Transcript April 26, 2005 - Texas Education Agency

TETN Accountability
Update Session
November 13, 2008
1
State Accountability Update
2
Recent and Upcoming Events
 Nov 4
TAT list release (TEASE)
 Nov 6
AEIS release (TEASE)
 Nov 7
TAT list release (TEA public website)
 Nov 20
AEIS release (TEA public website)
 Week of Dec 1 PEG release (TEASE)
 Week of Dec 8 School Report Cards (SRCs) release
(TEA public website)
 Dec 11
Public Education Grant (PEG) list release
(TEA Correspondence Site)
 December
2007-08 Pocket Edition (public web and print)
3
2008 Gold Performance
Acknowledgments (GPA)
4
GPA Indicators & Standards
GPA Indicators
2008
1
Advanced/Dual Enrollment Course Completion
>= 25.0%
2
Advanced Placement/International Baccalaureate
Results
>= 15.0%
and
>= 50.0%
Attendance Rate
3
4-8
High School:
Middle/K-12/District:
Elementary:
Commended Performance:
Reading/ELA
Mathematics
Writing
Science
Social Studies
>= 95.0%
>= 96.0%
>= 97.0%
>= 25.0%
5
GPA Indicators & Standards (cont.)
GPA Indicators
9
10
Recommended High School Program (RHSP)/
Distinguished Achievement Program (DAP)
SAT/ACT Results
(College Admissions Tests)
2008
>= 80.0%
>= 70.0%
and
>= 40.0%
(new SAT reading &
mathematics only)
11
Texas Success Initiative: Higher Education
Readiness Component- English Language Arts
>= 55%
12
Texas Success Initiative: Higher Education
Readiness Component- Mathematics
>= 55%
Comparable Improvement (campus level only)
13 -14 Reading/ELA
Mathematics
Top Quartile
(top 25%)
6
GPA Acknowledgments
 At the district level, the number of districts earning
acknowledgments increased or remained steady for 13
of the 14 possible acknowledgments. Mathematics TSI
is the only one that decreased.
 The greatest increase for districts is 12% for
Commended Performance: Reading/ELA from 25%
to 38%. A total of 161 more districts (including 3 under
AEA) earned this acknowledgment.
 The second greatest increase is 10% for Commended
Performance: Writing from 30% to 40%. A total of
121 more districts (including 3 under AEA) earned this
acknowledgment.
7
GPA Acknowledgments (cont.)
 At the campus level, the number of campuses earning
acknowledgments increased or remained steady for
12 of the 14 GPA indicators. The two indicators that
decreased are Comparable Improvement: Reading/ELA
(27 fewer campuses) and TSI Mathematics (30 fewer
campuses).
 The greatest increase for campuses is 8% for
Commended Performance: Science from 21%
to 29%. A total of 703 more campuses (including 3 under
AEA) earned this acknowledgment.
8
AEA GPA
 AEA campuses and charters were first evaluated on GPA
indicators in 2008. Only the All Students group is evaluated;
student groups are not evaluated separately.
 There are 12 AEA GPA indicators. The two Comparable
Improvement indicators are not evaluated for AEA GPA.
 An Attendance Rate standard of 95.0% is applied to all AECs
and charters under AEA GPA.
 The percentages of AECs and charters earning GPAs are
smaller than their counterparts evaluated under standard
procedures. Among AEA charters, the GPA earned most
often is the RHSP/DAP (21.1%). The GPA earned most often
by AECs is Attendance Rate (20.5%).
9
Technical Assistance Teams (TAT)
10
Technical Assistance Teams (TAT)
 For 2008-09, there are 292 unique districts with one or more
campuses on the TAT list compared to the 395 unique
districts for the prior year.
 Most districts (71%) have only one campus on the list.
Dallas ISD has the most campuses of any single district
with 27. Houston ISD has the second most with 21.
 The most common campus type on the list is Secondary
representing 54% of all campuses listed (among the Both,
Elementary, Middle School, and Secondary categories).
 The 2008-09 TAT list has 510 campuses with no waivers.
This is a reduction of 367 campuses from the prior year.
11
TAT Campus Identification

A campus is included on the 2008-09 TAT list if the
following conditions occur:
o The
campus was rated Academically Acceptable
(under standard procedures) or AEA: Academically
Acceptable (under AEA procedures);
and
o The 2007-08 performance does not meet the 2009
for AA or AEA: AA accountability standards;
or
o The campus avoided being rated AU or AEA: AU
in 2008 due to the School Leaver Provision.
12
TAT Campus Identification cont.

