Transcript Active Learning: Strategies for Student Engagement
Active Learning:
Motivating Students to Learn
Dr. Theresa R. Moore
May 22-23, 2006
I hear, and I forget; I see, and I remember; I
do
, and I understand.
- Confucious May 22-23, 2006
Outline of Plenary
1. Review goals of Title 3; 2. Course design; 3. What is active learning & why do it?
4. Learning theorists & learning styles; 5. Active learning and technology (Isaac).
May 22-23, 2006
Outcomes of the workshop
Faculty will… Know basic concepts related to a cognitive approach to learning styles; Understand basic premises of active learning; Engage in active learning with their peers; Work individually and with their programs on purposeful alignment of outcomes, assessment methods, and instructional activities; Have a “toolkit” of active learning approaches to apply to courses.
May 22-23, 2006
Section I: Goals of the Title III Project
Goal 1: increase the use of outcomes based assessment in courses and programs to measure and improve student learning; Goal 2: increase the use of
active learning strategies
and technologies to effect learner-centered instruction.
May 22-23, 2006
Section II: Course design
2. Learning goals
May 22-23, 2006
Active Learning 4. Teaching & Learning Activities 3. Feedback & Assessment 1. Situational factors
Student learning outcome:
Students will critically analyze the current educational policies in the United States.
Primary instructional method:
lecture
Assessment method:
exams with critical thinking items embedded Learning Outcome(s)
May 22-23, 2006
Teaching & Learning Activities Feedback & Assessment
Section III: What is active learning & why do it?
Strategies that increase student engagement with material and are aligned with student learning outcomes Theory that derives from two basic assumptions: (1) that learning is by nature an active endeavor and (2) that different people learn in different ways (Meyers and Jones, 1993).
May 22-23, 2006
What is active learning?
[it is] when students are engaged in more activities than just listening. They are involved in dialog, debate, writing, and problem solving, as well as higher-order thinking.
(Bonwell, C., and Eison, J., 1991) May 22-23, 2006
Types of activities
May 22-23, 2006 • Small group work • Presentations and debates • Journaling • Role playing • Learning Games • Field Experiences • Case Studies • Class Discussions • Simulations….more!
(Mc Keachie, 1994 and Silberman, 1996)
Active learning types
“simple tasks” ad hoc exercises; little or no advanced planning; e.g.
“think-pair-share” “minute paper” “concept mapping ” “complex tasks” longer duration, carefully planned and structured Collaborative learning carefully structured, group formation and student roles important Cooperative learning a form of collaborative learning that has 5 specific criteria to maximize learning
May 22-23, 2006
Cooperative learning: 5 key components
1.
2.
3. 4.
5.
Positive interdependence
(each individual depends on and is accountable to the others);
Individual accountability
(each person in the group learns the material);
Promotive interaction
(group members help one another, share information, clarify);
Social skills
(emphasis on interpersonal skills);
Group processing
(assessing how effectively they are working with one another).
May 22-23, 2006
Why do active learning?
May 22-23, 2006 Sousa, D.A. (2000)
Why do Active Learning?
www.foundationcoalition.org
May 22-23, 2006
Research summary
Longitudinal studies show that cohorts of students instructed using active learning techniques
outperformed a comparison group on multiple measures: retention, graduation and pursuit of graduate study
(Felder, R., Felder, G, and Dietz, E, 1998) May 22-23, 2006
Research summary
“Scientists and engineers work mostly in groups and less often as isolated investigators. Similarly, students should gain experience sharing responsibility for learning with each other.”
Meta-analysis of research studies:
greater academic achievement, more favorable attitudes toward learning and, increased persistence
and programs.
in SMET courses www.wcer.wisc.edu/nise/cl1/CL/resource/R2.htm
May 22-23, 2006
Why do active learning?
