Transcript Slide 1
APHA Session 3008 November 8, 2010 Jennifer Jimenez, ASTHO Association of State and Territorial Health Officials 57 members – state, territorial and DC Mission: To transform public health within states and territories to help members dramatically improve health and wellness Support development of public policy and promote public health programs. January 2010 Letter of Invitation 8 states self-identified areas of need ASTHO staff/consultant model Facilitation, Planning Sessions, Virtual Meetings, and Site-Visits Outcomes/Projects ◦ Accreditation preparation and quality improvement ASTHO’s technical assistance project was funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Joan H. Ascheim Senior Deputy Bureau Chief, Bureau of Public Health Systems, Policy and Planning NH Division of Public Health Services Kerre L. Fisher Deputy Director Alaska Division of Public Health Alaska Department of Health and Social Services Valerie Ricker Director, Family Health Division Maine CDC Moving Towards a Healthier State Preparing for Accreditation New Hampshire’s Approach Presented at APHA November 8, 2010 Annual Meeting April8, 2009 What Does Public Health Look Like in NH? •Each of New Hampshire’s 234 cities and towns are required by law to have a health officer •Only five New Hampshire communities maintain public health departments of various size; no county health departments •At the state level, DHHS is the lead public health agency. The Department of Environmental Services, Department of Education, and Department of Safety also play key roles • In almost all New Hampshire communities, non-governmental organizations provide a significant sub-set of public health services Public Health Regions • Organized to plan for and respond to public health emergencies • 15 Regions • Looking to expand the scope to broader public health areas Regionalization Goal • Overall Goal – A performance-based public health delivery system, which provides all 10 essential public health services throughout New Hampshire • Provide high quality public health based on national standards (PHAB) What are we learning? At the Regional Level Assessments to Help Us Determine, Resources, Costs, Needs and Approach • Financial analysis of all state/local/private public health funding with consideration of efficiencies from regionalization – Patrick Bernet, FAU • Assessment of local/regional public health system capacity to deliver the 10 essential services - with a gaps analysis • Assessment of what the link to government could look like Moving Towards Accreditation at the State Level • 2005 Conducted the NPHPS • Developed Strategic Priorities • Workgroups • Public Health Improvement Services Council Purpose of the Council •To monitor the implementation of existing public health improvement plans and to develop a public health improvement plan PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEM STRATEGIC PRIORITIES 2006–2009 NEW HAMPSHIRE 1 Inform, educate and empower people about health issues 2 Monitor health status to identify and solve community health problems 3 Mobilize community partnerships and actions to identify and solve health problems 4 Develop policies and plans that support individual and community health efforts 5 Develop a communication plan to convey the importance and value of public health 6 Develop a plan to assure a competent public health workforce Develop a communication plan to convey the importance and value of public health • Researched and developed a communication plan • Launched public health campaign and tagline • NH Public Health Improving health, preventing disease, decreasing costs for all • Evaluated reach and use of materials and will determine future efforts Multi-State Learning Collaborative • Working towards accreditation • Asked our MLC site visitors – What next? - repeat NPHPS – Prepare for accreditation through • Prerequisites – – Strategic plan – State health assessment – State health plan New Hampshire Division of Public Health Services Strategic Map: 2011-2013 Demonstrate Measurable Improvements in Health and Well Being A B Strengthen Approaches to Population Health Implement Cross- 1 Program Integration to Increase Population Health Impact Integrate 2 3 Data Systems to Monitor Population Health Status Position DPHS as Expert on Approaches to Population Health: Policy, Data, Practices Make Strategic Use of 4 Partnerships to Implement Population Health Approaches Strengthen Public Health Infrastructure Develop and Implement a Health Messaging Strategy Ensure Access to Healthcare and Public Health Services Build an Internal Social Marketing Capacity Develop the Capacity to Meet the Future Health Workforce Needs Focus on Chronic Disease Prevention, Diagnosis, Treatment and Intervention Continue to