A waiver is based on a three-year average improvement
calculation compared to the improvement needed to meet
the standard for the upcoming school year.

However, for the 2008-09 TAT list there will be no waivers
granted under standard or AEA procedures.

TAKS performance prior to 2005-06 cannot be recalculated
with grade 8 science and TAKS (Accommodated) results;
therefore, the waiver calculation cannot be constructed
using comparable data.
13
Requirements for Campuses Identified

The commissioner is required to select and assign a technical
assistance team to assist an identified TAT campus with
executing a school improvement plan and any other school
improvement strategies the commissioner determines as
appropriate.

The TAT team shall be composed of members of the
campus-level planning and decision making committee.

The team shall also include a member with the knowledge
and ability to provide technical assistance in the subject
area(s) requiring improvement.
14
Requirements for Campuses Identified

The commissioner will review and approve the final
membership of a TAT assigned. A form for the submission
of proposed TAT membership is located at
http://www.tea.state.tx.us/pmi/accmon/2008/tat.html

For districts with one or more TAT campuses, the form must
be submitted to the TEA, Division of Program Monitoring and
Interventions, through the TEASE Intervention Stage and
Activity Manager (ISAM) no later than December 1, 2008.

If a campus intervention team (CIT) remains in place for a
campus formerly rated Academically Unacceptable but now
rated Academically Acceptable, a TAT will not be assigned.
15
TAT Methodology
 In 2009, TAKS will include the same TAKS
(Accommodated) results as were used in 2008: science
(English) for grades 5, 8, 10, & 11; science (Spanish) for
grade 5; social studies for grades 8, 10, & 11; English
language arts (ELA) for grade 11; and mathematics for
grade 11.
 The 2008-09 TAT list utilizes 2007-08 and 2006-07 TAKS
results. The 2006-07 TAKS performance indicators have
been recalculated to include grade 8 science and the TAKS
(Accommodated) results.
 Campuses that meet the 2009 accountability standards
using the Exception Provision or Required Improvement
are not included on the TAT list.
16
Contacts
 Contact Performance Reporting at (512) 463-9704 or
[email protected] for questions
regarding TAT identification methodology.
 Contact Program Monitoring and Interventions (PMI) at
(512) 463-5226 or [email protected] for
questions regarding intervention requirements for TAT
campuses.
17
2007-08 Academic Excellence
Indicator System (AEIS)
18
November 6 TEASE release
 Two e-mail notifications were sent November 6, 2008 to
district superintendents and ESC directors.
 Unlike other accountability reports on TEASE, the AEIS
reports are not confidential because data are masked to
protect the anonymity of individual student performance
results. Therefore, these reports are ready to be
disseminated to the public.
 Note that the 90-day timeline for holding a hearing for
public discussion and publishing your reports began as
soon as the reports were released November 6th.
19
District Responsibilities
PUBLISHING
 MUST publish: performance and profile sections of district
and campus AEIS reports
 MAY publish: Glossary (Note: Spanish language
translation of the Glossary will be available January 2009)
 MUST ADD and publish:
o
o
o
Campus performance objectives
Report of violent or criminal incidents
Information from THECB about performance of
students in postsecondary institutions
20
District Responsibilities (cont.)
HEARING FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION
 Must be held within 90 calendar days after the November
6th TEASE release. District winter break days do not
count towards the 90 days.
 Within 2 weeks after the hearing, the AEIS report must be
disseminated.
21
District Responsibilities (cont.)
DISSEMINATION OF THE REPORT
May be accomplished by:

Directing readers to copies of the reports located on
the district’s website (preferred).

Directing readers to the TEA AEIS website.

Through mailouts.

