Transcript Slajd 1 - Wydział Prawa, Administracji i Ekonomii

Good administration
in European administrative law
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Institute of Administrative Studies
University of Wrocław
Good administration in European administrative law
Good administration in European administrative law is both:

a general principle (comprising legal and not-legal rules) and

a fundamental right (a public subjective right of fundamental nature)
That is why good administration is described as:
•
a notion with a double status
an umbrella notion (a general principle of good administration being the umbrella
principle, and a right to good administration being the umbrella right)
• an indeterminate notion
• an open-ended notion
• a framework concept and so on.
•
H.C.H. Hofmann, G.C. Rowe, A. H. Turk in Administrative Law and Policy of the EU explain good
administration as „a framework concept drawing together a range of rights, rules, and principles
guiding administrative procedures with the aim of:
• ensuring procedural justice,
• public administration adherence to the rule of law, and
• sound outcomes from administrative procedures”.
They justly stress that the principles of good administration have developed in close connection
with:
 the precept of procedural justice and
 the principle of the rule of law.
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
The notion of good administration can be linked
to certain other concepts including:
•
sound administration
•
proper administration
•
good administrative behaviour
•
good administrative practice(s)
•
good governance
•
good public governance
•
good public management
•
administrative efficiency
•
administrative effectiveness
•
administrative efficacy
•
administrative economy
•
(administrative) fairness
•
(good) administrative service
•
administrative culture of service
•
open, accountable and service-minded administration
•
open, efficient and independent (European) administration
•
open, accessible and properly run administration
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers Resolution (77) 31 on the protection
of the individual in relation to the acts of administrative authorities (adopted on 28 September 1977)
The following principles apply to the protection of persons, whether physical or legal, in administrative procedures
with regard to any individual measures or decisions which are taken in the exercise of public authority and which are
of such nature as directly to affect their rights, liberties or interests (administrative acts).
In the implementation of these principles the requirements of good and efficient administration, as well as the
interests of third parties and major public interests should be duly taken into account. Where these requirements
make it necessary to modify or exclude one or more of these principles, either in particular cases or in specific areas
of public administration, every endeavour should nevertheless be made, in conformity with the fundamental aims of
this resolution, to achieve the highest possible degree of fairness.
Right to be heard
1. In respect of any administrative act of such nature as is likely to affect adversely his rights, liberties or interests,
the person concerned may put forward facts and arguments and, in appropriate cases, call evidence which will be
taken into account by the administrative authority.
2. In appropriate cases the person concerned is informed, in due time and in a manner appropriate to the case, of
the rights stated in the preceding paragraph.
Access to information
At his request, the person concerned is informed, before an administrative act is taken, by appropriate means, of all
available factors relevant to the taking of that act.
Assistance and representation
The person concerned may be assisted or represented in the administrative procedure.
Statement of reasons
Where an administrative act is of such nature as adversely to affect his rights, liberties or interests, the person
concerned is informed of the reasons on which it is based. This is done either by stating the reasons in the act, or by
communicating them, at his request, to the person concerned in writing within a reasonable time.
Indication of remedies
Where an administrative act which is given in written form adversely affects the rights, liberties or interests of the
person concerned, it indicates the normal remedies against it, as well as the time-limits for their utilisation.
