Transcript Filateliaa - FIP REVENUE
ANALYSIS OF THE FIP REVENUE EXHIBITS 1988-2009 FIP Revenue Commission Meeting London 2010 Jukka Mäkinen Bureau Member of the Commission
CLICK: www.fip-revenue.org > exhibiting >
FIP EXHIBITION RESULTS 1988-2009
• A comprehensive list of all FIP Exhibitions revenue exhibits • Constantly updated in the future • London 2010 will be the next to be added shown in the with their results (awards and points)
CURRENTLY, THIS LIST INCLUDES:
• 31 FIP Exhibitions from Finlandia 1988 to China 2009 • 584 results of • 201 exhibitors with • 254 exhibits representing • 53 FIP Countries
INFORMATION ON THE LIST
An example: Great Britain
Akerman, Geoffrey Clive
Argentina, Revenues
Finlandia 88 (special class) V India 89 (experimental class) V New Zealand 1990 (experimental class) V Granada 1992 (experimental class) 90 G Brasiliana-93 90 G
Revenue Stamps of Brazil
Philakorea-94 LV Capex 96 91 G
Latin American Revenues printed abroad
España 2006 80 V St. Petersburg 2007 83 V
The Revenue Stamps of Peru
China 2009 85 LV ● Countries in alphabetical order ● Exhibitors of each country in alphabetical order ● Participations of each exhibitor in chronological order ● Many exhibitors have several exhibits; all of them are included ● Awards with points and possible special prices / felicitations
FOR NOTICING:
• In the very beginning, there was neither rules no evaluation in points, only medails were given (Finlandia 88, India 89, New Zealand 90) • Not every FIP Exhibition had a Revenue Class • The limits of the Revenue Class were first unclear or ”sliding”: for example (postal) railway and telegraph stamps and telegrams were shown • In some cases that kind of non-fiscal exhibit were transferred to another classes , sometimes not (transfers are hard to clear as Palmares lists are not uniform) • When evaluated as revenue exhibit , an exhibit is included in the list, when not, it is excluded
ALSO FOR NOTICING:
• A single exhibit can have been shown under different titles ; all these ” title varieties ” are mentioned on the list, although the exhibit is counted only once • Revenue literature (shown in literature class) is excluded • The list doesn’t include Continental Exhibitions FIAF and FIAP – they are another project!
of FEPA, • As the list has been constructed from many many different sources, errors and gaps are possible – please send alla your corrections and observations to: [email protected]
NUMBER OF REVENUE EXHIBITORS
TEN LEADING COUNTRIES 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 G R U S EA A T B R ITA IN C H IN A IN D A IA U S TR A LI A FI N LA N D G E R M A N Y S PA IN TH A IL N E A N TH D E R LA N S D IN S G A PO R E
TOTAL NUMBER OF EXHIBITORS: 201
NUMBER OF REVENUE EXHIBITS
TEN LEADING COUNTRIES 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 G U R S A EA T B R ITA IN IN D IA C H IN A A U S TR A LI A FI N LA N D S PA IN TH A IL A N D FR A N C E G E R M A N Y
TOTAL NUMBER OF EXHIBITS: 254
NUMBER OF PARTICIPATIONS IN FIP REVENUE CLASS
TEN LEADING COUNTRIES 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 G U R S A EA T B R ITA IN IN D IA C H IN A FR A N C E FI N LA N D A U S TR A LI A S PA IN TH A IL A N D G E R M A N Y
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPATIONS: 584
FIP-COUNTRIES WHICH DOESN’T HAVE ANY REVENUE EXHIBIT (IN FIP-LEVEL)
• Armenia • Austria • Bahrain • Belarus • Brunei • Bulgaria • Congo • Croatia • Cyprus • Czech Republik • Ecuador • Georgia • Guatemala • Honduras • Iceland • Iran • Ireland • Israel • Kuwait • Liechtenstein • Luxemburg • Macau • Malta • Mexico • Mongolia • Montenegro • Nigeria • Pakistan • Qatar • RPD Corée • Russia • Slovakia • Slovenia • Switzerland • Turkey • UAE • Uruguay • Vietnam
Totally 38 out of the 91 FIP-countries (=42%)
NUMBER OF PARTICIPATIONS PER EXHIBITOR
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 once twice 3 times 4 times 5 times 6-7 times 8-10 times 11-13 times
48 % OF THE EXHIBITORS HAVE SHOWN ONLY ONCE
NUMBER OF REVENUE EXHIBITS PER EXHIBITION
40 35 34 30 25 20 15 10 5 33 29 20 20 12 12 9 17 2019 21 7 2526 10 24 22 11 15 23 15 17 14 10 14 1112 17 20 4 0
EXHIBITIONS FROM 1988 TO 2009 SIZE OF REVENUE CLASS HAS VARIED FROM 4 TO 34 EXHIBITS
DEVELOPMENT OF AVERAGE POINTS FROM 1988 TO 2009
95 90 85 80 75
75,38
70
84,50 87,29 82,27 88,45 89,36 82,55
65
EXHIBITIONS FROM 1988 TO 2009 AVERAGE OF POINTS HAS VARIED FROM 75,38 (LS) TO 89,36 (LV)
MEDAILS AWARDED TO REVENUE EXHIBITS
30,00 % 25,00 % 20,00 % 15,00 % 10,00 % 5,00 % 4,80 % 0,00 % LG 25,50 % 27,20 % 20,90 % G LV V 10,80 % 7,10 % LS S 2,40 % 1,30 % SB B
THE MEDIAN LIES IN LARGE VERMEIL (27,2 % OF THE AWARDS)
CONCLUSION
In the future, FIP Revenue Commission as well as all us revenue collectors should draw our attention to: 1) Ensure that Revenue Classes of the future FIP Exhibitions are wide enough 2) Activate those FIP Countries philately who are not active in fiscal 3) Encourage one-time exhibitors exhibiting not to stop but continue
THANK YOU!
And remember visit: www.fip-revenue.org