AAMP - Latvijas universitāte
Download
Report
Transcript AAMP - Latvijas universitāte
Low-frequency excitation of
quantum dots: charge pumping
Slava Kashcheyevs
theory
Bernd Kästner (PTB, Braunschweig, Germany)
Mark Buitelaar (University of Cambridge, UK)
AAMP’2008, Ratnieki, Latvia
exp.
Outline
What we have...
quantum dots
What we
do...
”pump” ~ 0.1-1GHz
What we
get...
electrical current
What we learn...
electronic structure
metrological goals
quantum dots
conducting 2D
electron gas
Artificial versus natural atoms
Custom “ionic” potential
– easy to manipulate (electrostatics)
– less symmetries, hard to know exact shape
Excitation field confined to wires
– accurate frequency control
– (much) beyond dipole approximation
Coupled to enviroment
– the Fermi sea (gapless vacuum!)
– sensitive to fluctuations and signals around
Single-parameter non-adiabatic
qunatized charge pumping
Kaestner, VK, Amakawa, Li,
Blumenthal, Janssen, Hein, Pierz,
Weimann, Siegner, Schumacher
Phys. Rev. B 77, 153301 (2008);
Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 192106 (2008)
Experimental results
I=e×f
V1
V2(mV)
V2
Fix V1 and V2
Apply Vac on top of V1
V1
V2
Measure the current I(V2)
Theory steps - I
ε0
ε0(t) , ΓL (t) and ΓR (t)
Assume some resonable shape for the double-hill
Focus on “neutron-hydrogen” transition
Construct tunneling Hamiltonian
– each contact is a Fermi black body!
Solve for adiabatic evolution of the level and rates
Theory steps - II
For 1 level it is possible to
use exact Floquet solution
A rate equation is valid for
max (ΓL, ΓR, h f ) << kT
ε0(t) , ΓL (t) and ΓR (t)
We solve for P(t), separate the current into L-R
components and integrate over one period
Theory steps - results
Three main regimes:
I / (ef)
A. Adiabatic:
h f << min Γ
negligible
current
B. Optimal:
I→ef
quantization
C. Overdrive:
“stuck” charge
Mid-talk summary
Novel principle of quantized current
generation using just one signal
Frequency threshold for current generation
(“non-adiabatic blockade of tunneling”)
Work in progress...
Adiabatic pumping in carbon nanotubes
Experimental data
Peak-and-dip structure
Correlated with Coulomb blockade peaks
Reverse wave direction => reverse polarity
Experiment
and theory
Interpretation: a “molecule”!
Interpretation and a model
Two-level system
Adiabatic transfer:
– level-to-level
– level-to-lead
Two-parameter adiabatic pumping
Charge per period Q
Brouwer formula
PRB 58 (1998)
is easy to obtain
analytically
Q is an integral over
the area enclosed by
the pumping contour
Theory results for pumping
(0,0)
(1,0)
(0,1)
(1,1)
Effects of assymetry
Reduce frequency 5-fold
Conclusions
Every beast has some beauty...
...if you look at it form the right perspective.
Experimental findings
At small powers of applied acoustic waves the features
grow with power and become more symmetric
For stronger pumping the maximal current saturates
and opposite sign peaks move aparpt
(Static) transmission probability
Δ
Two “triple points”
0.3
One “quadruple point”
1
3
Γ/Δ
If Δ is less than ΓL or ΓR (or both), the two dots
are not resolved in a conductance measurement
Meaning of adiabaticity
Gapped system
Gapless system...?
Remain close to the ground state.
However, due to gapless excitations
(threre is an infinity!) you can end up in a
different state
Work in progress
Want to see quantum effects – Floquet
M.Sc. postition
Expreimentalist are pushing for
applications – postdoc postion in
Braunschweig