Prepare for and Respond to Public Health Threats Develop Key Communications Partnerships to Increase Impact Evaluate Message Effectiveness and Make Needed Adjustments 5 6 7 C Expand Public Health Education and Messaging Color boxes denote priority tracks of work for year one. Similar colors are related focus areas and would be worked on together. Implement a Regional Public Health System Prepare for Accreditation of the State Health Department Implement the Technology Required For Future Effectiveness Develop and Implement a Public Health Performance Management System F D Improve the Effectiveness of Resource Allocation Align Internal Resources to Support Strategic Goals Allocate Resources Externally to Support Strategic Goals Build the Internal Capacity to Support Strategic Resource Allocation E Strengthen Organizational Effectiveness and Adaptability Improve Intra-agency Communication at All Levels Redesign Internal Contracting Process and Financial Management Structure Ensure Optimal Workforce Capacity Strengthen Organizational and Staff Resilience Optimize the Performance of Key Business Processes Strategic Planning • • • • Selected priorities for year one Created work groups Developed work plans Assessing first quarter accomplishments Next Step State Health Assessment ASTHO Project • PHAB Definition Regularly and systematically collecting, analyzing and making available information on the health of a (state) including : – health status, state needs, other studies – Assist in adapting and responding to health problems and risks – Moving towards strengths and resources Looked at Other States • MLC states – Oklahoma, Iowa, Washington • Site visit to Oklahoma via MLC • Applied to ASTHO for TA – Provided other examples – Florida, Montana, Illinois – Provided criteria for indicator selection – Validated our plan and direction to meet PHAB standards State Health Assessment Aim To provide health profiles that assist the state and regions to set priorities to improve health status. Decisions/Challenges • Audience – elected officials, public health partners and stakeholders, public • Approach- determinants of health (County Health Rankings), by state and PHR • Format – hard copy, web-based, report card- ata-glance • Indicators- how many? How to choose? • What now, what later? • Time and resources Indicators • Used County Health Rankings indicators as a base (we don’t have services based on counties) • Added key indicators for NH as determined by state epis, program managers • Used an indicator sorting tool – adapted from OK Selection of Indicators • Impact on health (high, medium, low – proportion of population impacted) • National benchmarks available • State benchmarks available • Perceived ability to affect change – best practices demonstrating that change can be affected in 10 years (high, medium, low) • Emerging PH issue • Meaningfully measured(reliable, valid) • Links to other measures • Demographic availability • Trend data • Available at PHR Indicators • 60 total - Arranged by chapters – Social/economics – Health status/well-being – Disease – cancer, heart disease, injury, perinatal, obesity etc – Health behaviors – seatbelts, smoking, alcohol, physical activity – Clinical care – sealants, colonoscopy, Pap, immunizations – Physical environment – radon, lead, air quality Work in Progress • Programs asked to write about each indicator with support from epi • Style guide provided (thanks to OK) • Reviewed by three editors • Final edit • Layout and design • 1st iteration – state only, second by region • At a glance - national ranking, trend • Intro and so what? Next Steps • • • • • • • Regional assessments Web based – links to in depth data MAPP like process ?NPHPS? State health plan Revisit strategic plan Begin self-assessment for accreditation Questions? • Joan H. Ascheim, MSN Senior Deputy Bureau Chief, Bureau of Public Health Systems, Policy and Planning NH Division of Public Health Services [email protected] 603-271-4110 ASTHO Technical Assistance for Accreditation in Alaska Kerre L. Fisher Deputy Director Alaska Division of Public Health Alaska’s Road to Accreditation How do we fit in? Where are we now? How far do we need to go? What do we need to do to get there? What help is available? Same Scale Comparison: Alaska Area to Lower 48 States . .. . .. . . . .. . . .. . ALASKA HIGHWAY SYSTEM 0 200 400 MILES 600 800 Gambell Health Clinic Beaver General Store Tyonek ‘Road’ System Public Health Organization Public Health System in Alaska One local government health department with limited services Three local grantee agencies – public health nursing only 537 state public health employees 22 state public health centers 38 Native health corporations State Public Health Services Vital Statistics Chronic Disease Prevention & Health Promotion Certification & Licensing Emergency Programs Epidemiology Laboratories Public Health Nursing State Medical Examiner Women’s, Children’s and Family Health Getting the Job Done – Alaska Style Elaine Clement, Alaska PHN, 1956 Jane Conard, Alaska PHN, 2003 Public Health Strategic Plan Goals Prevent and Control Epidemics and the Spread of Infectious Disease Ensure the Public Benefits from Reductions in Suffering, Death and Disability Due to Injuries Prevent and Control Chronic Disease and Disabilities Minimize the Loss of Life and Suffering Resulting from Public Health Emergencies, Disasters and Terrorist Attacks Assure Access to Early Preventive Services and Quality Health Care Protect Against Environmental Hazards Impacting Human Health Ensure Effective and Efficient Management and Administration of Public Health PHAB Standards Meet Alaska Env Health Alaska Department of Alaska &Division of Health Social PHAB Health State Standards Public Services Tribal Health ASTHO Technical Assistance Stakeholders Expert briefing advice Workgroup / teleconferences Peer support – Washington and Florida Tools for assessing and organizing Site Visit - workshop Plans for moving forward Assignment of Standards Tool Measures DO BVS CDPHP CL EMERG EPI LABS PHN SME EH WCFH ALL Other Part A: Administrative Capacity and Governance Provide Infrastructure for Public Health Services Standard A1 B: Develop and maintain an operational infrastructure to support the performance of public health functions. A1.1 B: Maintain policies and procedures regarding agency operations, review policies regularly and make them accessible to X staff A1.2 B: Demonstrate written policies regarding confidentiality, X including applicable HIPAA requirements A1.3 B: Maintain socially, culturally, and linguistically relevant approaches in agency processes, programs, and interventions A1.4 B: Maintain a Human Resources system A1.5 B: Maintain information systems that support the agency’s mission and workforce by providing infrastructure for data X collection/analysis, program management, and communication A1.6 B: Maintain facilities that are clean, safe, accessible, and X X secure Provide Financial Management Systems Standard A2 B: Establish effective financial management systems. A2.1 B: Comply with requirements for externally funded programs X X X X X X A2.2 B: Maintain written agreements with entities providing processes, programs and/or interventions delegated or purchased by the public health agency A2.3 B: Maintain financial management systems X A2.4 B: Seek resources to support agency infrastructure and processes, programs and interventions Define Public Health Authority Standard A3 B: Maintain current operational definitions and statements of the public health roles and responsibilities of specific authorities. A3.1B: Provide mandated public health operations and services A3.2B: Demonstrate that the governing entity complies with regulations regarding governing entities A3.3 B: Demonstrate evaluation of the agency director by the X governing entity Provide Orientation / Information for the Governing Entity Standard A4 B: Provide orientation and regular information to members of the governing entity regarding their responsibilities and those of the public health agency. A4.1 B: Provide orientation and regular information to the governing X entity regarding the responsibilities of the public health agency A4.2 B: Provide orientation and regular information to the governing X entity regarding their responsibilities X X ITS X X HR X ITS X FMS X X FMS X X FMS / DOA X CO X X GOV / CO / AG X GOV / CO X CO X CO State Assessment Tool Measures Conformity of Measure Demonstrated Quality Improvement Assessment of Measure Partially Not Evidence of QI No QI Demonstrated Demonstrated Improvement Assessment Assessment Present Present Classification of Measures (S, PS, PO, O) Part A: Administrative Capacity and Governance Provide Infrastructure for Public Health Services Standard A1 B: Develop and maintain an operational infrastructure to support the performance of public health functions. A1.1 B: Maintain policies and procedures regarding agency operations, review policies regularly and make them accessible to X staff A1.2 B: Demonstrate written policies regarding confidentiality, X including applicable HIPAA requirements A1.3 B: Maintain socially, culturally, and linguistically relevant X approaches in agency processes, programs, and interventions A1.4 B: Maintain a Human Resources system X A1.5 B: Maintain information systems that support the agency’s mission and workforce by providing infrastructure for data X collection/analysis, program management, and communication A1.6 B: Maintain facilities that are clean, safe, accessible, and X secure Provide