發展藝術諮詢委員會

Download Report

Transcript 發展藝術諮詢委員會

Advisory Committee on
Arts Development
New Funding
Scheme
Arts and Sport
Development Fund



An injection of $1.5 billion into the arts
portion of Arts and Sport Development
Fund (ASDF)
Annual investment returns of around
$60M to provide sustainable resources
for long-term arts development
$30M - Hong Kong Arts Development
Council
$30M – New Funding Scheme
Advisory Committee on
Arts Development



Established in November 2010
Advise the Government on matters
pertaining to arts development in Hong
Kong, covering performing arts, visual
arts and other art forms
Other areas of work cover Arts
Development Fund, arts education and
funding for performing arts
New Funding Scheme


Initiative to establish a new funding
scheme with matching grants elements to
fill the gaps of existing public funding
sources
Support the development of the
performing arts, visual arts and other art
forms except Cantonese opera (which is
supported by Cantonese Opera
Development Fund)
Visions of the Scheme


To cultivate a supportive culture for the arts
in the community, garner public and
corporate support and foster tripartite
partnership among the government, arts
groups and the private sector to promote
arts and cultural development in Hong Kong
To nurture local budding artists, enlarge the
pool of local arts talent and enhance the
artistic milieu in the community by
supporting promising small to medium arts
groups with a strategic and long-term
funding arrangement
Arts Capacity
Development Fund (tentative)

4 Major Objectives
Contents
Development
Audience
Building
ACDF
Capacity Building
Arts
Education
Contents Development
Examples




Innovative and impactful new
works/exhibitions/festivals
Brand building of established
works/exhibitions/festivals
Serial /developmental programmes
Programmes/exhibitions for overseas
marketing
Audience Building
Examples



Building new audience base
(in addition to schools and community)
Use of creative marketing by means of
new media such as social networks on
the Internet
Partnership with commercial
corporations in marketing and publicity
Arts Education
Examples


Development of teaching kits or
information kits for parents for
appreciation of major art forms or
successful art works/exhibitions
Teachers’ training
(e.g. art appreciation and criticism)
Capacity Building
Examples



Professional advancement
Training of creative marketing personnel,
professional producers,
agents/impresarios for overseas
marketing, fundraisers, technical staff,
middle management
Artist-in-residence programme
Categories of Grants

Springboard Grants (for non-profit making arts
groups)
 More than a dollar-to-dollar match for income
over a threshold for overall institutional
development of an arts group for 2-4 years

Submission of comprehensive plans on

Programmes and activities

Manpower resources

Marketing and fundraising
during supported period to achieve marked
improvements over past capability and
performance
Categories of Grants

Project Grants (for non-profit making
activities)
 Budget over $2M
dollar-to-dollar
matching grant




Budget below $2M
grants
matching/direct
Matching grants awarded on dollar-todollar basis
Priority for applications for matching
grants
Projects may last more than one year
Eligibility of applicant




Individual arts practitioners*
Specially formed ensembles of
professional arts practitioners*
Arts groups not receiving recurrent
subvention
Arts management companies*
(*for project grants to organize nonprofit-making activities)
Application in 2011/12
Two rounds of application


1st round –
April to June
June to July
August
Application
Processing
Announcement
2nd round –
Oct to Nov
Nov to Dec
Jan (2012)
Application
Processing
Announcement
No Double Subsidy


Project grantees are not allowed to
accept funding support from other
public funding sources for the same
projects but non-cash support is allowed
(e.g. venue booking, publicity)
Springboard Grantees may have to opt
out from other public funding sources
which offer them cash support
Venue and Other Support


Grantees should not assume
automatic support from other
organizations such as LCSD for venue
booking, publicity support, etc.
Contingency should be planned and
indicated in the application
Income to be Matched
All cash income generated from funded
activities by CDF, including but not
limited to:
 commercial sponsorship
 private donation
(sponsorship and/or donation in kind can
be accepted but not accounted for
matching)
Disbursement of Funds


Disbursement by installments
Matching grants to be disbursed
upon evidence of income
obtained
Assessment Criteria

Assessment criteria
 Artistic merit
 Creativity and originality
 Impact on arts sector and
community
 Technical feasibility
 Financial viability
 Track record and execution ability
of applicants and participating arts
practitioners
Expert Advisers

A pool of expert advisers,
expandable on ad hoc basis for
individual applications, to assist
in assessing the artistic merit,
creativity, originality and impact
of the proposed projects and
applicants
Assessment Mechanism &
Grant Approval



ACAD Sub-committee on Capacity
Development Fund to make overall
assessment of applications
Sub-committee to recommend to
ACAD the order of priority of grantees
and conditions for disbursement, if
applicable
ACAD will make proposal to the
Government for funding approval and
arrangement
Evaluation Mechanism




Project delivery reports and audited
financial reports for all grantees
Performance to be measured against
qualitative and quantitative indicators
Applicants are welcomed to propose
additional performance indicators
(both qualitative and quantitative) to
enhance evaluation
Interim reports will be required for
Springboard Grantees and Project
Grantees for projects of longer time
frame and larger scale
Under Performance


Grantees must bear the consequences
of under performance and may not
receive the grant in full
“Break” clause may apply if projects
cannot be completed or deliver as
pledged