Transcript Slide 1
Introduction to the LAUSD Teaching and Learning Framework Module 1: The LAUSD Teaching & Learning Framework Copyright Copyright©©Los LosAngeles AngelesUnified UnifiedSchool SchoolDistrict District2011 2011 Teaching and Learning Framework Modules Overview Module 1: The LAUSD Teaching & Learning Framework Module 2: The LAUSD Teaching & Learning Framework Rubric Module 3: The Self-Assessment and Individual Growth Plan Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Objectives • To become familiar with the content and structure of the Teaching and Learning Framework • To reflect on Highly Effective Teaching Practices • To identify the benefits of using the LAUSD Teaching and Learning Framework Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 A Message from Dr. Deasy Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Context for the LAUSD Framework • Based on Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching – Created in 1996 • Validated in recent national studies Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 College Prepared and Career Ready Students Master Plan (The Who) Common Core (The What) Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Teaching & Learning Framework (The How) Think-Pair-Share: Journey from Novice to Expert • Think of a time when you improved your skills in any area. What strategies did you use? Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Reading Activity: Say Something Handout #1 – Excerpt from Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching – A Road Map for Novices A Road Map for Novices Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Reading Activity: Say Something Create groups of four and number yourselves accordingly. Read Handout #1 – A Road Map for Novices •Person #1 - Reads the 1st paragraph aloud and #2 responds with one idea heard from the text. •Person #2 - Reads the 2nd paragraph aloud and #3 responds with one idea heard from the text. •Person #3 - Reads the 3rd paragraph aloud and #4 responds with one idea heard from the text. •Person #4 - Reads the 4th paragraph aloud and #1 responds with one idea heard from the text. Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Highly Effective Practices 1. Think about various practices that signal expert or highly effective teaching. 2. With a partner, come up with the 3-5 practices you identified as essential. (5 min) Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 LAUSD Teaching and Learning Framework Vocabulary Standards #2: Classroom Environment LAUSD Teaching & Learning Framework Components 2b: Establishing a Culture for Learning Elements 2b3: Student Ownership of Their Work Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 11 Focus Elements Draft SY 2012-2013 LAUSD TEACHING AND LEARNING FRAMEWORK STANDARD 1: PLANNING and PREPARATION a. Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy 1. Knowledge of Content and the Structure of the Discipline 2. Knowledge of Content-Related Pedagogy b. Demonstrating Knowledge of Students 1. Awareness of Students’ Skills, Knowledge, and Language Proficiency 2. Knowledge of How Children, Adolescents, and Adults Learn 3. Knowledge of Students’ Special Needs 4. Knowledge of Students’ Interests and Cultural Heritage c. Establishing Instructional Outcomes 1. Value, Sequence, Alignment, and Clarity 2. Suitability for Diverse Learners d. Designing Coherent Instruction 1. Standards-Based Learning Activities 2. Instructional Materials, Technology, and Resources 3. Purposeful Instructional Groups 4. Lesson and Unit Structure e. Designing Student Assessment 1. Aligns with Instructional Outcomes 2. Criteria and Standards 3. Design of Formative Assessments 4. Analysis and Use of Assessment Data for Planning STANDARD 5: PROFESSIONAL GROWTH a. Reflecting on Practice 1. Accurate Reflection 2. Use of Reflection to Inform Future Instruction 3. Selection of Professional Development Based on Reflection and Data 4. Implementation of New Learning from Professional Development b. Participating in a Professional Community 1. Collaboration with Colleagues 2. Promotes a Culture of Professional Inquiry and Collaboration STANDARD 4: ADDITIONAL PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES a. Maintaining Accurate Records 1. Tracks Progress Towards Identified Learning Outcomes 2. Tracks Completion of Student Assignments in Support of Student Learning 4. Manages Non-instructional Records 5. Submits Records on Time b. Communicating with Families 1. Information About the Instructional Program 2. Information About Individual Students 3. Engagement of Families in the Instructional Program c. Demonstrating Professionalism 1. Ethical Conduct and Compliance with School, District, State, and Federal Regulations 2. Advocacy/Intervention for Students 3. Decision-Making STANDARD 2: CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENT a. Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport 1. Teacher Interaction with Students 2. Student Interactions with One Another 3. Classroom Climate b. Establishing a Culture for Learning 1. Importance of the Content 2. Expectations for Learning and Achievement 3. Student Ownership of their Work 4. Physical Environment c. Managing Classroom Procedures 1. Management of Routines, Procedures, and Transitions 2. Management of Materials and Supplies 3. Performance of Non-Instructional Duties 4. Management of Parent Leaders, other Volunteers and Paraprofessionals d. Managing Student Behavior 1. Expectations for Behavior 2. Monitoring and Responding to Student Behavior STANDARD 3: DELIVERY of INSTRUCTION a. Communicating with Students 1. Communicating the Purpose of the Lesson 2. Directions and Procedures 3. Delivery of Content 4. Use of Academic Language b. Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques 1. Quality and Purpose of Questions 2. Discussion Techniques and Student Participation c. Structures to Engage Students in Learning 1. Standards-Based Projects, Activities, and Assignments 2. Purposeful and Productive Instructional Groups 3. Use of Available Instructional Materials, Technology, and Resources 4. Structure and Pacing d. Using Assessment in Instruction to Advance Student Learning 1. Assessment Criteria 2. Monitoring of Student Learning 3. Feedback to Students 4. Student Self-Assessment and Monitoring of Progress e. Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness 1. Responds and Adjusts to Meet Student Needs 2. Persistence Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Handout #2 - Teaching and Learning Framework Placemat 1: 2: 3: 4: Planning & Preparation Classroom Environment Delivery of Instruction Additional Professional Responsibilities 5: Professional Growth HANDOUT # 3 Standard 3: Delivery of Instruction Rubric Sample Standard 3 Component 3b: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques Effective teachers design questions that provide cognitive challenge and engineer discussions among students to ensure all students participation. The highly effective teacher designs instruction that provides opportunities for students to develop their own cognitively challenging questions and to engage in various types of student-to-student discussions. Element 3b1. Quality and Purpose of Questions Questions are designed to challenge students and elicit high-level thinking Ineffective Developing Effective Highly Effective Teacher’s questions do not invite a thoughtful response or are not relevant. Questions do not reveal student understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion, or are not comprehensible to most students. Teacher’s questions are a combination of both high and low quality, or delivered in rapid succession. Only some questions invite a thoughtful response that reveals student understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make them comprehensible for some students. Teacher’s questions require rigorous student thinking. Most questions invite and reveal student understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make learning comprehensible for student subgroups. Teacher’s questions require rigorous student thinking and invite students to demonstrate understanding through reasoning. Students themselves formulate questions to advance their understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make learning comprehensible for all students in the class. Note: This content is taken directly from the working draft of the Teaching and Learning Framework, which was developed with our stakeholders, but does not substitute for current language in the LAUSD-UTLA Collective Bargaining Agreement. Why A Framework? • Silently, read Handout # 4 - Excerpt from Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching • Response to Text Activity – As you read: • Put a next to something you agree with • Put an next to something that surprised you • Put a next to something you are wondering about ! Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Small Group Discussion: Why A Framework? Share your findings with the whole group. (2 minutes) Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Video Clip: Experience From the Field From LAUSD teachers and administrators Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Objectives ✔• To become familiar with the content and structure of the Teaching and Learning Framework ✔• To reflect on Highly Effective Teaching Practices ✔• To identify benefits of using the LAUSD Teaching and Learning Framework Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Table Talk Activity: Rubric Matching Quiz Directions: Handout # 1 – Rubric Matching Quiz •Working in table groups, complete the quiz. •Read each descriptor to determine the corresponding performance level . •Come to a consensus for a group response. Everyone should be prepared to respond. Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Standard 3: Delivery of Instruction Standard 3: Delivery of Instruction HANDOUT # 1 Component 3b: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques Element Ineffective 3b1.Quality and Purpose of Questions D. Teacher’s questions do not invite a thoughtful response or are not relevant. Questions do not reveal student understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion, or are not comprehensible to most students. Questions are designed to challenge students and elicit high-level thinking CO Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Developing A. Teacher’s questions are a combination of both high and low quality, or delivered in rapid succession. Only some questions invite a thoughtful response that reveals student understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make them comprehensible for some students. Effective C. Teacher’s questions require rigorous student thinking. Most questions invite and reveal student understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make learning comprehensible for student subgroups. Highly Effective B. Teacher’s questions require rigorous student thinking and invite students to demonstrate understanding through reasoning. Students themselves formulate questions to advance their understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make learning comprehensible for all students in the class. StandardWhat 3: Delivery of Instruction are key distinctions between each level of the rubric? Standard 3: Delivery of Instruction HANDOUT # 1 Component 3b: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques Element Ineffective Teacher’s questions do not invite a thoughtful response or are not relevant. Questions do not reveal student Questions are understanding about the designed to content/concept or text challenge students and elicit under discussion, or are high-level thinking not comprehensible to most students. 3b1. Quality and Purpose of Questions Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Developing Effective Highly Effective Teacher’s questions are a combination of both high and low quality, or delivered in rapid succession. Only some questions invite a thoughtful response that reveals student understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make them comprehensible for some students. Teacher’s questions require rigorous student thinking. Most questions invite and reveal student understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make learning comprehensible for student subgroups. Teacher’s questions require rigorous student thinking and invite students to demonstrate understanding through reasoning. Students themselves formulate questions to advance their understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make learning comprehensible for all students in the class. Video Activity – Part 1 Common Core State Standard – ELA /Grade 8 Key Ideas and Details RL. 8.1. Cite the textual evidence that most strongly supports an analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text. Range of Reading and Level of Text Complexity RL. 8.10. By the end of the year, read and comprehend literature, including stories, dramas, and poems, at the high end of grades 6–8 text complexity band independently and proficiently. Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Video Activity – Part 1 Let us view the entire video segment of Mr. Foster’s Lesson Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Video Activity – Part 2 Directions: Using Handout # 2 – Video Activity, you will assume the role of an observer and record what you see and hear from the students and teacher. Pay close attention to the questions and answers from the teacher and students. Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Record what you see and hear from the students and teacher in this section. Video Activity – Part 2 We will watch the first minute of the same video segment Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Video Activity: Turn and Talk Now turn to a partner and compare notes. Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Sample Observation Notes Standard 3: Delivery of Instruction Component 3b: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques Turn and Talk Activity T: Like I said we are going to have this summary. R. and C. are going to be keeping track Now turn…used to this your partner and of your responses. last minute to confer with yourcompare group.. and to your figure out what the attached emotion was. to ofthis observer’s notes. … Ronald who isnotes keeping track the emotion and C. who is keeping track of the happened. … as a class we all try to label them as it as an explicit emotion. That is in the text. It says what the characters were thinking or feeling. …Or implicit meaning. you … figure it out like you guys did in the poem. You had to look at mountains and at street and come up with sad. ….So if the last line of this (pointed to chart)… she was so sad. That would it have been explicit or implicit? S: Explicit T: Thank you Bobby. I wish……with a chorus. Let’s try that again. Would it have been implicit or explicit? S: (total class in unison) Explicit! T: T.Y again. Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Video Activity – Part 3 We will watch the rest of the same video segment. Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Small Group Discussion: Rubric as a Tool How would Mr. Foster use this rubric to reflect on his practice for this element? Element 3b1. Quality and Purpose of Questions Questions are designed to challenge students and elicit high-level thinking CO Ineffective Teacher’s questions do not invite a thoughtful response or are not relevant. Questions do not reveal student understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion, or are not comprehensible to most students. Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Developing Teacher’s questions are a combination of both high and low quality, or delivered in rapid succession. Only some questions invite a thoughtful response that reveals student understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make them comprehensible for some students. Effective Teacher’s questions require rigorous student thinking. Most questions invite and reveal student understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make learning comprehensible for sub-groups of students. Highly Effective Teacher’s questions require rigorous student thinking and invite students to demonstrate understanding through reasoning. Students themselves formulate questions to advance their understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make learning comprehensible for all students in the class. Unpacking the Rubric: “Find the GIST” Directions: • Preview the rubric for the elements under Standard 3 • Restate the most important idea for any of the Elements – Consider key nouns and verbs • Discuss and share your findings in triads Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 “Find the GIST” Reading Strategy: Here’s an example Standard 3: Delivery of Instruction Component 3b: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques Element 3b1.Quality and Purpose of Questions Questions are designed to challenge students and elicit high-level thinking Ineffective Developing Effective Highly Effective Teacher’s questions do not invite a thoughtful response or are not relevant. Questions do not reveal student understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion, or are not comprehensible to most students. Teacher’s questions are a combination of both high and low quality, or delivered in rapid succession. Only some questions invite a thoughtful response that reveals student understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make them comprehensible for some students. Teacher’s questions require rigorous student thinking. Most questions invite and reveal student understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make learning comprehensible for sub-groups of students. Teacher’s questions require rigorous student thinking and invite students to demonstrate understanding through reasoning. Students themselves formulate questions to advance their understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make learning comprehensible for all students in the class. Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Unpacking the Rubric: “Find the GIST” Directions: • Preview the rubric for the elements under Standard 3 • Restate the most important idea for any of the Elements – Consider key nouns and verbs • Discuss and share your findings in triads Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Next Steps: Reflection of Practice Review the rubric for Element 3b1 – “Quality and Purpose of Questions” and reflect on your own practice: What questions do I design to challenge and elicit higher level thinking from my students? Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Objectives • To develop an understanding of the LAUSD Teaching and Learning Framework Rubric • To reflect on teaching practice • To connect instructional practices to the Teaching and Learning Framework Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011