Financial Management Systems Standard A2 B: Establish effective financial management systems. A2.1 B: Comply with requirements for externally funded programs X A2.2 B: Maintain written agreements with entities providing processes, programs and/or interventions delegated or purchased by X the public health agency A2.3 B: Maintain financial management systems X A2.4 B: Seek resources to support agency infrastructure and X processes, programs and interventions Define Public Health Authority Standard A3 B: Maintain current operational definitions and statements of the public health roles and responsibilities of specific authorities. A3.1B: Provide mandated public health operations and services X A3.2B: Demonstrate that the governing entity complies with X regulations regarding governing entities A3.3 B: Demonstrate evaluation of the agency director by the X governing entity Provide Orientation / Information for the Governing Entity Standard A4 B: Provide orientation and regular information to members of the governing entity regarding their responsibilities and those of the public health agency. A4.1 B: Provide orientation and regular information to the governing entity regarding the responsibilities of the public health agency X A4.2 B: Provide orientation and regular information to the governing entity regarding their responsibilities X Next Steps Leadership briefings, recommendations, buy-in Complete state health assessment MAPP process used in several communities Develop State Health Improvement Plan Internal policies and documentation Accreditation application Timeline for Moving Forward Tasks Preparation Phase · Designate a Point of Contact for Preparation Phase · Prepare a site visit summary for Director to include: o accreditation self-assessment strengths and weaknesses o fact sheet/summary of costs & benefits of accreditation · Set regular meeting schedule for accreditation workgroup (all Section Chiefs) to discuss to following: o Identify others who aren’t at the table e.g. C&L, SME, BVS o Identify available resources for the accreditation process o Identify comprehensive list of the “carrots” and/ or “sticks” of accreditation · Present final recommendation to the Director Implementation Phase · Identify Point of Contact for Implementation Phase · Set regular meeting schedule for accreditation workgroup (all Section Chiefs/appointee) · Develop a Social Marketing Campaign to assure o Buy in from Commissioner o Buy in from other SOA IT/FMS/DOA o Buy in from partner agencies e.g. UA, ANTHC o Buy in from the public on a statewide benefit/value · Define LHD for Alaska · Establish how to work with LHDs for accreditation · Get templates & samples from ASTHO · Get clarification on roles & responsibilities of each Section re: Measures · Identify a repository for documentation to be gathered and kept · Evaluate similar undertakings for overlap e.g. Healthy Alaskans 2020 planning/measures. · Inventory: current strategic plans & assessments & health improvement plans · DEC/EH and DPH/Sections assess their status of conformity with measures o Assess what would be needed to move from ‘not demonstrated’ to ‘partial’ or ‘demonstrated’ o identify timeline to fill gaps of each domain responsible for · Identify the timeline to complete Statewide 1. Community Assessment 2. Community Health Improvement Plan 3. Strategic Plan Who Start End Barriers to the Process Contact Information Kerre L. Fisher Deputy Director Alaska Division of Public Health Alaska Department of Health and Social Services 3601 C Street, Suite 756 Anchorage, AK 99503 Phone – (907) 269-2042 Fax – (907) 269-2048 Email – [email protected] Maine CDC : Stepping Forward into Voluntary Accreditation American Public Health Association November 8, 2010 Stepping Forward into Accreditation • Maine and Public Health – Geography – Structure – Why apply for voluntary accreditation Stepping Forward into Accreditation • How Maine CDC got started • Opportunity: ASTHO Technical Assistance – A gift of support – The first giant step forward Stepping Forward into Accreditation • First giant step – State Public Health Systems Assessment • Assessment meeting • Initial summary report • Full report back and prioritization Stepping Forward into Accreditation • Steps preparing for accreditation – Structures developed to support achieving accreditation – Leadership – Implementation of support structures – Integration with US CDC Public Health Infrastructure grant Stepping Forward into Accreditation • Challenges – Placement of resources – Managing expectations – Implementing a system wide QI process Stepping Forward into Accreditation • For more information as we move forward through the journey – Valerie Ricker – Director, Family Health Division – Maine CDC – [email protected] – 207-287-5396