Transcript Slide 1
FY14 BUDGET PRESENTATION September 2013 Board of Regents Meeting Campuses of Montana State University Fiscal Year FTE Enrollment FY14 Proj FY13 Actual MSU-Bozeman MSU-Billings FY12 Actual MSU-Northern Great Falls College FY11 Actual FY10 Actual 0 2,250 4,500 6,750 9,000 11,250 13,500 15,750 18,000 20,250 2 Enrollment (FTE) Resident WUE Non-resident Total Undergraduate Graduate Gallatin College Total FY10 Actual 7,973 348 2,555 10,876 FY11 Actual 8,452 438 2,930 11,820 FY12 Actual 8,758 488 3,106 12,352 9,850 1,026 10,487 1,075 258 11,820 10,981 1,038 333 12,352 10,876 FY13 FY14 Actual Budgeted 8,799 8,952 611 668 3,532 3,642 12,942 13,263 11,541 1,037 364 12,942 • 21.9% enrollment growth overall from FY10 to FY14 (Budget) Resident enrollment growth of 12.3% (979 FTE) Nonresident/WUE enrollment growth of 48.5% (1,407 FTE) • 24.4% increase in undergraduates and steady in graduate students 11,853 1,005 405 13,263 3 Expenditures per FTE FY10 Actual FY11 Actual FY12 Actual FY13 Actuals FY14 Budgeted Growth Rate $12,826 $12,244 $12,418 $12,910 $13,427 1.2% • Enrollment growth has provided increased tuition revenues which are used to increase the number of faculty hires and class sections and to enhance our academic programs and student support services. 46 new TT/NTT faculty hires Continued investments and efforts are being made to increase Montana resident need-based aid, financial literacy, retention, degree completion and academic program enhancements Increased opportunities for professional development for faculty and staff Classroom investments (TEAL, etc.) 4 Expenditures by Program FY10 Actual 01 - Instruction $ Expenditures Percent of Total 02 - Research $ Expenditures Percent of Total 03 - Public Service $ Expenditures Percent of Total 04 - Academic Support $ Expenditures Percent of Total 05 - Student Services $ Expenditures Percent of Total 06 - Institutional Support $ Expenditures Percent of Total 07 - Plant O & M $ Expenditures Percent of Total 08 – Scholarships & Fellowships $ Expenditures Percent of Total Total $ Expenditures Percent of Total FY11 Actual FY12 Actual FY13 Budgeted FY13 Actual FY14 Budgeted $67,586,996 $68,742,184 $70,535,497 $80,802,219 $78,528,376 $85,879,375 48.5% 47.5% 46.0% 47.9% 47.0% 48.2% $1,046,911 0.8% $1,182,373 0.8% $1,399,704 0.9% $1,219,405 0.7% $1,299,080 0.8% $1,252,314 0.7% $1,321,659 0.9% $1,304,934 0.9% $1,725,069 1.1% $1,929,187 1.1% $1,922,949 1.2% $2,058,625 1.2% $17,894,116 $19,318,667 $19,159,117 $22,531,777 $21,665,655 $21,897,601 12.8% 13.3% 12.5% 13.4% 13.0% 12.3% $9,949,346 $10,423,267 $11,039,553 $12,448,762 $12,443,253 $13,175,035 7.1% 7.2% 7.2% 7.4% 7.4% 7.4% $11,374,708 $11,922,337 $11,803,264 $13,078,001 $12,216,999 $13,750,008 8.2% 8.2% 7.7% 7.8% 7.3% 7.7% $17,374,773 $17,218,184 $21,083,274 $19,163,491 $19,087,536 $19,417,877 12.5% 11.9% 13.7% 11.4% 11.4% 10.9% $12,947,408 $14,613,829 $16,641,154 $17,437,902 $19,921,281 $20,648,640 9.3% 10.1% 10.8% 10.3% 11.9% 11.6% $139,495,917 $144,725,775 $153,386,632 $168,610,744 $167,085,129 $178,079,475 5 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Faculty & Staff Ratios MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Includes Gallatin College, FY11-present Student FTE to Contract Faculty Ratio Student FTE to Contract Admin/Pro Ratio Student FTE to Classified Employee Ratio FY09 Actual FY10 Actual FY11 Actual FY12 Actual FY13 Actual FY13 Budgeted FY14 Budgeted 16.9 41.5 21.4 16.9 45.0 23.1 17.1 44.7 24.2 17.1 45.1 24.6 19.5 45.4 27.5 16.2 45.1 25.4 16.5 45.0 26.8 • Change in employee FTE calculation method for FY13 • Student to faculty ratio: Faculty hires now being made in support of enrollment growth Funding was provided to Academic Affairs in FY12 and FY13 to support tenure-track & non-tenure track faculty hires, graduate teaching assistant stipends, associated benefits costs, and program enhancements. 46 new faculty joined MSU this Fall. • Student to admin/professional/classified ratio: Increase in students served per employee Continuing to invest in technology and process changes to address staff workloads The OpenMSU website documents the roadmap and status of current projects, http://wwwdev.montana.edu/openmsu/ 6 Montana Agricultural Experiment Station Strengths • Constituent interest and support • Facilities improvements and equipment upgrades system-wide • New varieties of spring wheat and winter wheat on millions of acres • Pulse crops (peas, lentils, chickpeas) acres expanding • Implementation of improved pest management on crops and livestock • State and Federal grant successes remain good in extremely competitive environment Challenges • Faculty, staff, and administration compensation • Faculty and staff recruitment and retention (especially at rural centers) • On-going facility improvements • Field and laboratory equipment • Federal sequestration 8% reduction and uncertainties in Farm Bill FY14 Funding: ≈ $13.3M State and ≈ $2.5M Federal FY13 Funding: ≈ $12.5M State and ≈ $2.0M Federal 7 MSU Extension Service Strengths/Opportunities • • • • Our county partnership is very strong. County governments support local Extension programs. We provide service to all counties and five reservations in Montana, bringing an MSU presence to the entire state. Demographics and industries of state are changing and Extension must adapt to remain relevant and meet needs of local communities. Additional funding from Legislature allows two long vacant specialist positions to be filled and also for Local Government Center and Schutter Diagnostic Lab to continue to operate and serve Montanans. Challenges • • • • MSU Extension sustained an 8.9% sequestration reduction of $233,000 in Smith-Lever allocation for Federal 2013. Secure base funding for the Local Government Center after FY 2015. Secure base funding to fully support the operations of Schutter Diagnostic Lab. The 2013 Legislature provided partial base support. Outcome of the Farm Bill may have significant impact on Extension 8 Fire Services Training School Strengths • • • • State-wide communications Established relationships Increased firefighters skills and abilities Reduced risk to communities Challenges • • Size of the state Number & makeup of fire departments Opportunities • • • • Use of more technology Build more capacity in communities Establish more partnerships Revising curriculum, updating the resources,, and identifying training opportunities to enhance the expertise and skills of regional staff 9