Transcript Document
The University of Texas at Tyler
Dr. Marilyn Young MANA 5320 Management and Organizational Behavior Chapters 13,15, 16, & 8 Spring 2009
College of Business and Technology
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
13
Conflict and Negotiation in the Workplace
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Inter-Generational Conflict
Inter-generational conflict is more common today because employees across age groups work together more than ever before. Fred Getz, an executive at Robert Half International Inc. recommends adapting to the different needs and work styles of younger employees to minimize this conflict.
J. Tomaselli, Chicago Tribune Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Conflict Inside Arthur Andersen
While Arthur Andersen employees put up a united front during the firm’s dying days (as this photo shows), the accounting firm’s fee structure and culture created substantial dysfunctional conflict.
©AP Photo/David Phillip
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Conflict at Air Canada
Conflict between Air Canada pilots and former Canadian Airlines pilots over seniority rights has created tension and ill feelings. “We will not mingle with those people [Air Canada pilots] and the feeling is mutual,” says a former Canadian airlines pilot now working at Air Canada.
McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
CP/Tannis Toohey
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict Defined
The process in which one party perceives that its interests are being opposed or negatively affected by another party.
McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e J. Tomaselli, Chicago Tribune Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Transitions in Conflict Thought Traditional View Human Relations View Interactionist View
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
14-5
Desired Conflict Outcomes
Agreement Stronger relationships Learning
McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Reasons for Conflict
Competition over scarce resources Power differentials Differentiation
Conflict
Ambiguity over responsibility or jurisdiction Interdependence between work units
McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Competitive reward systems
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Stage III: Conflict-Handling Intentions Competing Collaborating Compromising Avoiding Accommodating Uncooperative Cooperativeness Cooperative
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Third-Party Negotiation Mediator Arbitrator Conciliator Consultant
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Task-Related vs. Socioemotional Conflict
Task-related conflict
Conflict is aimed at issue, not parties Basis of constructive controversy Helps recognize problems, identify solutions, and understand the issues better
Socioemotional conflict
Conflict viewed as a personal attack Foundation of conflict escalation Leads to dissatisfaction, stress, and turnover
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Organizational Conflict Outcomes
Dysfunctional outcomes
Diverts energy and resources
Encourages organizational politics
Encourages stereotyping Weakens knowledge management Potential benefits
Improves decision making
Strengthens team dynamics
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Sources of Conflict
Goal Incompatibility Different Values and Beliefs
• Goals conflict with goals of others • • •
Different beliefs due to unique background, experience, training Caused by specialized tasks, careers Explains misunderstanding in cross-cultural and merger relations
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Sources of Conflict
Goal Incompatibility Different Values and Beliefs Task Interdependence Scarce Resources Ambiguity • Increases competition for resources to fulfill goals • •
Lack of rules guiding relations Encourages political tactics
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Sources of Conflict
Goal Incompatibility Different Values and Beliefs Task Interdependence Scarce Resources Ambiguity Communication Problems
McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Lack of opportunity
--reliance on stereotypes
Lack of ability
-- arrogant communication heightens conflict perception
Lack of motivation
-- conflict causes lower motivation to communicate, increases stereotyping
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict Mgt. Styles: Orientations
Win-win orientation
You believe parties will find a mutually beneficial solution to their disagreement
Win-lose orientation
You believe that the more one party receives, the less the other receives Tends to escalate conflict, use of power/politics
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Superordinate Goals at Tivoli Systems
The value of superordinate goals was apparent in a paper airplanes exercise at Tivoli Systems. Teams discovered that they succeeded by focusing on the organization’s goals rather than fighting over conflicting goals between teams.
