out of the total land area of
94,270,000 ha of Malawi, 3,336,000 ha,
representing 36 %, was classified as forest
(15%-natural woodlands on customary lands,
11% - national parks and game reserves and
10% under forest reserves and protected hill
slopes);
Trends in Forest Cover (2)
• The rate of deforestation, (percentage of
forest cover lost per year) ranged from 1% to
about 3% overall, averaging 2.3% in recent
years; and
• This is the highest deforestation rate in the
SADC region, representing a net loss of some
30,000 to 40,000 hectares per year.
Trends in Forest Cover (3)
Forestry Policy and Legislation
In 1996, Malawi developed and adopted the
forestry policy followed by a Community
Based Forest Management – A Supplement
to the National Forestry Policy in 2003;
In 1997 a law on forestry was passed which is
also in use up to date;
There are also Forestry (Community
Participation) Rules, 2001 and Forestry
(Amendment) Rules 2003; and
Forestry Department also developed the
National Forestry Programme in 2001 as a
means to put the 1996 National Forestry
Policy and Forestry Act (1997) into practice.
Challenges in Forestry Policy and
Legislation
Generally the forestry policy and legislation
have suffered implementation like other
policies in Malawi due to
Inadequate community involvement in law
enforcement;
Limited stakeholder coordination and
operationalization of institutions at local
and national level; and
Challenges in Forestry Policy and
Legislation (2)
Forestry policy conflicts with other polices like
food security in some sections; and
Absence of a coherent financing mechanism
for the forestry sector and
The sector is among the least funded sector
in the National budget especially at local level
National budget tracking and monitoring
between 2005 and 2013 indicated forestry as
among the least funded sectors especially on
operations;
83-93% are for personal emoluments; and
7-27% for day to day transactions.
Civil Society Contribution to
Forestry Sector
• Generally within the sector there is broadened
stakeholder participation in forestry utilization
and management:
civil society,
local communities
private sector
• However, coordinating institutional efforts to
enhance forest governance and community
based forest management remains a
challenge;
Civil Society Contribution to
Forestry Sector (2)
• In addition, there is very limited participation
of stakeholders such as civil society in the
implementation of the related forestry policy
and legislation;
• Most stakeholders participate in the
community level programmes such as
community based forest management and
tree planting etc;
• Programmes in forestry sectors by civil
society are not prominent like in other sectors
such as climate change;
Civil Society Contribution to
Forestry Sector (3)
• There is limited civil society influence in the
policy and legal framework development,
review, implementation and monitoring; and
• Most civil society have challenges to access
financial support to address gaps in the
forestry sector especially policy processes.
Civil Society Contribution to
Forestry Sector (4)
CEPA has:
• Conducted national budget tracking and monitoring
in the forestry sector;
• Engaged the policy makers such as the members of
parliament, directors and department technical
experts on the inadequate national budget
allocation;
• Engaging members of parliament and councilors to
actively participate in reducing deforestation focus
on;
Reducing charcoal production;
Reducing bush fires; and
Embracing low carbon technologies such as cook
stoves.
Civil Society Contribution to
Forestry Sector (5)
• Engaged the department on the need to
review the outdated policy and legal
framework;
• Facilitating development of by-laws for
community based forests in selected districts;
• Facilitating capacity building for local
structures on forestry related policies; and
• Facilitating community and media interaction
on community based forest management.
Forestry Sector Programme
• The forestry sector has had one big
programme
under
Improved
Forest
Management for Sustainable Livelihoods
Programme (IFMSLP) Phase I is a
Government of Malawi programme with
financial support from the European Union;
• IFMSLP phase I was implemented by
Department of Forestry
which presents
another
challenge
for
stakeholder
engagement;
• The programme targeted about 14 forests
reserves;
Forestry Sector Programme (2)
• The focus of this phase I was more on
organization of rural communities;
development of Participatory Forest
Management
Plans
and
Forest
Management Agreements; and
improvement of capacities of rural
communities to sustainably harvest and
sell forest products from customary land
and forest.
Forestry Policy Processes in
Progress
• Government in the process of reviewing
the 1996 National Forestry Policy with
support from UNDP but the process has
stalled; and
• Stakeholder involvement has not been
very inclusive like other policy processes
such as climate change;
Malawi REDD+
• REDD+ has gained momentum in Malawi and
policy processes towards REDD+ have been
initiated;
• The forestry sector has provided space for
stakeholder participation;
• This process has been more engaging than
that of forestry policy review; and
• Civil society have been given roles in the
development of the draft REDD+ strategy and
work plan.
Concluding Remarks
• The forestry sector in Malawi remains the
least prioritized sector;
• Forest degradation in Malawi is still high and
if not controlled all resources will be degraded
in few years to come;
• The forestry policy and legal framework are
outdated;
• Unlike other sectors such as climate change,
the forestry sector policy review has not been
inclusive;
• Civil society contribution to forestry policy
processes remains a challenge;
Concluding Remarks(2)
• Coordination of CSO in the forestry sector
is a challenge;
• The forestry sector in Malawi is among the
least funded sectors; and
• Over the past few years, there has been
an increased participation of Civil society in
the REDD+ strategy development.
Recommendations
• Forestry
related
policy
and
legal
frameworks review needs to speed up;
• Members of parliament need to participate
in forestry policy and legal framework
implementation;
• There is need to harmonize conflicting
policies for effective policy implementation;
• Our members of parliament need to speak
for the people in the National Budget;
Recommendations (2)
• Malawi is planting trees every year, in
addition to the National Forestry season,
there is need for all stakeholders to
monitor survival rates of these trees;
• Our members of parliament need to take
lead in the forestry management in their
respective constituency; and
• Forestry
sector
institutions
needs
strengthening in terms of capacity in
governance and coordination of other
institutions.
THANK YOU
The Future of Forest Resources Remains our
Responsibility