By posting the report in public places.
22
District Responsibilities (cont.)
AEIS AND THE DISTRICT WEBSITE
 TEC 39.252 requires districts with websites to post the most
current accountability ratings, Academic Excellence Indicator
System (AEIS) reports, and School Report Cards (SRC) not
later than the 10th day after the first day of instruction of each
school year.
There is no requirement in this statute that district websites must
be updated with new AEIS reports after the 10th instructional
day. However, districts are encouraged to do so.
 See our FAQ about this requirement at:
http://www.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/3297_faq.html
23
Changes to 2007-08 AEIS
 TAKS (Accommodated)
Evaluates performance on the following subjects and grades:
 Science (grades 5, 8, 10, & 11)
 Science (grade 5 Spanish)
 Social Studies (grades 8, 10, & 11)
 English Language Arts (grade 11)
 Mathematics (grade 11)
 This affects the following indicators on the AEIS report:





TAKS Met 2008 Standard, shown by grade
TAKS Met 2008 Standard, shown summed across grades
TAKS Commended Performance
Texas Success Initiative (both ELA and mathematics)
Comparable Improvement (grade 11 only)
24
Changes to 2007-08 AEIS (cont.)
 TAKS 2010 Preview
Includes performance on all TAKS (Accommodated) tests,
in all subjects, all grades. Only 2008 is available for
preview, because TAKS (Accommodated) tests were first
administered to all grades and subjects in 2008.
 Grade 8 Science
TAKS Grade 8 science results are based on the 2008
student passing standard—Panel Recommendation (PR).
Grade 8 science results are shown by grade, and are
included in the summed across grade accountability
indicators and the Commended Performance results.
25
Changes to 2007-08 AEIS (cont.)
 Participation
“TAKS-M Only” has been added to the Tested subsection,
and SDAA II has been deleted. “ARD Exempt” has been
deleted from the Not Tested subsection.
 Student Success Initiative – Grade 8
2008 is the first year for the student success initiative for
grade 8. TAKS grade 8 reading and mathematics
performance is included in this indicator. Only one year is
available, for the first two measures: (1) Students
Requiring Accelerated Instruction, and (2) TAKS
Cumulative Met Standard.
26
Changes to 2007-08 AEIS (cont.)
 Student Success Initiative – Grades 3 and 5

For the TAKS Met Standard (Failed in Previous
Years) indicator, only 2008 results for students who
failed in 2007 will be shown.

The 2007 results for students failed in 2006 are not
directly comparable to the 2008 results since the 2007
results include both TAKS and SDAA II and the 2008
results only include TAKS.
27
Changes to 2007-08 AEIS (cont.)
 English Language Learners Progress Measure

For 2008, the RPTE has been replaced by the Texas
English Language Proficiency Assessment System
(TELPAS). Because two years of comparable assessment
data are not yet available, the ELL progress measure
cannot be computed in 2008. A progress measure based
on two years of TELPAS results will be reported for the
first time on the 2009 AEIS reports.
28
Changes to 2007-08 AEIS (cont.)
TAKS-M
 TAKS-M results will be reported at the state level only in
2008.

Since TAKS-M was only given in reading, mathematics, and
science at grades 3-8 and 10, all grades and subjects are
not available to be reported at the district and campus levels
until 2009.

TAKS-M state results can be accessed online via an
embedded hyperlink on the HTML version of the state AEIS
report, similar to the existing link to Performance of Mobile
Students.
29
Changes to 2007-08 AEIS (cont.)
TAKS-Alt
 TAKS-Alt performance results will not be incorporated in
the 2008 AEIS reports.
 TAKS-Alt will continue to be included in the participation
data reported on the AEIS reports.
 TAKS-Alt performance will be reported at the district and
campus levels in 2009 in coordination with the TAKS-M
results.
30
November 20 Public Release
 Includes TEASE products such as district and campus AEIS
reports, Comparable Improvement (CI) reports, and Guidelines.
 ADDS:










