Transcript The Engineering Council Examination

ECUK Experience in Accreditation of
Engineering Programmes
Professor Ian Freeston
University of Sheffield, UK
Higher Education Adviser, ECUK
IET Academic Accreditation Committee
ENAEE Label Committee
Director, Magstim Company
regulating the engineering profession
1
Outline
• How accreditation of degree programmes is
organised in UK.
• What the standards are.
• Typical accreditation procedure.
• Assessing Learning Outcomes.
regulating the engineering profession
2
The Engineering Council UK (ECUK)
• Sets and maintains the Standard for qualifying as a
professional engineer.
• Maintains register of qualified professional engineers.
• Maintains register of accredited engineering degree
programmes.
• Licences professional engineering institutions to assess
competence and accredit programmes.
• Supports international agreements.
regulating the engineering profession
3
UK-SPEC
• The Standard is published as UK Standard for
Professional Engineering Competence (UK-SPEC).
• UK-SPEC specifies competences for registration as a
professional engineer.
• UK-SPEC specifies the Learning Outcomes of
academic programmes to support the competences.
• UK-SPEC is the benchmark for engineering degrees
published by Quality Assurance Agency (QAA).
regulating the engineering profession
4
Qualifying as CEng
• Three types of professional engineer in UK but will
focus on Chartered Engineer (CEng).
• Different routes, but education to level of Masters
degree (or equivalent) is required.
• After graduation, two or more years of professional
development in employment to acquire competences.
• Professional Review before CEng; review of career,
referees’ reports, interview.
regulating the engineering profession
5
Education for CEng
UK-SPEC identifies six Learning Outcomes:
• Underpinning science and mathematics
• Engineering analysis
• Design
• Economic, social and environmental context
• Engineering practice
• General learning outcomes
regulating the engineering profession
6
Underpinning Science and Mathematics
• M1. Comprehensive understanding of the scientific principles of
specialisation and related disciplines.
• M2. Awareness of developing technologies related to own
specialisation.
• M3. Comprehensive knowledge and understanding of
mathematical and computer models relevant to the engineering
discipline, and an appreciation of their limitations.
• M4. Understanding of concepts from a range of areas including
some outside engineering, and the ability to apply them
effectively in engineering projects.
regulating the engineering profession
7
IET Procedure
• Document from School stating how standards are
satisfied, plus supporting documentation.
• Panel of four assessors, at least one from industry.
• Panel visits School, and assesses evidence.
• Panel report sent to School for correction of factual
errors, and for Action Plan (90 days).
• Accreditation Committee decides period of
accreditation, maximum five years.
regulating the engineering profession
8
Evidence assessed (1)
•
•
•
•
•
•
Aims and objectives.
Programme structure.
Learning Outcomes.
Methods of assessing student work.
Industrial input into programme.
Student admission, progress and destination.
regulating the engineering profession
9
Evidence Assessed (2)
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Examination papers.
Student project reports.
Qualifications of academic and support staff.
Research activity.
Laboratory, computing and library facilities.
Quality assurance procedures.
Meetings with students.
regulating the engineering profession
10
Grading the Evidence
The evidence is graded using a numerical scheme.
• 4 Acceptable
• 3 Satisfactory in most areas
• 2 Unsatisfactory in most areas
• 1 Unacceptable
Shortcomings and commendable features are noted.
regulating the engineering profession
11
Learning Outcome Matrix (Part of)
regulating the engineering profession
12
Evaluating the Matrix
• Criteria used by the School?
• Balance of totals in the five Learning Outcomes?
• What is rationale of the School for the distribution of
totals?
• Are there any unusual features?
• If necessary, check a sample of rows and columns.
regulating the engineering profession
13
Decision
1. Outcomes from last accreditation visit
2. Teaching programme and Learning Outcomes
3. Admission, progression, award, destination
4. Major individual project
5. Group projects
6. Staffing
7. Resources and facilities
8. Quality assurance
regulating the engineering profession
14
Conclusions
• Devolving accreditation from ECUK gives decisions
to experts.
• Different methods promotes improvement.
• Matrix enables overview and testing of Learning
Output claims.
• Context ensures Learning Outcomes are achievable
by students entering the programme.
regulating the engineering profession
15