Financial Statement Analysis: A Valuation Approach

Download Report

Transcript Financial Statement Analysis: A Valuation Approach

The Analysis of
Financial Statements
Ratios are tools and their value is limited when used
alone. The more tools used, the better the analysis.
For example, you can’t use the same golf club for every
shot and expect to be a good golfer. The more you
practice with each club, however, the better able you will
be to gauge which club to use on one shot. So to, we
need to be skilled with the financial tools we use.
- Diane Morrison
- CEO, R.E.C. Inc.
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-1
Objectives of Analysis
Objectives will vary depending on the
perspective of the financial statement user
specific questions that are addressed
by the analysis
Remember--the identity of the user helps
define what information is needed
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-2
Creditors
A creditor is ultimately concerned with
the ability of an existing or
prospective borrower to make
interest and principal payments on
borrowed funds
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-3
Creditors
(cont.)
Questions raised in a credit analysis
should include:



What is the borrowing cause?
What is the firm’s capital structure?
What will be the source of debt
repayment?
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-4
Investors
An investor attempts to arrive at an
estimation of a company’s future
earnings stream in order to attach a
value to the securities being
considered for purchase or liquidation
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-5
Investors
(cont.)
The investment analyst poses questions as:




How has the firm performed/what are
future expectations?
How much risk is inherent in the
existing capital structure?
What are expected returns?
What is firm’s competitive position?
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-6
Management
Looks to financial statement data to
determine:




How well the firm has performed and why?
What operating areas have contributed to
success and which have not?
What are strengths/weaknesses of company’s
financial position?
What changes should be implemented to
improve future performance?
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-7
Caution!!!



Keep in mind: Management PREPARES
financial statements
Analyst should be alert to potential for
management to influence reporting to
make data more “appealing”
May want to supplement analysis with
other sources of information apart from
the Annual Report prepared by
management
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-8
Sources of Information
The analyst will want to consider
the following resources:
Proxy Statement
Auditor’s Report
MD&A
Supplementary schedules
Form 10-K and Form 10-Q
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-9
Other Sources of Information

Computerized data bases




Info on industry norms/ratios
Info on particular companies/industries
Ever-expanding financial and
investment websites
Articles in popular/business press
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-10
Tools and Techniques
These include:
Common-size financial statements
Financial ratios
Trend analysis
Structural analysis
Industry comparisons
Most important:
Common sense and judgment
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-11
Common-Size
Financial Statements
Express each account on the
 balance sheet as a percentage of
total assets
 income statement as a percentage
of net sales
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-12
Key Financial Ratios
Standardize financial data in terms of
mathematical relationships
expressed in the form of
Percentages
Times
Days
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-13
Key Financial Ratios





(cont.)
Liquidity (Short-term liquidity)
Activity
Leverage (Long-term solvency)
Profitability
Market
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-14
Key Financial Ratios
(cont.)
Five Categories of key financial ratios:
1. Liquidity Ratios
Measure a firm’s ability to meet cash
needs as they arise
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-15
Key Financial Ratios
(cont.)
Five Categories of key financial ratios:
2. Activity Ratios
Measure the liquidity of specific assets
and the efficiency of managing
assets
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-16
Key Financial Ratios
(cont.)
Five Categories of key financial ratios:
3. Leverage Ratios (Long-term
solvency)
Measure the extent of a firm’s financing
with debt relative to equity and its
ability to cover interest and other
fixed charges
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-17
Key Financial Ratios (cont.)
Five Categories of key financial ratios:
4. Profitability Ratios
Measure the overall performance of a
firm and its efficiency in managing
assets, liabilities and equity
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-18
Cautions!
Ratios are valuable analytical tools and
serve as screening devices, BUT. . .

