Young researchers and risk: a diverging reality
Download
Report
Transcript Young researchers and risk: a diverging reality
the European Council of Doctoral Candidates
and Junior Researchers
NEST-PROMISE Regional Workshop
Risky and Visionary Research: Challenges and Opportunities
Pisa, September 18th 2006
Young researchers and risk:
a diverging reality?
Renzo Rubele
ADI, Past President of EURODOC
Representing young researchers
eurodoc is the federation of the national associations
of Ph.D. candidates and junior researchers in Europe
Young researchers
and risky research
«RCUK says scientists are deterred from
running with more adventurous ideas
because to get on in their careers they need
a portfolio of successful projects. And those
deciding which projects are awarded
funding may err on the side of caution
because of pressures to ensure a return on
public funds.»
Natasha Gilbert
in High-risk research, The Guardian, June 20, 2006
Doing research is a hard job
Science as endless frontier
Frontiers of research are more and more far
away from common perception and knowledge
(many) Experimental efforts are in need of
larger facilities, or to access larger resources
Theoretical and conceptual research implies
mastering all the previous work done on the
issues at stake
Research environment and constraints
Management of research activities: facing
increasing pressure, standardization
attractiveness of a researcher’s career
Research Training
A renewed attention
Wider debate in Europe after 2000 due to
the Lisbon targets and the Bologna Process
Increasing number of youngsters enrolled in
research degree programmes
But there is tension between
- Generic skills, wide employability
- Specialist training, advanced and in-depth
studies, and conduction of specific research
Individual (economic) conditions
Everlasting discussions on the nature of
research (in particular: doctoral) training
Germany
23.043
UK
14.935
France
8.420
Spain
7.479
Italy
6.351
Poland
5.450
Portugal
3.723
Sweden
3.558
Netherlands
2.584
Austria
1.790
Finland
1.759
Czech Rep.
1.546
Belgium
1.432
Hungary
1.067
Denmark
993
Norway
714
Ireland
668
Ph.D. graduates
(figures of 2003)
Year
2003
2000
EU 25
88.115
79.247
USA
45.994
44.904
Japan
14.512
12.192
Israel
n.a.
859
2.685
2.745
Switzerland
Source: reported from
She Figures 2006, EC
Career development after the Ph.D.
Some key features of the early stages
Employment on short-term contracts
External funding of projects
Question of the independence of the
researcher (in a group/institution/society)
Assessment criteria, recruitment conditions
Research environment, "systemic variables"
But there is tension between
- project-based activities
- curiosity-driven research
[despite efforts to format the second into the
first]
Career development and risk
Elements affecting choices
A researcher’s career – always a pathway
within the unknown: but how much
uncertainty is sustainable?
Personal attractiveness for a discipline, a
field, a theme, an inquiry
Matching aspirations and actual possibilities
Researchers’ labour market
Risky research: a risk on the top of a risk?
How to strike a balance between certainties
and uncertainties?
«Multi-dimensional space of risks»
Mobility and risk (1)
Geographical mobility
Obstacles/risks related to mobility:
Family-related issues
Financial issues
Loss of reintegration prospects in the country of
origin
Bureaucratic/Administrative obstacles
Language problems
Social and Cultural problems
Lack of information
Difficult transfer of social benefits
Lack of international networking
Opposition by the supervisor
Mobility and risk (2)
Inter-disciplinary mobility
Changing your field or subject may be a
risk
Inter-sectorial mobility
Academia-industry relationships
Problematic in some countries and fields
Different appraisal systems
Difficult mixed career paths
Business not interested in risky research
Public Administration
Uneasy valorization of competencies
Research environment and risk
Institutional traditions and practices
Depend on countries and available
resources
Intertwined with wider social customs
Affect choices of career and of research
Academic localism
culture and practice of inbreeding
Reseach organisation
disciplinary/inter(trans)-disciplinary
structures (from degree courses to doctoral
programmes to research activities)
research strategies, decisions
Funding schemes and risk
Assesment of risky research
Question of potential vs. record of results
«For science and engineering, if what you want is roughly
the same distribution as you get with the RAE then you may
as well use a metric-based system […]. "But if you want is a
system that supports the kind of risky research that the
funding council grant is supposed to be for then you need
something different.»
P. Cotgreave reported by S. Pincock in
UK plans research funding overhaul, The Scientist, 20/06/06
Risky research badly formatted inside
existing project management?
Research track and risk
Unequal chances around Europe
Different opportunities and policies as what
regards young researchers
Career structure, appraisal system
Question of solutions by way of long-term
Fellowships, tenure-track
European Research Council
«Starting Independent Researcher» Grant
Scheme: a strong signal of change
Hopeful dissemination of ideas and practice
at the national and local level
Conclusions:
risky research and risk
Need to cope with multi-facet types of risk
Young researchers are more subject than
others to risks, not (necessarily) overcome by
enthusiasms
Build a better framework for a researcher’s
career
«Risky researchers» are to be protected
unless we risk a diverging reality
The «Renaissance Man» left to the past,
and future competition on knowledge and
economic growth based on other factors
«Although welcome, more
money won't in itself encourage
researchers to take more risks.
Career structures and the
framework in which science is
funded act as a deterrent. If a
culture change within the system
leads the way, researchers will
follow.»
Natasha Gilbert
in High-risk research, The Guardian, June 20, 2006