Marzano & assessmenet - CRCSD

Download Report

Transcript Marzano & assessmenet - CRCSD

Data and Learning

Ground Rules Mission Statement Quality Tools & PDSA Quality Classroom SMART Goals Data Center Class Meetings Student-Led Conferences Data Folder

Quality Classroom

Deciding to enter into a quality process in education is not because good things are not happening but because of a desire to have good things happen regularly, consistently, and predictable at every level of the school system. Random acts of excellence have little effect on the desired strategic results.

~Margaret Byrnes

Essential Questions

 What do we want students to know or be able to do?

 How do we know? What evidence do we have of the learning?

 How do we respond if they struggle or don’t learn?

 How do we respond if they already know it?

Student Questions

What do I need to know?

Where am I now?

How do I get there?

What happens if I struggle or fail?

Assessment – What is it?

Can you define it?

Force Field Analysis

 Drivers & Preventors  With your group.

Types of Assessment

Formative

In-Process

Summative

High Stakes Testing

 What do these terms mean?

 Discuss with your group.

Purpose:

Assess to meet whose needs?

C l l a s s s s r o o m

  

S t t u d e n t t s s

  

T e a c h e r s s

  

P a r e n t t s s I I n s s t t r u c t t i i o n a l l S u p p o r t t

  

C u r r i i c u l l u m S p e c i i a l l i i s s t t s s

  

P r i i n c i i p a l l s s

  

C o u n s s e l l o r s s P o l l i i c y

  

S u p e r i i n t t e n d e n t t

  

S c h o o l l B o a r d

  

T a x P a y e r s s

  

L e g i i s s l l a t t o r s s

PURPOSE Two Uses of Assessment

SUMMATIVE

Assessments

OF

Learning

How much have students learned as of a particular point in time?

FORMATIVE

Assessments

FOR

Learning

How can we use assessment information to help students learn more?

Assessment for Learning

Rick Stiggins

Balanced Assessment: Meeting the Needs of All Stakeholders

Annual accountability testing

Interim, short-cycle or benchmark

Ongoing, accurate classroom assessment

for

learning

Overview

Reason To Inform Focus Summative Formative

Assessment OF Learning Check Status Others about students Standards Assessment FOR Learning Improve Learning Students about themselves Enabling Targets

Key IDEA:

Formative assessment can and should be done BY STUDENTS, as well as by teachers.

The key to improvement is how students and teachers use assessment information.

Assessment and Student Learning

 Robert J Marzano http://www.marzanoandassociates.com/  Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning http://www.mcrel.org/  Rick Stiggins Assessment Training Institute http://www.assessmentinst.com/

Factors Influencing Achievement

School

1. Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum 2. Challenging Goals and Effective Feedback 3. Parent and Community Involvement 4. Safe and Orderly Environment 5. Collegiality and Professionalism

Teacher

6. Instructional Strategies 7. Classroom Management 8. Classroom Curriculum Design

Student

9. Home Environment 10. Learning Intelligence/ Background Knowledge 11. Motivation Marzano

100 80 Increase of 34%ile to

84%ile

60 40 Starting percentile 50th 20 0 Teacher assessment effectiveness

13%ile increase to 63%ile

Starting percentile 50th Student Achievement

100 80 Increase of 49%ile to

99%ile

60 40 Starting percentile 50th 20 0 Teacher assessment effectiveness

28%ile increase to 78%ile

Starting percentile 50th Student Achievement

John Hattie—reviewed 7,827 studies on learning and instruction.

Conclusion… “The most powerful single innovation that enhances achievement is feedback. The simplest prescription for improving education must be ‘dollops’ of feedback.”

Like most things in education, classroom assessment enhances student achievement under certain conditions only.

• Feedback from classroom assessments should provide students with a clear picture of their progress on learning goals and how they might improve • Feedback from classroom assessment should encourage students to improve.

• Classroom assessment should be formative in nature.

• Formative classroom assessments should be quite frequent.

