Legal Concepts for Engineers
Download
Report
Transcript Legal Concepts for Engineers
Legal Concepts for Engineers
Wentworth Institute of Technology
ELEC 163 Electronic Design I
Prof. Tim Johnson
Chapter 4 Section 7
“Fundamentals of Engineering Design”
By Barry Hyman
Accidents Happen
Students should read pages 162 to 165 in the text
regarding the Hyatt walkway accident.
Observe carefully the diagrams of Fig. 4-11.
Before the modification:
The nut in view A supported just the weight of one walkway.
The rod supported all the weight.
After the modification:
The nut on the lower right seen in view B supported the
immediate walkway plus all the weight below.
Accidents are the results…
If the nut had been strengthen to handle the addition
load, the accident wouldn’t have happened.
Most accidents are preventable.
The “most preventable” accidents are the result of
multiple, small causes.
Overlooked details, lapse of judgment, and lack of
familiarity, experience or knowledge are causes of
accidents.
…of the action not taken
Trust, assumptions, and confidence are weak
substitutes for verification.
“Injured parties” can file for compensation in
civil courts.
The defendant can be anyone in the product
chain connected with the product. This can
include the engineer! Anyone can be held
liable for the defect and the court will decide.
Legal Liabilities
Liability is part of civil law.
Civil law decides:
Who is a fault
Who violated an agreement
Who failed to keep a promise
Basis for decision is the evidence or facts.
Civil cases are decided on a “preponderance”
of evidence.
Legal Liabilities, con’t.
Winners collect from the losers:
Property
Monetary damages
Rights
Civil law is common law:
Based on tradition (what the normal course of business
would obligate the parties to),
And precedent (what a previous court decided in a
similar case).
Most common law has no specific statutory language.
Torts
Liability law belongs to that branch of civil law
known as torts.
It does not include disputes over contracts and
warranties.
“Tort reform” refers to overhauling the liability
system.
Most cases are heard at the state level thus creating
a different precedence for a different state.
Product Liability
Issues of product liability are claims by a
plaintiff concerning the characteristics of a
product.
The claims may be the result of the way the
product was manufactured, serviced or
repaired.
Claims could result from the product manual.
History of Torts
Originally, a plaintiff could claim damages
only if the engineer and the manufacturer had
an explicit (written) contract with their
customers. Known as the “privity doctrine”.
In 1916, when a wheel fell off a car…this
was replaced the doctrine of negligence.
Negligence
Basis for negligence:
Design created a concealed danger.
Failed to incorporate appropriate safety devices.
Product was made from inadequate materials.
Failure to warn user of the danger.
There are difference degrees of negligence.
3 Types of Negligence
Simple negligence
Failure to exercise care and caution that an ordinary
person normally would do.
Gross negligence
Intentional failure to perform an obvious duty
regardless of the consequences to the user.
Criminal negligence
Such flagrant disregard for the safety of the user that it
resulted in personal injury or death.
Strict Liability
Since the 1960’s, the plaintiff doesn’t have to
prove negligence.
The manufacturer is liable if:
The product was defective and unreasonably
dangerous, and
the defect existed at the time the product left the
defendant’s control, and
the defect caused the harm, and
the harm is appropriately assignable to the defect.
And the difference is…
Negligence considered the behavior of the
defendant.
Strict liability considers the behavior
irrelevant.
In strict liability, all that counts is the
condition of the product.
If no product is involved, negligence rules.
Defects
Can be the result of a production error or a
design error.
A production error occurs when the product
is not manufactured as intended.
A design error rests with the engineer.
The professor will talk about a design
problem he encountered during his career.
Unreasonable danger
Juries that are asked to consider whether or
not a design is safe are told to use a “test of
reasonableness”.
They are asked to consider whether or not a
reasonable person could expect a product
(when operated as the plaintiff did) to fail
and cause injury.
Compensation
If the plaintiff wins, a monetary award is
made. The plaintiff can ask for a certain
amount in the papers filed originally.
The award is made to compensate for the
damages suffered (compensatory damages).
Punitive awards are assigned to motivate the
defendant to modify their behavior.
Engineering Design for Today
Design to reduce exposure to liability.
Recognize that the product will be used in
careless or abusive ways and design
accordingly.
Courts have held that carelessness on the part
of the user is not grounds for dismissal.
Additional Design Procedures
Records must be kept to prove how well designed a
product is.
Engineers keep design journals that are records of their work.
Conduct extensive tests.
Results are recorded in the journal.
Records must be kept of the manufacturing
procedures and details.
These too are kept in a journal.
Careful preparation of product manuals.
These are prepared from information in the journal.
In a word…Exposure
Reduce your company’s exposure to liability by doing
your best.
Document everything. If you straighten up the stock
room, write it down!
If you aren’t happy with a design, neither will the
customer.
Oh, if your journals don’t have records of
what you did in the soldering iron project…
…you’re exposed to a lower grade.