Transcript The Danielson Teacher Evaluation Model: A Panel Discussion

Lifelong learning for both educators and students.
Facilitator: Katie Bray
Panel Members:
Jocelyn Hafner, Assistant Principal, Stevens High School
Rod Haugen, Principal, South Park Elementary School
Danny Janklow, Principal, Horace Mann Elementary School
John Julius, Principal, Stevens High School
Dr. Tim Mitchell, Superintendent, Rapid City Area Schools
Valerie Nefzger, Principal, North Middle School
Rick Owen, Principal, Pinedale Elementary School
Shannon Schaeffers, Principal, Grandview Elementary School
Deborah Warr, Principal, Knollwood Elementary School




LEARNING TARGET:
To share the various applications of the Danielson
model for teacher evaluation in the Rapid City Area
Schools.
CRITERIA FOR SUCCESS
Participants gain a better understanding of the
application of the Danielson model.
The Danielson model more effectively merges the two
goals of evaluation and facilitates a collaborative and
reflective growth process for teachers and administrators.
1.
2.
Professional Development
Accountability
PURPOSES FOR EVALUATION
Assist in making employment decisions


Student Achievement
Cost Savings
When we are able to retain rather than release a teacher through an
evaluation process, districts make gains in student achievement and save
money.
A study completed in California indicated that a new teacher negatively
impacts student achievement by as much as 5% in national median test
scores in both reading and math (Public Policy, 2002).
The cost of teachers leaving the profession varies from district to district.
The National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future (NCTAF,
2008) estimated that the costs associated with teacher attrition in a nonurban school to be as high as $12,000.
Domain 1: Planning and Professional Practice
Domain 2: The Classroom Environment
Domain 3: Instruction
Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities
From: Danielson, Charlotte. (1996). Enhancing Professional
Practice, A Framework for Teaching (ASCD).
Question 1: Each of the 4 domains has 5-6 components with
several elements within each component. How do you
determine which components to address?
x
Question 2: The Danielson model lends itself to both a check-list
and narrative format. Shannon, will you lead the discussion on
the benefits of using a narrative approach.?
Question 3: Reflection and self-assessment are critical
components of the model. In the district’s Teacher
Evaluation Manual, we talk about pre and post
conferencing. Rod, would you discuss how you set up
and facilitate the process.
PRE-CONFERENCE GUIDE
Rapid City Area Schools
Name_____________________________
Administrator_______________________
Date of Pre-Conference______________
Date/Time of Observation_____________
Grade Level/Curriculum Area Observed _____________________________________
1. Briefly describe the students in this class, including those with
6. What difficulties do students typically experience in this area, and how
special needs. (Component 1b)
do you plan to anticipate these difficulties? (Component 1a)
2. Briefly describe the classroom environment. (Component 2b)
7. What instructional materials or other resources, if any, will you use?
(Attach sample materials you will be using in the lesson.) (Component
1d)
3. What is your learning target for the lesson? What do you want the
students to learn?
(Component 1c)
8. How do you plan to assess student achievement of the goals? What
procedures will you use? (Attach any tests or performance tasks, with
rubrics or scoring guides.) (Component 1f)
4. How do these objectives support the district’s curriculum and the
content standards?
9. How do you plan to use the results of the assessment?
5. How do you plan to engage students in the content? What will you
do? What will the students do? (Component 3c)
10. What is your criteria for success?
Teacher comments:
Administrator comments:
OBSERVATION REFLECTION GUIDE
Name
Grade/Subject
Observation Date
Time
Post Conference Date
Time
•As I reflect on the lesson, to what extent were students productively engaged? (Components 4a, 1e, 3c).
•Did the students learn what I intended? Was the criteria for success met? How do I know?
•Did I alter my objectives or instructional plan as I taught the lesson? If so, why? (Components 1e and 3e)
•If I had the opportunity to teach this lesson again to this same group of students what would I do differently? Why?
(Components 4a).
•What district opportunities have you participated in to support you with this lesson?
•Describe how you keep communication open with parents?
•How do you contribute to our school and district outside of your classroom?
Adapted from: Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum
Development; and Danielson, C., & McGreal, T. L. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Question 4: Learning targets and formative
assessments have been a focus of our staff
development process for the past three years. Danny,
how have you incorporated both of these elements into
the evaluation process?
Walk-Through Tool
Effective Sharing of Learning Targets and Criteria for Success
Teacher:
Date:
1.
Observation of the Teacher
The teacher communicates learning targets and criteria for success/elements of quality
and also uses strategies to assess students’ understanding of these elements.
Teacher communicates the learning target and criteria for success/elements of quality with students (oral, written, display, demonstration,
modeling).
Teacher uses a strategy to help students understand the learning target and criteria for success/elements of quality (questioning, planning
and envisioning, using examples, using rubrics).
The learning target indicated what students will understand or be able to do, was specific, and can be observed or measured.
Conversation with the teacher about how the learning targets and criteria for success were shared:
2.
Conversation with Students
Students can explain their intended learning and
their understanding of the criteria for success/elements of quality.
When asked What are you learning in this lesson? Students responded:
(Look for students expressing a clear, accurate, and specific description of the learning.)
When asked Are you doing well on this task? How do you know? Students responded:
(Look for students expressing specific strategies for assessing the quality of their work.)