They do not provide answers in and of
themselves


They are not predictive

Ratios should be used with other elements of
financial analysis
There are no “rules of thumb” that apply to the
interpretation of ratios
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-19
Liquidity Ratios:
Short-Term Solvency
Current Ratio
Measures ability to meet short-term
cash needs
Current assets
Current liabilities
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-20
Liquidity Ratios:
Short-Term Solvency
(cont.)
Quick or Acid-Test Ratio
Measures ability to meet short-term cash needs
more rigorously by eliminating inventory
Current assets - Inventory
Current liabilities
(Cash+short-term investments + A/R)
current liabilities
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-21
Liquidity Ratios:
Short-Term Solvency
(cont.)
Cash Flow Liquidity Ratio
Focuses on ability of the firm to
generate operating cash flows as a
source of liquidity
Cash + Marketable securities + CFO *
Current liabilities
*Cash flow from operating activities
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-22
Liquidity Ratios
A. Cam
Short term liquidity
Current Ratio
Quick Ratio
Cash Flow Liquidity
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
2006
1,18
0,52
0,55
2005
1,43
0,68
1,21
2004
2,04
0,86
1,61
2003
1,65
0,40
0,92
5-23
Activity Ratios: Asset Liquidity,
Asset Management Efficiency
Accounts Receivable Turnover
Another measure of efficiency of firm’s
collection and credit policies
Credit sales, net
Averagetradereceivables, net
365
receivable turnover
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-24
Activity Ratios: Asset Liquidity,
Asset Management Efficiency (cont.)
Inventory Turnover
Another measure of firm’s efficiency in
managing its inventory
Cost of goods sold
average inventories
365
inventoryturnover
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-25
Activity Ratios: Asset Liquidity,
Asset Management Efficiency (cont.)
Payables Turnover
Another way to gain insight into a firm’s
pattern of payment to suppliers
COGS   in inventorie
s
Averagetradepayables
365
payableturnover
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-26
Cash Conversion Cycle or
Net Trade Cycle
The normal cycle of a firm that consists of:



