Transcript Document

CALS 8/22/13
Shane Burgess, Vice Provost & Dean
1
Recent history
2
Budget Cut and Remove Deficit
CALS Data for FY13 Budget Reduction (perm budget data as of 7/1/12)
1. CALS was in deficit and any money gained in retirements/other departures went straight
back to provost office.
2. Then we had to make the cut.
3. Credit given to units (optimized by all funds budgeting for key areas).
4. But CALS still needed to cut $115,552 and this was distributed to those units that had
not contributed by RIF.
Total Effective
Rate of Perm Cut
Total Acad. units:
Total Exp. stations:
Total county CES units:
Total other units:
CALS TOTAL
9.49%
6.73%
5.72%
3.73%
8.69%
Total Effective
Rate of Temp Cut
10.30%
9.20%
7.65%
5.01%
10.47%
But no single unit had to take 8.69% cash out of its budget.
3
FY
12
13
CALS central
57%
52%
Units
43%
48%
FY
12
13
CALS central $1,013,302 $542,374
Units $779,698 $492,626
4
“…2012 was just foreshadowing the difficult financial future that
public colleges will continue to face”.
“….the data over all put public colleges on a path to economic
oblivion”.
“…political pressure to limit tuition increases and little
expectation for big improvements in state spending mean that
public colleges will have to continue to cut costs for the
foreseeable future…”
5
Today
6
CALS perm base budget
$75,000,000
$70,000,000
$65,000,000
$60,000,000
Adjusted for
inflation
Effect of salary increase
$55,000,000
$50,000,000
$45,000,000
$40,000,000
$35,000,000
Absolute
Despite the additional money provided
in pay rises we are now -$39, 126
in spending power compared with FY13
$30,000,000
89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
7
Total T/C-track FTE
270
260
# 250
240
230
220
210
86% of peak (FY08)
State base on salary FY00-FY14
$30,000,000
Research
$25,000,000
$20,000,000
$15,000,000
Extension
80% of peak (FY09)
Teaching
81% of peak (FY09)
88% of peak (FY09)
$10,000,000
$5,000,000
$0
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
O7
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
FY
8
State Permanent Base dollars
$60,000,000
$50,000,000
$40,000,000
$30,000,000
$20,000,000
$10,000,000
$0
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 O7 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
3,500
Total Undergraduate Students
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 O7 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
9
#s T/C track faculty and Appointed Professionals
300
No.
250
200
150
100
50
0
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 O7 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
FY
10
College-level permanent salary dollars projections
$1,000,000
At Jan 2012
At June 30 2013
$500,000
$0
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
-$500,000
-$1,000,000
-$1,500,000
11
7/1/2013 Projections for CALS college-level permanent salary dollars
12
FY14 Hiring
13
FY14: $431,309 prior salary commitments
USGS match SPFI
Schlinger
Foundation
match
ACBS
SWES
Entomology
SNRE
Environment
Initiative
14
FY14-17: $823,259 prior salary commitments
ACBS
ENTO
SWES
FCS
SNRE
Nutritional Sci
Plant Sci
15
FY14 Hires IN ADDITION to those already
committed
Initial Salary requests from Unit Heads after
working with ADs = $1.6 M
Amount of salary available = $340K
Most CRITICAL or EXCEPTIONAL
16
College-level temporary commitments
17
7/1/2013 Projections for CALS college-level temporary/operating dollars
1. The majority of temporary commitments are now in
faculty start-up costs.
2. We cannot go negative; the money has to come from
somewhere within the greater college.
18
Distribution of Temporary Commitments
faculty/other
appointed salaries
21.30%
Startup
37.71%
operations/travel/
capital investments
19.78%
staff
7.74%
graduate
students
undergrad 12.39%
students
1.08%
19
UA Strategic Planning and plan
implementation how this affects us.
• Assigning metrics (Phase IV)
• Tracking achievement (Phase V)
20
21
22
23
Strategic Planning Phase IV
24
25
CALS’ TARGETS TO HELP UA MEET ABOR METRICS: SEE CALS STRATEGIC PLAN PAGE 6
26
% of CALS Undergraduate Majors enrolled
35%
FCS
30%
ACBS
25%
NS
20%
15%
10%
AREC
SWES
SNRE
5%
ABE
ENTO AGED
PLANT SCI
0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
% of Total Perm Instruction Base Funding
25%
27
% FY13 Research (all sponsored)
expenditures (excluding IDC)
25%
SNRE
20%
PS
15%
FCS
NS
SWES
10%
5%
ACBS
ENTO
AGED
AREC
5%
ABE
10%
15%
20%
25%
% of Total Perm Research Base Funding
28
• Efficiency, effectiveness, innovation
• Business centers
• Quarterly Budget Models.
29
RCM2
………will work for us if we are doing the right things well.
I’ve lived through some terrible things in my life, some of
which actually happened. Mark Twain
30