Transcript Document
CONTROL OF ELECTRON ENERGY
DISTRIBUTIONS THROUGH INTERACTION OF
ELECTRON BEAMS AND THE BULK IN
CAPACITIVELY COUPLED PLASMAS*
Sang-Heon Songa) and Mark J. Kushnerb)
a)Department
of Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
[email protected]
b)Department
of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
[email protected]
http://uigelz.eecs.umich.edu
Gaseous Electronics Conference
October 24th, 2012
*
Work supported by DOE Plasma Science Center, Semiconductor Research Corp. and
National Science Foundation
AGENDA
Interaction of beams with plasmas
Description of the model
Electron energy distribution (EED) control
Electron beam injection
Negative dc bias
Electron induced secondary electron emission
Concluding remarks
SHS_MJK_GEC2012
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
ELECTRON BEAM CONTROL OF f()
In pulsed dc magnetron, the electron energy distribution has a
raised tail portion due to beam-like secondary electrons
Ar, 3 mTorr
Unipolar dc pulse, -350 V
PRF = 20 kHz, Duty cycle = 50%
Ref: S.-H. Seo, J. Appl. Phys. 98, 043301 (2005)
SHS_MJK_GEC2012
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
ELECTRON BEAM-BULK INTERACTION
ne
nb
The coherent Langmuir wave is generated with nb/ne of 3 x 10-3,
and the bulk electron is heated as the wave is damped out.
Vlasov-Poisson Simulation
nb/ne = 3 x 10-3, vDe/vTe = 8.0
Ref: I. Silin, Phys. Plasmas 14, 012106 (2007)
SHS_MJK_GEC2012
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
COULOMB COLLISION BETWEEN BEAM-BULK
However, with much smaller beam electron density the stream
instability is not important, thus rather purely kinetic approach is
presented in this investigation.
Beam electron transfers energy to bulk electron through electronelectron Coulomb collision.
The electron beam heating power density (Peb)
1 new 2
2
W 1
Peb 3 ne
me vb
vb
cm t
i 2
SHS_MJK_GEC2012
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
HYBRID PLASMA EQUIPMENT MODEL (HPEM)
Electron
Monte Carlo
Simulation
Te, Sb, Ss, k
E, Ni, ne
Fluid Kinetics Module
Fluid equations
(continuity, momentum, energy)
Poisson’s equation
Fluid Kinetics Module:
Heavy particle continuity, momentum, energy
Poisson’s equation
Electron Monte Carlo Simulation:
Includes secondary electron transport
Captures anomalous electron heating
Includes electron-electron collisions
SHS_MJK_GEC2012
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
FLOW CHART: E-BEAM BULK INTERACTION
Electron Monte Carlo Simulation
MCS
Bulk electron transport calculation
...
Update f()
...
MCSEB
Bulk electron at
(i, j )
gains energy by
Eiloss
,j
in random direction.
Beam electron transport calculation
Collision between beam electron (vb) and bulk electron (vth) occurs.
Record energy loss of beam electron.
Eijloss
1 new 2
2
me vb
vb
2
Energy loss is transferred to bulk electron energy distribution.
SHS_MJK_GEC2012
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
Injection of Beam Electron
SHS_MJK_GEC2012
REACTOR GEOMETRY: E-BEAM CCP
2D, cylindrically symmetric
Ar/N2 = 80/20, 40 mTorr, 200 sccm
Base case conditions
Lower electrode: 50 V, 10 MHz
Upper electrode: e-Beam injection with 0.05 mA/cm2
SHS_MJK_GEC2012
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
ELECTRON DENSITY & TEMPERATURE
With beam-bulk interaction
Without beam-bulk interaction
Electron density is larger with beam-bulk interaction due to the
increase of bulk electron temperature through the interaction.
MIN
Ar/N2 = 80/20, 40 mTorr, 100 eV
Beam = 0.05 mA/cm2, Vrf = 50 V (10 MHz)
SHS_MJK_GEC2012
MAX
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
E-BEAM HEATING POWER DENSITY
[3 dec]
MIN
MAX
The beam electrons deliver their kinetic energy to the bulk
electrons through the Coulomb collisions.
The heating power density is maximum adjacent to the
electrodes due to lower beam energy accelerating out of and
into sheaths.
