Transcript Document

A WELL-MADE PLAY
Saturday, 18 July 2015
Exam format:
A
“passage” question worth 10 marks –
your spoken language CA might be useful
here…
 A critical essay from a choice of two, worth
20 marks.
 PEE and close analysis is vital in the
passage.
 Embedded quotation is needed in the
essay.
An Inspector Calls

What is a “well-made play”?

The description is generally thought to
refer to two elements of the play:
The progression from ignorance to
knowledge not only of the characters, but
also of the audience.
The unity of time and space within the
play
1.
2.
Ignorance to Knowledge:

Unlike many Shakespearean plays, we are not
in the world of dramatic irony here in the sense
of the plot. However…
 The references to war and the Titanic are the
exceptions and foreshadow what will happen
 The audience may guess what is coming, just as
Sheila Birling does, but in essence, we know no
more than the characters.
 Each character has their own journey to
knowledge. We need to consider how the
inspector comes to be so well informed about
everyone.
Politics
 Priestley
was a committed socialist. Note
that the play was premiered in Moscow –
why would the storyline have appealed to
Stalin’s Soviet Union?
 Goole and Birling are both given political
speeches during the play. Sum up their
standpoints with references to speeches
on pp6-7. 14-16, 56.
Whodunnit?
As the plot unravels, we are hooked and
wish to find out more. Each scene adds to
our knowledge. But:
 There is no outcome, no Poirot-like
denouement.
 Instead we are left with the knowledge that
all will repeat itself until the characters see
the error of their ways. Why?
 MORALITY play?

Morality/Mystery play
 Medieval
plays to teach the Bible to an
illiterate mass.
 Clear presentations of allegorical
characters.
 Present a battle between good and evil for
possession of the human soul.
 Characters also represent sins who fight
for the soul of Man, protected by God…
 Greed, Pride, Lust, Envy…
Mum and Dad

By turns obnoxious and grand, the parents
struggle to cope on many levels.
 Mr Birling is an unashamed advocate of
Capitalism in its rawest state. Not above threats
and bluster, his realisation, if it ever comes, is
too little, too late. Even in Act 3 he is talking
about covering up Eric’s theft of money. His
bluster and anger is contrasted with the calm
and massive way that the inspector takes
control.
 What do we understand of his foresight in Act 1?
“Mummy dearest…”
 Insulted
by the “theft” of her name, she
rejects Eva, despite the fact that she is
pregnant.
 Unable to see what is coming she
advocates Eric’s downfall
 Dominant at home she treats Sheila as a
child and seeks to intimidate her and the
inspector.
Sheila


Seems to realise early on. Why?
Seems to almost be on Goole’s “side” as the
story develops.
 Hurt by Gerald, she has the capacity to
understand – she tells him that she does not
“dislike” him and takes responsibility for her
actions.
 “We often do on the young ones, they’re more
impressionable” –Inspector Act 2. In what ways
does Sheila fit this description?
 Has Goole’s visit worked for Sheila?
GERALD
Socially superior – who are his parents and what do they
make of the engagement?
 Seems to share Birling’s outlook on life.
 His affair: boys will be boys or something else?
 Did Sheila know all along?
 Consider his description of “Alderman Meggarty”.
 He is able to advise Mrs B. how to behave in front of the
inspector –once again, are we to believe that youth
confers some form of teachability?
 Consider his explanation on pp66-67. Why does Priestly
write this here?

Little Eric

Weak and treated like a child. