Transcript Tekst

Model-based tools to support
practical water management?
(Some) Lessons learnt from
Harmoni-CA
Ilke Borowski, Prof. Claudia Pahl-Wostl
(Harmoni-CA/WP5)
Harmonised Modelling Tools for
HARMONI-CA
IRBM
• European Concerted Action
2007)
(Oct. 2002-Sept.
• Improve harmonisation of ICT-tools for the
WFD implementation.
• Establishing a forum for communication
– Networking among projects
– Exchange between water managers & tool developers
– Exchange between monitoring/ modelling
CatchMod Cluster
HarmoniCA
Interaction &
communication
Planning process
(e.g. WFD)
Information:
Data & Modelling
TRP
RiB
TQS
CLI
TRP
Problem definition
Solution
CoP
Calibration
TQS
CLI
TRP
Implementation
Data system
IT building
IT
QuABMW RiB
Transfer
Euroh
TQS
CLI
TRP
TQS
CLI
TRP
TQS
CLI
TRP
Quality assurance
BMW of building
RiB QuA
TQS
Selection
blocks
CLI
Euroh
CoP
Start
QuA
TQS
CLI
TRP
Adaptation
IT
CoP: HarmoniCoP; IT: HarmonIT; RiB: HarmoniRiB; Euroh: Euroharp;
QuA: HarmoniQuA; CLI: Clime; TRP: Tizsa River Project; TQS:
TempQSim; BMW: Benchmarking in WaterModelling;
WISE-RTD web-portal
www.wise-rtd.info
•brings together expertise from ongoing
projects on RBM
•elaborates, harmonises and makes expertise
available for practitioners
Options for Interaction
•to generate a dialogue between scientists
and policy makers
• 3 conferences, 12 workshops, river basin
meetings...
Interactive,
► . on: focused workshops for policy makers
and model developers!
-Use of tools in participatory RBM
-Tools for interaction of CAP & WFD
-Using Economic Methods and Models for the
Implementation of the WFD: 14/15th June 07, Berlin
Guiding Documents & Reviews
1. Guiding document on Uncertainty Analysis
2. Economic Methods and Models for the implementation of the WFD
3. Data availability and accessibility: State of the art on existing data
required for modelling for research purposes and for the
implementation of the
WFD
4. Decision Support Systems for water resources management: current
state and guidelines for tool development
5. Good practice in joint use of monitoring and modelling
6. End user involvement in research projects - a phone survey based
assessment of 12 research projects
7. Guiding document on integration of the human dimension in model
supported water management
8. Sensitivity analysis
9. Calibration
10.Model-based tools with regard to the interaction of water
management and agriculture
Some lessons learnt...
• Model-based tools are used in water management,
but...
they are in general developed and maintained
by consultancies
• Transfer from research to management
application has been facilitated but there are still
some challenges....
1) Structural Differences
Researchers
Water Managers
Timelines: project duration/
funding cycles
deadlines of e.g. WFD or
other management tasks
interest to improve research
methodology
Interest to assess specific
measures/ cost benefits
Full sectoral integration
specific integration
according to current tasks
2) Differences in Attitude
Researchers
Water Managers
Model-based tools as THE tool to
support IRBM
multitude of information sources
for IRBM
More involvement during
development of models
strong time/resources constraints
Interest in tool development
interest in long-term application
Improved uncertainty analysis
improved scientific data base
Options for improvement
• Earlier interaction of water managers and
researchers (e.g. during project development)
• More training of model developers on
management processes
• Model development processes as social learning
processes about IRBM
• Expanding funding for
– after development maintenance and application in
(different) basins
– proposal development
• Linking up different funding programms (e.g.
Research, LIFE, InterReg)
www.harmoni-ca.info
www.wise-rtd.info (22nd March)
4th Harmoni-CA Forum & Conference:
25th Sept 07
Workshop presenting projects results
26/27th Sept 07
Thank you!
Ilke Borowski