Buying or manufacturing inventory,
with some purchases on credit
Selling inventory, with some sales
on credit
Collecting the cash
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-27
Cash Conversion Cycle or
Net Trade Cycle (cont.)
Helps the analyst understand why cash
flow generation has improved or
deteriorated by analyzing:
Key balance sheet accounts that affect
cash flow from operating activities
 Accounts Receivable
 Inventory
 Accounts Payable
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-28
Cash Conversion Cycle or
Net Trade Cycle (cont.)
Calculated as follows:
Average collection period
Plus
Days inventory held
Minus
Days payable outstanding
Equals
Cash conversion or net trade cycle
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-29
Activity Ratios: Asset Liquidity,
Asset Management Efficiency (cont.)
Fixed Asset Turnover
Assesses effectiveness in generating sales
from investments in fixed assets
Net sales
Net property, plant, equipment
(Average)
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-30
Activity Ratios: Asset Liquidity,
Asset Management Efficiency (cont.)
Total Asset Turnover
Assesses effectiveness in generating sales
from investments in all assets
Net sales
Total assets
(Average)
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-31
Activity Ratios- Summary
Receivable Turnover
Inventory Turnover
Payable Turnover
Fixed Asset Turnover
Total Asset Turnover
Net Sales/Average Trade Receivables
COGS/Average Inventories
Purchases/Average Trade Payables
Net Sales/Average PP&E
Net Sales/Average Total Assets
Average collection period
Average days in inventory
Avergae payment period
365/receivable turnover
365/inverntory turnover
365/payable turnover
Net Trade Period
collection period +
days in inventory -
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-32
Activity Ratios- Summary
Activity Ratios
Receivable Turnover
Inventory Turnover
Payable Turnover
PPE Turnover
Asset Turnover
2006
10,67
4,98
14,21
0,96
0,60
2005
11,40
6,08
13,90
0,91
0,58
2004
15,55
6,57
25,24
0,98
0,63
Collection Period
Days in inventory
Payment period
34,21
73,33
25,68
32,00
59,99
26,26
23,47
55,52
14,46
Cash cycle
81,86
65,74
64,54
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-33
Leverage Ratios:
Debt Financing and Coverage
Debt Ratio
Considers the proportion of all assets
that are financed with debt
Total liabilities
Total assets
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-34
Leverage Ratios:
Debt Financing and Coverage
(cont.)
Long-term Debt to Total Capitalization
Reveals the extent to which long-term
debt is used for the firm’s
permanent financing (both longterm debt and equity)
Long–term debt
Long-term debt + Stockholders’ equity
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-35
Leverage Ratios:
Debt Financing and Coverage
(cont.)
Debt to Equity
Measures the riskiness of the firm’s
capital structure in terms of the
relationship between the funds
supplied by creditors (debt) and
investors (equity)
Total liabilities
Stockholders’ equity
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-36
Leverage Ratios:
Debt Financing and Coverage
(cont.)
Times Interest Earned
Indicates how well operating earnings
cover fixed interest expenses
Operating profit
Interest expense
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-37
Leverage Ratios:
Debt Financing and Coverage
(cont.)
Cash Interest Coverage
Measures how many times interest
payments can be covered by cash
flow from operations before interest
and taxes
CFO + interest paid + taxes paid
Interest paid
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-38
Leverage Ratios:
Debt Financing and Coverage
(cont.)
Fixed Charge Coverage
Broader measure of how well operating
earnings cover fixed charges
Operating profit + Rent expense
Interest expense + Rent expense
*Rent expense = operating lease payments
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-39
Leverage Ratios:
Debt Financing and Coverage
(cont.)
Cash Flow Adequacy
Measures firm’s ability to cover capital
expenditures, long-term debt
payments and dividends each year
Cash flow from operating activities
Capital expenditures + debt repayments
+ dividends paid
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-40
Leverage Ratios: Debt Financing and
Coverage Summary
Solvency Ratios
Debt Ratio
LT Debt to Capital
Debt to equity
Times interest earned
Cash interest coverage
Long-term Liquidity
Debt ratio
L/T Debt to Capitalization
debt to equity
Times interest earned
Cash Interest earned
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
Total liabilities/Total assets
Total liabilities/Total equity
Oper. Income/Interest expense
CFO + interest paid + tax paid)/Interest paid
2006
0,43
0,29
0,83
3,84
2005
0,38
0,26
0,67
11,57
2004
0,29
0,19
0,43
8,63
5-41
Profitability Ratios:
Overall Efficiency and Performance
Gross Profit Margin
Measures ability to translate sales into
profit after consideration of cost of
products sold
Gross profit
Net sales
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-42
Profitability Ratios:
Overall Efficiency and Performance (cont.)
Operating Profit Margin
Measures ability to translate sales into
profit after consideration of
operating expenses
Operating profit
Net sales
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-43
Profitability Ratios:
Overall Efficiency and Performance (cont.)
Net Profit Margin
Measures ability to translate sales into
profit after consideration of all
expenses and revenues, including
interest, taxes and nonoperating
items
Net earnings
Net sales
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-44
Profitability Ratios:
Overall Efficiency and Performance (cont.)
Cash Flow Margin
Measures ability to translate sales into
cash (with which to pay bills!)
Cash flow from operating activities
Net sales
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-45
Profitability Ratios:
Overall Efficiency and Performance (cont.)
Return on Total Assets (ROA) or Return
on Investment (ROI)
Measures overall efficiency of firm in
managing investment in assets and
generating profits
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
Net earnings
Total assets
(Average)
5-46
Relating the Ratios
—The Du Pont System
Is helpful to complete the evaluation of
a firm by considering the
interrelationship among the
individual ratios
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-47
Relating the Ratios
—The Du Pont System
(cont.)
The Du Pont System helps the analyst
see how the firm’s decisions and
activities over the course of an
accounting period interact to
produce an overall return to the
firm’s shareholders, the return on
equity
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-48
Relating the Ratios
—The Du Pont System
(cont.)
The summary ratios used are the following:
(1)
Net profit margin
(2)
Total asset turnover
Net income
Net sales
Net sales
X
Total assets
(3)
Return on investment
(4)
Financial leverage
Net income
Total assets
Total assets
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
(3)
Return on investment
Net income
=
Total assets
(5)
Return on equity
Net income
X Stockholder equity = Stockholder equity
5-49
Profitability Ratios:
Overall Efficiency and Performance (cont.)
Return on Equity (ROE)
Measures rate of return on stockholders’
investment
Net earnings
Stockholders’ equity
(Average)
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-50
Profitability Ratios:
Overall Efficiency and Performance (cont.)
Cash Return on Assets


