Transcript Slide 1

August 20, 2003
DOL Publishes QMCSO Compliance Guide
The Department of Labor (DOL) has released a compliance guide to help employers
understand ERISA's requirements regarding qualified medical child support orders
(QMCSOs). Loosely defined, QMCSOs are judgments, decrees, or orders that require a
group health plan to provide coverage to a participant's child (referred to as “alternative
recipient”). QMCSOs usually require the plan of a child's non-custodial parent to provide
coverage to the child, even if the child fails to meet the plan’s eligibility criteria.
The new DOL guide responds to general questions regarding QMCSOs and National
Medical Support Notices (NMSNs). (NMSNs are orders issued by state agencies to
secure children’s health coverage. )
The following highlights have been drawn from the DOL compliance guide:
COBRA Rights. The DOL guide noted a question that surfaces with some frequency:
does a child who is covered by a group plan pursuant to a QMCSO have continuation
rights under the plan? The guide indicates that yes, such a child is a qualified
beneficiary with the right to elect COBRA continuation coverage as long as the plan is
subject to COBRA and the child loses coverage as a result of a COBRA qualifying event.
Employee Not Enrolled in Plan. Questions often arise about whether an order may
require an eligible, but non-covered employee to become covered under the employer’s
group health plan in order to enroll the child. The guide indicates that if a QMSCO
requires the child to be covered and the plan requires the employee to be enrolled before
a dependent can be enrolled, then yes, the employer can force the employee to become
covered as well. The guide further notes that if the employee has not yet satisfied the
plan's generally-applicable waiting period, and a bona fide QMCSO has been received by
the plan sponsor, the employer must "have procedures in place so that the child will
begin receiving benefits upon the employee's satisfaction of the waiting period." (The
rules for National Medical Support Notices include similar requirements.)
Employee Enrolled in Different Coverage Option. If a plan provides that dependents
must be enrolled in the same coverage and options as the participant, then an alternate
recipient under a QMCSO must also be enrolled in the same coverage and options as the
participant. However, if a QMCSO specifies that an alternate recipient is to receive a
particular level of coverage or option under the plan and the participant has not selected
the particular coverage or option, then the plan may be required to change the
participant's enrollment to the extent necessary to provide the specified coverage or
option to the alternate recipient.
Willis Benefits Alert is produced by Willis’ National Benefits Resource Department. The information contained in this
publication is not intended to represent legal advice and has been prepared solely for educational purposes. Please
consult your attorney regarding issues raised in this publication. Willis publications appear on the internet at:
www.focusonbenefits.com
Copyright © 2003 Willis
(Cont’d from page 1)
August 20, 2003
Selection of Coverage Options. According to the guide, if the plan offers more than one
type of coverage (e.g., HMO and fee-for-service options), the order should make clear
which option should be provided or what factors govern the choice of health care option
chosen for the child. If the order is unclear, the plan's procedures may direct the
administrator to contact the submitting party or provide other selection methods similar
to those established under the rules for National Medical Support Notices. (Those rules
allow plans to enroll alternate recipients in a "default option" if the state agency does not
select an option within a specified period of time.) If the plan has no such procedures,
the administrator may have to reject the order. (Sample language to address this aspect
of compliance is included below.)
Pre-Existing Conditions. Perhaps the most surprising answer relates to preexisting
condition exclusions (PCEs) under HIPAA. According to the guide, a plan may impose
its generally-applicable PCE provisions on alternate recipients (reducing the PCE for any
prior creditable coverage). Interestingly, the guide also states that the time taken by a
plan administrator to review an order and determine whether it is a QMCSO would not
count as “break in coverage” time under the 63-day break-in-coverage rule (which
disallows credit against the new plan’s PCE for prior creditable coverage that has been
lost for 63 days or more). It is also the DOL's view that if a child was previously covered
under a plan and was disenrolled by the parent-employee in anticipation of an event such
as a divorce or separation, then the time between the child's disenrollment and the plan
administrator's determination that an order is a QMCSO would not count as part of the
63-day break-in-coverage period.
Willis offers additional details about QMCSOs, as well as a sample employer policy, in
Chapter 7 of the Willis Compliance Manual. Please contact your Willis representative for
access to the Compliance Manual.
As described above, the following is sample language that when incorporated into a plan
sponsor’s QMCSO procedures, should help address the DOL’s “default coverage” rule:
"The Issuing Agency must select from one of the plan's available options. If the
issuing agency does not reply within 20 business days of the date this response is
returned, the child(ren), and the participant if necessary, will be enrolled in the
plan's default option of ________________."
Willis Benefits Alert is produced by Willis’ National Benefits Resource Department. The information contained in this
publication is not intended to represent legal advice and has been prepared solely for educational purposes. Please
consult your attorney regarding issues raised in this publication. Willis publications appear on the internet at:
www.focusonbenefits.com
Copyright © 2003 Willis
U.S. Benefit Office Locations
Anchorage, AK
(907) 562-2266
Detroit, MI
(248) 735-7580
Florham Park, NJ
(973) 410-1022
St. Louis, MO
(314) 721-8400
Atlanta, GA
(770) 640-2940
Eugene, OR
(541) 687-2222
Naples, FL
(239) 514-2542
San Diego, CA
(619) 297-7111
Baltimore, MD
(410) 527-1200
Ft. Worth, TX
(817) 335-2115
Nashville, TN
(615) 872-3700
San Francisco, CA
(415) 981-0600
Birmingham, AL
(205) 871-3871
Greenville, SC
(864) 232-9999
New Orleans, LA
(504) 581-6151
San Jose, CA
(408) 452-7555
Boston, MA
(617) 437-6900
Knoxville, TN
(865) 588-8101
New York, NY
(212) 344-8888
Seattle, WA
(206) 386-7400
Cary, NC
(919) 459-3000
Lexington, KY
(859) 223-1925
Philadelphia, PA
(610) 964-8700
Tampa, FL
(813) 281-2095
Charlotte, NC
(704) 376-9161
Los Angeles, CA
(818) 548-7500
Phoenix, AZ
(602) 787-6000
Washington, DC
(301) 530-5050
Chicago, IL
(312) 621-4700
Louisville, KY
(502) 499-1891
Portland, OR
(503) 224-4155
Wichita, KS
(316) 264-5311
Cleveland, OH
(216) 861-9100
Milwaukee, WI
(414) 271-9800
Raleigh, NC
(919) 459-3000
Wilmington, DE
(302) 477-9640
Columbus, OH
(614) 766-8900
Minneapolis, MN
(763) 302-7100
Rochester, NH
(603) 332-5800
Dallas, TX
(972) 385-9800
Mobile, AL
(251) 433-0441
Roswell, NM
(505) 317-3397