3.
Conclusions and Next Steps
Analyzing the Walk-Through and Planning for the Teacher’s Growth
Conclusions about the quality, consistency, and effect of the ways the teacher shares the learning targets and criteria for success:
Specific next steps or goals for the teacher:
Strategies to help the teacher become more effective at sharing learning targets and success criteria:
Ways to have a short, focused, collaborative conversation to promote the teacher’s growth:
Classroom Walk-Through
Effective Sharing of Learning Targets and Criteria for Success
•Observations of Teachers: Evidence that the teacher communicates learning targets and the criteria for
success and also uses strategies to assess students’ understanding of these elements:
The learning target indicated what students will understand or be able to do, was specific, and can be observed or measured.
Comments:
How did the teacher communicate the learning target and criteria for success/elements of quality with students?
(Examples include oral, written, display, demonstration, modeling.)
Comments:
What strategy did the teacher use to help students understand the learning targets and the criteria for success/elements of quality?
Used questioning
Helped students plan and envision their learning or work
Used examples to discuss elements of quality
Used a rubric or checklist
Other
Ask the teacher: In this lesson, how did you share the learning targets and criteria for success with your students?
Record the response.
•Conversations with Students: Evidence that students can explain their intended learning and their
understanding of the criteria for success/knowing what quality looks like:
Students were asked What are you learning in this lesson? Their responses indicated:
Students described what they were doing (We are writing papers).
Students described their learning in general terms (We are learning to be strong writers).
Students provide a clear and accurate description of what they are learning (We are learning the three elements necessary in persuasive writing).
Students were asked Are you doing well on this task? How do you know? Their responses indicated:
Students cannot describe the criteria for success/elements of quality (I’ll know when I see my grade).
Students describe a general strategy for assessing the quality of their work (If I follow directions; If I do my best).
Students describe specific strategies for assessing the quality of their work (I use the rubric; I look at the examples).
Question 5: Valerie, Please share some of the ways you have
incorporated the walk-through process as a formative
assessment.
Question 6: Danielson addresses the importance of peer
mentoring. Jocelyn, would you address the mentoring
program you implemented at Stevens High School?
Stevens High School
Jocelyn Hafner
Assistant Principal
Stevens High School
To: John Keating
From: J. Hafner
Date: January 12, 2011
Re: Classroom Visit
 During my observation of your period 1 Shakespeare 101 class, I was in your classroom for 4 minutes.
 As I entered the room, you were discussing word choice by providing students with examples, as well as asking students to
provide examples. While questioning students, I noticed you allowed a student to not answer a question. What types of strategies
can you utilize to engage all students in the question/answer sessions?
 You transitioned into your next activity by announcing that you would discuss Shakespeare as someone who writes something
very interesting. Students responded by groaning. You informed students you understood they look forward to Shakespeare like
they look forward to a root canal. Next, you did impressions of famous actors, such as John Wayne reciting lines from
Shakespearean plays. Your use of humor allows you to be effective in the instructional process. With a good laugh, you are able
to get things back on track in the classroom.
 While reading out loud to students, you demonstrated reading fluency. All students appeared to be engaged and reacted
positively to the reading.
 Next, you stood on your desk and asked students why you would perform such a task. One student answered, “To feel taller.”
You explained that your expectation is for students to look at things in a different way. You then asked students to”see for
themselves.” Students complied by lining up and standing and jumping off your desk one-by-one. While students were
completing the action, you explained that while they read, you didn’t want them to simply consider what the author thinks; you
also wanted them to consider what they (the students) think. Although a creative approach, safety is a concern. What other
approach could you utilize to make a similar point?
 At the bell, you informed students of an additional assignment: students needed to compose an original poem, which they
would deliver to the entire class. If you were to define the criteria for success in regard to the poem assignment, what would that
look like?

Question 7: Many of us have also taken Dr. Ed
Porthan’s class on Educational Leadership which
focuses on evaluations. John, how have you
incorporated the learnings from Dr. Porthan’s class
into the Danielson model and your evaluation process?
Question 8: Rick, how you have addressed the state content
standards within the context of the model?
Weekly Grade Level Meeting Log
Grade 3
Members:___________________________
___________________________
TARGETED STANDARDS:
Reading
Standard
3.R.5.1
Standard
3.R.5.2
Standard
3.R.5.3
____________________________________
____________________________________
TODAY’S DATE: _________________
Students can determine and utilize organizational features of text.
Students can choose reference materials to locate information.
Students can collect information from two reference materials.
Math
Standard
3.A.1.1
Students are able to identify and explain the relationship between repeated addition and multiplication
Standard
3. A.1.2
Students are able to identify and apply special properties of 0 and 1 with respect to arithmetic operations
(addition, subtraction, and multiplication).
Standard
3. A.3.1
Students are able to use the relationship between multiplication and division to solve division problems and
check results.
TARGETED GOALS FOR THIS WEEK:
Math
Reading
INTEGRATED STUDIES FOCUS:
(List to be given to Marilyn and Joni)
OTHER CURRICULIM TOPICS
(Could include Word Work/Study, Writing, Testing etc…)