Ed Lallo Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Emphasizing Superordinate Goals
Emphasizing
common objectives
rather than conflicting sub goals Reduces goal incompatibility and differentiation
Ed Lallo Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Improving Communication/Understanding
Employees understand and appreciate each other’s views through communication Informal gatherings Formal dialogue sessions Teambuilding activities (such as drum circles, shown here)
G. Diggens, Soul Drums Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Bargaining Zone Model
Initial Your Positions Target Resistance
Area of Potential Agreement
Resistance Target Opponent’s Positions Initial
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Situational Influences on Negotiation
Location Physical Setting Time Investment and Deadlines Audience
© Corel Corp. With permission.
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Effective Negotiator Behaviors
Plan and Set Goals Gather Information Communicate Effectively Make Appropriate Concessions
© Corel Corp. With permission.
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
15
McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Organizational Structure
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Decentralization of Coca-Cola
Coca-Cola decentralized its organizational structure by cutting half of the staff at its Atlanta headquarters and moving the regional chieftains closer to their local markets. In India, decision making has been moved further down to different areas of that diverse country.
© AFP/CORBIS Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Division of Labor
Subdivision of work into separate jobs assigned to different people Potentially increases work efficiency Necessary as company grows and work becomes more complex
© AFP/CORBIS Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Forms of Work Coordination
Informal communication
Sharing information
High media-richness
Important in teams Formal hierarchy
Direct supervision
Common in larger firms
Problems -- costly, slow, less popular with young staff Standardization
Formal instructions
Clear goals/outputs
Training/skills
McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e © AFP/CORBIS Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Making Decisions in Organizations
High Low Managerial Control Employee Empowerment Centralized Decision Making Decentralized Decision Making Employee Empowerment Managerial Control High Low
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Elements of Organizational Structure
Department alization Organizational Structure Elements Span of Control Formalization Centralization
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Span of Control
Number of people directly reporting to the next level Assumes coordination through direct supervision Wider span of control possible when:
with other coordinating methods
subordinates’ tasks are similar tasks are routine
Flatter structures require wider span (if same # of people in the firm)
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Span of Control
Chief Executive
McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Chief Executive wide narrow span
Span of Control at Ducks Unlimited
Ducks Unlimited Canada recently flattened its organizational structure by removing layers of management. The environmental conservation group wanted the flatter structure to empower employees, and let them make decisions quickly without having to go up the hierarchy .
Ducks Unlimited/Darin Langhorst Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Forces for (De)centralization Centralization
• • •
Organizational crises Management desire for control Increase consistency, reduce costs
• •
Complexity -- size, diversity Desire for empowerment
Decentralization
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Mechanistic vs. Organic Structures Mechanistic Organic
•
High formalization
•
Low formalization
• •
Narrow span of control
•
Wide span of control High centralization
•
Low centralization
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Effects of Departmentalization
Establishes work teams and supervision structure Creates common resources, measures of performance, etc Encourages informal communication among people and subunits
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Functional Organizational Structure
Organizes employees around skills or other resources (marketing, production) President Finance Production Marketing
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Divisionalized Structure
Organizes employees around geographic areas, products, or clients
President Enterprise Systems
Laserjet Solutions Consumer Products
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Functional Organization
Chief Executive Officer
President
Production
McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Sales Research & Development Accounting Department
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Product Organization
Chief Executive Officer President Product Group 1 Product Group 2 Product Group 3 Prod.
Sales R&D Actg.
Prod.
Sales R&D Actg.
Prod.
Sales R&D Actg.
Actg. = accounting
McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Prod. = production R&D = research and development
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Sample Organization Chart for a Hospital (continued)
Executive Administrative Staff Executive Medical Director Dir.
Of Human Resources Dir.
Of Patient & Public Relations
McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Dir.
Of Nutrition & Food Services Dir.
X-Ray & Lab Services Dir.
Of Admissions Dir.
Of Accounting Dir.
Of Surgery Dir.
Of Out Patient Services Dir.
