Transcript Slide 1

TEACHER EDUCATION AND TEACHER DEVELOPMENT
IN A CONTEXT OF CHANGE
Serbia
November 2012
Professor Graham Donaldson CB
University of Glasgow
Propositions
 Relentless drive to improve educational quality will continue
 The twenty-first century learner is different
 The twenty-first century teacher has to be different
 We need new ways of approaching career-long learning
 That requires a sophisticated concept of leadership
 School improvement starts and ends in the classroom
Relentless Drive for
Educational
Improvement
 School education is one of the most important and contested policy
areas for governments across the world.
 Evidence of relative performance internationally has become a key
driver of policy.
 Human capital in the form of a highly educated population is seen
as a key determinant of social justice and economic success.
 The pace and character of social, economic and technological
change has profound implications for how we conceive education in the
future.
 States and individuals need high levels of education for future economic,
social and personal wellbeing
 Innovation is integral to educational quality - create the future not
recreate the past
 Models of governance and change need to be dynamic and promote
alignment
↓
RE-EXAMINE APPROACH TO AND RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN
TEACHING / LEADERSHIP / CURRICULUM / ACCOUNTABILITY
Successful 21st Century
Learners
 Deep knowledge
 Strong core skills
 Can change, adapt, transfer skills
 Skills to access information, as well as retain it
 Persistent, resilient, able to manage impulse
 Have learned how to learn and want to learn
 Strong interpersonal/ intrapersonal skills
 Responsible, global citizens
 Secure in their values
What do we mean by
‘quality’?
 Qualifications?
 Destinations?
 Basics?
 Wellbeing?
 Capacity to learn?
 Desire to learn?
 Educated Person?
Lessons from
High-Performing Systems
 Clarity of purpose – values and curriculum
 High expectations of achievement
 Enabling all young people to achieve their potential
 Emphasis on early learning
 High quality teachers
 Culture of professional learning
 High quality leadership at all levels
 Outward looking – open to but not beguiled by innovation
 Intelligent accountability
 Reflective and self-evaluative
Fall and Rise of Teacher Agency?
 Early focus on expansion of provision – more =
better/strong teacher agency
 1960s - Alphabet soup curriculum reform
 Standards movement - measurement mania
 School effectiveness
 Curriculum specification
 Professional conspiracies – competition & inspection
 Teachers Matter - “It’s the teacher, stupid”
 ?????????
It’s the teachers stupid!
• Overall, the research results indicate that raising
teacher quality is vital for improving student
achievement, and is perhaps the policy direction
most likely to lead to substantial gains in school
performance
• Students of the most effective teachers have
learning gains four times greater than the
learning gains of the least effective teachers (
Sanders and Rivers 1996)
 Moving from being taught by an average
teacher to one of high quality leads to an
improvement which is roughly equivalent to
the effect on learning of reducing class size
by 10 students (Rivkin et al 2001)
 Differences among teachers explain up to
23% of the variation in student test score
performance that is potentially open to
policy influence (Rockoff 2004)
Teachers Matter
The quality of an education system cannot
exceed the quality of its teachers
(McKinsey & Co 2007)
Teachers Matter but…
“For commitment to flourish and for teachers to be
resilient and effective, they need a strong and
enduring sense of efficacy…They need to work in
schools in which leadership is supportive, clear,
strong and passionately committed to maintaining the
quality of their commitment.”
Day et al ‘Teachers Matter’ OUP 2007 quoted in
Hargreaves & Fullan ‘Professional Capital’ Routledge
2012
Teachers and change
85 percent are resistant to change what works for
them; ten percent are willing to change to be more
efficient; and five percent are willing to try new
innovations. Hence the moves to use accountability,
government pressure, compulsion and the stick rarely
change the conceptions or lens of teachers.
Hattie ‘Visible Learning ’ 2009 Routledge
And much teacher
knowledge is
 Tacit
 Intuitive
 Situation bound
 Chance
Wikman (Teacher Education Policy in Europe
2010)
We need teachers who  have high-levels of expertise – subject, pedagogy and theory
 have secure values – personal and professional accountability
for the wellbeing of all young people
 take prime responsibility for their own development
 but also see themselves as and act as part of a team
 see professional learning as an integral part of educational
change
 engage in well-planned and well-researched innovation
 are outward-looking and seek partnerships
AND
See themselves as having these values and capacities
AND
Are seen by others to have these values and capacities
How do we do it?
 Select and develop high quality people
 A continuum of teacher learning –






framework of standards
intellectual integrity
relevant
reflective
collegiate
research aware
 Relentless focus on impact on young people’s learning.
Teacher Standards should capture characteristics of high quality teacher
 establish a common language of quality
 provide a key reference point for teacher education – pre
and post qualification
 act as an incentive for career-long professional growth
 provide a basis for evaluating progress
 look credible to an experienced teacher
 contribute to embedding innovation
 help align policy and practice
If “the quality of education cannot exceed the quality
of its teachers” then the prime task for leadership is
to build the capacity of and maximise the impact of
those teachers, individually and collectively.
Leadership
 Distributed – attitude not roles/not followership
 Clear moral purpose/vision – social justice
 Relentless pursuit of high quality
 Respect for evidence
 Continuous learning – lead learner
 Communication/empathy
 Outward looking
 Capacity building
Policy frameworks for teacher evaluation
 Most countries (16/21) have policy frameworks for teacher
evaluation in place
 Completion of probation: 11/21
 Performance management: 13/21
 Registration: 6/21
 Reward schemes: 3/21
 Where teacher evaluation is not regulated nationally, it may still
occur informally at the local or school level
Forthcoming OECD Review 2012
Reference standards
 All but two countries that have policy frameworks for teacher
evaluation also have central standards to guide evaluation
 For the completion of probation, most countries use central
standards, sometimes complemented by description of duties /
code of conduct
 For performance management purposes, the use of school level
rules, regulations or development plans as reference points for
teacher evaluation is also common
 For registration, central standards or particular registration
standards; graduate profile in one country
Forthcoming OECD Review
Standards in Netherlands
Standards of professional competence
Dutch law defines 7 standards of professional competence
for Dutch teachers:
- pedagogically competent (safe learning environment)
- competent in terms of subject matter (contents and
didactics)
- competent in interpersonal relations
- organizationally competent
- competent in teamwork
- competent in cooperation with school environment
(parents)
- competent in reflection and development
Netherlands – Two categories of Skills
Basic skills:
The teacher clearly explains the subject matter
The teacher creates a task- oriented learning
environment
Pupils are actively involved in the classroom activities
Complex skills
The teacher:
tailors the lessons to various needs
tailors the assignments to various needs
tailors the available time to various needs
monitors the progress of pupils systematically
Netherlands
Rick Steur SICI 2012
Central concept:
 The professional space for the teachers
 The use of professional space by the teachers
Summary of current policy context
in Scotland
Curriculum for
Excellence:
what and how
children will
learn
National
partnership to
improve
teacher
professionalism
Establishing
conditions to
enable
teachers to
teach more
effectively
Supporting and
Accountability:
inspection
and
challenging
review
Improvement
Scottish Teacher Reform Programme
‘Teaching Scotland’s Future’ (Donaldson 2010)
Entry qualifications
New degrees – practicum reconceptualised
Continuum of professional learning – Standards
Professional review
Masters level profession
University engagement
Leadership college
Aligned policy
Strong partnership approach
ATEPIE PROJECT
 Addressing the key issue – teacher capacity
 Reference framework for teacher standards
 Partnership across the region
 Drawing on best international practice
 Attention to dissemination
 Inclusive development process
Big Messages for Policy
 Build on the past but do not be imprisoned by tradition
 Gearing and traction – focus on what matters
 If it’s not happening in the classroom, it’s not
happening (Elmore)
 Teaching capacity – professional standards
 School culture of aspiration, initiative, enquiry and
impact on learning
 Leadership focus on people and culture
 Policy alignment