Question 9: We have spent the majority of our time
talking about evaluations as a formative assessment for
growth. Deb, how do you use progressive discipline
within the Danielson model?
Progressive Discipline
Common Steps
 Oral Warning/Conference

Written Warning

Letter of Reprimand

Unsatisfactory Evaluation ---***Plan of Assistance

Suspension with/without pay

Dismissal
CONFERENCE REVIEW
PURPOSE:
This form is to be used as an aid in providing a more accurate record of employment performance in the Rapid City Area
Schools, and will complement the evaluation process. It should be utilized whenever a conference is held to either
compliment a staff member or to discuss a problem or concern.
A copy of this conference review has been placed in your personnel file. You may prepare a written response, which will also be
included.
PLAN OF ASSISTANCE:
Targeted Domains
Circle components identified by evaluator with teacher input. Refer to Rubrics for Levels of Performance
for sample descriptions.
DOMAIN 1 – Planning and Preparation
Components:
a. Demonstrating knowledge of content and pedagogy
b. Demonstrating knowledge of students
c. Selecting instructional goals
d. Demonstrating knowledge of resources
e. Designing coherent instruction
f. Assessing student learning
DOMAIN 2 – Classroom Environment
Components:
a. Creating environment of respect and rapport
b. Establishing a culture for learning
c. Managing classroom procedures
d. Managing student behavior
e. Organizing physical space
DOMAIN 3 – Instruction
Components:
a. Communicating clearly and accurately
b. Using questioning and discussion techniques
c. Engaging students in learning
d. Providing feedback to students
e. Demonstrating flexibility and responsiveness
DOMAIN 4 – Professional Responsibilities
Components:
a. Reflecting on teaching
b. Maintaining accurate records
c. Communicating
d. Growing and developing professionally
OBJECTIVE(S):
The objective of this plan of assistance is to ensure the expectations ________________for at Knollwood Elementary.
____________________was suspended from her position in _________of this year for ________________. It is the goal of this plan for
________________to have a successful completion of 2011-2012 school year.
Domain 1- Planning and Preparation
1.Demonstrating knowledge of content and pedagogy.
________________ will follow curriculum goals as set by the Rapid City Area School District. She will teach all classes
that she is assigned to teach and fulfill all duties assigned to her.
ASSISTANCE PLAN:
Objective One:
_______________ will follow curriculum goals as set by the Rapid City Area School District. She will teach all classes that
she is assigned to teach and fulfill all duties assigned to her.
Plan:
•_______ will teach all classes that she is assigned to teach in each building.
•_______ will visit two other classrooms two afternoons next year to help her with planning and scheduling.
Timeline:
Immediately
AVAILABLE RESOURCES:
Objective One:
•_________ will be given a copy of her schedules as soon as they are available.
•_________ will utilize two hours of early release time on Wednesday’s to plan and prepare for lessons.
MEASURING PROGRESS:
Objective One:
•Progress will be measured by weekly lesson plans submitted to building administrators.
As we want ______ to be successful, we are willing to help her with any of the above objectives as well as provide resources.
___________ will be placed on a continued employment with qualifications for the 2011-2012 school year. _________ will meet
monthly with her building administrator to monitor her progress. If a lack of progress is documented, it may result in any of the
following:
__ Recommend for Continued Employment with Qualifications
__ Recommended for Non-Renewal
__ Recommended for Termination
DATE OF REVIEW:
Monthly beginning in the 2011-2012 school year.
FOLLOW-UP
CONFERENCE
Yes X
No
Date
Signing shall not imply agreement by the staff member to the conference review but merely indicates that the information has been
discussed.
_____________________________________________
______________________
(Evaluatee)
(Date)
(Evaluator)
COMPLETE IN TRIPLICATE: One copy for administrator, one for staff member and the original for the Director of Personnel.
RCAS Form 03-293
Revised 7/88
Revised 7/90
Revised 9/92
Revised 8/95
Revised 8/96
The first question in increasing productivity in
knowledge work has to be, “What is the task?”
“The best way to improve a school or district is by
developing the people within it!!”
“Educational change depends on what teachers do and
think-it is as simple and complex as that.”Fullan
Fullan (2006) defined capacity building as an action based and
powerful strategy that increases the collective efficacy of a group
to improve student learning through new knowledge, enhanced
resources, and greater motivation on the part of people working
individually and together.
To create conditions for people to succeed by helping
people find meaning, increase their skill
development, and their personal satisfaction while
they make contributions that simultaneously fulfill
their goals and the goals of the organization.