Agriculture in Thailand

Download Report

Transcript Agriculture in Thailand

Agriculture in Thailand
Part B
1
IV. Markets
1. Factor Markets:
Land Rights:
 High tenancy rates in central and
north (old rice areas), but small rates
elsewhere
 In 2003, total= 24%, central= 44%,
north= 36%, northeast= 16%,
south= 5%
2
IV. Markets
1. Factor Markets:
Land Rights:
 Unclear ownership of farmers’ land
 20% of farmers are “squatters” in
forest land
 Problems of no incentive for land
conservation
 No loan collateral, and low productivity
3
IV. Markets
Labor
Seasonal demand and supply
More cash-wage labor VS household
labor exchange
Supply from the Northeast, but no
year-round surplus
More labor shortage in recent years
4
IV. Markets
Labor
 More farmers become “professionals”
rather than “casual”
– “professionals”: new generation, new
technology coping with market changes
and labor shortage; households obtaining
>60% of income from agri., and heads of
families have no second jobs
– number of “professionals” rising from
0.94 million HH in 1986 to 1.36 million
HH in 2004 (20% of total farm HH)
5
IV. Markets
Credit
 Traditional (informal) sources VS
formal sources (Bank of Agriculture
and Agricultural Cooperatives or
BAAC)
 Debt problem for small farmers
 60% of farming households are
indebted
 Not enough long-term credit
6
IV. Markets
2. Output Markets:
 Not much government intervention,
except in rice
 Arm’s length markets through
middlemen: efficiently organized, except
product quality
7
IV. Markets
2. Output Markets:
 Contract farming: firms contract farmers
in advance to produce and sell products at
fixed prices e.g. poultry, pigs, tobacco,
pineapples, vegetables
 Contract farming: lower price risk for
farmers, quality control, technology
promotion
8
IV. Markets
2. Output Markets:
 Sugar cane: pre-arranged 70:30 price split
between growers and sugar millers, with
negotiated basic farm price
 A case of bilateral monopoly, with
political power to get subsidy from govt.
and domestic sugar consumers
9
V. Policies
Land
 Not clear in granting land rights for
agriculture: natural forests VS economic
forests
 Clashes between officials and farmers over
unclear “forest land”
 Slow land titling for farmers
10
V. Policies
Irrigation
 20% of agri. Land is irrigated (VS rainfed)
 Fail to increase efficiency of existing systems,
wasteful use of water, and conflict among
different users
 Present system based on “unlimited supply”
 “Pricing of water” still politically
unacceptable
11
V. Policies
Credit
 3 modes:
– In the past, commercial banks required to
lend x% of deposits to agri.; but not so
successful
– BAAC, most successful with large impact,
reaching 90% of farm households
12
V. Policies
Credit
 3 modes:
– mortgage scheme, paddy-pledging scheme:
farmers pledge their paddy with BAAC at
guaranteed price, and get loans at subsidized
rate; problems of small price impact,
corruption, and expensive subsidy
– Recent change to “price gaurantee” at
minimum levels for rice, corn and cassava by
the Apisit government
13
V. Policies
Credit
 3 modes:
– Past debt deferment program, allowing farmers
to postpone debt repayment for 3 years;
problems of financial discipline and benefit to
the not-so-poor farmers
14
V. Policies
Pricing
 Border measures on exports & imports
 Heavily-taxed agriculture in the past; a
controversial “rice premium”
 Agricultural taxes reduced after 1982
 Some protection from import for sugar,
soybean, cotton, oil palm
 Ineffective direct price intervention
15
VI. Future Directions
 Three causes of agri. decline since 1980s:
– Natural decline: agri. share naturally
declines with economic growth; but not
clear why this is always true analytically
– End of land frontier: land surplus ended in
1980s
16
VI. Future Directions
 Three causes of agri. decline since 1980s:
– Dutch disease: industrial export boom
causes baht appreciation, adversely
affecting agri. exports (But the baht
depreciation after the crisis has invalidated
this argument? What about the recent baht
appreciation?)
17
VI. Future Directions
 Thai agriculture at a crossroads with no land
surplus and good export market
 Absolute decline of agricultural labor, and
labor become more scarce
 Not enough water during dry season
18
VI. Future Directions
 Towards land-intensive, capital-intensive, and
less water-intensive horticulture (fruits,
vegetables, flowers) and livestock
 Towards safe and organic food crops
(alternative agriculture)
 Different government role is required: away
from price intervention, towards R&D
promotion and extension
 Role of genetically modified organism
(GMO)?
19
VII. Recent Issues: Agriculture and
the Economic Crisis in 1997
 Thai agriculture was less affected than other
sectors
 Agriculture (rural economy) absorbed some
laid-off workers
 Reduced government spending in rural areas
20
VII. Recent Issues: Agriculture and
the Economic Crisis in 1997
 Rural community development efforts
strengthened
 The King’s “sufficiency economy”: produce
for own consumption and sell the surplus to
reduce risk in world market
– Household, community, and national levels
– Farm land use: 30/30/30/10  water irrigation +
poultry & aquaculture/ rice/ other cash crops/
housing & backyard production
21
VII. Recent Issues: Agriculture and
Thaksin’s Policy





Kitchen of the world
Debt postponement/deferment
Asset capitalization
One Tambon One Product
Free Trade Agreement with China, Australia,
NZ and impact on temperate-zone fruits,
vegetables, and dairy products
22
VII. Recent Issues: Agriculture and
High Oil Prices
 High oil prices since 2004  biofuels become
a more competitive substitute
 Ethanol from sugar (molasses), maize, and
cassava
 Biodiesel from oil palm, coconut, jathropa,
and algae
23
VII. Recent Issues: Agriculture
and High Oil Prices
 Agricultural wastes can be used as fuels in
producing electricity, e.g. sugar cane waste,
paddy husk, cassava roots, wood waste, as
well as bio-gas from animal waste
24