Dehumanizing the Lowest of the Low: Neuroimaging Responses
Download
Report
Transcript Dehumanizing the Lowest of the Low: Neuroimaging Responses
DEHUMANIZING
THE LOWEST OF THE LOW:
NEUROIMAGING RESPONSES
TO EXTREME OUT-GROUPS
Lasana T. Harris and Susan T. Fiske
Princeton University, 2006
Introduction - Prejudice
Allport (1954), father of prejudice research
Antipathy based on a perceived social category
Not as “black and white” as like/dislike – different
types of prejudice
Extreme forms of prejudice may deny their targets full
humanity
Stereotype Content Model (SCM)
Predicts differentiated prejudices
1.
2.
Friend-foe judgment (warmth)
Capability judgment (competence)
Societal groups:
intend either help or harm, are either capable or
incapable of enacting these intentions
Stereotype Content Model (SCM)
4 combinations of the dimensions 4 emotions towards social
groups
1. Pride
2. Envy
3. Pity
4. Disgust
Not all groups provoke animosity
Competent + warm = middle-class, pride and admiration
Competent + not warm = rich people, envy and jealousy
Warm + incompetent = elderly people, pity and sympathy
Stereotype Content Model (SCM)
Low warmth + low competence = most extreme outgroups, disgust and contempt
Based on perceived moral violations and subsequent
negative outcomes these groups allegedly cause
themselves
Dislike and disrespect
Extreme discrimination:
Excluding
out-groups from full humanity
The Medial Prefrontal Cortex (mPFC)
fMRI data:
mPFC differentially activated in social compared to
nonsocial cognition
especially when required to make social judgments
about people
“Social groups falling into the low-warmth/lowcompetence quadrant of the SCM might not
significantly activate the mPFC”
Participants
22 Princeton University undergraduates, for course credit
Right-handed
Reported no abnormal neurological condition, head trauma, brain lesions
Normal or corrected vision
Mean age across the two studies: 19.5 years
12 participants were women
6 were ethnic minorities
Method
Participants shown images of
Different social groups (Study 1, 10 subjects)
Different objects (Study 2, 12 subjects)
Assessed each picture
which of the four SCM emotions best described how the
image made them feel
Once inside the scanner, once outside
Blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal changes
recorded
The Images
Study 1
48 colour photographs of eight different social groups
Study 2
Eight images of objects, each shown three times each
Each study had six filler neutral images
Each picture depicted one of the four SCM quadrants
254 undergraduate students had pretested 80 images:
“How much of the following emotions does this picture make you feel?” on a
5-point scale
ANOVA, t-tests – only pictures with reliable effects selected
Results – Study 1
Support for the dehumanization hypothesis
Participants identified the predicted emotions for
the pictures of the social groups
Outside scanner: low-low rated higher on disgust
Results – Study 1
Significant mPFC activity for pride, envy, pity
No activity above significant threshold for disgust
Results – Study 1
Did find that there was activation in the left insula
and the right amygdala
Insula – disgust
Amygdala - fear
Results – Study 2
No mPFC activity above baseline for disgustinducing objects
Small yet significant mPFC activation for objects
inducing envy
Pride, envy, pity: social emotions felt during
presence (implied or actual) of a person
Participants
reported envy towards an object only if
the presence of a person was implied (stack of money)
Discussion
Used to investigate and reduce “hate crimes, prisoner abuse”
Clear to read
Focus on previous research and the introduction
Almost no discussion
Specific examples of extreme out-groups
What eight social groups shown – which ones elicited disgust
Significance of testing inside and outside the scanner
Discussion
Rating of photos to standardize
Done by Princeton students as well: more likely to have similar opinions
as their peers – no random sampling for study or standardization
Objects induced people’s emotions when they weren’t meant to
In study 2, the pictures were repeated three times, to be
consistent: have 48 pictures as well
Amygdala and insula mentioned only in passing – study that
further to see if combined that is what they imply or if its
only when they are separate
Aspects that make people feel this way – living conditions,
inability to relate
What manipulations/changes could make people not feel this
way