Transcript Document
Wireless without CompromiseTM For The New Enterprise Network Al Rocco Regional Sales Manager [email protected] 201-227-1941 Meru Networks Wireless Without CompromiseTM Founded 2002 Offices Headquarters in Sunnyvale, CA with locations in Asia & Europe Status Private Customers 1000+ marquee customers across all major market segments Market Position 4th Highest WW Market Share in Enterprise WLAN Innovations 35+ patents and pending Products Meru Mobile SCALE WLAN System, a complete wireless solution for The Enterprise Network Broad Market Penetration Sample Customers Higher Ed & K-12 Healthcare Enterprise Industrial & Harsh Environments Retail & Hospitality Government Education The New Enterprise Network Network of Convenience The NEW Enterprise Network Evolving Requirements Business WLAN Infrastructure Support Business Critical applications Guaranteed application delivery Pervasive : access applications anywhere Simple to deploy, operate and grow Multi-layer Security RF-level, Application, user-based security Adapt to Future Applications Grow gracefully with new applications, more clients, more bandwidth WLAN Requirements Are Changing: Network of Convenience Primary Connectivity Stand-alone Managed Pervasive Number of Clients & Size of Coverage Applications • Email, Web • Email, Web • Voice and Data • Business applications • Primary Connectivity Architecture • Stand-alone AP • Thin/dumb AP • Central Controller • Cellular: Coordinated AP • Centralized control Deployments • Early adopters • Conference Rooms • Vertical Industries • Guest Access • Enterprise-wide Backbone-centric problems Air-centric problems WLAN Compromises Key Considerations The Legacy Way “Ethernet Hubs with Central Management” Tradeoff between coverage and co-channel interference Channel planning, Planning Tools, Microcell (lower-power APs) High density data performance suffers Micro-cell to reduce number of clients/AP No over-the-air QoS and co-ordination across APs Separate voice and data on different channels Clients make the decisions based on local knowledge Assume smarter clients; proprietary client extensions Only 1 40Mhz channel in 2.4Ghz 11n Don’t support 11n on 2.4Ghz WLAN Architectural Comparison The Legacy Way The Right Way “Cellular-like”: Coordinated Cells Ethernet Hubs with Central Management Air Traffic Control™: Key Technology Difference Coordinated Virtual Cells Channel Span Simplify Wireless View: Channel spans, One cell Scale Capacity Per Area Layered Channel Spans For Increased Capacity Optimize Applications Data Voice Application Aware Network Air Traffic Control™ Technology: Virtual Cell – Single Channel Spans APs act as a coordinated system rather than each AP acting as an individual wireless hub All APs on the same channel have the same BSSID (wireless MAC address) X 100 ms – 3 seconds between handoff Client only sees only one AP on a channel Benefits Legacy Microcell Infrastructure controlled o Best AP assignment o Handoff No handoff from Client Perspective Load balancing between AP’s Meru Virtual Cell Air Traffic Control™ Technology: Multi-channel Layering Legacy WLAN channel plan consumes RF resources Meru’s channel spans preserve RF resources Ch. 11 Ch. 1 Ch. 6 Ch. 11 Ch. 6 Ch. 1 All RF channels are consumed to provide a single channel of capacity per region Multiple channels can be layered to add capacity per region Add capacity by layering channel spans Air Traffic Control™ Technology: Application-Aware Optimization Manages upstream and downstream application flows like a switch: over the air QoS Airtime fairness: provides fair and equal network access — faster clients are not penalized by slower clients Enables high-density, mixed 802.11b/g client networks Toll quality voice with high density data Client load balancing Benefits for all Standard clients Data Voice Application Aware Network I heard of Meru’s approach to client density and improving 802.11g & 802.11b performance and was intrigued to see if this would solve our issues. The Meru system was deployed throughout Jamrich Hall supporting 800 students simultaneously.” Dave Maki Dir. Of