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
The Council of Europe has continued to issue principles
related to good administration. See e.g.:
Recommendation No. R (80) 2 concerning the exercise of
discretionary powers by administrative authorities

Recommendation No. R (87) 16 on administrative procedures
affecting a large number of persons

Recommendation No. R (2000) 10 on codes of conduct for public
officials


Recommendation No. R (2007) 7 on good administration
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
Recommendation CM/Rec(2007)7 of the Committee of Ministers
to member stateson good administration (adopted on 20 June 2007)
The Committee of Ministers […] Having regard to Recommendation 1615 (2003) of the Parliamentary
Assembly, which calls on the Committee of Ministers to draft a model text for a basic individual right
to good administration and a single, comprehensive, consolidated model code of good
administration, based in particular on Committee of Ministers’ Recommendation No. R (80) 2 and
Resolution (77) 31 and the European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour (2001), in order to
define the basic right to good administration, and therefore facilitate its effective implementation in
practice; […] Considering that […]
cases of maladministration, whether as a result of official inaction, delays in taking action or taking
action in breach of official obligations, must be subject to sanctions through appropriate procedures,
which may include judicial procedures;
 good administration must be ensured by the quality of legislation, which must be appropriate and
consistent, clear, easily understood and accessible;
 good administration implies that services must meet the basic needs of society;
 good administration in many situations involves striking an appropriate balance between the rights
and interests of those directly affected by state action on the one hand, and the protection of the
interests of the community at large, in particular those of the weak or vulnerable, on the other, and
recognising that procedures intended to protect the interests of individuals in their relations with the
state should in certain circumstances protect the interests of others or the wider community;
 good administration is an aspect of good governance; that it is not just concerned with legal
arrangements; that it depends on the quality of organisation and management; that it must meet the
requirements of effectiveness, efficiency and relevance to the needs of society; that it must maintain,
uphold and safeguard public property and other public interests; that it must comply with budgetary
requirements; and that it must preclude all forms of corruption;

dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
good administration is dependent on adequate human resources available to the public authorities
and on the qualities and appropriate training of public officials;
 the administration exercises its prerogative of public power to carry out the tasks required of it;
that these powers might however, if used in an inappropriate or excessive manner, infringe the rights
of private persons;
 it is desirable to combine the various recognised rights with regard to the public authorities into a
right to good administration and to clarify its content, following the example of the Charter of
Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2000);
 the requirements of a right to good administration may be reinforced by a general legal
instrument; that these requirements stem from the fundamental principles of the rule of law, such as
those of lawfulness, equality, impartiality, proportionality, legal certainty, taking action within a
reasonable time limit, participation, respect for privacy and transparency; and that they provide for
procedures to protect the rights and interests of private persons, inform them and enable them to
participate in the adoption of administrative decisions.

Recommends that the governments of member states:
– promote good administration within the framework of the principles of the rule of law and
democracy
– promote good administration through the organisation and functioning of public authorities
ensuring efficiency, effectiveness and value for money
[…]
– promote the right to good administration in the interests of all, by adopting, as appropriate, the
standards set out in the model code appended to this recommendation, assuring their effective
implementation by the officials of member states and doing whatever may be permissible within the
constitutional and legal structure of the state to ensure that regional and local governments adopt
the same standards
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
CM/Rec(2007)7 Principles of good administration
Art 2 – Principle of lawfulness
Art 3 – Principle of equality
Art 4 – Principle of impartiality (In 1999 the OECD Public Management
Committee launched a survey on managing ethics in the public service in all
OECD countries. Impartiality/neutrality/objectivity was the most frequently
stated core public service value in the OECD countries)
Art 5 – Principle of proportionality (comment: the principle of proportionality is
one of the most useful tools to control administrative decisions and especially
administrative discretion)
Art 6 – Principle of legal certainty
Art 7 – Principle of taking action within a reasonable time limit
Art 8 – Principle of participation
Art 9 – Principle of respect for privacy
Art 10 – Principle of transparency
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
2005:4
Principles of Good Administration
in the Member States of the European Union
Case Law of the European Court of Justice (ECJ)
and European Court of First Instance (ECFI)
The European Courts have stressed the importance of procedural guarantees as a
counterweight to administrative discretion. ECJ has further recognised an array of
general administrative principles, e.g.:
•
the general principle of administration through law
the principle of non-discrimination (comment: the principle of non-discrimination is
based on the assumption of equal value of all human beings, which is a corner stone
in most legal systems)
• the principle of proportionality
• the principle of legal certainty
• the protection of legitimate expectations
• the right to a hearing before an adverse decision is taken by a public authority
•
The obligation to provide reasons for decisions is laid down in the Treaty as Art 253 (ex Art 190): „Regulations,
directives and decisions (…) shall state the reasons on which they are based and shall refer to any proposals or
opinions which were required to be obtained pursuant to this Treaty” (today Art 296 TFUE – JS). The ECJ and the
ECFI have developed this article into a fundamental right for individuals thus creating an unwritten administrative
law through its case law. Such reasoning of ECJ and ECFI might be interpreted as an evolution away from a
French-inspired administration-centered tradition towards a more individual-oriented view of community
administrative procedures.
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CFR)
proclaimed by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on 7 December 2000
(initially without binding legal force, but today – through Art 6(1) TEU – the CFR has got the same
status as the Treaties and therefore good administration under its Art 41 took on a double status of a
fundamental right and a general principle of EU law; Art 41 draws the boundaries of good
administration as a public subjective right).
Article 41 Right to good administration
1. Every person has the right to have his or her affairs handled impartially, fairly and within a
reasonable time by the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union.
2. This right includes*
(a) the right of every person to be heard, before any individual measure which would affect him or
her adversely is taken;
(b) the right of every person to have access to his or her file, while respecting the legitimate
interests of confidentiality and of professional and business secrecy;
(c) the obligation of the administration to give reasons for its decisions.
3. Every person has the right to have the Union make good any damage caused by its institutions or
by its servants in the performance of their duties, in accordance with the general principles common
to the laws of the Member States.
4. Every person may write to the institutions of the Union in one of the languages of the Treaties and
must have an answer in the same language.
Nota bene the above aspects of the right to good administration can be find in the following provisions of TFEU: Art
24(4), Art 108(2), Art 296(2), and Art 340.
* Rights and obligations are enumerated in non-exhaustive manner; in other words, good administration in Art 41 is
a general category under which may be subsumed a whole set of subjective rights intended to limit arbitrary
administrative conduct in the Union. In other words, a category of rights rather than as a right in its own.
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
Differences between
the right to good administration and
the principle of good administration under the CFR
 The Court of First Instance in Case T-193/04 Tillack v Commission [2006] ECR II-3995 held that:
[T]he principle of sound administration, which is the only principle alleged to have been
breached in this context, does not, in itself, confer rights upon individuals (Case T-196/99
Area Cova and Others v Council and Commission [2001] ECR II-3597, paragraph 43), except
where it constitutes the expression of specific rights such as the right to have affairs
handled impartially, fairly and within a reasonable time, the right to be heard, the right to have
access to files, or the obligation to give reasons for decisions, for the purposes of Article 41 of the
Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union, proclaimed on 7 December 2000 in Nice (OJ
2000 C 364, p. 1), which is not the case here, para 127.
 The other difference relates to the limits of the protection offered. Article 41 is applicable
only to activity of the EU’s institutions, bodies, offices and agencies. This is an exception
to the specification of the general field of application in Article 51(1) CFR, according to which the
provision of the CFR are also addressed to the Member states when ‘implementing Union law’.
Therefore the European courts referring to good administration as a general principle of EU law
enable these principles to be invoked also against Member States when acting ‘within the sphere of
Community law’ (Case C-260/89 ERT v DEP [1991] ECR I-2925) and esp. in line with Lisrestal case
law in the area of cooperative administration (Case T-450/93 Lisrestal and others v Commission
[1994] ECR II-1177).
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL SIR GORDON SLYNN
DELIVERED ON 27 OCTOBER 1983
in Case 64/82 TRADAX v COMMISSION [1984] ECR 1385-6
[Nor do I consider, as is submitted, that there is any generalized principle of law that what is
required by good administration will necessarily amount to a legally enforceable rule. To keep
an efficient filing system may be an essential part of good administration but is not a legally
enforceable rule. Legal rules and good administration may overlap (e.g. in the need to
ensure fair play and proportionality); the requirements of the latter may be a factor in
the elucidation of the former. The two are not necessarily synonymous. Indeed,
sometimes when courts urge that something should be done as a matter of good
administration, they do it because there is no precise legal rule which a litigant
can enforce].