Of Physician Pharmacy Chief
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Organization Chart-- Hospital
Strategic Planning Advisor Executive Administrative Staff
McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Board of Directors Chief Executive Officer President Legal Counsel Cost Containment Staff Executive Medical Director
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Project-Based Matrix Structure
Employees are temporarily assigned to a specific project team and have a permanent functional unit President Engineering Manager
Marketing Manager
Software Manager Project A Manager Project B Manager Project C Manager
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Team-Based Structure Features
Self-directed work teams Teams organized around work processes Very flat span of control Very little formalization Usually found within divisionalized structure
AAP Image/Dave Hunt
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
President Matrix Organization Farm Machinery Division Production department Project Alpha manager Production support group Project Beta manager Production support group Project Gamma manager
McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Production support group Legal department Engineering department Accounting department Legal support group Engineering support group Accounting support group Legal support group Engineering support group Accounting support group Legal support group Engineering support group Accounting support group
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Team Structure at Jabil Circuits
Jabil Circuits relies on a team based organizational structure at its manufacturing operations. Each production team is responsible for a specific customer group. Team members have a high degree of autonomy and are cross-trained.
Courtesy of Jabil Circuits Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Features of Team-Based Structures
Self-directed work teams Teams organized around work processes Very flat span of control Very little formalization Usually found within divisionalized structure
Courtesy of Jabil Circuits Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Org. Environment & Structure
Dynamic • High rate of change • Use organic structure Stable • Steady conditions, predictable change • Use mechanistic structure Complex • Many elements (such as stakeholders) • Decentralize Simple • Few environmental elements • Less need to decentralize
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
16
McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Organizational Culture
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Reinventing Hewlett Packard’s Culture
Carly Fiorina wants to reinvent Hewlett Packard’s legendary culture, known as ‘The H-P Way’. She documented a new set of values, called “The Rules of the Garage” and is merging H-P with Compaq to create a more performance-oriented culture.
© Reuters/New media, Inc./ CORBIS Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Organizational Culture Defined
The basic pattern of shared assumptions, values, and beliefs considered to be the correct way of thinking about and acting on problems and opportunities facing the organization.
© Reuters/New media, Inc./ CORBIS Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Elements of Organizational Culture
Artifacts of Organizational Culture Physical Structures Rituals/ Ceremonies Stories Language Organizational Culture Beliefs Values Assumptions
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Brown & Brown’s Cultural Content
Brown & Brown, Inc. in Daytona Beach has an aggressive culture that helps it succeed in the highly competitive insurance business. At its annual sales meeting, managers of poorly performing divisions are led to the podium by medieval executioners while a funeral dirge plays.
McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e E. M. Samelson/Orlando Sentinel Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Organizational Subcultures
Located throughout the organization Can support or oppose (countercultures) firm’s dominant culture Two functions of countercultures:
provide surveillance and evaluation
source of emerging values
E. M. Samelson/Orlando Sentinel Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Artifacts: Organizational Stories
Social prescriptions of desired behavior Demonstrate that organizational objectives are attainable Most effective stories:
Describe real people
Assumed to be true Known throughout the organization Are prescriptive
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Artifacts: Rituals and Ceremonies
Rituals
programmed routines e.g., conducting meetings Ceremonies
planned activities for an audience e.g., award ceremonies
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Artifacts: Organizational Language
Words used to address people, describe clients, etc.
Leaders use phrases and metaphors as cultural symbols
e.g.. General Electric’s “grocery store”
Language also found in subcultures
e.g.. Whirlpool’s “PowerPoint culture”
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Artifacts: Physical Structures/Space
Oakley, Inc.’s protective and competitive corporate culture is apparent in its building design and workspace. The building looks like a vault to protect its cherished product designs (eyewear, footwear, apparel and watches).
Courtesy of Oakley, Inc.
McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Courtesy of Oakley, Inc.
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Problems with Strong Cultures
Culture content might be incompatible with the organization’s environment.
Strong cultures focus attention on one mental model.
Strong cultures suppress dissenting values from subcultures.