Technical Services N. Michigan University Real-World Benefits of Air Traffic Control Throughput 15.9 1 11.26 1 802.11b 802.11g 4.68 Vendor C Vendor C Meru 6.5% 802.11g 802.11b/g Performance Active Users Per Access Point 100+ 13% 11% 13% 6.5% 6.5% 13% 13% 6.5% 30.5% Vendor C 13% 13% 802.11g 802.11g 802.11g 802.11g 802.11g 802.11g 802.11b 802.11b - 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 Fair Client Access 5X Meru 20 calls, 10 clients 12 calls, 10 clients Meru Vendor C(WMM) MOS 802.11b Meru 11% 6.5% 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0.87 Airtime per Client 6.5% 30.5 User Density 802.11 Differential Rate Fairness 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 20-25 Vendor C Meru Vendor C(WMM) MOS Over the Air QoS Meru Ease of Set-up and Use: Single Channel Spans Ease of set-up and use No traditional channel surveys No Access Point power adjustments or spacing limitations No channel configuration Plug and play out of the box Extend the network without re-planning Meru is bucking the trend with unique offerings that reject conventional architectural and deployment models. Meru’s single channel-channel architecture makes deployment easier while promising greater scalability, enhanced roaming and coordinated over-the-air quality of service. Dave Molta, November 2006 Because the Meru Wireless LAN System allows all APs to reside on the same channel, a site survey proved unnecessary, saving us valuable time and reducing our costs. Shawn Iverson, Network Administrator, New Castle School District Zero Channel Planning, AP Power Management Expanding a Legacy WLAN 6 1 11 1 11 6 11 6 11 6 6 1 6 11 1 1 11 1 11 6 11 1 6 11 6 1 11 Legacy WLAN Expanding a Meru WLAN 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Meru WLAN Single channel set-up eliminates interference so full power can be used, larger areas covered so fewer devices required Access Points can be changed or added to increase capacity without a channel planning survey 1 1 1 1 To minimize interference power levels are lower so cell size is smaller– requires more Access Points, cable drops, and labor Recurring site surveys are required Adds/moves/ changes require channel reassignment Automatic assignment mechanisms don’t work in real world applications and must be constantly tweaked Significantly Lower Cost of Deployment and Operations Example Customer Case Study 20-30% Less AP’s, Cable Pulls, PoE Ports Eliminated expensive, sitesurvey/channel planning costs $500K savings for a 2000 AP Network $10K x 30 buildings = $300K savings in initial deployment costs Operate the network with less personnel and OpEx 1 person vs. 5 to manage $500K annual recurring savings “Once we had the cabling infrastructure in place for the access points in each facility, we could just look at a floor plan to install the Meru APs. We didn’t have to pay experts to do RF planning or site surveys.” Chris Bogue IT Director University of Miami Medical Center Graceful Bandwidth Growth and Migration to 11n with Channel Layering Adding Capacity with Increased Application and Bandwidth Needs Ch. 11 Ch. 6 Add capacity with layered channels Up to 3x the capacity with b/g No upgrade of clients to 11a, 11n Ch. 1 Ch. 1 11n - 5 11n – 2.4 Ch. 1 Add capacity in 11n Can add in 2.4 or 5 GHz 802.11n: Inevitable March Toward The All-Wireless Office 2000 2004-7 2007-8 Mbps per cell Up to 600 Application • • Casual usage Networks of Convenience • Applications in mobile workforce organizations • Healthcare, Edu, Retail, Manufacturing • • • Pervasive, businesscritical deployments All applications over wireless All wireless offices Promise of 802.11n Better coverage Higher throughput Improved coverage through multipath and MIMO; multiple transmit and receive paths Over 6 times better than 802.11a/g * Longer range More reliable Longer range: Over 2 times better than 802.11a/g * More resistant to interference and loss due to multipath * * Based on specifications in the standard. Why you should consider deploying 802.11n (draft 2) Growing percentage of Clients/laptops have built-in 11n. All Apple Laptops have 11n Rogue detection of 