Transcript Slide 1
Disaster Preparedness For Public Transit Systems Transportation Research Board 87th Annual Meeting Geary L. Robinson Environmental Design and Planning Ph.D. Candidate Anne E. Dunning Assistant Professor Department of Planning and Landscape Architecture Clemson University Clemson, SC 29634-0511 7/20/2015 1 Abstract Paris Metro Bombing - 1995 Tokyo Metro Police File Photo 1995 7/20/2015 2 Abstract Madrid Train Bombing -2004 Reuters - 2005 London Underground Bombing - 2005 7/20/2015 3 Methodology Research needs in the area of security training and disaster preparedness for transportation systems. Literature resources: academic literature, industry publications and general news Focus on problems of disaster preparedness National and International disaster preparedness drills information will be included as a part of the process 7/20/2015 4 Research Issues for Public Transit Understand the need and demands for transportation security Determine Level of disaster preparedness Current state of security drills/training for public transit systems and complementary first-response agencies Comparative analysis will be used to determine how well plans achieve the needs of security planning Creation of training models to establish sustainable preparedness 7/20/2015 5 Threat Definition Event “which suddenly occurs or is unstoppable that may overwhelm the resources of an impacted people and region, having a long term impact on social or natural life and at the onset is always negative” [i] [i] Emergency Disaster Management, Inc. web site accessed July 31, 2007. http://www.emergency-management.net/ 7/20/2015 6 Potential Threats 70 percent of transportation executives believe shipping containers carrying 90 percent of the world’s cargo to be vulnerable [ii] Threats to transportation systems and the vulnerability of the traveling public have been demonstrated Investments are going toward improving security Spending money does not necessarily equate to disaster preparedness [ii] Deloitte Touche Research (November 2004). “Prospering in a Secure Economy 2004.” Presentation at the US Maritime Security Expo, New York City, New York. http://www.maritimesecurityexpo.com/whitepapers.html 7/20/2015 7 Presidential Declarations U.S. government is participating more in an increasing number of natural disaster events. Presidents declared an average of 30.6 natural disasters each year from 1964 to 2000. From 2000 to 2007 has seen an average of 53.9 presidential disaster declarations [iii] . [iii] Federal Emergency Management Administration (2007). “Get Disaster Information: Disaster Maps.” Web site accessed July 31, 2007. http://www.fema.gov/hazard/map/index.shtm 7/20/2015 8 Domestic Hijackings Hijacking of airplanes from 1947 to 1958 was reported 23 times. The peak activity of 324 hijackings occurred between 1968 and 1972. Early airplane hijackings from the 1930s to 1955, while stressful to passengers, did not lead to death. Emergency Disaster Management, Inc. “Airplane Hijacking,” web site accessed July 31, 2007. http://www.emergency-management.net/airterror_hijack.htm 7/20/2015 9 Potential Attack Types Physical Attacks Car bomb at bridge approach Series of small explosives on highway bridge Single small explosive on highway bridge Single small explosive in highway tunnel Car bomb in highway tunnel Series of car bombs on adjacent bridges or tunnels Bomb(s) detonated at pipeline compressor stations Bomb detonated at pipeline storage facility Bomb detonated on pipeline segment Simultaneous attacks on ports Terrorist bombing of waterfront pavilion Container vessel fire at marine terminal Ramming of railroad bridge by maritime vessel Attack on passenger vessel in port Shooting in rail station Vehicle bomb adjacent to rail station Bombing of airport transit station Bombing of underwater transit tunnel Bus bombing Deliberate blocking of highway-rail grade crossing Terrorist bombing of rail tunnel Bomb detonated on train in rail station Vandalism of track structure and signal system Terrorist bombing of rail bridge Explosives attack on multiple rail bridges Explosive in cargo of passenger aircraft Biological Attacks Biological release in multiple subway stations Anthrax release from freight ship Anthrax release in transit station Anthrax release on passenger train Chemical Attacks Sarin release in multiple subway stations Physical attack on railcar carrying toxics Cyber and C3 Attacks (Command-Control-Communications) Cyber attack on highway traffic control system Sabotage of train control system Cyber attack on pipeline control system Tampering with rail signals Attack on port power/telecommunications Cyber attack on train control center 7/20/2015 10 Source: Improving Surface Transportation Security: A Research and Development Strategy, National Academies Press ISBN: 0-309-51429-0, 96 pages, 6 x 9, (1999): http://www.nap.edu/catalog/9689.html Transportation Operations and Disaster Preparedness Disaster preparedness for transportation systems frequently focuses on infrastructure Attacks on passenger transportation in the United States and Europe in recent years has shown that both infrastructure and operations require focus. 7/20/2015 11 Preparedness for Threats to Public Transit In 1991, the Urban Mass Transportation Administration (now the Federal Transit Administration) recognized the need for transit systems to address emergency response planning as part of its operations [iv] . [iv] Recommended Emergency Preparedness Guidelines for Urban, Rural and Specialized Transit Systems U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Research and Special Programs Administration January 1991 Final Report, UMTA-MA-06-0196-91-1 DOT-VNTSC -UMTA-91-1 7/20/2015 12 Typical Public Transit Emergency Scenarios Include: passenger fall or illness; vehicle breakdown; driver incapacitation; vehicle collision; vehicle fire; vehicle collision with fire; vehicle rollover; vehicle immersion in water; and severe weather conditions or natural disasters. [v] [v] Ritter, Luke; Barrett, J. Michael; and, Wilson, Rosalyn (2006). Securing Global Transportation Networks: A Total Security Management Approach; New York: McGraw-Hill ISBN97800071477512. 