Transcript Slide 1

Partnership to Cut Hunger
and Poverty in Africa
Research-Based Advocacy for African Agricultural Development
Overview of U.S. Initiatives on Global
Agricultural Development
and Food Security
Dr. Julie Howard
Executive Director
Partnership to Cut Hunger and Poverty in Africa
“Linking the Region to the Global Agricultural and Economic
Recovery Agenda”
2009 FANRPAN Regional Policy Dialogue
Maputo, Mozambique
September 3, 2009
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Introduction …and what is “the Partnership”?
Trends in US Assistance for African Agriculture
Interaction of US Public Sector and Civil Society
in Shaping the Evolving US Response to the Food
Crisis of 2008
When will African Leaders Speak Out on
Agriculture?
Beyond the Maputo Declaration and 10%
Commitment
1. Introduction
The Partnership to Cut Hunger and Poverty in Africa




Independent US-African coalition
Founded 2001 by Presidents Chissano, Konaré, former
USAID Administrator Peter McPherson, Cong. Lee
Hamilton, Sen. Bob Dole, David Beckmann
Research-based advocacy to increase U.S. investment in
African agriculture and rural development, improve the
effectiveness of related US policies and programs
Focus areas: US policy related to food security and
agricultural development; food aid reform; agricultural
markets and trade; infrastructure; capacity-building,
especially for science and technology
Promotes economic development in Africa
that is



Agriculture-based (supported by increased
yields and value-adding industry)
Market-based
Responsive to African needs and initiatives
….as the best way to cut hunger and poverty
How does the Partnership work?
The Partnership improves donor, civil society and private sector
response to rural Africa by:
 Conducting focused research and synthesizing existing
studies to inform policy
 Convening US and African experts from public and private
sector organizations to identify practical ways to address
problems and opportunities in rural Africa
 Advocating for these ideas to be implemented by US and
global decision-makers
 Working with African leaders to align donor and African
national policies and practices
We invite all FANRPAN organizations and individuals to join
the Partnership
2. Trends in US Assistance for
African Agriculture
•
•
•
2005 report: US assistance for African agriculture flat
2000-2004 ($460-$514 million), documented impact
of earmarks, fragmentation of US assistance across
agencies
2005-2007: significant increase due to MCC and
African requests for agricultural infrastructure ($677$840 million)
2008: Global Food Price Crisis motivates increase
($1.1 billion)
More change is coming



April 2009: President Obama pledges to double U.S.
agricultural development assistance at the G20,subsequently
submits a proposed 2010 budget making good on his pledge.
US Congress is considering legislation calling for a
comprehensive, whole-of-government strategy for tackling
food security with sustainable agricultural development at the
heart. Authorizes add-on appropriations reaching $2.5 billion
by 2014.
US Administration expected to release a strategy to support
country-defined priorities for agricultural development as
determined by a CAADP Compact or similar process.
Strategy is expected to emphasize the development of
country-owned monitoring and evaluation tools to track the
impact of investments.
3. Role of Civil Society in Shaping the
US Response to the 2008 Food Crisis





Fall 2007. Release of 2008 WDR on Agriculture, after extensive consultation
with civil society and private sector world-wide.
Summer 2008. Global Hunger Task Force Report released. Convened by
Center for Strategic and International Studies, co-chaired by Senators Lugar
and Casey, and included leading civil society, private and public sector
leaders. Calls for significant increase in agricultural assistance as an
alternative to growing reliance on emergency humanitarian assistance.
Summer-Fall 2008. Lugar and Casey draft legislation, meeting with
representatives from NGOs, private sector, university leaders in the US and
Africa. Creates new program for increasing higher education capacity for
agricultural development. US civil society, African ambassadors urge
support for legislation, bill passes committee unanimously Spring 2009.
Fall 2008. US NGOs urge Obama transition team to place a high priority on
food security and agricultural development.
Fall-Winter 2008. Roadmap to End Hunger coalition of 30 NGOs formed,
drafts report calling for comprehensive food security approach integrating
emergency assistance and long-term agricultural support.
Civil Society and Food Security






February 2009. Chicago Council on Global Affairs releases report of a highlevel panel of experts on “Renewing American Leadership in the Fight
Against Global Hunger and Poverty.”
February 2009. Partnership convenes US-Africa conference on food security
and the financial crisis. Partnership recommendations on “demand-driven”
country-responsive support for food security released June 2009.
Spring 2009. NGOs urge support for food security/budget increases
proposed by Pres. Obama and attention to food security at the G8.
Spring 2009. Congressional representatives McGovern, Emerson, McCollum
introduce food security legislation. Throughout winter,spring and summer,
Congress convenes briefings on food security, agriculture, and foreign
assistance in collaboration with civil society and private sector.
Spring-Summer 2009. US Administration representatives meet frequently
with NGO and private sector leaders as food security strategy is drafted.
Civil society, former public officials publish op-eds, letters to the editor and
policy articles regarding food security.
What is different this time?





Food Price Crisis trigger
Large, loose coalition of civil society organizations
activates advocacy teams in Washington and
grassroots supporters
New involvement of respected foreign policy think
tanks
New reports provide basis for consultation with
the public, Congress and Administration
Involvement of foundations provides resources for
report development and outreach/education
4. When Will African Leaders
Speak Out on Agriculture?
We need to hear directly from African leaders about their
commitment to agriculture and food security. What are the
priorities for investment, and what are emerging successes in
individual countries?
 UN General Assembly?
 G-20 Meetings in Pittsburgh?
 World Food Day celebrations?
 November World Food Summit in Rome?
 Op-eds, articles and letters to international newspapers and
magazines?
What is the role of African civil society in assuring that African
leaders speak out on agriculture and food security?
Beyond the Maputo Declaration
and 10% Commitment




The 10% indicator is a blunt instrument
What would “country-owned or region-owned” monitoring and
evaluation of agricultural investments look like?
Most of the available int’l indexes are descriptive indexes. E.g., FAO
State of Food and Agriculture, UN Human Development Index, IFPRI
Global Hunger Index, and World Bank World Development
Indicators all measure success or failure of countries in satisfying the
food and income needs.
Few indexes explicitly identify and measure the causal factors that
contribute to agricultural success. They focus instead on outcome
measure like yield/ha, total food supply, sector income, health status.
These compare relative performance in important areas but don’t
help inform the process of public decision-making that underlies the
long-term pattern of agricultural growth.
An “action-oriented index” on food
and agriculture?


Constructing an action-oriented index, encompassing the breadth of
potential factors contributing to agricultural growth and permitting
discrimination of relative levels of performance could be a good first
step in searching for those factors that govern most countries’
agricultural performance.
Such an index might be based on scores for composite variables
regarding performance in:






sector governance;
agricultural science and technical research;
production, storage, transportation and communications infrastructure;
input and output market structure and function;
education and training; extension and outreach; and
farm and agribusiness enterprises’ access to financial services.
To promote maximum impact of the index among policymakers, the
values of indicators making up the composite variables would also
be available.
Possible role of FANRPAN in developing and applying an AgIndex?

Thank you!