This opinion has been corroborated by Courts, for example, when they consider that
regrettable conduct is liable to breach the principle of good administration but does not vitiate
the legality of a decision (ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd vs Commission [2002] II-1881, para.
104) or that rules directed at ensuring good administration do not necessarily constitute
procedural guarantees on which individuals can rely (Aseprofar and Edifa vs Commission
[2005] ECR II-3449, para. 56).
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
Draft Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
Brussels 11 October 2000 Note from the Praesidium
Text of the explanations relating to the complete text of the Charter. These explanations have been
prepared at the instigation of the Praesidium. They have no legal value and are simply intended to
clarify the provisions of the Charter.
Explanation
Article 41 is based on the existence of a Community subject to the rule of law whose
characteristics were developed in the case law which enshrined inter alia the principle
of good administration [...].
Cologne European Council 3-4 June 1999
Conclusions of the Presidency Annex IV – European Council Decision on the Drawing Up of A Charter of Fundamental
Rights of the European Union
Protection of fundamental rights is a founding principle of the Union and an indispensable prerequisite for her
legitimacy. The obligation of the Union to respect fundamental rights has been confirmed and defined by the
jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice. There appears to be a need, at the present stage of the Union's
development, to establish a Charter of fundamental rights in order to make their overriding importance and relevance
more visible to the Union's citizens. […]
In the view of the European Council, a draft of such a Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union should
be elaborated by a body composed of representatives of the Heads of State and Government and of the President of
the Commission as well as of members of the European Parliament and national parliaments. Representatives of the
European Court of Justice should participate as observers. Representatives of the Economic and Social Committee,
the Committee of the Regions and social groups as well as experts should be invited to give their views. Secretariat
services should be provided by the General Secretariat of the Council. This body should present a draft document in
advance of the European Council in December 2000. […]
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
EXPLANATIONS RELATING TO THE CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OJ 2007/C 303/02
These explanations were originally prepared under the authority of the Praesidium of the Convention which drafted
the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. They have been updated under the responsibility of the
Praesidium of the European Convention, in the light of the drafting adjustments made to the text of the Charter by
that Convention (notably to Articles 51 and 52) and of further developments of Union law. Although they do not as
such have the status of law, they are a valuable tool of interpretation intended to clarify the provisions of the Charter.
Explanation on Article 41 — Right to good administration
Article 41 is based on the existence of the Union as subject to the rule of law whose characteristics were developed
in the case-law which enshrined inter alia good administration as a general principle of law (see inter alia Court of
Justice judgment of 31 March 1992 in Case C-255/90 P Burban [1992] ECR I-2253, and Court of First Instance
judgments of 18 September 1995 in Case T-167/94 Nölle [1995] ECR II-2589, and 9 July 1999 in Case T-231/97 New
Europe Consulting and others [1999] ECR II-2403). The wording for that right in the first two paragraphs results from
the case-law (Court of Justice judgment of 15 October 1987 in Case 222/86 Heylens [1987] ECR 4097, paragraph 15
of the grounds, judgment of 18 October 1989 in Case 374/87 Orkem [1989] ECR 3283, judgment of 21 November
1991 in Case C-269/90 TU München [1991] ECR I-5469, and Court of First Instance judgments of 6 December 1994
in Case T-450/93 Lisrestal [1994] ECR II-1177, 18 September 1995 in Case T-167/94 Nölle [1995] ECR II-2589) and
the wording regarding the obligation to give reasons comes from Article 296 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the
European Union (cf. also the legal base in Article 298 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union for the
adoption of legislation in the interest of an open, efficient and independent European administration).
Paragraph 3 reproduces the right now guaranteed by Article 340 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European
Union. Paragraph 4 reproduces the right now guaranteed by Article 20(2)(d) and Article 25 of the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union. In accordance with Article 52(2) of the Charter, those rights are to be applied
under the conditions and within the limits defined by the Treaties.
The right to an effective remedy, which is an important aspect of this question, is guaranteed in Article 47 of this
Charter.
Comment: Good administration can therefore be seen as the administrative law equivalent to the
constitutional notion of the ‘Community of law’ concept proclaimed by the ECJ in Case 294/83 Les Verts
v Parliament [1986] ECR 1339.
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
The European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour
Proposed by European Ombudsman and approved by the European Parliament
on 6 September 2001
The Ombudsman: the code is intended to explain in more detail what the Charter’s
right to good administration should mean in practice.
While claiming to explicate the content of the right to good administration, the code
displays rather an eclectic set of rules and as a result three different layers of good
administration can be identified in the code’s 27 articles:
 It includes a codification of general principles of European administrative law
(legality, non-discrimination, proportionality, absence of abuse of power, respect for
legitimate expectation, transparency).
 It restates procedural and substantive rights and duties which result from European
law. Some of these are fundamental rights enshrined in the CFR (data protection, the
right to complain to the European Ombudsman), some correspond to the rights listed
in Art 41 of the CFR, others correspond roughly to long-standing primary rules of
European law (notification of decisions).
 It embraces rules of administrative practice which are directed by the idea of
providing a good service to the public and in principle don’t form judicially enforceable
rights or rules (the duty to advise the public on handling of cases, to act courteously, to
acknowledge the receipt of letter or complaint and provide an information on who is
dealing with the matter, to transfer a file to competent services, to indicate the
possibility of appeal and so on).
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
The European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour
Article 4 Lawfulness
The official shall act according to law and apply the rules and procedures laid down in
EU legislation. The official shall in particular take care to ensure that decisions which
affect the rights or interests of individuals have a basis in law and that their content
complies with the law.
[Nb. the principle of lawfulness is also given expression by the requirements pursuant to Arts 5 to
9 of the Code].
Emphasis of the principle of lawfulness of administrative activity recalls
that the principle of good administration emanates from the rule of law.
The rule of law entails:
 the submission of official action to the rules and procedures laid down in EU
legislation
 the requirement of having a legal basis for action, esp. for decisions which affect
the rights or interests of individuals
This approach reflects the dual approach in the legal systems of several Member States. E.g. in
Poland Article 7 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland reads: The organs of public
authority shall function on the basis of, and within the limits of, the law. In German constitutional
and administrative law these two aspects of the rule of law are emphasized as the requirement of
having a legal basis for an action by the administration (Vorbehalt des Gesetzes) and the
requirement of acting according to law (Vorrang des Gesetzes).
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
2005:4
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
Principles of Good Administration
in the Member States of the European Union
2005:4
 The following rights and obligations are, as all part of Art 41 and Art. 42 in the Charter of
Fundamental Rights of the Union and should naturally be seen as a central part of the concept of
good administration.
• to have ones affairs handled impartially and fairly and within a reasonable time (Art 41.1)
• to be heard before any individual measure is taken that would affect the citizen adversely (Art
41.2)
• to have access to his or her file, regarding any individual measure that would affect him or her
(Art 41.2)
• the obligation to state reasons in writing for all decisions (Art 41.2)
• the right of access to documents (Art 42).
 The following substantive principles are part of the European Code of Good Administrative
Behaviour. The following substantive principles were considered minimum substantial requirements
for establishing a good administration.
• lawfulness (Art 4)
• non-discrimination (Art 5)
• proportionality (Art 6).
 The following
Behaviour.
• the obligation to
• the obligation to
• the obligation to
• the obligation to
• the obligation to
obligations are further part of the European Code of Good Administrative
be service-minded (Art 12)
give an indication of remedies available to all persons concerned (Art 19)
notify all persons concerned of a decision (Art 20)
keep registers (Art 24)
document administrative processes (Art 24).
