Building alliance to address mental health in primary care

Download Report

Transcript Building alliance to address mental health in primary care

Building alliance to address
mental health in primary care
Larry Wissow, MD MPH
Johns Hopkins School of Public
Health, Baltimore, MD
Goals
• Learn about the importance of alliance
(patient-doctor; patient-staff; patient-office)
in promoting the care of mental health
problems
• Learn some techniques for fostering patientdoctor alliance
• Using the alliance to ask about things that
patients/parents might not expect you to ask
about
Disclosure
• No conflicts to report
• Grateful to funders and collaborators
– Duke Endowment
– National Institute of Mental Health
– Dr. Anne Gadomski (Bassett Healthcare)
• Oregon Pediatric Society
Cases to think about
• Foster parent brings in the bag of pills and
says they aren’t working
• Parent seems depressed or has revealed
problems on a screening form
• In the middle of a short medical visit the
family raises a mental health issue
Background/philosophy
• Pediatric practices see same range of
severity as child psychiatrists
– But distribution varies
• Many different ways to cope
– Good triage
– Develop your own skills
– Co-locate with mental health
Core needs
• Efficiently rule out emergencies
• Provide immediate relief and advice
• Develop a mutually agreeable plan for
next steps
• Stay in control of the visit and balance the
needs of this patient with the needs of
others
To meet core needs
• Core capability for any solution might be
called “alliance” with family
– Partnership, engagement…
• Data from adult primary care studies of
depression treatment
– Relationship with provider predicted
engagement and outcome
Van Os TW. J Affect Disord 2005;84:43-51. Frémongt P. Encephale 2008;34:205-10.
Why start with a focus on alliance?
• Advice alone isn’t enough
– < 50% of psychosocial concerns disclosed
– < 50% of mental health referrals kept
– < 50% of children who start mental health
treatment finish
• Evidence from psychotherapy
– Predicts outcome over and above any
specific treatment (including medications)
Elements of alliance in
psychotherapy
• Agreement on nature of problem
• Agreement on what to do (and when to do
it)
• “Affective bond” with provider
– Trust
– Optimism
– Relief
Why alliance especially with mental
health issues?
• Particularly stigmatizing
• Doubt and equivocation part of the
“illness”
• Not sure that you’re the one to tell
• Afraid to hear the answer
What builds alliance?
• Evidence that process starts with initial
interaction with office
– Image of relationship built from staff as a whole,
not just the pediatrician
– Patients value flexible, open staff who can
•
•
•
•
pinch hit for each other
help trouble shoot problems
speed things up when needed
realize when the patient’s context has changed
Ware NC. Psychiatr Serv. 1999;50:395-400.
Pulido R. Arch Psych Nursing 2008;22:277-87.
Patient trust and practice climate
• Adult primary care patients’ trust in provider
related to:
– Physicians and staff reporting better collaboration
with each other, more autonomy, ability to
delegate to each other
• Trust then relates to:
– Attribution of influence over healthy behaviors to
provider recommendations
Becker ER, Medical Care 2008;46:795-805
Alliance building 1:1
1. Feeling heard and understood (the bond)
2. Seeking agreement on a working formulation
of the problem
3. Seeking permission to offer advice
1. Feeling heard and understood
• Heard: active listening
– Creating the illusion of taking time
– Verbal and non-verbal indicators of paying
attention
– Actions that “co-construct” the story
• Understood: agreement on the nature of
the concerns and the highest priorities
2. Seeking agreement on a working
formulation of the problem
• Asking for permission to gather more
information
– Opportunity to open up more sensitive areas,
rule outs, emergencies
• Asking for permission to offer a preliminary
idea of the problem
– Asking if you’ve got it
– Cycling back to more questions
3. Seeking permission to offer advice
• Ready to act?
– If not, what would it take?
• What can we do now?
• What might we need to do next?
• Responding to “no”
1. Feeling heard and understood
Shaping concerns and managing time
•
•
•
•
Open-ended questions
Anything else?
Breaking into the story
Managing the two-patient visit
Skills for rambling (co-construction)
1. “I want to make sure we don’t run out of
time…”
2. Summarize your understanding and ask
for additional concerns
3. Specifically ask for focus
•
•
•
“Which one of those is hardest?”
“Pick one of those to start with.”
Ask for a specific example
“Pick one”
Click box to start film clip
0021/Example7
Two in the visit: skills when turn-taking
interrupted
•
Possible tactics
