www.3gpp.org

Download Report

Transcript www.3gpp.org

The 3GPP Seminar
All you always wanted to know about 3GPP …
but were too afraid to ask.
© 3GPP 2009
th February 2009
MobileThe
3GPP
World
Training
Congress,
Course
Barcelona,
/ Module19
12a
1
The 3GPP Seminar
Module n
Hints for Getting Results
- a guide for chairmen
© 3GPP 2009
th February 2009
MobileThe
3GPP
World
Training
Congress,
Course
Barcelona,
/ Module19
12a
2
3GPP Working Methods are Tools
Choosing the right tool for the job is the Chairman’s Task
© 3GPP 2009
th February 2009
MobileThe
3GPP
World
Training
Congress,
Course
Barcelona,
/ Module19
12a
3
Picking the Right Tools for the Job
Starting Work
Priorities
Coordination
Getting Agreement
Finishing Work
© 3GPP 2009
th February 2009
MobileThe
3GPP
World
Training
Congress,
Course
Barcelona,
/ Module19
12a
4
Starting Work
Start it as a WID
•
•
•
•
Feature/BB/WID
WG/TSG Wide/3GPP Wide
Scope can change over time
Can include TR work
Start it as a SID
• Good when a solution isn’t clear
• Brainstorming often done in xx.8xx series specification
Do it as TEI
• Only when resolved in a single meeting and single CR
Do it first and ask for permission later
• Not recommended, but happens
The Workplan is a tracking tool not a work approval tool
• Should be aligned with WIDs/SIDs at Feature/BB level
© 3GPP 2009
th February 2009
MobileThe
3GPP
World
Training
Congress,
Course
Barcelona,
/ Module19
12a
5
Work priorities
3GPP is contribution driven
Priorities may be decided on WG or TSG level
• TSGs can coordinate work across groups
• SA can make across 3GPP prioritization
The completion date in the WID or SID
• Date is typically a “sunny day” estimate
• Chairman’s job is to try and make estimates as realistic as possible
• Don’t spend too much time on completion date – Ultimate outcome depends
on when then work completes
Meeting Time Allocation
•
•
•
•
Encourage offline discussion
Ah-Hocs or meetings with restricted scope
Subworking groups
Agenda allocation
Allocating to a release
• Should not be discussed at WG level (TSG level discussion)
• Early implementation mechanism defined in 3GPP (rarely used)
• Release independent mechanism not defined in 3GPP (often used)
© 3GPP 2009
th February 2009
MobileThe
3GPP
World
Training
Congress,
Course
Barcelona,
/ Module19
12a
6
Coordination
Coordination between 3GPP groups
•
•
•
•
•
•
Company (Individual coordination)
Status reports
Chair tasked with coordinating with the group
Liaision statements
Colocated meetings
Joint meetings <- Most joint meetings are not formally joint meetings
Coordination with groups outside 3GPP
•
•
•
•
•
Company (Individual coordination)
Chair tasked with coordinating with the group
Liaision statements
Colocated meetings
Joint meetings <- Usually not possible
ITU coordination is special
• Conflict with National Positions toward ITU
• Special coordination groups for ITU-T and ITU-R
• If to become part of an ITU deliverable then needs to go to PCG
© 3GPP 2009
th February 2009
MobileThe
3GPP
World
Training
Congress,
Course
Barcelona,
/ Module19
12a
7
Formal vs Informal Agreement
Informal Tools
• Consensus in the meeting
• Consensus on email
• Chair’s edict
Formal Tools
• Vote
• Working Agreement
© 3GPP 2009
th February 2009
MobileThe
3GPP
World
Training
Congress,
Course
Barcelona,
/ Module19
12a
8
Consensus Building Tools
Coffee break/offline sessions
• Appoint a coordinator that you can rely on to be fair
• Ensure the scope of the offline discussions are clear
• Ensure people know who to contact for inclusion
Postponement until later in the meeting
• A bit like offline sessions, but less organized (usually if companies aren’t objecting but
request more time)
Indicative Show of Hands
• If asked then “by company”* – companies generally vote by IM
• Questions don’t need to be as formal as voting questions
Discussion until Exhaustion
• Late sessions on a topic
• Generally leads to bad agreements as “fuzzy” agreements can be reached
Chairman’s Compromise
• If the two sides are close, then propose a specific compromise.
• Proposals from the chair carry extra weight
*Note: unless it is something like meeting hours and then it makes more sense to do it by delegate
© 3GPP 2009
th February 2009
MobileThe
3GPP
World
Training
Congress,
Course
Barcelona,
/ Module19
12a
9
Email Discussions
Useful for preliminary consensus building
• When there are very few views on an issues
• Companies have more time to consider views
Useful for specific, limited decisions
• Email approvals can be done
• Needs a specific coordinator and deadline
Not very useful for critical decisions
• Hard to judge overall sense of the group
• Discussions can become multi-threaded and hard to follow
© 3GPP 2009
th February 2009
MobileThe
3GPP
World
Training
Congress,
Course
Barcelona,
/ Module19
12a
10
Understanding Roots of a Conflict
Understanding the base rational is a key step to resolving the
issue
Between Operators
• Differences in deployment strategy
• IPR considerations
• Technical disagreement
Between Vendors
• Already developed or planned products
• IPR considerations
• Technical disagreement
Between Operators and Vendors
• Deployment options vs common evolution
• IPR considerations
• Technical disagreement
© 3GPP 2009
th February 2009
MobileThe
3GPP
World
Training
Congress,
Course
Barcelona,
/ Module19
12a
11
Finishing Work
Work may or may not be tracked in a report
• Done by RAN
Terms often used in specs
•
•
•
•
•
Information (60% of development work)
Approving (80% of development work)
Frozen (99% of development work) [By Release]
Deep Freezing [FASMO] (95% of errors fixed) [By Release]
Closed (100% of errors) [By Release]
Tentatively allocated to a release by SA
• Freezing by Stages
• Exceptions required if past freeze date
Some TR (or TS) may be abandoned
• Often happens with 800 series TRs
© 3GPP 2009
th February 2009
MobileThe
3GPP
World
Training
Congress,
Course
Barcelona,
/ Module19
12a
12