Integrated Waste Management Diversion Plan

Download Report

Transcript Integrated Waste Management Diversion Plan

Making a Dent in Construction
and Demolition Debris
or
Getting More and Less
Than You Bargained For
Baltimore, MD
September 17, 2003
Stephen M Bantillo
City of San Jose, Environmental Services Department
Integrated Waste Management
777 N. First Street, Suite 300, San Jose, CA 95112
(408) 277-3846 / (408) 277-3669 fax / [email protected]
CDDD Overview
• Builder/Contractor
applies for permit
• Deposit assessed
based on square
footage and type of
project
CDDD Overview
• C&D materials hauled
to Certified Facility
CDDD Overview
• Contractor returns
receipts/records to
City for Deposit
refund
Deposit Amounts
Building Segment
Rate $/SqFt
Residential New Construction
$0.20
Non-Residential New Construction $0.10
Residential Alterations
$1.16
Non-Residential Alterations
$0.35
Residential Demolition
$0.35
Non-Residential Demolition
$0.10
Roof with tear-off
Flat Rate
$100
City-Certified Facilities
Two Types:
Administrative Certification
• Inert processors recover at least 90%
Full Certification
• Mixed C&D facilities recover at least 50%
Certified Facilities
•
•
•
•
•
•
8 Mixed C&D/Landfills/Transfer
7 Rock/Asphalt/Quarry
3 Metal
2 Carpet
1 Wood
1 Reuse
Laying The Groundwork:




Identify The Target
Economics
Stakeholders
Infrastructure
Results of 1998 Waste Characterization Study
Composition of Materials Going to Landfill
Paper
22%
Hazardous/
Special
4%
Organics
24%
Glass
3%
Metal
7%
Plastic
9%
Construction/
Demolition
31%
Results of 1998 Gate Survey
Source of Materials Going to Landfill
City Waste
5%
Businesses
38%
Multi Family
10%
Single Family
21%
Self-Haul
26%
Results of 1999 Gate Survey
C&D Materials Going to Landfill
• >300,000 tpy
• 160,000 tpy buried
Economic Study
• Determine costs associated with the handling
of C&D materials in and out-of-town
• Establish rates based on cost differential for
recycling/diversion
Stakeholder Process
• Focus Groups
• One-on-One
• Group Meetings
Stakeholder Process cont.
Who was involved?
External:
Banking
Education
Developers
Architects
Contractors
Chamber
Labor
Haulers
Processors
Landfills
Home Builders Assoc.
Internal:
City staff
Public Works
Redevelopment
Housing
Planning
Green Building
Stakeholder Process cont.
Why Important?
• Feedback on system design
• ID key support policies, processes, and
interests
• Navigate the political process for approval by
administration
C&D Infrastructure Grants
FY 1999/2000
$250,000
FY 2000/2001
$500,000
3 Landfills
$333,000
4 Processors $217,000
1 Individual
$200,000
C&D Infrastructure Grants
January 2000
February 2001
 $36K “Portable
MRF”
 $10K C&D Line
 $140K Mixed C&D
Line
 $64K “Rocket”
Mixed C&D Line
 $200K Carpet Recovery
 $71K Wood Waste
Recycling System
 $100K Roofing/Wood
Recycling System
 $129K Organics
Removal System
What Have We Learned?
• There are more types of projects than you can
shake a 2X4 at!
• Sweat the details with the Permit Center /
Building Department (and everyone else)
• Provide clear written instructions to customers
• The other guy’s project makes more waste
www.sjrecycles.org
Program Data
Total Project Value
Average
Median
High
Low
$848,712,920
$242,559
$28,000
$108,000,000
$100
Program Data
Total SqFt
Average
Median
High
Low
9,681,258
2,768
400
615,000
1
Program Data
Total Deposit Value
Average
Median
High
Low
$2,676,226
$766
$350
$58,110
$1.05