Transcript Slide 1
Achieving Excellence in HIgher
Education in the United States
with the Baldrige Criteria
Robert Sedlak, Provost University of Wisconsin-Stout
Achieving Excellence in Education Conference
Gebze, Turkey September 6, 2002
Excellence in Higher Education
Improving Overall Performance
Fewer than 50 Organizations have
Received the Award Since 1989
– Selected Recipients Include:
• Motorola, Inc. 1988
• Xerox Corp, Business Products 1989
• Cadillac Motor Car Division 1990
• IBM Rochester 1990
• Zytec Corp 1991
• The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Co. 1992
• Eastman Chemical Co. 1993
• Corning Telecommunications Product Division 1995
• Merrill Lynch Credit Corp. 1997
• STMicroelectronics 1999
• Los Alamos National Bank 2000
• University of Wisconsin-Stout 2001
Facts About UW-Stout
27 undergraduate and 16
graduate degree programs
Minneapolis
UW-Stout
St. Paul
$95M budget
8,000 students with 1,200
faculty and staff
Madison
(11) 4-year campuses
(13) 2-year campuses
(2) Doctoral campuses
Chicago
Baldrige Core Values
Systems Perspective
Visionary Leadership
Learning-Centered Education
Organizational Learning
Valuing Employees & Partners
Agility
Future Focus
Managing for Innovation
Management by Fact
Public Responsibility
Focus on Results
Baldrige Categories
Leadership
Strategic Planning
Market, Student and Stakeholder Focus
Faculty and Staff Focus
Information and Analysis
Process Management
Performance Results
The Setting
Between 1990 to 1996 UW-Stout
developed quality tools
UW System and Board of Regents
adopted Baldrige criteria
Extensive campus training on TQM tools
Cross-functional TQM teams operating in
over 20 areas
Historically data-driven organization
but planning was decentralized
and fragmented
The Setting
UW-Stout environment in
the mid-1990’s
Budget cuts
Need to fund new technology
infrastructure
Pressure to be efficient
Pressure to continually improve
Pressure to be accountable
Perceptions And Realities
High levels of stress
Poor faculty morale
Lack of communication
Declining levels of trust
Lose-Lose; Win-Lose; but no
Win-Win decision-making
Suspicion
What We Did
Realized we had serious
problems and resolved to
address them
Listened to the faculty and staff
on what needed to be fixed
Addressed areas of their
concern first to achieve buy-in
Committed time
Changes We Made
Revolutionary Changes
Created a new leadership system
Created budget, planning, and analysis unit
Revamped annual budget and
planning processes
Initiated team building with senior leaders
Improved communication
Leadership Systems:
An Environment for Transformational Change
Change To An Inclusive Decision-Making Process
Provide all internal stakeholder groups with a voice in
policy discussions and budget recommendations
-Faculty Senate
-Senate of Academic Staff
-Stout Student Association
-Classified Staff Unions
-Senior Administration
“Shared Governance = Shared Responsibility”
Leadership Systems:
Chancellor’s Advisory Council
Flattens the traditional hierarchy
Makes recommendations to
Chancellor, sets direction, and
deploys resources
Budget, Planning and Analysis
unit formed
Prepares, interprets, and provides
information needed to make
effective decisions
Chancellor’s Advisory
Council Allows Us To:
Enable campus-wide involvement and
participation in strategy development
and decision-making
Plan and review performance
Guide alignment and integration of
short- and long-term actions
Aid in assessment of results and
improve performance
Enhance organizational performance
through team building
Strategic Planning
Budgetary And Financial Planning
Intended Outcomes:
Facilitate planning and discussion
Encourage participation
Improve the quality of decisions and buy-in
Build a trusting climate
Increase understanding of plan and budget
Strategically focus on campus
Planning
Budget
Strategic Planning
Strategic Budgetary And Financial Planning
The strategic plan includes five-year goals and
shorter-term action plans
Broad-based participatory planning is used to
identify, set, and fund campus priorities
Review of progress at all levels
The strategic plan aligns resources and actions
leading to desired results levels of the
campus
Planning
Budget
Strategic Planning
Developing Annual Budget Priorities
Chancellor
Communicates
Final Plan
Institution-Wide
Winter Budget Planning
at Division/College Level
Fall/Winter Chancellor’s Advisory
Council Budget Planning
Chancellor’s Advisory Council
Summer Retreats
Fall Focus Groups
Strategic Planning
Annual Budget Priorities
Branding and Marketing
Digital Campus
Equality for Women
Graduate Education
Distance Education
Applied Research
Creating a Quality Culture:
Keys to Success
Keys To Success:
Communication
NEWSLETTERS
OPEN
FORUMS
WEB
LISTENING POSTS
GOVERNANCE &
DEPARTMENTAL
MEETINGS
CAMPUS-WIDE MAILINGS
Keys To Success:
Teamwork
A traditional hierarchy,
complemented by set of
established committees and
other cross-functional structures
Chancellor’s Advisory Council
Faculty Senate committees
Senate of Academic Staff
committees
University-wide committees
Keys To Success:
Information
Access to data
Analysis by BPA
Computing power
Networking
Internet
Training
Keys to Success:
Faculty and Staff Satisfaction
Morale
Surveys
Full survey every three
years
One-minute survey on
alternate years
Changes
Faculty teaching workload
Lead
To
Communication
Gender equity
Process Management
Process for Process
Improvement
Academic Program
Review Process
Educational Support Unit
Review Process
Process Management:
The Digital Campus Initiative
Upgraded technology:
state-of-the-art network
University computer cost-share
program
Implementation of laptop
environment
Hired instructional web designers
Next Steps – The Journey Continues
Face new challenges
optimistically
Remember we are excellent
but not perfect
Help others in the journey