Transcript Martinez Unified School District

MARTINEZ UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
CST DATA ANALYSIS
2011-12 STAR RESULTS
10 September 2012
Presented by Audrey Lee
Director, Curriculum & Educational Technology
County & State Comparison

ELA
 Above

county and state averages (all grade levels)
Math
 Above
state averages (all grade levels)
 Above county averages in all but 2nd & 6th
 Secondary Math
ELA: Percent Proficient Trends
Areas Showing
Decline
• 5th Grade
(-5)
To Watch
Areas Showing
Growth
• 10th & 11th
Grade (-3)
• All other
grades,
especially
3rd, 6th, and
8th.
Math: Percent Proficient Trends
Areas Showing
Decline
• 2nd Grade
(-4)
To Watch
•
•
•
•
5th Grade
Algebra 1
Algebra II
HS
Summative
Areas Showing
Growth
• 3rd Grade
• General
Math
History and Social Science

History (8th, Grade 11, US History)
 Flat
over the years at ~50% proficiency
 Slight growth in 8th Grade History

Social Science (5th, 8th, 10th, Bio, Chem, ES)
 Decline
in Biology and Earth Science
 Growth in 8th Grade Science
API & AYP
Comparison
API
AYP
• Academic Performance
Index
• State Measure
• Growth Targets
• Districts/Schools must meet
API targets in subgroups as
well
• Adequate Yearly
Performance
• Federal Measure
• Uniform Targets
• Requirements:
• API Growth
• proficient + percentage
• percentage participation
• graduation rate
Because of a testing irregularity
(not in MUSD) AYP and API will not
be released until October
ASAM: Vicente & Briones

1.
2.
3.
Indicators
Credit recovery
Student Persistence
Math Achievement
2009
2010
2011
2012
(Projected)
4 Year
Change
Vicente
556
518
506
554
-2
Briones
489
628
647
635
+146
API: 4 Year Trends & Projections
2009
2010
2011
2012
(Projected)
4 Year
Change
District
808
819
832
-
+24 (3 yr)
Alhambra High School
794
815
805
813
+19
Martinez Junior High School
800
822
846
861
+61
John Muir
807
786
831
826
+19
John Swett
893
896
905
917
+24
Las Juntas
857
850
850*
835
-22
Morello Park
886
894
909
932
+46
** Projected API Scores are from Data Director and NOT official scores
Las Juntas – PI Update

2011 Testing Irregularity

Projected API could mean Year 2 PI Status is coming

Compliance Implications:
 School
Choice/Transportation
 Set aside of Title I Funding for SES
 Comprehensive Assessment + Plan for CDE
CONTEXT: AYP Targets Over Time
NUMERICALLY
SIGNIFICANT SUBGROUPS
Numerically Significant Subgroups
Hispanic or Latino
 White
 English Learners
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
 Two or More Races
 Students with Disabilities


Subgroup Comparison
Subgroup
Areas of Growth
To Watch
Areas of Decline
Economically
Disadvantaged
Students
(867 = 28%)
•2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th ELA
•4th Math
•General Math
•Algebra 1
•3rd ELA
•8th ELA
•10th ELA
•5th ELA
•6th Math
•Algebra II
Students with
Disabilities
(320 = 10%)
•4th, 8th, 10th ELA
•3rd ELA
•7th ELA
•9th ELA
•7th ELA
•6th Math
•3rd ELA
•7th ELA
•3rd Math
•2nd Math & ELA
•Algebra I
English Learners •4th, 9th, 11th ELA
(235 = 8%)
•4th Math
•General Math
Comparison by Ethnicity: ELA Percent Proficient
Grade
White
1677 (54%)
Hispanic/Latino
839 (27%)
Two or More Races
304 (10%)
2nd
75%
59%
76%
3rd
75%
63%
67%
4th
84%
80%
82%
5th
76%
74%
71%
6th
78%
54%
80%
7th
84%
53%
80%
8th
78%
56%
58%
9th
86%
63%
68%
10th
66%
44%
64%
11th
65%
43%
53%
Comparison by Ethnicity: Math Percent Proficient
Grade
White
Hispanic/ Latino
839 (27%)
Two or More Races
304 (10%)
2nd
75%
61%
78%
3rd
89%
84%
87%
4th
76%
81%
83%
5th
75%
68%
62%
6th
68%
37%
60%
7th
79%
59%
62%
General Math
60%
49%
69%
Algebra 1
49%
45%
48%
Geometry
66%
43%
47%
Algebra II
63%
53%
78%
CONCLUSIONS & NEXT STEPS
Identified for Further Analysis

2nd & 5th Grade Math, ELA
 CST

Cluster Analysis – site specific
6th Grade Math
 MJHS

has already put changes in place to address
Earth Science
 Increase

in percent proficient = bump for AHS
Subgroups: ELs, Hispanic/Latino, SED, SPED
 Evaluate
Programs (Imagine Learning, Read 180)
 CST Cluster Analysis – site specific
 Target Interventions
Consistently above
county and state
percentages in ELA and
Math
24 API point increase in
3 years. (More in 2012!)
Way to Go
MUSD!
All of our schools are
over 800 (Two are over
900 and California
Distinguished Schools)
We have an incredibly
talented, dedicated staff
committed to excellence
and high expectations.
Schools Over 800 are Different
Standards mastery & coverage is not enough!
Academic
Behaviors
Problem
Solving
Communication
Rigor &
Relevance
College & Career Readiness, Common Core State Standards, Tech Integration
With All That in Mind…Next Steps

Data Discussions at AC = model best practices
 How
do district trends look at each site?
 What’s working for some teachers?

Continued critical analysis of Programs
 Data

around usage and student achievement
Professional Development around CCSS Big Ideas
 Take
the next step
 Transition smoothly to CCSS
Questions?