Termite Treatments

Download Report

Transcript Termite Treatments

Termite Treatments
Dr. Richard Houseman
Assistant Professor of Entomology
Division of Plant Sciences
University of Missouri
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Termite Control Tactics
• Possible Strategies
– Physical
– Cultural
– Biological
– Chemical
• Wood Treatments
• Soil Barriers
• Baits
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Cultural Controls
• Avoid wood-to-soil contact
– Log piles against structures
– Construction debris
– Backfill/front stoop shouldn’t contain wood
• Moisture management
– Drainage away from foundation
– Gutters, downspouts well-maintained
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Physical Control
• Barriers to tunneling
– Sand, basalt, granite, glass, etc.
– Grain size of 2.0-2.8 mm.
– 20cm thick.
– Stainless Steel Mesh
• Termi-Mesh
– Thick rubber mats
• Pre-construction only
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Biological Controls
• Nematodes (Steinernema)
– Not effective against subterranean termites in field
trials
• Fungi (Metarhizium)
– More successful than nematodes
– Bio-Blast (Paragon Professional)
– applied as a dust/WP
• Bacteria (Bacillus)
– Has been studied, but not currently used
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Chemical Controls
• Wood Treatments
– Reduce feeding on structural wood
– Pressure treatments or spray-on
• Products
– BoraCare/Jecta (Nisus) www.nisuscorp.com
• disodium octaborate tetrahydrate
– Tim-bor (U.S. Borax) www.borax.com
• disodium octaborate tetrahydrate
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Chemical Controls
• Chemical Barriers
– Applied to soil around structures
– 4gal./10ft./1ft.depth
– Restricted-use chemicals only
• Repellent vs. Non-repellent?
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Why Soil Barriers?
• To protect areas of the structure where
termites are likely to enter.
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Subterranean Termite Control
• Repellent vs. Non-repellents?
– Repellent (Pyrethroids)
• Termites detect and move away from treated soil
• No mortality
– Non-repellent (Various)
• Termites don’t detect treated soil and enter
• Mortality results
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Termiticide Bioassays
1cm
5cm
T
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Repellent Termiticide Bioassays
T
T
Control
T
Experimental
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Non-Repellent Termiticide Bioassays
T
T
Control
Experimental
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Termite Behavior Assays
Food
Nest
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Repellent Barrier
Food
Nest
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Termiticides
• Repellent Barrier Products
• Biflex TC (FMC) www.fmc-apgspec.com/
– bifenthrin; pyrethroid
• Demon TC (Zeneca) ecaprofprod.com/pest/
– cypermethrin; pyrethroid
• Dragnet FT (FMC) www.fmc-apgspec.com/
– permethrin; pyrethroid
• Prelude (Zeneca) www.zenecaprofprod.com/pest/
– permethrin; pyrethroid
• Prevail FT (FMC) www.fmc-agspec.com
– cypermethrin; pyrethroid
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Termiticides
• Repellent Barrier Products (cont’)
• Talstar (FMC) www.fmc-apgspec.com/
– deltamethrin; pyrethroid
• Torpedo (Zeneca) www.zeneca.com/
– permethrin; pyrethroid
• Prevail FT (FMC) www.fmc-agspec.com
– cypermethrin; pyrethroid
• Tribute (AgrEvo) www.agrevo.com
– fenvalerate; pyrethroid
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Non-Repellent Barrier
Food
Nest
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Termiticides
• Non-repellent Barrier Products
• Premise 75 (Bayer) www.nobugs.com
– imidacloprid; chlorinated nicotine derivative
• Termidor 80 (Aventis) www.aventis.com
– fipronil; phenyl pyrazole
• Phantom (American Cyanamid) www.basf.com
– chlorfenapyr; pyrrole
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Termidor PerimeterPLUS label
• Exterior perimeter
– MUST Trench/rod along foundation wall
– MUST Drill/rod adjoining slabs/patios
• PLUS
– MUST treat active sites indoors (+2ft in at least two
directions).
– MAY treat susceptible areas
• Original label directions for spot/partial/full
treatments still valid
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Termidor PerimeterPLUS label
A
A
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Chemical Controls
• Managing Reticulitermes Using Baits
– Just ‘killing the queen’ doesn’t work
– Centers of activity change in habitat
– Splitting colonies can occur using soil
termiticides
– Termite baits seek to address colony networks
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Why Baiting?
• To reduce the number of subterranean
termites in the vicinity of a structure.
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Baiting Methods
Four basic methods have been examined:
1. Monitoring stations followed by consumable
bait when termites are located
2. Consumable bait in stations prior to
detection
3. Consumable bait at the site of infestation
4. Trapping followed by groomable coating
applications and release back into station
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Typical Baiting Sequence
In: Termites: Biology and Pest Management
MJ Pearce. 1997.
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Baiting Strategies
• Areas where foraging is likely
– Temperature and moisture consistent
– Food sources nearby
– Active sites are best
• Do not want to disrupt foraging/feeding
• Distance between stations
– Clustered stations
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Baiting Systems
• Design considerations
– Disturbance at station
– Monitor integrity/acceptance
– Type of active ingredient
• Palatability of active ingredient
• Metabolism of active ingredient
– Bait matrix
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Commercial Baits
•
•
•
•
•
•
Sentricon (noviflumeron)
Firstline (sulfluramid)
Exterra (diflubenzuron)
Subterfuge (hydramethylnon)
Advance (diflubenzuron)
Terminate (sulfluramid)
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Sentricon
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
First Line
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Exterra
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Terminate
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005
Thank you. Questions or Comments?
Kansas IPM Education
October 2005