Transcript Document

Recycling Tear Off Asphalt Shingles:
A presentation
at the
Best Practices Guide
3rd Asphalt Shingles
Recycling Forum
October 11, 2007
On Friday,
November 2, 2007
In Chicago
Acknowledgments
• U.S. EPA staff:
Julie Gevrenov
Paul Ruesch
• Bill Turley, CMRA
• Deb Haugen
• Innovative Waste Consulting Services:
Dr. Tim Townsend
Jon Powell, et . al.
Acknowledgments
(Case studies)
• Sean Anestis, Roof Top Recycling
• Ken Snow, Recycle America Enterprises
• John Adelman, Commercial Paving &
Recycling Systems
• Ron Sines, PJ Keating
Acknowledgements
(Additional case studies, resources, and peer reviwer*)
•
•
•
•
•
•
Dusty Ordorff, Bituminous Roadways
Jim Omann, Omann Brothers
Roger Brown, Pace Construction **
Joe Schroer, MoDOT *
Mn/DOT
NAPA
BPG Peer Reviewers
• John Adelman
Commercial Paving & Recycling Corporation
Scarborough, ME
• U.S. EPA Staff:
Dr. Kimberly Cochran
Truett DeGeare and
David Carver
Julie Gevrenov
Paul Ruesch
BPG Peer Reviewers
(continued)
• Gary Davis
Recycling & Processing Equipment, Inc.
Peru, IN
• Charles Fandale
Florida Shingle Recycling, LLC
Bradenton, FL
• Dr. Jenna Jambeck
Recycled Materials Resource Center (RMRC)
Durham, NH
• Jenna Kunde
WasteCap Wisconsin, Inc.
Milwaukee, WI
We welcome
your continued comments!
BP#1:
Recyclers handling tear – off
shingles should carefully plan and
implement a supply quality
assurance / quality control
(QA/QC) system.
BP#2:
Tear – off shingle recyclers should
optimize their operations to
produce a RAS product that meets
or exceeds specifications of their
end markets.
BP#3:
Tear – off shingle recyclers should
develop a comprehensive marketing
plan based on multiple outlets.
“Supply” BP’s
1.1 Written specification
1.2 Clean tear-off scrap only
1.3 Must be free of ACM
1.5 Certification and sorting
“Supply” BP’s
(continued)
1.6 Sort shingles from non-shingle debris
1.8 No hazardous waste permitted.
If found, charge back to supplier.
“Supply” BP’s
(continued)
1.12 Must follow NESHAP:
* Asbestos management plans
* No ACM
1.13 Consider restricting initial supply to
“non-regulated facilities”
1.14 Written, signed certification
“Supply” BP’s
(continued)
1.18 Each load must be inspected
1.19 Mutually acceptable asbestos testing plan
1.20 Initial asbestos lab data should establish
“baseline” (* See Appendix D)
1.21 Random and unannounced testing for
ongoing sampling procedure
“Processing” BP’s
2.1 Meet or exceed market specifications
Maximize TPH and capacity
2.3 Elevated sort line
2.5 Agency inspections
2.6 Maximize protection of worker health and
safety
“Processing” BP’s
(continued)
2.9 Provide workers with best available
information about asbestos risks
2.10 Dust control plan
2.11 Water
2.12 Dust control devices on grinders
and other processing equipment
(e.g., loaders should be equipped with
enclosed, air conditioned cabs)
“Processing” BP’s
(continued)
2.13 Standard protective clothing and personal
safety equipment
2.15 Invite OSHA staff to visit / inspect
“Marketing” BP’s
3.1 Short-term and long-term marketing plans
3.2 Guarantee RAS to be:
a) Asbestos free
b) Nail free
c) In specified mix ratios
“Marketing” BP’s
(continued)
3.3 Internal sampling and testing as part of
larger QA/QC program
3.4 Data feedback from customers
3.6 State DOT and academic institutions
may wish to consider additional testing
“Marketing” BP’s
(continued)
3.7 Recyclers should advocate for state and
local government owner / agencies to use
“affirmative, environmentally preferable
procurement” policies that give preference
for RAS - derived HMA.
CMRA’s Web Site
Dan Krivit
DKA
[email protected]
651-489-4990