Transcript Slide 1

Gamma-Ray Bursts and GLAST

Ehud Nakar

California Institute of Technology GLAST at UCLA May 22

Outline

•

GRBs: observations and model –very very brief overview

•

Sources of GeV emission in GRBs

•

Some physics probed by GLAST

•

The Lorentz factor during the prompt emission

•

The magnetic field strength

•

The jet structure

•

Predictions based on EGRET observations

•

Summary

Observations prompt emission

•

Fluence ~ 10 -7 - 10 -4 erg/cm Isotropic Energy ~ 10 50 -10 54 2 erg

•

Duration 0.01- 1000 s

•

Non-thermal spectrum (peaking at ~0.1-1Mev)

•

Highly variable temporal structure

Time

Afterglow Radio – optical – X-rays

Fox et. al. ‘05 Following soft g -rays we observe: X-rays (minutes-weeks), optical emission (hours-months) radio emission (weeks-years)

Longs & shorts

Kouveliotou et al. 1993

?

Shorts A merger of compact binary ???

(Eichler et al 1989; …) (Review by Nakar 07)

Longs Collapsar (

Woosley et al., …) (Review by Piran 05, Meszaros 06)

Goodman 86’ Paczynski 86’ Shemi & Piran 90’, …

The Fireball Model

Prompt emission

(Rees & Meszaros 94, …)

Compact Source synchrotron

g

-rays Internal Shocks 10 13 -10 15 cm

Thompson 94’, Usov 94’, Katz 97’, Meszaros & Rees 97’, …

EM instabilities

Particle acceleration (~10 16 cm)

Lyutikov & Blandford 02, Thompson 06

synchrotron

g

-rays

Afterglow (in the fireball model)

Reverse shock

††

(~10 17 cm) Relativistic ejecta X-rays Optical Radio Forward shock

†

(10 17 -10 18 cm) External medium Magnetic

†††

bubble

† ††

Meszaros & Rees 92… Meszaros & Rees 92; Katz 94; Sari & Piran 95…

†††

Luytikov & Blandford 02 X-rays Optical Radio

GeV-TeV photons

Gev-TeV photons are expected to result from

•

Inverse compton: Comptonization of the self synchrotron emission (SSC) in

•

the internal, external and reverse shocks

(Meszaros et al 94, Waxman 97, Wei & Lu 99, Dermer et al, …)

IC of photons produced in one shock by electrons that are accelerated in another shock

(e.g., Pe’er & Waxman 04, Beloborodov 05

.

Wang et al. 2006, Fan & Piran 2006) p 0

decay, proton synchrotron: Expected to be fainter than IC component

(e.g., Bottcher & Dermer 98, Totani 98, Bahcall & Meszaros 00, Zhang & Meszaros 01)

GeV spectrum of the prompt emission Constraining the Lorentz factor

High opacity to MeV photons is avoided by high Lorentz factor Long GRBs - assumption of high energy power-law spectrum up to Gev (supported by EGRET) implies

G

>~100-300

(e.g., Lithwick & Sari 01)

Short GRBs – Observatoins hint on a spectral cutoff (indication of particle acceleration cutoff???) around 300 keV implying

G

>~15

(Nakar 07)

Detection of opacity spectral cutoff will provide a measurement of

G

Synchrotron Self-Compton constraining the magnetic field strength

SSC emission is predicted to dominate at GeV

L IC L syn

~           

e B e B

   1 / 2 if if    

B e B e

 1  1 

e – fractional electron energy

B – fractional magetic field energy Afterglow observation indicate

e ~0.1 and

B ~10 -3 -10 -2 In the prompt emission

e >0.1,

B is not well constrained

Orphan afterglows –probing the jet structure

A collimated relativistic jets predict: On-axis orphan afterglow

(Nakar & Piran ‘03)

Typical GRB Off-axis orphan afterglow

(Rhoads ‘97) Nakar & Piran 03

Extensive search for optical orphan afterglows didn’t detect any yet.

GLAST has the potential to detect GeV orphans!

Detectability of a very bright GRB by the LAT alone 10 -7 10 2

jet =0.05 rad 10 1 10 0 10 -1 10 -8 10 3 T (s) 10 4 1 false detection 0.01 false detections

obs =0

obs =0.05 rad

obs =0.06 rad

obs =0.07 rad 10 5 10 -9 10 -10 10 2

jet =0.05 rad 10 3 T (s) 10 4 E iso =10 54 erg, n=1 cm -3 ,

e =0.3,

B =0.01, z=1

obs =0

obs =0.05 rad

obs =0.06 rad

obs =0.07 rad 10 5

EGRET GRBs

Earth occultation Hurley et al 1994

EGRET detected about a dozen GRBs both during the prompt emission and the afterglow

GeV detections by EGRET

From Ph.D. thesis by Maria Magdalena Gonzalez Sanchez

Prompt emission Afterglow

SSC predicts (to first order) a linear relation between BATSE and EGRET fluences: F

EGRET

=10

h

·F BATSE where

h

distributed normally

T90 200s Afterglow

1.6

Prompt emission 1.6

90%

1.4

1.4

90% 1 

1.2

1.2

1 

1

1

0.8

0.6

0.8

0.6

-3 -2.5

-2

-1.5

-1

-3 -2.5

-2  -1.5

-1 Ando, Nakar & Sari, in preparation

Likelihood contours for

h

distribution (

and

)

T90

1.6

1.4

1.2

1 0.8

0.6

-3 B

90%

-2.5

1 

-2

A -1.5

C -1 Detection Rate (yr -1 ) >5 photons

prompt A T90 B T90 C T90 15 20 10 Afterglow A 200 B 200 C 200 20 30 10 Ando, Nakar & Sari, in preparation

Summary

•

EGRET observations guarantee GRB detections by the LAT

•

If the GeV emission source is synchrotron self-compton the predicted LAT detection rate is ~20 yr -1

•

Determination of the MeV-GeV spectrum of the prompt emission:

•

will constrain (and maybe measure) the Lorentz factor

• •

may shed light on electrons acceleration in short GRBs will help to determine E p in many bursts

•

The ratio of the GeV to MeV emission in the prompt and afterglow emission may constrain the magnetic field strength

•

LAT triggering may detect the long sought for orphan afterglows.

•

Simultaneous operation with Swift is very important

Thanks!