Region reports
State report
A separate report of how mobile students performed (statelevel only)
A separate report of how TAKS-M students performed (statelevel only)
Data download (includes a masking explanation)
Additional CI information
Multi-Year data
Links to prior-year reports
Links to grade level Progress of Prior Year Failers
Glossary
31
2007-08 School Report Cards
32
Overview
 The School Report Card (SRC) contains a subset of the
performance, staff, and financial data in the AEIS reports.
 As required by statute, these report cards must be
disseminated to the “parent, guardian, conservator, or other
person having lawful control of each student at the campus.”
33
District Responsibilities
 Districts must provide SRCs to their campuses.
 Must be disseminated to parents within six weeks after
districts are notified by TEA.
 The district winter break does not count toward the
six-week period.
 There are various ways to achieve the distribution
requirements (see TAC 61.1021).
 Supplemental materials are provided by TEA
o
o
Sample cover letters to parents (English and Spanish)
Definitions (English and, as soon as available, Spanish) 34
Delivery & Notification from TEA
 A website release only. Paper copies not mailed.
 Web products are accessible through the AEIS site.
There won’t be a separate TEASE release.
 Target release date is the week of December 8.
 Superintendents and principals will be notified of
availability via email.
35
2009-10
Public Education Grant (PEG) Program
36
Overview
 A statutorily-mandated program of school choice
(TEC Ch. 29, Subchapter G, 29.201-29.205
 Statute addresses campus identification, funding issues,
and student eligibility issues.
37
Criteria
 Partially aligned with accountability ratings, but not aligned
with the state system, AYP, or the TAT list.
 PEG criteria are more rigorous on the evaluation of
science results than the state standards.
 There is a three year moving time frame, so even
improved schools stay on the list if they were AU in any
of the prior three years.
 The number of campuses anticipated this year is expected
to be similar to last year. Last year there were 404
schools identified.
38
Calendar and Notification
 Planned release date is the week of December 1 via
TEASE to all districts with one or more campuses on
the list.
 List will be posted to agency website on December 11.
 An online FAQ is available through the Division of
Performance Reporting Resources link
http://www.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/resources/index.html
39
District Responsibilities
 Statute requires that districts notify parents of the
2008-09 list by February 1, 2009.
 The PEG list is based on 2006, 2007, and 2008
performance, but is effective for the 2009-2010 school year.
40
2009 AEA Campus Registration Process,
Registered AEC List, and
AEA At-Risk Registration Criterion
41
2009 AEA Campus Registration Process

The 2009 AEA campus registration process was
conducted online using the TEASE Accountability
website.

The 2009 AEA campus registration process was
opened initially from September 10-24. Due to
Hurricane Ike, the AEA campus registration process
was extended to October 31, 2008.

On November 5, 2008, response emails were sent to
campuses that submitted rescission and/or registration
forms. All 2009 AEA campus registration forms
submitted were approved.
42
2009 Registered AEC List

The 2009 Registered AEC List is available on the AEA
website at http://www.tea.state.tx.us/aea.

An Excel version of the 2009 Registered AEC List, sorted
by ESC region, will be emailed to ESC Accountability
Contacts later this week. This list may be used as a
reference when working with AECs in reporting accurate
at-risk data in the 2008-09 PEIMS fall submission.
43
2009 AEA At-Risk Registration Criterion

Each registered AEC must have at least 75% at-risk student
enrollment or be eligible to use either the Prior-Year PEIMS
At-Risk Data or New Campus safeguard to be evaluated
under 2009 AEA procedures and receive an AEA rating on
July 31, 2009. At-risk enrollment is verified through
2008-09 PEIMS fall enrollment data.

In April after the at-risk registration criterion is applied, the
Final 2009 Registered AEC List will be developed and
posted on the AEA website in May 2009. This list will
contain the AECs that will receive a 2009 AEA rating.