Shift in body language
• Acknowledge and re-direct
• Reminder of “rules”
•
•
Considerations
Timing
• Status of person interrupting or interrupted
•
“Enforcing” taking turns - child
Skills when participants are angry
at each other
• Rationale
– Want to manage negative affect in the visit (and help
people move on to problem solving)
– Want to demonstrate that dialog is possible
• Several “flavors” of extreme statements
– “Black or white” statements leave no room for
discussion
– Critical comments about family members
– Set-ups involving vague, value-laden goals
Responding to “black or white”
• Characterized by “always,” “never,” or
similar words
• Point out and ask for restatement
– Be prepared if you choose to challenge the
generalization
– Alternative: ask for “something easier to hear”
Responding to “black or white” with
“say something easier”
Click box to start film clip
mhvg0010/stronglang
Common issues in agenda setting
•
•
•
Parent and child/youth have different
priorities
Family priorities not same as yours’
Opportunities for additional visits are
limited
•
You really do want to accomplish more than
you have time for!
Skills for agenda setting
•
•
•
•
•
Making sure this process is clear to
patient/parent
Playing back the list of concerns
Asking for priorities
Getting agreement from all parties
Openly and collaboratively problem solve
about limitations on follow-up visits
2. Getting to agreement on a working
formulation
• Why ask for permission to get more
information?
• What is it that you want to know?
– Sensitive but important details
– Data related to possibly urgent treatment
needs (including overall level of function)
– What they think might be the underlying
cause
Small group task
• Pick a common condition (ie, depression)
• Brainstorm most efficient ways to ask about:
– Overall function and possible indicators of need
for urgent care
– Sensitive but possibly important information
related to the child or family
– Initial somatic causes/rule outs
– What child/family has already thought about as
cause/underlying issue
Reports from groups
• Focus on the first 2-3 minutes worth of
questions that will help you decide where
you are going with this problem
Hint about severity/function
• Questions from “SDQ”
– Do the difficulties you mentioned distress you
(teen) or your child (younger child)?
• How much?
– How much do they interfere with life?
•
•
•
•
At home
With friends
In school
In other activities
3. Asking for permission to offer
advice
• Summing up your thinking and checking
for agreement
– May need to cycle back to get more
information
• Do they still agree that this is something
they want to do something about?
– If no, what should be monitored, what would it
take?
Giving advice
• Rationale
– Being directive can fail even when people want help
• Anxiety, ambivalence, shame, loss of control
– Medical provider is usually not the first person in the
chain of consultation
• People come with prior ideas and opinions (about cause,
condition, treatment) that need to be incorporated
– People will accept advice they can’t follow
• Need to actively identify barriers
Asking about readiness to act
• People may be aware of a problem but not
yet ready to act on it
– The kind of advice needed depends on this
“stage of change”
– Mis-matched advice likely to be rejected
• If ready: get permission to give advice
• If not ready: what would motivate action?
What would be grounds to act?
Click box to start film clip
Gloss2/whatwouldittake2
When you get to give advice
• Ask for permission
– Helps patients maintain sense of control
• Ask for their ideas
• Offer advice as set of choices
– Preferably include their ideas among choices
• Frame as short and long term plans
– What might help now
– What diagnostic steps to take
Asking about barriers
• Easy to skip this step in a quick visit
• Evidence suggests even motivated
patients appreciate help with logistics
• Asking allows people to think through and
get more committed to plan
• Opportunity to build alliance and anticipate
“resistance”
Responding to “resistance”
• Overall, emphasize choice and time to
discuss
• Apologize for getting ahead
• Agreeing with a twist
• What would it take?
Getting information: apologize for
“getting ahead”
Click box to start film clip
gloss10/example3_9cine
Getting information: what would be
grounds to act?
Click box to start film clip
example3_10cine
Agree “with a twist” and inform
Click box to start film clip
example3_11cine
Summing up
• Evidence suggests these skills are worth the
time it takes to use them
– Also suggests they don’t take that much time
• It’s a team effort – worth thinking about who
on the team does what part best
• Only a part of building a larger system of care
– But may be an essential part
Much thanks