Transcript TCC
The Danish Flexicurity Model The Danish Wonder Drug against Economic Troubles -- a win-win situation? Jette Steen Knudsen The Copenhagen Centre for Corporate Responsibility The Copenhagen Centre for Corporate Responsibility Independent think tank founded by the Danish government with a focus on the changing role of business in society and corporate responsibility (CR) initiatives. Independent board of directors Secretariat for the Danish National Network of Business Leaders which advises the Minister of Employment Target group: key decision-makers in business and government The Copenhagen Centre Mission Generate knowledge, stimulate public debate and raise awareness about the changing social role of business in society How we work Applied research: the Centre undertakes research and practical studies Outreach activities: the Centre regularly convenes seminars and workshops, and continuously engages decision-makers and the media in dialogue and debate Practical tools: develop practical advice for firms and government Focus Areas 1) Employment trends: the Danish understanding of CR • Globalization and outsourcing: impact on vulnerable groups • National Network of Business Leaders: new forms of social employment due to 1) globalization; 2) juvenile crime 2) Risk management • SMEs and ethical supplier standards • Non-financial reporting • Corporate image and CR initiatives • Institutional investors and social initiatives Implicit assumptions of the CR Agenda which focuses on inclusive employment • Economic burden-sharing perceived as necessary for maintaining social welfare • Business included in problem-solving in order to solve problems from the ”bottom up” rather than ”top down” (business needs are a great motivating factor..) New labour market initiatives during the 1990s • The Danish National Network of Business Leaders (1996) + Regional Networks / “Inspirators” (2000) • Tools employed: Different kinds of subsidized employment programmes (i.e. ”sheltered” jobs) • The Network Award for Social Inclusion - initiatives that ”make a difference in every day life to employees, the company and to society” Types of CR Initiatives 1) Integration of employees excluded from the labor market (training, sheltered jobs, testing the ”capacity to work”) 2) Pre-emptive measures (with the goals to reducing absence due to illness, improving physical and psychological working environment, sheltered jobs for employees etc.) Study of CR initiatives: Netværksprisen set i Bakspejlet • Integration of groups at the edge of the labour market: qualitative study from The Copenhagen Centre • • • • What works? Possibility of getting a real job in the end Company must have a real need for workers (business case) Optimal framework conditions such as supplementary salary scheme, training and education) • Mentors Examples: • Danish Crown • Specialisterne • TDC Read more at www.copenhagencentre.org http://www.copenhagencentre.org/graphics/CopenhagenCentre/Publica tions/Papers/pilotundersoegelse_full_report.pdf Crucial features of the Danish welfare model • Universal service provision • Financed through general taxation • Requires high taxes and high employment levels Successful model • High employment levels, low unemployment • High average income level • Little poverty • Government budget in surplus Den danske flexicurity model: the golden triangle Flexible labor market ALMP: Improved labor market qualifications Aktive labor market policies Generous welfare support ALMP: motivating factor Kilde: Thomas Bredgaard, Flemming Larsen og Per Kongshøj Madsen, 2005 (ALMP) Background for flexicurity model • Flexibility: Consensus that employer has the right to hire and fire • ALMP: Labor market reform from 1993 active labor market policies (training and education schemes have been part of social partner agreements since mid 1990s) • Social security Flexibility 1) high internal numerical flexibility (regulate working time, overtime, etc.) 2) high external numerical flexibility (regulate the number of hires and fired) 3) high functional flexibility (organization/work functions) 4) salary flexibility Active labor market policy • Improvement of qualifications • Separation of social security and active labor market policy so that ALM-period does not count towards right to unemployment • Individual action plans • Training after 12 months unemployment • Young people after 6 months - reduced earnings during training. Security • Collective agreements b/w social partners • Combination of work/personal life (i.e. maternity leave, education leave, etc) • Public welfare - universal provision Social Security – Income Compensation Two challenges Ageing: desirable but problem for public finances Globalization: desirable but need adjustment pressures Options for adjusting to spending pressures related to ageing • • • • Higher taxes Cut spending Pre-save Delay retirement (and finish education faster) Share of cohorts with a further education (source Jørgen Elmeskov, OECD) Pct. 60 Pct. 60 0 0 Kilde: Education at a Glance 2004 25-34 D N EU D D EC O U FR SW FI C 45-54 EU 10 LD 10 15 20 K 20 K 30 A 30 E 40 N 40 JP N KO R U SA 50 AN 50 Globalization • Demand for low-skilled workers might drop but effect is not clear • Some tax bases become more mobile • More emigration of high-skilled workers? • Pressure to improve integration of immigrants (Denmark is relatively more attractive to low-skilled immigrants)