Transcript New Directions” - Duke University
The
R.H.I.C.
Transport Challenge
Berndt Mueller (with Steffen A. Bass)
Modeling Methodology Working Group
SAMSI, November 23, 2006
1
Some Like It Hot…
Genre:
Comedy / Crime / Romance Thriller / Quark gluon plasma Melting nuclear matter (at RHIC / LHC / FAIR)
2
Elements of matter and force Matter Particles
Quarks Leptons
u
e e c
t
Force Particles
Photon (γ), gluon (g), weak bosons (W/Z) Higgs boson (H), graviton (G)
3
Transitions
Normal (atomic) matter: Electrons and atomic nuclei are bound into atoms With sufficient heat (~ 3000 K) electrons can be set free; atomic matter becomes a electron-ion plasma.
Nuclear matter: Quarks and gluons are bound into protons and neutrons With sufficient heat (~ 2 10 12 K) quarks and gluons are liberated; nuclear matter becomes a quark-gluon plasma.
4
When the Universe was hot…
Atoms form and Universe becomes transparent Quarks acquire QCD mass and become confined 5
Why Heat Stuff Up?
What heat does to matter: Increases disorder (entropy) Speeds up reactions Overcomes potential barriers States / phases of matter: Solid [long-range correlations, shear elasticity] Liquid [short-range correlations] Gas [few correlations] Plasma [charged constituents] (solid / liquid / gaseous)
6
Interlude about units
Energy (temperature) is usually measured in units 1 MeV 10 5 10 -3 binding energy of H-atom rest energy of proton Time is usually measured in units 1 fm/c = 3 10 -24 s time for light to traverse a proton
7
QCD (Nuclear) Matter
Matter governed by the laws of QCD can also take on different states: Solid, e.g. crust of neutron stars Liquid, e.g. all large nuclei Gas, e.g. nucleonic or hadronic gas (T Plasma - the QGP (T > T c 150 7 MeV) – 200 MeV) The QGP itself may exist in different phases: Gaseous plasma (T Tc) Liquid plasma (T, near T c , c ?) Solid, color superconducting plasma ( c )
8
QCD phase diagram
RHIC T Quark Gluon Critical end point Plasma Hadronic matter Chiral symmetry broken 1 st order line Nuclei Chiral symmetry restored Color superconductor Neutron stars B
9
QCD equation of state
Degrees of fr eedom : gluons (2 8) spin color 4 quarks (2 3
N
f ) spin color flavor 30
170 340 510 MeV
RHIC
Indication of weak coupling?
2 )
10
QGP properties
The
Quark-Gluon Plasma
is characterized by two properties not normally found in our world: Screening of color fields ( it’s a plasma!): Quarks and gluons are liberated Disappearance of 98% of (
u,d
) quark masses: Chemical equilibrium among quarks is easily attained
11
Color screening
2 f
a
g a G b
)
g a Q
Induced color density
a
b
)
a
wit h
G
2 (
gT
Q
2
N F
6 (
gT
) 2 f
a
Static color charge (heavy quark) generates screened potential f
a
t a
s r e
r
12
Quark masses change
1000000
Higgs
100000 QCD mass Higgs mass
quark
10000
field
1000 100 10
quark Quark
qq qq
1 u d s c b t
condensate Quark consendate “melts” above
T
c and QCD mass disappears: chiral symmetry restoration
13
The practical path to the QGP…
…is hexagonal and 3.8 km long
R
elativistic
H
eavy
I
on
C
ollider
STAR
14
RHIC results
Some important results from RHIC: Chemical and thermal equilibration (incl.
s
-quarks!)
u, d, s
-quarks become light and unconfined Elliptic flow rapid thermalization, extremely low viscosity Collective flow pattern related to valence quarks Jet quenching parton energy loss, high color opacity Strong energy loss of
c
and
b
quarks (why?) Charmonium suppression is not increased compared with lower (CERN-SPS) energies
15
Collision Geometry: Elliptic Flow
Reaction plane
z y x
Elliptic flow (v 2 ):
• Gradients of almond-shape surface will lead to preferential expansion in the reaction plane • Anisotropy of emission is quantified by 2 nd Fourier coefficient of angular distribution: v 2 prediction of fluid dynamics Bulk evolution described by relativistic fluid dynamics , assumes that the medium is in local thermal equilibrium, but no details of how equilibrium was reached.
Input:
e
(x,
i ), P(
e
), (
h
,etc.).
16
Elliptic flow: early creation
spatial eccentricity momentum anisotropy Flow anisotropy must generated at the earliest stages of the expansion, and matter needs to thermalize very rapidly, before 1 fm/c.
17
v
2
(
p
T
) vs. hydrodynamics
Failure of ideal hydrodynamics tells us how hadrons form Mass splitting characteristic property of hydrodynamics
18
Quark number scaling of v
2 In the recombination regime, meson from the quark v 2 : v 2
t
2 v 2
q
p
2
t
and baryon v 2 can be obtained v 2
B
t
3 v
q
2
p t
3
qqq
T,
,v
Emitting medium is composed of unconfined, flowing quarks.
19
Investigative tools Detectors Computers
BG-J
Phenomenology
provides the connection
20
Purpose of dynamic modeling
QGP and hydrodynamic expansion hadronic phase and freeze-out initial state Lattice-Gauge Theory: Experiments: pre-equilibrium Transport-Theory: hadronization
rigorous calculation of QCD quantities works in the infinite size / equilibrium limit only observe the final state rely on QGP signatures predicted by Theory full description of collision dynamics connects intermediate state to observables provides link between LGT and data
21
Transport theory for RHIC
initial state QGP and hydrodynamic expansion hadronic phase and freeze-out pre-equilibrium CYM & LGT hadronization PCM & clust. hadronization PCM & hadronic TM NFD NFD & hadronic TM string & hadronic TM 22
Observables / Probes
Two categories of observables probing the QGP: Fragments of the bulk matter emitted during break-up Baryon and meson spectra Directional anisotropies Two- particle correlations Rare probes emitted during evolution of bulk Photons and lepton pairs Very energetic particles (jets) Very massive particles (heavy quarks) Both types of probes require detailed transport modeling
23
RHIC transport: Challenges
• Collisions at RHIC cover a sequence of vastly different dynamical regimes • Standard transport approaches (hydro, Boltzmann, etc.) are only applicable to a subset of the reaction phases or are restricted to a particular regime Hybrid models can extend the range of applicability of conventional approaches The dynamical modeling of the early reaction stage and thermalization process remain special challenges
24
Microscopic transport
Microscopic transport models describe the temporal evolution of a system of individual particles by solving a transport equation derived from kinetic theory The state of the system is defined by the function In the low-density limit, neglecting pair correlations and assuming that f 1 f 1 f N N -body distribution only changes via two-body scattering, the time-evolution of can be described by a Boltzmann equation :
t E
r
f
1 processes
25
Relativistic fluid dynamics
Transport of macroscopic degrees of freedom based on conservation laws: μ T μν =0, μ j μ =0 For ideal fluid: T μν = (ε+p) u μ u ν - p g μν and j i μ = ρ i u μ Equation of state closes system of PDE’s: p=p( e ,ρ i ) Initial conditions are input for calculation RFD assumes: local thermal equilibrium vanishing mean free path
26
Hybrid transport models
Rel. Hydro Q-G-Plasma Hydrodynamics
Ideally suited for dense systems
model early QGP reaction stage
Well defined Equation of State Parameters:
initial conditions equation of state
Hadronization + Micro Hadron Gas
Monte Carlo time
microscopic transport
Ideally suited for dilute systems
model break-up/ freeze-out stage describe transport properties microscopically
Parameters:
scattering cross sections matching condition: • same equation of state • generate hadrons in each cell using local conditions
27
Analysis challenge
Parameters: Initial conditions Equation of state Transport coefficients Reaction rates Scattering cross sections Emission source Etc.
Models Analysis Observables: Hadron spectra Angular distributions Chemical composition Pair correlations Photons / di-leptons Jets Heavy quarks Etc.
28
Estimate of challenge
Optimization of parameters (with errors) involves: 20 – 30 parameters.
Large set of independent observables (10s – 100s).
Calculation for each parameter set: 1 – 10 h CPU time.
y
(
x
, q ) is highly nonlinear.
Output of MC simulations is noisy.
Estimate of required resources: 10 4 simulations for each point in parameter space.
MC sampling of O(10 5 ) points in parameter space.
O(10 11 ) floating point op’s per simulation.
Total numerical task
O
(10 20 ) floating point op’s.
Efficient strategy is critical.
29
RHIC Transport Initiative
Modeling Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions
Proposal to DOE Office of Science
Sci
entific
D
iscovery through
A
dvanced
C
omputing Program 10 PI’s from 5 institutions led by Duke, including 4 Duke faculty members (S.A. Bass, R. Brady, B.Mueller, R. Wolpert) Proposed budget ($4.5M over 5 years)
30
RTI structure
31
Optimization strategy
Use Bayesian statistical approach.
Vector of observables {
y
O (
x
, q )} parameters
x
with known system and model parameters q .
Compare with vector of modeled values {
y
M (
x
, q )} as with bias
b
(
x y
O (
x
, q ) =
y
M (
x
, q ) +
b
(
x
) + e ) and mean-zero random e , describing experimental errors and fluctuations.
Create Gaussian random field surrogate
z
M (
x
, q )
y
M (
x
, q ) probability distribution P( q |
y
M ).
of for efficient MCMC simulation of posterior
32
Visualization framework
33
IT Infrastructure
34
Outlook
The first phase
of the
RHIC science program has shown that:
•
equilibrated matter is rapidly formed in heavy ion collisions;
•
wide variety of probes of matter properties available;
•
systematic study of matter properties is possible.
The Quark-Gluon Plasma appears to be a novel type of liquid with unanticipated transport properties.
The successful execution of the next phase of the RHIC science program will require:
•
sophisticated, realistic modeling of transport processes;
•
state-of-the-art statistical analysis of experimental data in terms of model parameters.
Exciting opportunities for collaborations between physicists and applied mathematicians!
35
THE END
36