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Strengthening Organizational Culture
Founders and leaders Selection and socialization Strengthening Organizational Culture Aligning Artifacts Culturally consistent rewards Stable workforce
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
C H A P T E R 17
Organizational Change and Development
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
16
McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Organizational Change
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Driving Change at EDS
Richard H. “Dick” Brown drove the change effort at EDS by:
listening to customer complaints
changing the firm’s structure
monitoring the change process
communicating the change directly with employees
replacing several executives
McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e AP/ Wide World Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Change at Nissan Motor Company
© AFP/Corbis
Carlos Ghosn launched a turnaround at Nissan Motor Company that saved the Japanese automaker and relied on change management practices rarely seen in Japan.
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Unilever Reduces Resistance to Change
Gary Calveley (right) brought in team coaches to train employees throughout the process of changing Unilever’s Elida Faberge factory into Europe’s best factory. A theatrical production helped to communicate the changes that Calveley was trying to achieve through coaching.
Dean Smith/The Camera Crew
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Strategic Vision at Hanson Brick
© Robert Padgett Richard Manning (shown in photo) relied on strategic vision and his role as a change agent to integrate seven companies into a single corporate entity at Hanson Brick’s North American operations.
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Appreciative Inquiry at Hunter Douglas
The Hunter Douglas Window Fashions Division in Colorado relied on appreciative inquiry as well as a search conference to create a collective vision, re instill a sense of community among employees, and build leadership within the company.
McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Courtesy of Amanda Trotsen-Bloom
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Some External Forces for Change
Information Technology Globalization & Competition Demography
Easier information transfer Facilitates global structures Requires new competencies and expectations Facilitates telecommuting; new employment relationships More emphasis on knowledge management
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Some External Forces for Change
Information Technology Globalization & Competition Demography
Global competition Technology makes it easier to compete quickly Results in restructuring, outsourcing, mergers produces many employment changes
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Some External Forces for Change
Information Technology Globalization & Competition Demography More educated workforce
want involvement; interesting work Younger generation
less intimidated by status want a more balanced work life Cultural changes
more individualism in traditionally collectivist countries
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Force Field Analysis
Desired Conditions Restraining Forces Restraining Forces Driving Forces Current Conditions Restraining Forces Driving Forces Before Change
McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Driving Forces During Change After Change
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
World Politics Social Trends Workforce
Forces For Change
Technology Economic Shocks Competition
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Job Rotation Job Enlargement
Work Redesign Options
Group-Based Work Job Enrichment
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
20-6
Assumptions About Change
Involves learning something new, Discontinuing current attitudes, behaviors, or organizational practices.
Change will not occur unless there is motivation to change. People are the hub of all organizational changes. Resistance to change is found even when the goals of change are highly desirable.
Effective change requires reinforcing
McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Organizational Change
Unfreezing Changing Refreezing
Lewin’s Three-Step Process
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Refreezing the Desired Conditions
Creating organizational systems and team dynamics to reinforce desired changes alter rewards to reinforce new behaviors new information systems guide new behaviors recalibrate and introduce feedback systems to focus on new priorities
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Resistance to Change at BP Norge
Employees initially resisted self directed work teams (SDWTs) at BP Norge’s North Sea drilling rigs.
“
We already have teams!”
“
SDWTs don’t work on rigs!” “This creates more work -- we want higher pay!” “I don’t know how to work in teams.” “SDWTs will threaten my job as a supervisor!”
AP/ Wide World Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Creating an Urgency for Change
Need to motivate employees to change Most difficult when organization is doing well Must be real, not contrived Customer-driven change
Adverse consequences for firm Human element energizes employees
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Reducing Restraining Forces at Unilever
Gary Calveley (right) brought in team coaches to train employees throughout the process of changing Unilever’s Elida Faberge factory into Europe’s best factory. A theatrical production helped to communicate the changes that Calveley was trying to achieve through coaching.