After the Final 2009 Registered AEC List is developed, the
list of charter operators that will be rated under 2009 AEA
procedures will be posted on the AEA website in May 2009.
44
Federal Accountability Update
45
2008 AYP State Summary Results
District Results
AYP Status
Meets AYP
Missed AYP
Not Evaluated
TOTAL
Final 2007
Results
Preliminary 2008
Results
1,069
87%
816
66%
136
11%
399
32%
17
1%
14
1%
1,222
100%
1,229
100%
46
2008 AYP State Summary Results
Campus Results (Regular and Charter)
AYP Status
Meets AYP
Final 2007
Results
Preliminary 2008
Results
6,447
80%
6,122
75%
Missed AYP
664
8%
1,160
14%
Not Evaluated
950
12%
913
11%
8,061
100%
8,195
100%
TOTAL
47
2008-09 SIP Results based on 2008 AYP
District Results
SIP Stage
Identification
Final 2007
Results
Preliminary 2008
Results
Stage 1
31
53%
50
53%
Stage 2
27
47%
27
29%
Stage 3
0
0%
17
18%
TOTAL
58
100%
94
100%
48
2008-09 SIP Results based on 2008 AYP
Campus Results (Regular and Charter)
SIP Stage
Identification
Final 2007
Results
Stage 1
115
41%
151
42%
Stage 2
93
33%
78
22%
Stage 3
46
17%
70
20%
Stage 4
22
8%
37
10%
Stage 5
2
1%
21
6%
278
100%
357
100%
TOTAL
Preliminary 2008
Results
49
2008 AYP State Summary Results
 Of those missing AYP, 18% (71)of districts and 1%
(13) of campuses missed AYP solely due to the 1%
and/or 2% caps in 2008. compared to 32% of
districts and 11% of campuses in 2007.
 A total of 498 campuses missed the Mathematics
Performance indicator, the largest category that
failed to Meet AYP standards.
50
Schedule for 2008 AYP Appeals and
Final Release
 October 10: Districts were notified of their AYP results via
the TEASE Accountability web application.
 October 14: Public release of Preliminary AYP results.
 October 24: Appeals deadline (must be postmarked by
this date).
 Mid-December: Districts will receive their appeal decision
notification letters and TEA will release final 2008 results
updated with the results of appeals.
51
2008 AYP Appeals
 A total of 126 School Districts have submitted
Appeals
 This represents 270 total AYP appeals:

78 School District appeals

Of the 78 district appeals, over 50 address
the requirements of the Texas AYP
Workbook

196 Campus level appeals
52
General Considerations for
AYP Appeals
 Appeals are not a data correction opportunity.
 Appeals are not considered for areas where a
district/campus Met AYP or was Not Evaluated.
 Appeals are considered for areas where AYP was missed,
even if the result would mean the district/campus still
misses AYP overall.
 Appeals are considered for data relevant to the 2008 AYP
result, and are not considered for data reported in the
prior year for Performance, Participation, Graduation Rate
measures.
53
General Considerations for AYP Appeals
(cont.)
 Appeal of the USDE approved Texas AYP Workbook
requirements, including the performance or participation
indicators based on the results of TAKS-Modified (TAKSM), TAKS-Alternate (TAKS-Alt), or TELPAS Reading are
not favorable for appeal.
 Appeals related to the Federal Cap, Campus Rankings, or
to the performance results due to the federal caps are not
considered.
 Graduation Rate Appeals based on the State
Accountability School Leaver Provision or the use of the
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) dropout
definition cannot be considered.
54
General Considerations for AYP Appeals
(cont.)
 Appeals to the AYP Graduation Rate indicator include those:

Based on recent immigrant students in U.S. schools for one
year or less with limited English proficiency (LEP), or

Based on students served by special education with
individualized education programs (IEPs) indicating 5-year (or
longer) graduation plans.

Appeal packet must include sufficient documentation for students
developed in their earliest years of inclusion in the Class of 2007
cohort.

Students served in special education programs with IEPs
developed during their fourth year (or Grade 12) of the
longitudinal cohort will not be favorable for appeal.
55
2008 AYP Exceptions Process
 School districts registered in the RF Tracker system and
school districts with RDSPD that are included in the 20072008 Directory for Services for the Deaf in Texas were
automatically applied an exception to the 1% cap.
 The federal cap applied to proficient TAKS-Alt results was
extended to include an additional number of students up to
the statewide 1% cap limit.
 The statewide 1% cap limit was sufficient to allow every
school districts with an exception to include all TAKS-Alt
passing students as proficient for AYP (in effect, remove
the 1% cap).
56
2008 AYP
Other Circumstance Exceptions
 Other circumstance exceptions were allowable and
were submitted as a regular appeal through the
online system.
 The approval of school district requests for
exceptions to the federal cap is based on the
availability of statewide slots within the cap that allow
the state to maintain a 1% cap limit on proficient
results from TAKS-Alt.
57
2009 AYP Preview

AYP Performance Standards increase to
67% in Reading/English language arts
58% in Mathematics

No changes to the state assessments used to evaluate
AYP are anticipated in 2009.

The Federal Cap process will be reviewed/discussed with
advisory groups, such as the Title I Committee of
Practitioners (COP), to determine if any changes are
necessary for 2009.