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
2005:4
Principles of Good Administration
in the Member States of the European Union
Conclusions
A core set of principles on good administration is widely accepted among
the Member States of the European Union. The following principles
of good administration are embraced by a majority of them:
1. The principles of lawfulness, non-discrimination and proportionality.
2. The right to have ones affairs handled impartially and fairly and within a reasonable
time.
3. The right to be heard before any individual measure is taken that would affect the
citizen adversely.
4. The right to have access to his or her file, regarding any individual measure that
would affect him or her.
5. The right of access to documents.
6. The obligation to state reasons in writing for all decisions.
7. The obligation to give an indication of remedies available to all persons concerned.
8. The obligation to notify all persons concerned of a decision.
9. The obligation to be service-minded.
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
2005:4
Principles of Good Administration
in the Member States of the European Union
The interpretation of the principles of good administration
will vary between four European traditions of administrative law
The development of administrative law has always been deeply influenced by European history, culture and
constitutional contexts and it is important to keep in mind that the subject of this survey, principles and rules of
good administration will look different depending on the Member State in question. From the literature, we can
infer at least four traditions of administrative law in Europe.




The administration-centered tradition views administrative law as a tool for governments to run
an efficient administration. As such, it is designed for the construction of efficient administration
and implementation of policies.
The individual-centered tradition tends to treat administrative law as an instrument for
controlling government and protect individuals from infringements of their rights. It views
administrative law as the rules that keeps the government within its legitimate boundaries and
thus regulates the relationship between the State and the Citizens.
The legislator-centered tradition relies on the legislator to design administrative procedures,
often in the form of a very detailed administrative procedure act, or in some cases in the form
of constitutional provisions. This represents the German ethos of the Rechtsstaat where the
administration is viewed as a mere executant of the law.
The ombudsman-centered tradition is representative of the Scandinavian countries.
Characteristic of this more pragmatic tradition is that an independent person, who is often
appointed by the parliament, works outside of the executive in order to identify, investigate and
recommend solutions to cases of maladministration. In those cases where an Ombudsman has
emerged as the primary means of redress for citizens who have suffered injury by the
administration, the development of a strong litigation culture has often not taken place.
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
Other codes intending to steer administrative behaviour
and give effect to the principle of good administration
 Code of Good Administrative Behaviour for staff of the European
Commission in Their Relations with the Public.
 Guide to the Obligations of Officials and other Servants of the
European Parliament.
 Public service principles that should guide EU civil servants (framed
by the European Ombudsman in 2012)
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
European Parliament resolution of 15 January 2013 with recommendations
to the Commission on a Law of Administrative Procedure of the European Union
The European Parliament,
– having regard to Art 225 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– having regard to Art 298 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– having regard to Art 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which
provides that the right to good administration is a fundamental right,
[…]
– having regard to the Council of Europe's Recommendation CM/Rec(2007)7 of the Committee of
Ministers to member states on good administration, dated 20 June 2007,
– having regard to the 'Public service principles for the EU civil service' published by the European
Ombudsman on 19 June 2012,
– having regard to the survey commissioned by the Swedish Government from the Swedish Agency
for Public Management on the principles of good administration in the Member States of the
European Union
1. Requests the Commission to submit, on the basis of Art 298 of the Treaty on the Functioning of
the European Union, a proposal for a regulation on a European Law of Administrative Procedure,
following the detailed recommendations set out in the Annex hereto;
2. Confirms that the recommendations respect fundamental rights and the principle of subsidiarity;
3. Considers that the requested proposal does not have financial implications;
4. Instructs its President to forward this resolution and the accompanying detailed recommendations
to the Commission and the Council, to the European Ombudsman and to the parliaments and
governments of the Member States.