Dean Smith/The Camera Crew Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Minimizing Resistance to Change
Coercion Negotiation Communication Training Minimizing Resistance to Change Stress Management Employee Involvement
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Overcoming Resistance to Change
Education and Communication Participation Negotiation Facilitation and Support Manipulation and Cooptation Coercion
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Organization Development Defined
A planned system wide effort, managed from the top with the assistance of a change agent, that uses behavioral science knowledge to improve organizational effectiveness.
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Appreciative Inquiry at Hunter Douglas
The Hunter Douglas Window Fashions Division in Colorado relied on appreciative inquiry as well as a search conference to create a collective vision, re-instill a sense of community among employees, and build leadership within the company.
Courtesy of Amanda Trotsen-Bloom Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
What is Appreciative Inquiry?
Directs the group’s attention away from its own problems and focuses participants on the group’s potential and positive elements.
Reframes relationships around the positive rather than being problem oriented
Courtesy of Amanda Trotsen-Bloom Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
8
Decision Making and Creativity
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Decision Making at NASA
The loss of the space shuttle Columbia (shown here lifting off for its final flight) and its crew was caused by more than foam hitting the left wing; it was also due to NASA’s flawed decision making.
©AP Photo/Chris O’Meara
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Decision Making Defined
Conscious process of making choices among one or more alternatives with the intention of moving toward some desired state of affairs
.
©AP Photo/Chris O’Meara
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Rational Decision Making Model
1. Identify problem 6. Evaluate decision 2. Choose decision style 5. Implement solution 3. Develop alternatives 4. Choose best solution
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Problem Identification Process
Problems and opportunities are not announced or pre-defined
need to interpret ambiguous information Involves both rational and emotional brain centers
probably need to pay attention to both in problem identification
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Problem Identification Challenges
Perceptual bias :
Selective attention mechanisms
Influence from others
Mental models Diagnostic skills :
Defining problems in terms of solutions
© Photofest
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Intuitive Decision Making
Ability to know when a problem or opportunity exists and select the best course of action without conscious reasoning Conduit for tacit knowledge Use intuition to complete rational process
McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Choosing Solutions Effectively
Systematically evaluate alternatives Balance emotions and rational influences Scenario planning © Corel Corp. With permission
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Escalation of Commitment
Escalation of commitment occurred when the British government continued funding the Concorde supersonic jet long after it ’ s lack of commercial viability was apparent. Some scholars refer to escalation of commitment as the “ Concorde fallacy.
”
© Corel Corp. With permission
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Escalation of Commitment Causes
Self-justification Gambler’s fallacy Perceptual blinders Closing costs
© Corel Corp. With permission
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Employee Involvement Defined
The degree to which employees influence how their work is organized and carried out
Level of control over decision making
Different levels and forms of involvement
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Levels of Employee Involvement
High Medium
High involvement
Employees have complete decision making power (e.g.. SDWTs) Full consultation
Employees offer recommendations (e.g.. gain sharing) Selective consultation
Employees give information, but don’t know the problem
Low
McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Creative Process Model
Verification Insight Preparation Incubation
McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Characteristics of Creative People
Above average intelligence Persistence Relevant knowledge and experience Inventive thinking style
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Creative Work Environments
Learning orientation
Encourage experimentation Tolerate mistakes Intrinsically motivating work
Task significance, autonomy, feedback Open communication and sufficient resources Team trust and project commitment
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Creative Activities at EDS
These employees at the EDS eSpace innovation center near Detroit play with toys to generate new ideas. “We’re all about collaboration and creativity and inspiration, and the toys are props to stimulate the thought process,” says an employee at the computer service firm.
©M. Richardson II/The Detroit News
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
Creative Activities
Redefine the Problem Associative Play Cross Pollination • Review abandoned projects • Explore issue with other people • Storytelling • Artistic activities • Morphological analysis • Diverse teams • Information sessions • Internal tradeshows
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e
McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.