Retention levels are enhanced when active learning methods are used (McKeachie, 1999; Silberman, 1996) Active learning produces: higher achievement, more positive relationships among students, healthier psychological adjustment. (Johnson, D. W., R. T. Johnson, and K. Smith , 1991) May 22-23, 2006
Section IV: Learning theorists & learning styles
Behaviorism (B.F. Skinner) – learning built on conditioning Constructivism (J. Dewey, J. Piaget, L. Vygotsky, others) – learning built on prior knowledge May 22-23, 2006
John Dewey (1916): 1) individual experience & 2) collaboration w/others are important for learning “School is primarily a social institution. Education is a social process….therefore [it]
is
a process of living, not preparation
for
living.” May 22-23, 2006
Active learning from the Constructivist School
Jean Piaget: we come to know the world by building new experiences on old experiences Lev Vygotsky: students learn better by engaging with “more capable others” May 22-23, 2006
Constructivist principles
Knowledge is constructed from experience; Learning results from personal interpretation of knowledge; Learning is an active process; Learning is a collaborative process.
May 22-23, 2006
Benjamin Bloom
Viewed education as goal attainment, not competition; Acknowledged individual differences and environment as crucial; Studied high achieving adults - found they excelled because of MENTORSHIP.
May 22-23, 2006
Three Domains of Learning (Bloom,1956)
• • • Cognitive: mental skills Affective: growth regarding feelings, emotions Psychomotor: manual, physicality, environment May 22-23, 2006
Bloom’s Taxonomy of Learning “Higher Order Thinking Skills”
Synthesis Comprehension Application Analysis Knowledge Evaluation
May 22-23, 2006
Alone or with a neighbor: 1) define each skill & 2) align in a hierarchy.
Bloom’s Taxonomy of Learning
Evaluation: compare and discriminate between ideas.
Question Cues:
assess, decide, grade, test, measure, recommend, convince, select, judge Synthesis: use old ideas to create new ones.
Question Cues:
combine, integrate, modify, substitute, plan, create, design, invent Analysis: identification of components.
Question Cues:
analyze, separate, order, explain, connect, classify, arrange, divide, compare, select Application: use of concepts/methods in new situations.
Question cues
: apply, demonstrate, illustrate, examine, solve Comprehension: understanding of meaning.
Question cues
: summarize, describe, interpret, predict Knowledge: recall May 22-23, 2006 of information.
Question cues
: define, identify, list, match
Learning styles
Visual, Auditory, Kinesthetic (VAK) Kolb’s learning style inventory (LSI) Meyers Briggs (MBTI) May 22-23, 2006
VAK learning styles
Visual learners have two subchannels
visual-linguistic visual-spatial
Auditory learners Kinesthetic learners have two subchannels
kinesthetic (movement) tactile (touch)
May 22-23, 2006
Section V: Active Learning & Technology
May 22-23, 2006
Bibliography
Bloom, B.S. (Ed.) (1956).
Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook I, cognitive domain
. New York ; Toronto: Longmans, Green. Bonwell, C. and Eison, J. (1991). “Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom.”ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Bonwell C. and Sutherland, T. (eds.). (1996).
Using Active Learning in College Classes: A Range of Options for Faculty
. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Dewey, J. (1938).
Experience and Education.
New York: Collier Books. Felder, R.M., Felder, G.N., Dietz, E.J. (1998). “A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention V. Comparisons with Traditionally Taught Students.” Engineering Education
, 98
(4), 469-480.
Fink, L. D. (2003).
Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses
. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.
Huba, M. E. and Freed, J. E. (2000).
Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning
. Allyn and Bacon.
Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., and Smith, K. (1991).
Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom,
Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
Kolb, D. A. (1984).
Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development.
Prentice Hall. May 22-23, 2006
Bibliography
Mc Keachie, W. J. (1994).
Teaching Tips: Strategies, research, and theory for College Teachers
. 9th edition. Lexington, Maryland: D.C. Heath.
Meyers, C. and Jones, T.B. (1993).
Promoting active learning: Strategies for the college classroom.
Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993. San Paiget, J. (1970).
The Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child
. NY: Grossman. Silberman, M. (1996).
Active learning: 101 Strategies to teach any subject
. Allyn & Bacon.
Sousa, D. A. (2000).
How the brain learns: A classroom teacher's guide
. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Stice, J. E. (1987). “Using Kolb’s Learning Cycle to Improve Student Learning.” Engineering Education, 77(5), 291-296.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1971). Press.
Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes
.. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds. & Trans.). Cambridge: MA: Harvard University May 22-23, 2006