Transcript Framework Agreement on First Nation Land Management
September 12, 2012
Presentation to: Ts’kw’aylaxw First Nation
What is The Framework Agreement?
A government-to-government agreement signed in 1996 Negotiated between 14 First Nations and the Department of Indian Affairs Gives First Nations the option of withdrawing their lands from the Indian Act in order to exercise control over their lands and resources Sets out the powers that will be transferred to the First Nation and is source of First Nation land management authorities
The original
14
First Nations Signatories
• • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Westbank, British Columbia Musqueam, British Columbia Lheidli T’enneh, British Columbia N’Quatqua, British Columbia Squamish, British Columbia Siksika, Alberta Muskoday, Saskatchewan Cowessess, Saskatchewan Opaskwayak Cree Nation, Manitoba Nipissing, Ontario Mississaugas of Scugog Island, Ontario Chippewas of Mnjikaning, Ontario Chippewas of Georgina Island, Ontario Saint Mary’s, New Brunswick
First Nation Land Management Act
It was enacted by Parliament in June 1999 It ratifies the Framework Agreement for the federal government Sets out the federal governments powers and obligations under the Framework Agreement It does not control Framework Agreement First Nations
Framework Agreement on First Nations Land Management Timeline
Draft Principles
Framework Agreement on First Nation Land Management Developed by Chiefs from 14 First Nations and Minister of DIA 1980/90’s
Framework Agreement on First Nation Land Management Federal Ratification Process
First Nations Land Management Act
Expansion 14 First Nations 37 Land Codes Ratified 90 First Nations Signatory 18 FN to be developmental between 2012 2016
Signed by 14 Chiefs and Minister of DIA February, 1996 Parliament of Canada Ratified First Nation Land Management Act June, 1999 Announced by the 14 LAB Chiefs and Minister of DIA March 2003 January 2012
Role of the Lands Advisory Board (LAB) and the Resource Centre
Lands Advisory Board FNLM Resource Centre
Elected political body comprised of 10 Board Members + the Chairman 3 regions in Canada (BC, Prairies, East) 4 Prairie Board Members Supports First Nations in accordance with the Framework
Agreement
Technical Body established by the Lands Advisory Board Day-to-day operations including support for LAB activities, financial administration, and technical advice and support to developmental and operational communities
Principles of the FA
Inclusion of on and off reserve First Nations members Once a Land Code is ratified by the community, the land management provisions of the Indian Act (approx. 25%) no longer apply First Nation lands continue to be lands reserved for Indians within the meaning of section 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867 (not fee simple lands).
Law making power over lands and resources Special relationship with the crown is retained
Principles of the FA
Legal status and capacity clearly defined No expropriation of reserve lands by government Protection of treaty rights or aboriginal rights Canada continues to be liable for previous acts and omissions (e.g. settlement of land claims).
Principles of the FA
A third party interest on reserve is protected – until that interest has expired (e.g. valid leases continue) An individual band member’s interest is protected on reserve (e.g. valid CP and other legal interests continue) Local dispute resolution mechanisms are to be developed to the satisfaction of the First Nation community Matrimonial real property provisions are to be developed by the community Conflict of Interest provisions are mandatory, ensuring fair land practices
Framework Agreement on First Nation Land Management
First Nation First Nation Land Management Federal Government Land Code Individual Agreement Ratification Process First Nations Land Management Act
Framework Agreement
Land Code Law-making powers Law-making processes Community consultation Land Protection Administration & Accountability Land Interests Dispute Resolution Individual Agreement Sets out specifics of the transfer of federal authority from the Indian Act to the First Nation Environmental Assessments Attached as schedules Sets out the First Nation funding levels that accompany the transfer Community Ratification Process Membership Votes
Community Successes
Nipissing First Nation (2010 Labour Survey results) 35 businesses (40% participation) Employment – 155 individuals employed 43 members / 63 Native people / 49 non-Native $42,808 average or $6.6 million in wage costs Estimate total 386 jobs @ $16.5 million in employment dollars
Community Successes
Whitecap Dakota First Nation (2011) Population 320 members (562 total) 19 Consecutive unqualified audits Numerous developments (golf course, casino, heritage trail, etc.) $100 million capital investment / 700 jobs created / $90 million generated in revenue annually / 1.4 million tourist visits per year Unemployment reduction – 1993 (67%) / 2011 (5%) Provincial average 4.7%
KPMG Findings
Framework Agreement First Nations are increasing the average annual number of land transactions by a 9% rate as opposed to transactions by First Nations under the Indian Act which are decreasing on average by 1%; and Framework Agreement provides better circumstances for First Nations to improve their land governance systems and processes (i.e., governance and decision making, facilitation of market opportunities).
KPMG Findings
Framework Agreement has contributed to First Nations increasing the number of businesses on reserve, with most new businesses being First Nation member-owned business (increased entrepreneurial activity).
Framework Agreement First Nations are expanding their business development to new and/or different industry areas.
Framework Agreement First Nations are beginning to see a shift in the quality of jobs available on reserve by providing jobs that require higher levels of education (2,000 jobs created).
KPMG Findings
Framework Agreement First Nations have experienced increasing internal and external investment in their communities (over $100 million in internal and external investment). Additionally, this investment occurred in more areas than before (i.e., hard/soft infrastructure, business regeneration/growth, new business).
37 Operational First Nations who have Ratified their Land Codes and are Managing their Reserve Lands and Resources
British Columbia Lheidli T’enneh Saskatchewan Muskeg Lake Sumas Muskoday Westbank* Songhees Whitecap Dakota McLeod Lake Nanoose Kinistin Beecher Bay Matsqui Kahkewistahaw Tsawwassen* Tzeachten Manitoba Ts’kw’aylaxw Leq’ a: mel Opaskwayak Cree Nation Sliammon Seabird Island Chemawawin Swan Lake Kitselas We Wai Kai Shxwha:y Village Ontario T’Sou-ke Skawahlook Tsawout Mississaugas of Scugog Island Chippewas of Georgina Island Squiala Henvey Inlet Tsleil-Waututh Mississauga First Nation Nipissing Whitefish Lake Anishnaabeg of Naongashiing