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
Recommendation 1
on the objective and scope of the regulation to be adopted
The objective of the regulation should be to guarantee the right to good
administration by means of an open, efficient and independent administration
based on a European Law of Administrative Procedure.
The regulation should apply to the Union's institutions, bodies, offices and
agencies (‘the Union's administration’) in their relations with the public. Its
scope should therefore be limited to direct administration.
It should codify the fundamental principles of good administration and should
regulate the procedure to be followed by the Union's administration when
handling individual cases to which a natural or legal person is a party, and
other situations where an individual has direct or personal contact with the
Union's administration.
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
Recommendation 3
on the general principles which should govern the administration
The regulation should codify the following principles:
– principle of lawfulness
– principle of non-discrimination and equal treatment
– principle of proportionality
– principle of impartiality
–
principle of consistency and legitimate expectations (The Union's
administration shall be consistent in its own behaviour and shall follow its normal
administrative practice, which shall be made public. In the event that there are
legitimate grounds for departing from such normal administrative practice in individual
cases, a valid statement of reasons should be given for such departure. Legitimate and
reasonable expectations that persons might have in the light of the way in which the
Union's administration has acted in the past shall be respected).
– principle of respect for privacy
– principle of fairness
– principle of transparency
– principle of efficiency and service
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
Austria's Constitution of 1920
Reinstated in 1945 with Amendments through 2009
Article 18, subsection 1:
The entire public administration
shall be based on law.
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
The Constitution of Finland
11 June 1999
Section 21 - Protection under the law
Everyone has the right to have his or her case dealt with appropriately and
without undue delay by a legally competent court of law or other authority,
as well as to have a decision pertaining to his or her rights or obligations
reviewed by a court of law or other independent organ for the administration
of justice.
Provisions concerning the publicity of proceedings, the right to be heard, the
right to receive a reasoned decision and the right of appeal, as well as the
other guarantees of a fair trial and good governance shall be laid down by
an Act.
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
Spanish Constitution
PASSED BY THE CORTES GENERALES IN PLENARY MEETINGS OF THE CONGRESS OF DEPUTIES AND
THE SENATE HELD ONOCTOBER 31, 1978
RATIFIED BY REFERENDUM OF THE SPANISH PEOPLE ON DECEMBER 7, 1978
SANCTIONED BY HIS MAJESTY THE KING BEFORE THE CORTES GENERALES ON DECEMBER 27, 1978
Section 105
The law shall make provision for:
a) The hearing of citizens, directly, or through the organizations and
associations recognised by the law, in the process of drawing up the
administrative provisions which affect them.
b) The access of citizens to administrative files and records, except to the
extent that they may concern the security and defence of the State, the
investigation of crimes and the privacy of persons.
c) The procedures for the taking of administrative action, with due
safeguards for the hearing of interested parties when appropriate.
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
Administrative Procedure Act
in Latvia
Adopted 25 October 2001
Section 6
Principle of Equality
In matters where there are identical factual and legal circumstances,
institutions and courts shall adopt identical decisions (in matters where there
are different factual or legal circumstances – different decisions) irrespective
of the gender, age, race, skin colour, language, religious beliefs, political or
other views, social origin, nationality, education, social and financial status,
type of occupation or other circumstances of participants in the
administrative proceedings.
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
Maladministration
The European Ombudsman’s definition of maladministration in his
1997 Annual Report:
[M]aladministration occurs when a public body fails to act in
accordance with a rule or principle which is binding upon it.
Article 228 TFUE
A European Ombudsman […] shall be empowered to receive complaints from any
citizen of the Union or any natural or legal person residing or having its registered
office in a Member State concerning instances of maladministration in the activities of
the Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies, with the exception of the Court of
Justice of the European Union acting in its judicial role. […]
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat
Good administration in European administrative law
An official is a citizen in the service of people.
Estonian Public Service Code of Ethics
(the annex to Public Service Act
passed on 25 January 1995)
dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat