Slide 1

Transcript Slide 1

Improving the interface between home, hospital and aged care

Professor Helen Bartlett Australasian Centre on Ageing The University of Queensland Presentation to the 2006 Healthcare Providers Conference,11-13 September 2006 Christchurch, New Zealand

Outline

1. What are the current challenges facing the aged care sector in Australia?

2. What are the issues at the home, hospital and aged care interface?

3. How should the system respond?

4. What lessons do recent pilot projects and innovations offer for future models? 5. What is the evidence base to inform future directions?

Changing structure of the Australian Population

Source: Productivity Commission 2005

Demographic shifts in the Australian population

Source: ABS, Population Projections 2004-2101 (Cat 3222.0)

The drivers for change

• Increasing numbers of older people with high dependency levels • Rising cost of aged care: $8.3 billion in 2003/4 to $30.6 billion in 2022/23 – dementia greatest cost • Shift towards home care over past decade – formal plus informal care costs less then institutional care • Shortage of skilled workforce • Decrease in availability of women to provide informal care • Fragmentation of services - access issues, duplication of assessment, unmet need • Changing needs and expectations of older people – greater choice, control, individuality, remaining in own home

Policy context: “Achieving World Class Care”

“For the oldest Australians with multiple complications and co morbidities, models of care will be required at the local level to ensure quality, integrated care ” “If community care and step-down care, including rehabilitation, were built into an interrelated care system, then following hospitalisation some older people might only need to access high level care on a short term rather permanent basis”.

“Better resourcing and linking of existing care health services such as hospital based geriatric medicine and rehabilitation services, community care services and GP services would be another way of integrating care for older people with chronic conditions who wish to remain in the community”.

“Reform options should look at how existing systems and programs might be better organised or differently funded to support integration of care …at the local level as well as state and national levels”.

Ref: National Strategy for an Ageing Australia (2002)

• • • • • • •

Policy context

‘Ageing in Place’ - policy goal since mid-1980s Community Care – A Discussion Paper (2003) A New Strategy for Community Care: The Way Forward (Commonwealth DoHA, 2004) Australian Local Government Population Ageing Action Plan 2004-2008 Hogan Review (May 2004) AHMAC Care of Older Australian Working Group: From Hospital to Home (July 2004) Aged Care Amendment (Transition Care and Assets Testing) Bill 2005

Aged Care Services in Australia 2005 Residential Care Community Care Low Care 50 130 High Care 101 780 Respite Care 48 295 Extended Aged Care at Home 1125 Community Aged Care Package 28 899 Home and Community Care 537 000 Veterans Home Care – 61600 veterans received a service Multipurpose Services - 2093 RAC places & 447 CACPs were available at June 2004

Use of aged care services by the oldest old, Australia 2003-04

Source: Australia’s Welfare 2005, AIHW

Trends in provision

• hospital beds decreased between 1985-2001; • residential care places increased in number, but relative to population decreased.

• Increase in community care investment, but high care places decreased, low care remained the same. • Community care aged packages increased • % of older people in hospital the same as 10 years ago • Length of stay decreased in very old, not changing in young

Why is the hospital / home interface important in aged care?

Exploring the acute- aged care interface New Pop 70+ (male,female) 70+ in the Community (nil, informal care, formal care HACC CACP EACH, on PRAC Entry List, on Hospital Wait List) Die Overnight Admits 70+ in overnight Hospital (acute, sub-and non acute care) Die Return to Community (nil or assistance) Return to PRAC Hospital ACAT Assessment PRAC to overnight Hospital 70+ in overnight Hospital awaiting Permanent Residential Aged Care (high,low) Die PRAC Entry 70+ in Permanent Residential Aged Care (high, high in low, low) Die

(diagram courtesy Geoff McDonnell, Adaptive Care Systems & Len Gray)

Issues at the interface

• • • • • • • • • • Poor coordination and lack of integration at service provider and government levels People waiting for permanent care – approx 2,000 waiting in hospital beds for RAC Pressure to make transitions from hospital to residential care Expected to recover more quickly than reasonable Some hospital admissions are unavoidable RAC admission may be premature Poor access to hospitals from residential aged care Access blocked to hospital for frail older people Access to rehabilitation and sub-acute care poor Role of rehab, convalescent and sub-acute care and links with acute care needs strengthening

Some Australian initiatives

Coordinated Care Trials

First round • 9 trials in 6 states and Territories funded, including 4 trials among ATSI involving 6600 • 10967 intervention and 5571 control participants • Ran from 1997-1999 • Intervention varied by trial based on different models of care coordination, care planning and funds pooling Second round • 6 trials (3 general, 3 Aboriginal community) • Started in late 2002 for 3 years.

Coordinated Care Trials: success or failure?

