Transcript Slide 1

Gamma-Ray Bursts and GLAST

Ehud Nakar

California Institute of Technology GLAST at UCLA May 22

Outline

GRBs: observations and model –very very brief overview

Sources of GeV emission in GRBs

Some physics probed by GLAST

The Lorentz factor during the prompt emission

The magnetic field strength

The jet structure

Predictions based on EGRET observations

Summary

Observations prompt emission

Fluence ~ 10 -7 - 10 -4 erg/cm Isotropic Energy ~ 10 50 -10 54 2 erg

Duration 0.01- 1000 s

Non-thermal spectrum (peaking at ~0.1-1Mev)

Highly variable temporal structure

Time

Afterglow Radio – optical – X-rays

Fox et. al. ‘05 Following soft g -rays we observe: X-rays (minutes-weeks), optical emission (hours-months) radio emission (weeks-years)

Longs & shorts

Kouveliotou et al. 1993

?

Shorts A merger of compact binary ???

(Eichler et al 1989; …) (Review by Nakar 07)

Longs Collapsar (

Woosley et al., …) (Review by Piran 05, Meszaros 06)

Goodman 86’ Paczynski 86’ Shemi & Piran 90’, …

The Fireball Model

Prompt emission

(Rees & Meszaros 94, …)

Compact Source synchrotron

g

-rays Internal Shocks 10 13 -10 15 cm

Thompson 94’, Usov 94’, Katz 97’, Meszaros & Rees 97’, …

EM instabilities

Particle acceleration (~10 16 cm)

Lyutikov & Blandford 02, Thompson 06

synchrotron

g

-rays

Afterglow (in the fireball model)

Reverse shock

††

(~10 17 cm) Relativistic ejecta X-rays Optical Radio Forward shock

(10 17 -10 18 cm) External medium Magnetic

†††

bubble

† ††

Meszaros & Rees 92… Meszaros & Rees 92; Katz 94; Sari & Piran 95…

†††

Luytikov & Blandford 02 X-rays Optical Radio

GeV-TeV photons

Gev-TeV photons are expected to result from

Inverse compton: Comptonization of the self synchrotron emission (SSC) in

the internal, external and reverse shocks

(Meszaros et al 94, Waxman 97, Wei & Lu 99, Dermer et al, …)

IC of photons produced in one shock by electrons that are accelerated in another shock

(e.g., Pe’er & Waxman 04, Beloborodov 05

.

Wang et al. 2006, Fan & Piran 2006) p 0

decay, proton synchrotron: Expected to be fainter than IC component

(e.g., Bottcher & Dermer 98, Totani 98, Bahcall & Meszaros 00, Zhang & Meszaros 01)

GeV spectrum of the prompt emission Constraining the Lorentz factor

High opacity to MeV photons is avoided by high Lorentz factor Long GRBs - assumption of high energy power-law spectrum up to Gev (supported by EGRET) implies

G

>~100-300

(e.g., Lithwick & Sari 01)

Short GRBs – Observatoins hint on a spectral cutoff (indication of particle acceleration cutoff???) around 300 keV implying

G

>~15

(Nakar 07)

Detection of opacity spectral cutoff will provide a measurement of

G

Synchrotron Self-Compton constraining the magnetic field strength

SSC emission is predicted to dominate at GeV

L IC L syn

~           

e B e B

   1 / 2 if if    

B e B e

 1  1 

e – fractional electron energy

B – fractional magetic field energy Afterglow observation indicate

e ~0.1 and

B ~10 -3 -10 -2 In the prompt emission

e >0.1,

B is not well constrained

Orphan afterglows –probing the jet structure

A collimated relativistic jets predict: On-axis orphan afterglow

(Nakar & Piran ‘03)

Typical GRB Off-axis orphan afterglow

(Rhoads ‘97) Nakar & Piran 03

Extensive search for optical orphan afterglows didn’t detect any yet.

GLAST has the potential to detect GeV orphans!

Detectability of a very bright GRB by the LAT alone 10 -7 10 2

jet =0.05 rad 10 1 10 0 10 -1 10 -8 10 3 T (s) 10 4 1 false detection 0.01 false detections

obs =0

obs =0.05 rad

obs =0.06 rad

obs =0.07 rad 10 5 10 -9 10 -10 10 2

jet =0.05 rad 10 3 T (s) 10 4 E iso =10 54 erg, n=1 cm -3 ,

e =0.3,

B =0.01, z=1

obs =0

obs =0.05 rad

obs =0.06 rad

obs =0.07 rad 10 5

EGRET GRBs

Earth occultation Hurley et al 1994

EGRET detected about a dozen GRBs both during the prompt emission and the afterglow

GeV detections by EGRET

From Ph.D. thesis by Maria Magdalena Gonzalez Sanchez

Prompt emission Afterglow

SSC predicts (to first order) a linear relation between BATSE and EGRET fluences: F

EGRET

=10

h

·F BATSE where

h

distributed normally

T90 200s Afterglow

1.6

Prompt emission 1.6

90%

1.4

1.4

90% 1 

1.2

1.2

1 

1

1

0.8

0.6

0.8

0.6

-3 -2.5

-2

-1.5

-1

-3 -2.5

-2  -1.5

-1 Ando, Nakar & Sari, in preparation

Likelihood contours for

h

distribution (

and

)

T90

1.6

1.4

1.2

1 0.8

0.6

-3 B

90%

-2.5

1 

-2

A -1.5

C -1 Detection Rate (yr -1 ) >5 photons

prompt A T90 B T90 C T90 15 20 10 Afterglow A 200 B 200 C 200 20 30 10 Ando, Nakar & Sari, in preparation

Summary

EGRET observations guarantee GRB detections by the LAT

If the GeV emission source is synchrotron self-compton the predicted LAT detection rate is ~20 yr -1

Determination of the MeV-GeV spectrum of the prompt emission:

will constrain (and maybe measure) the Lorentz factor

• •

may shed light on electrons acceleration in short GRBs will help to determine E p in many bursts

The ratio of the GeV to MeV emission in the prompt and afterglow emission may constrain the magnetic field strength

LAT triggering may detect the long sought for orphan afterglows.

Simultaneous operation with Swift is very important

Thanks!