AYP Growth Proposal to the USDE and Final Title I
Federal Regulation may require changes to the 2009 AYP
calculations.
58
2009 Preview: AYP Growth Proposal
October 15, 2008
 Texas submits a proposal to use a growth model for determining
whether schools, school districts, and the state Meet AYP for the
2008-2009 school year. The proposal may be access at the TEA
Student Assessment website:
http://www.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment
October 29, 2008
 Texas receives a response from the USDE on the initial review of
the AYP growth proposal.
November 12, 2008
 Texas provides responses to the initial review, which may be
accessed from the TEA Student Assessment website.
59
2009 Preview: AYP Growth Proposal
(cont.)
Growth Proposal Abstract
 Students’ 2009 Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills
(TAKS), TAKS (Accommodated), and LAT scores in both
reading/English language arts and mathematics and campuslevel mean scores in these subjects will be used to predict
their performance.
 Students who are predicted to meet proficiency will be
counted in the numerator of the AYP percent proficiency
calculation along with students meeting the standard, and this
new percent would be compared with the AYP targets to
determine if the performance standard for percent proficient is
met.
60
AYP Preview: Final Title I Regulations
On Oct 28, 2008, Secretary Spellings announced final
Title I regulations to strengthen the NCLB Act that cover
three areas:

Accountability, Assessments, and Transparency

A Uniform, Comparable Graduation Rate

Proposed Regulations for Public School Choice and
Supplemental Educational Services
See Final Regulations for Title I Fact Sheets and Summary at
http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/reg/title1/index.html
61
AYP Preview: Final Title I
Regulations (cont.)
Regulations directly related to AYP:
Accountability, Assessments, and Transparency
 Minimum Subgroup Size and Inclusion of Students in
Accountability

Peer Review of the Title I Accountability Workbook
 Submit for approval in time for 2010 AYP.

Requirements for the Title I Accountability Workbook
 Explain the minimum group size and other
components of its AYP definition interact to provide
statistically reliable information while,
62
AYP Preview: Final Title I Regulations
(cont.)
Regulations directly related to AYP:
Accountability, Assessments, and Transparency

Requirements for the Title I Accountability Workbook
(cont.)
 Ensuring that the maximum inclusion of all students
and student subgroups in AYP determinations;

Include the number and percentage of students and
subgroups excluded from school-level accountability
determinations.
63
AYP Preview: Final Title I Regulations
(cont.)
Regulations directly related to AYP:
Accountability, Assessments, and Transparency
 National Technical Advisory Council (National TAC)
 National Assessment of Educational Progress
(NAEP) Data on State and District Report Cards

State, district and school Report Card information
must include NAEP
64
AYP Preview: Final Title I
Regulations (cont.)
Regulations directly related to AYP:
A Uniform, Comparable Graduation Rate
 Timeline to Implement the Four-year Adjusted Cohort
Graduation Rate
 Report the Four-year Adjusted Cohort Graduation
Rate by 2011 AYP;
 Use for AYP decisions in 2012 AYP.
 Option to Use an Extended-Year Adjusted Cohort
Graduation Rate or Rates
 Permit states to propose one or more extended-year
adjusted cohort graduation rates.
65
AYP Preview: Final Title I
Regulations (cont.)
Regulations directly related to AYP:
A Uniform, Comparable Graduation Rate
 Graduation Rate Goal, Targets, and AYP
 Set a state graduation rate goal and requirement for
continuous improvement from the prior year toward
meeting that goal;