RESULTS • mixed success in implementing key strategies • Stakeholders did not fully endorse the trial's key goals and strategies • general practitioners were unable to become effective purchasers • increased gatekeeping was never fully realised • cost-saving strategies were not taken up • improvements in continuity of care were impeded by limited provider networks and GP reluctance to collaborate with other providers CONCLUSIONS • uncovered need and patients liked them • not operationalised • use of market mechanisms insufficient for motivating behaviour change

Hospital in the Home (HITH)

• Provision of hospital care in own home • Remain as inpatients under care of treating hospital doctor • Seen by nurse or doctor at least once a day • May have access to staff at nights and weekends • Receive the same treatment as in hospital • May be all or part of treatment • Voluntary • No additional charges • Started in Victoria in 1994 as pilot project

Total HITH patient days for private & public hospitals and as % of total hospital days

NSW 325,544 (4.2%) Vic 14,328 (0.23%) Qld 12,977 (0.28%) WA 44,499 (2.16%) Source: Aust Hosp Stats 2004-2005, AIHW

Benefits of HITH

 Patients prefer home based treatment than hospital  Better management of hospital resources  Cheaper than hospital care in many cases

Future directions

National Action Plan for Older People

1. Older people have access to an appropriate level of health and aged care services 2. Services are shaped around their diverse needs 3. Admissions to hospital or residential care are prevented where avoidable 4. Access to transition care services within acute-aged care continuum 5. Integrated suite of services across acute-aged care continuum 6. Skilled responsive, sufficient workforce 7. Informal and family carers well equipped to provide support and care

Ref: AHMAC 2004

Key initiatives proposed

• Emergency room interventions to target older people • Strengthening discharge planning and post-acute care • Strengthening community care and respite services • Data linkage to include acute, sub-acute, aged care and community care datasets – e.g. WA • National minimum datasets • Best Practice Assessment Guide for the Care of Older People in Health Services Settings • Care pathways for stroke and delirium • Extended ACAT model and link with general practice

Ref: AHMAC 2004

Models for the hospital/home interface

Wide range of potential ‘hospital outreach’ programs proposed to fully integrate hospitals with other elements of the health system: • GP emergency clinics for older patients • Hospital based ambulatory are unit connecting patients to full range of community heath/wellness services • Post acute care services outside hospital • Hospital in the home or residential care • Rapid outreach programs Ref: National Care Alliance May 2006

Transition Care in the Australian Context

“short term support and active management for older people at the interface of the acute/sub-acute and residential aged care sectors…the program also includes transition care provided in a community based setting…”

Australian Department of Health and Ageing 2005 Australian Government Transition Care Program

The

Definitional confusion

      intermediate care step-down care convalescent rehabilitation interim care transitional care

The Transition Care Program

         2,000 new transition care places over 3 years for people who have been in hospital Federal and State/Territory Government partnership Focus on recovery & maintaining function & facilitating long-term care arrangements Smooth transition from acute/sub-acute services to aged care services - RAC or community Assessment by Aged Care Assessment Team (ACAT) 8-12 week program Interdisciplinary input (nursing, therapy, medical, personal) coordinated by care manager Delivered in residential aged care or community setting Funded to enable flexible packages of services during transition

The Australian evidence on Transition care

• Post-acute transition care program in Victoria reduced subsequent utilisation of hospital beds (Lim 2003) • Nursing home-based interim care service in SA reduced length of stay in referring acute hospital (Crotty 2005) • Home Rehab Support services in SA (ATA HRSS) reduced admission to long-term care (Kroemer et al 2004)

The evidence gap

• Uncertainty about the impact of transition style programs • No formal costing analysis • Limited evidence about clinical outcomes • Little insight into satisfaction and quality of life from client’s and carer’s perspective • Impact of social factors on transition to residential care not known

Is transitional care the answer?

“…as a long term goal the need for transitional beds should remain modest. If there are adequate places in residential aged care facilities and enough community support packages, coupled with good rehabilitation and post acute services in the community or in residential aged care facilities, there should not be a large number of transitional care places”.

Ref: National Aged Care Alliance (May 2006)

AHMAC and Beyond – A Strategic Framework for Health Care for Older People

Lessons from intermediate care in UK

Many success factors, e.g. reduction in hospital bed usage BUT: • Diversity of schemes managed at local level • Led to confusion and fragmentation • Duplication of effort • Reduced cost-effectiveness • No decrease in hospital bed admissions • Weak primary care engagement • Limited evaluation of personal outcomes for patents and carers • Patients with cognitive impairment excluded

Ref: Joseph Rowntree Foundation 2003

Integration of transition services?

Source: Howe et al, 2002

Expanding the evidence base

Transition Care: Innovation and Excellence

NHMRC Health Services Program Grant: 2006-2011 - University of Sydney (Cameron) - Flinders University (Crotty) - University of Qld (Grey, Bartlett)

Objectives of Transition Care Research Program

1. Evaluate the impact of transition care and service integration models on older people and their carers, as well as the use of resources and costs of the services in three states 2. Evaluate the implementation and operation of transition care and service integration models by determining conditions that would assist/inhibit implementation from the viewpoint of older people, their carers and formal caregivers 3. Develop and validate quality, cost and continuity of service indicators for transition care and service integration models in different settings

• Stage 1 : development of a classification of models of transition care - review of literature - Mapping programs in each state and demand/unmet need - cost analysis - journey mapping: client/patient outcomes, perceptions and experiences • Stage 2 : Evaluation of models of transition care • Stage 3 : Changing policy and practice