Transcript Slide 1

Flanders Waste Management Plan
Example for SE European
Countries
Dr. S. Helsen
Zagreb
25/11/2010
Situation of Flanders
North Belgium
Pop. 6 million
Area 13.600 km²
# Municip. 308
2
Need for Waste Management Plan
1970’s poorly managed landfills  pollution
1980’s  competences from national to regional level
 re-organisation of Assoc. of Municipalities
1981  waste management and soil remediation
competences centralised  Public Waste Agency
Flemish Waste Decree based on : prevention, reuse,
recycling, incineration, disposal
Five Waste Management (Implementation) Plans since
1986
3
First WMP (1986-1990):
Making order out of chaos
Closing and redeveloping landfills
Maximum use of existing incineration capacity and
separate collection of municipal waste
Cost depositing at landfill and incineration raised
First step towards waste prevention and recovery
4
Second WMP (1991-1995):
Built on previous success
Necessary policy instruments + infrastructure for
segregation at source
Separate door-to-door collection of municipal waste
streams and recovery
Network of recycling yards
Infrastructure for collection and processing of VFG
and green waste
Focused on waste minimisation and recovery
5
Third WMP (1997- 2001):
Targets to reduce residual Waste
Partnership with non-profit organisation
Recoverable materials from bulky waste
Prevention /reuse through composting (home/industrial)
Development reuse centres network
Waste prevention public awareness
Incineration: construction postponed, capacity
reduced, optimisation with energy recovery systems
Landfill deposits further reduced
6
Fourth WMP (2003- 2007):
Evaluation of Previous Plan
Main goal consolidate results and ensure progress
 Implementation, acceleration, intensification of plan
 Effective instruments adopted to achieve wide-range
of objectives
Aim: achieving sustainable development and permanent
management of materials
Covering entire material chain: production of materials,
goods and products to treatment of household waste
7
Fifth WMP (2008- 2015):
3 Target objectives
Objective 1
 Environmentally responsible consumption habits
 Buy and use environmental friendly products
 Government stimulates and sends message to adapt
behavioural consumption to fit new practices
Objective 2
Reduction of residual waste production without affecting the
quantities of materials consumed
Objective 3
Final waste treatment: BATNEEC
8
Objectives of 5th WMP aim at:
1. Minimum waste produced
2. Re-introduction of waste in material chain  recycling
3. Disposal of materials in environmentally friendly way
Action programmes:
1. Prevention, lowered consumption and re-use
2. Selective collection and recycling
3. Final treatment
9
Results:
Residual waste reduction
Targets continuously
evaluated and updated
Targets achieved faster;
e.g. target for 2006:
3
4
WMP  220 kg/head
th WMP  160 kg/head
rd
Proposed long-term
target :150 kg/head
10
Incineration and bio-mechanical
pre-treatment of household waste
Objective
Separate collection
WMP 2003 – 2007
66 % in 2000
69 % in 2008
Objective
Cessation landfilling
11
Waste disposal levies vs quantities
of landfilled waste 1990-2008
12
Waste-to-Energy
CH4 and electricity production, Flemish landfills 1990-2006
13
Energy production from incineration of household waste
14
Discussion
Waste Implementation plans: key to success
Impressive results in reduction, reuse, etc., since 2007
 70 % of household waste collected separately
 less than 3% deposited in landfill
WMP goals achieved
Legislation focus : prevention and recovery of waste
(decrees amended)
WMP targets for 2003-2007 and 2008-2015
have been met or likely to be met
15
Mix of policy measures





Regulation modifications / adaptations (obligatory)
Voluntary agreements
Market-based instruments
Population communication and initiatives
Agreements, consensus-based policy preferred
Interesting policy outcomes
Population acceptance, willingness to segregate and
compost waste
Waste management and littering high in political agenda
16
Implementation Plan for 5 years - key measure
 Comprises provisions for all public authorities
 All relevant parties involved in process
 Contribution with suggestions
 relationship between waste targets and
agreements with municipalities happens naturally
Legal instruments
 Uncontrolled landfill and incineration prohibitions
 Methodical approach to waste problems
 Waste approach based on producer responsibility
(take back obligations) and polluter-pays principle
 High landfill tax: incentive to recover & recycle waste
17
Intermunicipal co-operation recommended
Municipalities controlling and financing waste services:
 Fixed (yearly) tax & cash tax (Pay-As-You-Throw)
 Reduction of residual waste
 Development of recycling infrastructure network
(ca. 350 yards), incl. composting activities, etc.
 Public Private Partnerships
(contracting, participation, concessions)
Total cost: 220 € / household (2.4 persons)
18
Sorting and recycling natural
resources and energy savings
Recycling contributes to saving natural resources :
Aluminium, steel, PET plastic, glass, cardboard,…
Recycling saves energy:
Recycled steel requires up to 85% less energy, etc.
Reducing energy consumption reduces CO2
In 2008 ca. 680,000 t household waste recycled in BE
 850,000 t of CO2 emissions avoided
Sorting = reflex !
95% of Belgians sort their waste
Awareness raising can never stop (schools, firms, ... )
19
From waste management to
sustainable material management
Waste chain managed as one :
from "cradle to grave" or from “cradle to cradle“
Waste management linked to sustainable material
management (worldwide evolution)
Depletion of resources and environmental pressure
from material reduced
Challenge : providing sustainable material
management policy whilst having a growing economy,
production and consumption on a global scale
20
Waste management:
new economic sector
Collecting, sorting
and recycling:
growing economic sector
Recycling sector employs
2,500 people in BE
Waste management offers
8,000 jobs in Flanders
Recycling market stable
Crisis not affected trends in
quantity of household
packaging put on market
21
Conclusions: 25 years of
Waste Management in Flanders
Impressive waste management system,
one of the best in EU
Final disposal in landfills almost ceased / landfill mining!
Packaging waste largely recycled or reused
Incineration for heat or energy recovery
Innovative techniques for better waste treatment
Municipalities responsible for implementation of
waste policies & organised through intermunicipal
cooperations and PPP constructions
22
Setting the example
In Flanders: “There is no such thing as waste”
Export of experience and knowhow to SE European
countries, based on lessons learnt
Advice and technical assistance
 Innovation and technologies
 Legal instruments
 Economical instruments
 Social instruments
Challenge: most appropriate instrument or mix of
instruments to achieve targets
23
Thank you for the attention
ECOREM NV / SA
Headquarters:
Kontichsesteenweg 38
B – 2630 Aartselaar
T +32 3 871 09 00
F +32 3 871 09 01
Keizer Karellaan 292B
Av. Charles Quint 292B
B – 1083 Brussel/ Bruxelles
T +32 2 800 00 10
[email protected]
www.ecorem.be
Ecorem is a member of the Exequtes Group – www.exequtes.eu
16 Place de l’Université
B – 1348 Ottignies
T +32 10 48 35 03