Transcript Slide 1

External Examiner Induction Session
20 March 2012
Tim Hudson – Academic Services
Pam Parker – Learning Development
Centre
External Examiner Induction Session - timetable
10.00 am – Registration and refreshments
10.15 am – Welcome from the Deputy Vice-Chancellor
10.30 am – University External Examiner induction
11.30 am – Question and Answers
12.00 pm – Programme Directors arrive and start of programme
induction with Programme Directors
1.00 pm – Close of External Examiner Induction Session
External Examiner Induction Session
•
•
•
•
•
Introduction to City
The importance of External Examiners
Programme Director induction
Payment of fees and expenses
UUK review of the External Examiner system
•
•
•
•
•
•
External Examiner’s Annual Report
Consideration of Annual Reports
Assessment regulations and policies
Assessment and feedback policy
HE Academy website
Question and answer session
Introduction to City University London
City University London gained its degree awarding powers
in 1966. Now it has seven Schools:
•School of Arts
•Cass Business School
•School of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences
•School of Informatics
•School of Law
•School of Community and Health Sciences
•School of Social Sciences
Validated Institutions and Partnership Institutions
•Arts Educational Schools Ltd
•ESCP Europe Business School
•Guildhall School of Music and Drama
•Nordoff Robbins Music Therapy Centre
•Ravensbourne College of Design and Communication
•Trinity Laban Conservatoire of Music and Dance
•City and Islington College
•INTO City
•Westminster Kingsway College
Student statistics – HESA 2010/11
headcount
Total students
17,499
12,733FTE
Students in
Validated
Institutions
3, 749
3,503FTE
Full-time
12,723
87%
Part-time
4,776
13%
Type of programme undertaken by students
headcount
%
Undergraduate
9,626
55%
Postgraduate taught
7,269
42%
604
3%
Postgraduate research
Students by gender
headcount
%
Male
7,373
42%
Female
10,127
58%
Number of students by fee status
headcount
%
UK
10,832
62%
European Union
2,417
14%
Overseas not EU
4,250
24%
Number of students in each School
UG
PG
Total
444
1,061
1,505
1,420
2,108
3,528
School of Informatics
662
637
1,259
City Law School
647
761
1,408
School of Community &
Health Sciences
4,066
1,146
5,212
School of engineering &
Mathematical Sciences
1,252
953
2,205
School of Social Sciences
1,165
671
2,298
74
78
School of Arts
Cass Business School
Learning Development
Centre
The University for Business and the Professions
• HE Academy
• Broadcast Journalism Training Council
• Association of Chartered Certified Accountants
• Institute of Financial Services
• Association of MBAs
• Nursing and Midwifery Council
• College of Radiographers
• Health Professions Council
• British Computer Society
• Law Society of England and Wales
• Bar Council
• Institute of Mechanical Engineers
• British Psychological Society, etc.
QAA’s UK Quality Code for Higher Education – Chapter
B7 External Examining October 2011
There are three principles which all refer to the importance of the
role for maintaining standards and the need to ensure the role is
transparent for students.
There are then 18 indicators provided but these stress:
i whether the academic standards set for its awards are appropriate;
ii the extent to which its assessment processes are rigorous, ensure
equity of treatment for students and have been fairly conducted
within institutional regulations and guidance;
Iii where appropriate, the comparability of the standards and student
achievements with those in some other higher education
institutions;
v good practice that has been identified in learning, teaching and
assessment and opportunities to enhance learning.
Programme specific induction
•Programme and module specifications
•Programme handbook defining the aims and objectives of the
programme, the programme scheme, syllabuses, assessment
scheme and assessment regulations
•Background information on the programme and its place in the
department/school system of education in that subject
•Subject benchmark statement (where available)
•Details of any professional, regulatory or statutory body
requirements
•Previous External Examiner report and programme director’s
response
•Annual Programme Evaluation
•School Teaching and Learning Strategy
Types of External Examiner
• Programme External Examiner
• Module or subject External Examiner
• Lead or chief External Examiner
• Number and range of External Examiners:
• Workload
• Academic diversity of the programme
• FHEQ
• New External Examiner mentoring
• PSRB requirements
• Diversity of assessments particularly where there is
performance or work based learning involved.
Role of an External Examiner
•Attend award Assessment Board and approve
recommendations of the Assessment Board for
submission to Senate
•Complete an Annual External Examiner Report
•Approve the assessment compiled by the internal
examiners
•Review assessment materials
•Perform such other special duties as may be agreed
Academic Calendar
• Dates and times of Assessment Boards, with indication of
Boards at which attendance is required
• Dates and timescales for receipt and turnaround of work,
what to be received, and from whom
• Dates for visits to the University to review work, meet
students etc
School process for annual reports
What happens to them?
Academic Services receive your report within two weeks of
the Assessment Board. The report is annotated to help
the University be aware of good practice and ascertain
whether there are any common issues within Schools.
The report is then sent to the programme team who
prepare a response which is considered at the School’s
APPSC/BOS before being sent to you. Students will be
present at this meeting.
External Examiner reports are also available on the City’s
intranet for students to see.
Assessment Regulations and Policies
The University has a set of policies and regulations that cover all
programmes and provide additional guidance
These have been regularly reviewed
In the main all programmes adhere to these however there is a
mechanism of being able to gain an exception where required for
professional reasons
The Assessment and Feedback Policy document provides guidance for
aspects such as developing assessment, marking and moderating,
responsibilities and academic misconduct, extenuating circumstances
and appeals
Submission of student work
• Many schools now use on line submission but we still have
some physical submission of coursework and some
performance aspects such practice assessments
• The University does have turnitin however there is no standard
policy for use at present.
• There is a University Assessment Working Group which is
currently looking at how student appeals and extenuating
circumstances claims are managed. This is with a view to
ensuring fairness to all students and the proper maintenance
of academic standards.
Marking and Moderation
• The University has moved to a policy of first marking and
moderation in many departments although there is some
second marking.
• Second marking is mostly still on assessments such as
dissertations and portfolios
• In relation to feedback there has been a lot of
development of this over the last few years but one of the
key areas is reducing the time from submission to
feedback now 3 weeks
Assessment and Feedback Policy
This policy was revised and approved in June 2010. The
policy covers additional guidance for assessment such as:
•Assessment criteria and grade related criteria
•More advice on marking and moderating
•Advice on Assessment Boards
•Advice on Feedback
Useful Websites
The Higher Education Academy have an area on their
website just for external examining.
http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/external-examining
QAA website
http://www.qaa.ac.uk/Publications/InformationAndGuidance
/Pages/Quality-Code-Chp-B7-External-examining.aspx
Any Questions?