Ar/N2 = 80/20, 40 mTorr, 100 eV
Beam = 0.05 mA/cm2, Vrf = 50 V (10 MHz)
SHS_MJK_GEC2012
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
HEATING: BEAM ELECTRON ENERGY
Axial Heating Profile
Average Heating Power Density
As the beam electron energy increases, the heating power
density decreases due to the energy dependency of the e-e
Coulomb collision cross section.
Ar/N2 = 80/20, 40 mTorr
Beam = 0.05 mA/cm2, Vrf = 50 V (10 MHz)
SHS_MJK_GEC2012
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
EED: BEAM ELECTRON ENERGY
100 eV
400 eV
The bulk electron energy distribution is altered more significantly
with the intermediate energy range of beam electron where the
Coulomb collision cross section is larger.
Ar/N2 = 80/20, 40 mTorr
Beam = 0.05 mA/cm2, Vrf = 50 V (10 MHz)
SHS_MJK_GEC2012
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
Negative dc Bias
SHS_MJK_GEC2012
REACTOR GEOMETRY: E-BEAM CCP
2D, cylindrically symmetric
Ar/N2 = 80/20, 40 mTorr, 200 sccm
Base case conditions
Lower electrode: 10 MHz
Upper electrode: Negative dc bias
SHS_MJK_GEC2012
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
E-BEAM HEATING POWER DENSITY
Sec. coefficient (g) = 0.15
Ion flux = 2 x 1015 cm-2s-1
e-beam current = 0.05 mA/cm2
e-beam density = 4 x 105 cm-3
Plasma density = 2 x 1010 cm-3
MAX
MIN
[3 dec]
Secondary electrons emitted from the biased electrode heat up
the bulk electrons through Coulomb interaction.
Since the beam electron density is much smaller than bulk
electron density, the beam instability is not considered.
Ar/N2 = 80/20, 40 mTorr
Vdc = – 100 V, Vrf = 50 V (10 MHz)
SHS_MJK_GEC2012
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
ELECTRON ENERGY DISTRIBUTION
Upper
Center
Secondary electron
emission coefficient
(g) = 0.15
The cross section of Coulomb collision between beam and bulk
electrons increases as the beam electron energy decreases.
Adjacent to the upper electrode, the tail part of EED is more
enhanced due to the moderated electrons in the sheath region.
Ar/N2 = 80/20, 40 mTorr
Vdc = – 100 V, Vrf = 50 V (10 MHz)
SHS_MJK_GEC2012
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
SECONDARY ELECTRON EMISSION
Beam electrons are generated by ion induced secondary
electron emission (i-SEE) on the upper electrode.
Beam electrons emitted from upper electrode produce electron
induced secondary electron emission (e-SEE) on the lower
electrode.
SHS_MJK_GEC2012
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
SECONDARY EMISSION YIELD
If the dc bias is large enough for beam electrons to penetrate
RF potential, those are more likely to be collected on the RF
electrode producing more e-SEE.
*Ref: C. K. Purvis, NASA Technical Memorandum,
79299 (1979)
SHS_MJK_GEC2012
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
HEATING: MAGNITUDE OF NEGATIVE BIAS
The electron beam heating power increases due to additional
heating from e-SEE, when the beam electrons have enough
energy to penetrate the RF sheath potential and to reach the
surface producing e-SEE.
SHS_MJK_GEC2012
Ar/N2 = 80/20, 40 mTorr
Vrf = 100 V
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
ELECTRON ENERGY DISTRIBUTION: e-SEE
Vdc = – 80 V
Vdc = – 140 V
As a result of additional heating from e-SEE, the tail portion of
the EED is raised, when the dc bias is large enough to generate
high energy beam electrons.
SHS_MJK_GEC2012
Ar/N2 = 80/20, 40 mTorr
Vrf = 100 V
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
The EED can be manipulated by beam electron injection in CCP.
Beam electron heating power is strong adjacent to the electrodes
due to large decelerating sheath potential.
Beam electron heating power is dependent on the beam electron
energy due to the energy dependency of Coulomb collision
between beam and bulk electrons.
Negative bias on the electrode plays a same role to produce
electron beam injected into the bulk plasma altering the bulk EED.
The beam heating effect is more prominent when the amplitude of
dc bias is larger than rf voltage, since the beam electrons produce
secondary electron emission when hitting the other electrode.
SHS_MJK_GEC2012
22/22
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.