Transcript Document

IDNs in Norway
wwTLD-meeting
26.03.2003
Hilde Thunem
What is happening in Norway?


Two main areas : Technical (how do we make IDNs work?)
and policy (rules for IDNs)
Technical:


We will be following the IETF standard
Policy:

A proposal is currently out for public comment by the
Norwegian Internet community
2
Policy: Internationalization has its costs


DNS: IETF standard handles all non a-z characters equally
Technical consequences outside DNS




Billing systems
Whois
Customer databases
Administrative consequences


User support both at the registry and at the registrar
ADRP – must handle all scripts that are allowed under the
TLD
3
Policy: Internationalization has its costs

Legal consequences
 A larger namespace – new opportunities for domain name pirates
 Characters that look the same




ВЕНЕМОТН [Cyrillic]
BEHEMOTH [Latin, Helvetica]
BEHEMOTH [Latin, Times, italics, red]
Final important point:
 IDNs will be used locally, for the local users of a language. Users
without the relevant characters on the keyboard will probably hesitate
to enter a IDN given them on a business card. Domain name holders
that want to reach a global community will therefore probably still
use a-z domains
4
Policy proposal on limiting the characters
under .no

Only characters in written languages that has official status as Norwegian languages
 The letters a-z, numbers 0-9 and  The special Norwegian characters æøå
 In addition:



Bokmål and nynorsk (Norwegian language council)
• à, ç, è, é, ê, ñ, ò, ó, ô, ü, ä
Sámi (Sámi council)
• Northern Sámi: á, č, đ, ŋ, š, ŧ, ž
• Southern Sámi: none
• Lule Sámi: á and ń
Personal names (The Norwegian register of names)
• ä, é, è, ô, ö and ü

Whether to use language variant tables will be considered after the Local Internet
community has given its input on which languages that will be allowed
5
Transition mechanism

Three choices:

The big bang


Draw lots


Open at a given time, first come first served
Accept applications over a period, and then randomly determine
the order they are treated in
Give special rights to some

Based on prior trademark rights, prior domain name
registrations etc.
6
Policy proposal on transition for .no: Draw
lots



Equal chances for everyone
No special rights for holders of prior registrations. Today’s policy explicitly
states that registering a domain name does not give the holder any new
rights that he did not already have
Procedural strengths:




The registry may return wrong applications, and if there is still time the registrar can
correct them and send them in again before the drawing commences
Duplicate applications are eliminated, so that applicants need not go to lots of different
registrars and fill up their capacity
More robust for temporary technical problems at the registry or registrars
It worked once… (at the liberalization of .no)
7
More information

Norid’s proposal:




www.norid.no/regelverk/forslag/idn-2003/
Only in Norwegian, but English translation coming soon at
www.norid.no/regelverk/forslag/idn-2003/index.en.html
[email protected]
www.norid.no/
8