Measures firm’s ability to generate cash
from the utilization of its assets
Useful comparison to ROA
Cash flow from operating activities
Total assets
(Average)
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-51
Profitability Ratios-Summary
Profitability Ratios
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Profit Margin
Return on Assets
Return on Equity
Cash Return on Assets
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
Gross profit/Sales revenue
Operating Income/Sales revenue
Net Income/Sales Revenue
Net income/Average total assets
Net income/Average total equity
CFO/Average total assets
5-52
Profitability Ratios-Summary
Profitability
Gross margin %
Operating Margin
Net Profit Margin
ROA =
ROE =
Cash Return on Assets
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
2006
27,14%
10,99%
5,45%
3,25%
5,99%
7,19%
A. Cam
2005
27,80%
15,78%
9,98%
5,76%
9,37%
16,58%
2004
30,83%
18,61%
12,61%
7,94%
11,96%
14,80%
5-53
Market Ratios
Four market ratios of particular interest
to the investor are
1.
2.
3.
4.
Earnings per common share
Price-to-earnings
Dividend payout
Dividend yield
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-54
Market Ratios
(cont.)
Earnings per Common Share
Provides the investor with a common
denominator to gauge investment
returns
Net earnings
Average shares outstanding
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-55
Market Ratios
(cont.)
Price-to-Earnings
Relates earnings per common share to the
market price at which the stock trades,
expressing the “multiple” that the stock
market places on a firm’s earnings
Market price of common stock
Earnings per share
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-56
Market Ratios
(cont.)
Dividend Payout
Determined by the formula cash
dividends per share divided by
earnings per share
Dividends per share
Earnings per share
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-57
Market Ratios
(cont.)
Dividend Yield
Shows the relationship between cash
dividends and market price
Dividends per share
Market price of common stock
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-58
Market Ratios
Market Ratios
Price earnings ratio
price to book value
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
2006
46,67
1,34
A. Cam
2005
2004
16,93
11,16
1,49
1,28
5-59
Five Steps of a Financial
Statement Analysis
Step 1
Establish objectives of the analysis



Who are you and why are you interested
in this company?
What questions would you like to have
answered?
What info is vital to the decision at hand?
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-60
Five Steps of a Financial
Statement Analysis (cont.)
Step 2
Study the industry in which the firm
operates and relate industry climate
to current and projected economic
developments
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-61
Five Steps of a Financial
Statement Analysis (cont.)
Step 3
Develop knowledge of the firm and
the quality of management
 How well does this firm appear to be run?
 Are they taking advantage of
opportunities?

Are they innovative, forward-looking, etc?
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-62
Five Steps of a Financial
Statement Analysis (cont.)
Step 4
Evaluate financial statements–tools include:
 Common-size financial statements
 Key financial ratios
 Trend analysis
 Structural analysis
 Comparison with industry competitors
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-63
Five Steps of a Financial
Statement Analysis (cont.)
Step 4
Evaluate financial statements–areas include:
 Short-term liquidity
 Operating efficiency
 Capital structure and long-term solvency
 Profitability
 Market ratios
 Segmental analysis (when relevant)
 Quality of financial reporting
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-64
Five Steps of a Financial
Statement Analysis (cont.)
Step 5
Summarize findings based on analysis

Reach conclusions about the firm
relevant to your established
objectives
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-65
What we have accomplished
Turned Maze
Statement of Cash Flows
Balance Sheet
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
MD&A
Income Statement
Notes
Auditor’s Report
Statement of Shareholders’ Equity
5-66
Financial Statements
An Overview
Map
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.
5-67