• Feedback from classroom assessments should provide students with a clear picture of their progress on learning goals and how they might improve Bangert-Drowns, Kulik, Kulik, & Morgan, 1991

# of studies Characteristic of Feedback from Classroom Assessment Percentile Gain/Loss

6 39 30 9 4 Right/wrong Provide correct answers Criteria understood by student vs. not understood Explain Student reassessed until correct -3 8.5

16 20 20

Feedback

from classroom assessments should provide students with a clear picture of their progress on learning goals and how they might improve Fuchs & Fuchs 1988

# of studies

49 89

Characteristic of Feedback from Classroom Assessment

Evaluation by rule

Percentile

32 26 49 32 classroom assessments using a tight logic)

 Identify one grade level (or course) learning goal per quarter or per semester for each of the following subject areas: mathematic, reading, writing, science, and social studies.

 Construct a rubric, or other type of common scale, for each learning goal.

 Have teachers formally and informally assess each learning goal at least once every two weeks keeping track of each student’s score on each learning goal. (Use of appropriate computer software is highly recommended)  Have students keep track of their progress on each goal and use the data as the basis for teacher/student interactions about student progress.

 Periodically (at least, once per quarter) aggregate the data by grade level. Have teachers meet to discuss student progress and how it might be improved

How effective am I when I set objectives?

When I set objectives, to what extent do I believe that my students

could describe what they are learning, not just describe what they are doing

focus more on learning goals than on completing assignments

personalize the learning goals Not at all 1 2 3 To a great extent 4

Setting Objectives and Providing Feedback

Generalizations from research on Providing Feedback

1. Feedback should be “corrective” in nature.

2. Feedback should be timely.

3. Feedback should be specific to a criterion.

4. Students can effectively provide their own feedback.

How do you provide feedback in a way that students

Know what they are learning and how well

the are progressing

Can explain what they need to do to get

better.

4 Clean refrigerator Entire refrigerator is sparkling and smells clean. All items are fresh, in proper containers (original or Tupperware, with lids), and organized into categories 3 Refrigerator is generally wiped clean. All items are relatively fresh, in some type of container (some Tupperware lids are missing or don’t fit) and are sitting upright

2 1 Some of the shelves are wiped clean, although there are some crusty spots. There are some suspicious smells. Items are in containers, but there seems to be some green stuff growing in some of the Tupperware Items stick to the shelves when they are picked up. The smells linger long after the refrigerator door is closed. Several items need to be thrown out— Tupperware and all

A generic template for rubric design

2 1 0 4 3 The student’s responses demonstrate no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and/or processes (THAT WERE EXPLICITLY TAUGHT)

4 3 2 The student’s responses demonstrate no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and/or processes The student’s responses indicate major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes; however they do not indicate major errors or omissions relative to the simpler details and processes 1 0

4 3 2 1 The student’s responses demonstrate no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and/or processes The student’s responses indicate major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes; however they do not indicate major errors or omissions relative to the simpler details and processes The student provides responses that indicate a distinct lack of understanding of the knowledge. However, with help, the student demonstrates partial understanding of some of the knowledge.

0

4 3 2 1 0 The student’s responses demonstrate no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and/or processes The student’s responses indicate major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes; however they do not indicate major errors or omissions relative to the simpler details and processes The student provides responses that indicate a distinct lack of understanding of the knowledge. However, with help, the student demonstrates partial understanding of some of the knowledge.

The student provides little or no response. Even with help the student does not exhibit a partial understanding of the knowledge.

3 2 1 0 4 In addition to exhibiting level 3 performance, the student’s responses demonstrate in depth inferences and applications that go beyond what was taught in class The student’s responses demonstrate no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and/or processes The student’s responses indicate major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes; however they do not indicate major errors or omissions relative to the simpler details and processes The student provides responses that indicate a distinct lack of understanding of the knowledge. However, with help, the student demonstrates partial understanding of some of the knowledge.

The student provides little or no response. Even with help the student does not exhibit a partial understanding of the knowledge.

3 2 4 1 0 In addition to exhibiting level 3 performance, the student’s responses demonstrate in-depth inferences and applications that go beyond what was taught in class.

The student’s responses demonstrate no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and/or processes The student’s responses indicate major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes; however they do not indicate major errors or omissions relative to the simpler details and processes The student provides responses that indicate a distinct lack of understanding of the knowledge. However, with help, the student demonstrates partial understanding of some of the knowledge.

The student provides little or no response. Even with help the student does not exhibit a partial understanding of the knowledge.

On this writing task, I will be working on, and would like to receive feedback on

,

_______________________________. In my next writing assignment, I need to work on_____________________.

4

My Progress in Writing Process—Content and Organization

Goal 3 2 1 Effort Achievement