Submit for Peer Review and approval.
66
AYP Preview: Final Title I
Regulations (cont.)
Regulations directly related to AYP:
A Uniform, Comparable Graduation Rate
 Disaggregating Graduation Rate Data
 Report the four-year adjusted cohort graduation rate or a
transitional graduation rate reported for school, district,
and state levels by student groups prior to school year
2010–11;
 States report the four-year adjusted cohort graduation
rate by the 2010–11 school year; and
 Use the cohort graduation rate by student group in 2012
AYP results.
67
2009 Assessments Used for
State and Federal Accountability
68
TAKS
State
Federal
Reading/ELA (grades 3 – 8 and 10)
Reading (grades 3 – 6 Spanish)
Mathematics (grades 3 – 8 and 10)
Mathematics (grades 3 – 6 Spanish)
Use in State Ratings
Use in AYP
Reading/ELA (grades 9 and 11)
Mathematics (grades 9 and 11)
Writing (grades 4 and 7)
Writing (grade 4 Spanish)
Science (grades 5, 8, 10, and 11)
Science (grade 5 Spanish)
Social Studies (grades 8, 10, and 11)
Use in State Ratings
Not used in
AYP
69
TAKS (Accommodated)
State
Federal
Reading/ELA (grades 3 – 8 and 10)
Reading (grades 3 – 6 Spanish)
Mathematics (grades 3 – 8 and 10)
Mathematics (grades 3 – 6 Spanish)
Report Only Indicator in AEIS
(2010 Preview)/
Not used in State Ratings
Use in AYP
Reading (grade 9)
Mathematics (grade 9)
Writing (grades 4 and 7)
Writing (grade 4 Spanish)
Report Only Indicator in AEIS
(2010 Preview)/
Not used in State Ratings
Not used in
AYP
ELA (grade 11)
Mathematics (grade 11)
Science (grades 5, 8, 10, and 11)
Science (grade 5 Spanish)
Social Studies (grades 8, 10, and 11)
Use in State Ratings
Not used in
AYP
70
TAKS-Modified (TAKS-M)
State
Federal
Reading/ELA (grades 3 – 8 and 10)
Mathematics (grades 3 – 8 and 10)
Report only Indicator in AEIS
(State Level only) /
Not used in State Ratings
Use in AYP
Reading (grade 9)
ELA (grade 11)
Mathematics (grades 9 and 11)
Writing (grades 4 and 7)
Science (grades 5, 8, 10, and 11)
Social Studies (grades, 8, 10, and 11)
Report only Indicator in AEIS
(2009) /
Not used in State Ratings
Not used in
AYP
71
TAKS-Alternate (TAKS-Alt)
State
Federal
Reading/ELA (grades 3 – 8 and 10)
Mathematics (grades 3 – 8 and 10)
Report only Indicator in AEIS
(2009)/
Not used in State Ratings
Use in AYP
Reading (grade 9)
ELA (grade 11)
Mathematics (grades 9 and 11)
Writing (grades 4 and 7)
Science (grades 5, 8, 10 and 11)
Social Studies (grades 8, 10, and 11)
Report only Indicator in AEIS
(2009)/
Not Used in State Ratings
Not used in
AYP
72
LAT Administrations of TAKS
Reading/ELA (grades 3 – 8 and 10)
Reading (grades 3 – 6 Spanish)
Mathematics (grades 3 – 8 and 10)
Mathematics (grades 3 – 6 Spanish)
Science (grades 5, 8, 10, and 11)
Science (grade 5 Spanish)
State
Federal
Not Reported in AEIS/
Not used in State Ratings
Use in AYP
Not Reported in AEIS/
Not used in State Ratings
Not used in
AYP
73
LAT Administrations of TAKS-M
Reading/ELA (grades 3 – 8 and 10)
Mathematics (grades 3 – 8 and 10)
Science (grades 5, 8, 10, and 11)
State
Federal
Not Reported in AEIS/
Not used in State Ratings
Use in AYP
Not Reported in AEIS/
Not used in State Ratings
Not used in
AYP
74
TELPAS
TELPAS Reading
(grades 3 – 8 and 10)
TELPAS Reading
(grades 2, 9, 11, & 12)
State
Federal
Report only as a Component of
ELL Indicator in AEIS (2009)/
Not Used in State Ratings
Use in AYP (for
students in their first
year of enrollment in
U.S. schools)
Report only as a Component of
ELL Indicator in AEIS (2009)/
Not Used in State Ratings
Not used in AYP
75
TETN Accountability Update Sessions
2009 Tentative Schedule and Agenda Topics
 February 19
Update on Accountability Development
 April 23
Accountability Decisions for 2009 and Beyond
 June 18
Accountability Manuals – State and AYP
 August 20
Accountability Results for 2009
 November 19
Accountability Ratings Update
Gold Performance Acknowledgments
AEIS Reports
School Report Cards
PEG List
76
Accountability Resources

Email the Division of Performance Reporting at
[email protected].

Phone the Division of Performance Reporting at (512)
463-9704.

ESC Accountability Contacts.

Online:

ACCT: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/

AEA: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/aea/

AYP: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/ayp/
77