7/20/2015 13 Supercell Thunderstorm Crossing Oklahoma / Arkansas Border 2302 CDT April 21, 1996 - National Climatic Data Center - NOAA GOES 8 Satellite 7/20/2015 14 Downtown Ft. Smith, AR April 22, 1996 Arkansas Democrat-Gazette / Tom Ewart / April 22, 1996 7/20/2015 15 Mount Vista area Van Buren, AR April 23, 1996 Arkansas Democrat-Gazette / Rick McFarland / April 23, 1996 7/20/2015 16 Role of Transportation Operations in an Evacuation Recent years have demonstrated the accessible nature of transportation systems makes them particularly vulnerable to threats. Aside from being targets, transportation systems are also solutions. They provide means of evacuating people out of harm’s way and modes to deliver recovery supplies and services. 7/20/2015 17 Three Objectives Of An Emergency Plan Are: To plan the response by a transit system and its outside emergency organizations to a transit emergency; To mobilize the actual response to emergencies; And, to recover from emergencies and restore normal operations. [vi] [vi] Ritter, Luke; Barrett, J. Michael; and, Wilson, Rosalyn (2006). Securing Global Transportation Networks: A Total Security Management Approach; New York: McGraw-Hill 7/20/2015 ISBN97800071477512. 18 Needs In Disasters For Transport Are: Outbound evacuees, Inbound mutual aid operational resources, Inbound state and federal operational resources, Outbound returning mutual aid operational resources Inbound support shipments, Inbound returning evacuees, and Outbound state and federal resources [vii]. [vii] Recommended Emergency Preparedness Guidelines for Urban, Rural and Specialized Transit Systems U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Research and Special Programs Administration January 1991 Final Report, UMTA-MA-06-0196-91-1 DOT-VNTSC -UMTA-91-1 7/20/2015 19 Successful Emergency Plan Contain The Following Elements: Policy and Scope Agreements between emergency organizations Transit system functions and responsibilities Procedural guidelines for specific emergencies General response capability criteria Supporting documentation 7/20/2015 20 The Federal Emergency Management Administration Four Step Process: Organizing resources, Assessing risks, Developing a mitigation plan, and Implementing & monitoring the plan progress [viii]. [viii] Integrating Historic Property and Cultural Resource Considerations Into Hazard Mitigation Planning, FEMA 386-6 / May 2005 7/20/2015 21 Total Security Management Considers Operational Enablers Strategic (long-term), Operational (how the company is being run), and Tactical (applying core TSM values and tenets to a firm’s daily operation). 7/20/2015 22 Total Security Management 5 Pillars Must base practices on creating value that can be measured; Involves everyone throughout value chains; Implies continual improvement; Helps firms avoid, minimize, or survive disruptive events; and, Requires resiliency and business continuity planning as essential business functions. 7/20/2015 23 Stanford University Study Customs inspections reduced by 48 percent, Asset visibility enhanced by 50 percent, Time taken to identify problems reduced by 21 percent, and Customer attrition diminished by 26 percent. ([ix]) [ix] Peleg-Gillai, Barchi; Bhat, Gauri; and, Sept, Lesley (July 2006). “Innovations in Supply Chain Security: Better Security Drives Business Value,” the Manufacturing Innovation Series, Stanford University. http://www.nam.org/supplychainsecurity 7/20/2015 24 U.S. Department of Transportation Intelligent Transportation Systems 1996 Formally established intelligent transportation system standards program. [X] Transit professionals identify interoperability as the standard for an intelligent transportation system program. [X] Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, “Deployment of Standards for Intelligent Transportation Systems TE7.N27s no.280 ISBN 0-309-09453-4 7/20/2015 25 Intelligent Transportation Systems Standards Application Areas Center to center Center to roadside Center to vehicle/traveler Data archival Incident management (emergency management systems) Rail Coordination Traffic management Transit management Traveler Information Data collection and monitoring Dynamic message signs Environmental monitoring Ramp metering Traffic Signals Vehicle sensors Video surveillance Mayday Transit vehicle communications Traveler information [left blank in the source] Roadside to roadside Roadside to vehicle (dedicated short-range) Signal priority Toll/fee collection Source: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, “Deployment of Standards for Intelligent Transportation Systems TE7.N27s no.280 ISBN 0-309-09453-4 7/20/2015 26 National ITS Architecture Subsystems and Communications Source: U.S. DOT Report No. FHWA -JPO - 98 - 26# 7/20/2015 27 Public Transit Security Training Information and Intelligence Security and Emergency Management Regional Coordination Information Technology & Communications Employee and Public Communications Contingency and Continuity Plans 7/20/2015 28 Research Questions: Public Transit 1. What understanding do public transit system managers have of the needs and demands for transportation security? 2. What level of disaster preparedness is sufficient for public transit systems? If such a benchmark can be developed, how well do transit systems meet this benchmark? 7/20/2015 29 Research Questions: Planning and Model 3. Through comparative analysis of public transit security plans, how well do plans achieve the needs of security planning? Beyond the documents, how well are the plans followed and implemented in either drills or actual events? 4. What training model can be created to establish sustainable methods of training to ensure preparedness becomes the norm and not the exception? 7/20/2015 30 Research Questions: Drills and Training 5. What is the current state of security drills and training for public transit systems and complementary first-response agencies? 6. How well do drills simulate real disasters, and how well do training exercises enhance preparedness? 7. What training techniques work most effectively in this highly-specialized context? 7/20/2015 31