11n, even if 11n is not needed for service Increased capacity for your mission critical applications All-wireless offices and associated cost and productivity benefits Key Considerations for 802.11n • • • • Simplifying deployment & operations Optimizing capacity and scalability Impact on wired switching infrastructure Impact on wireless security Meru’s Superior Architecture Offers the Best Solution Simplest deployment & operations Maximum capacity Total investment protection for wired switch infrastructure Implementation Consideration #1: Simplifying Deployment & Operations 11n Technology Principles More spectrum Higher data rates 40 Mhz Channels (vs. 20Mhz in 11a/g) Multiple antennas (MIMO) 64QAM encoding Higher efficiency MAC protocol efficiency Deployment Considerations Coverage at higher data rates tougher to predict Data rates fluctuate more than 11g/a More co-channel interference 4x drop in mixed 11g/a and 11n networks on same channel Typical Coverage Pattern for 802.11n Rate/Range is Unpredictable Deployment Considerations Sample coverage from an installation High rate Low rate Coverage in 802.11n at higher data rates is unpredictable due to multipath Higher co-channel interference; coordinated APs to mitigate needed Predictive tools are not effective at high rate; Lack of good planning tools for 802.11n is a deterrent to deploying using micro cell architecture The optimal approach for 802.11n is one that minimizes the performance penalty for sub-optimal AP placement Meru’s Channel-Span Architecture Enables Simplest Deployment and Operations Meru Solution Other WLANs X Office Floor Initial Current planning and optimization Technology difficult Fixing coverage holes requires replanning and “domino effect” of changing channel plans Not possible to fix co-channel interference issues in multi-floors Office Floor No channel planning needed Deploy APs based on rule-of-thumb (e.g. 60 feet in office cubes) Any coverage holes easily fixed without re-planning Packet-access-level coordinated AP mitigates co-channel interference Implementation Consideration #2 Optimizing Capacity and Scalability 36+1 44+1 52+1 60+1 100+1 108+1 116+1 124+1 Total of 11 40-MHz channels in 5-GHz Wide side lobes require spacing between channels to avoid interference, and reduced performance Effectively only 6 usable 40-MHz channels in 5GHz spectrum 1 132+1 149+1 Channel 44 + 1 52 Channel 44 + 1 157+1 52+1 6, 11 Only 1 40-MHz channel in 2.4-GHz Only Meru enables Gbps+ capacity Chart from 802.11n specification Deployment Consideration #3: Impact on Wired Switched Ethernet Investment Centralized Model Controller Meru Distributed Model: 3TDS™ DP’s Controller Options DP 11n AP 11n AP 11n AP 11n AP Access Point (AP) Distribution Point (DP) Control Point (CP) 11n AP 11n AP 11n AP Blue: Control Traffic Green: Data Traffic DP 11n AP 11n AP DP 11n AP DP 11n AP 11n AP Meru is the Only Option to Deliver 802.11n Wireless Without Compromise™ Single channel spans simplify deployments and ensure predictable performance Architecture exclusively enables enterprises to use 2.4GHz for 802.11n Scale to Gigabit or greater capacity with layered channels Protect wired switching investment with 3TDS™ MERU Solution for the Enterprise Enterprise Backbone Central Management Across Global Enterprise Remote APs Small remote office Branch Office 1-5 AP’s Mid Sized Office Office 100-150 APs Central Campus Indoor/outdoor 1000 APs Distributed Campus Indoor/Outdoor 1000+ APs Summary: Customers Trust Meru to Deliver Wireless Without Compromise Largest Deployment with No RF Planning 2.5 Million Square Feet 3000+ APs on a single channel World’s Largest Enterprise WLAN Deployment 30,000 radios; 250,000 students Innovative, all-wireless teaching environment at Microsoft School of the Future with 600 Mbps of wireless capacity at every location Highest user density production deployment Largest Enterprise FMC dual-mode phone deployment 100+ active users/AP Completely wireless teaching/testing environment 6000+ phones, 8000+ laptops; all-wireless 49 offices First Campus-Wide 802.11n 900+ APs in 30+ buildings 11n laptops Make It Meru!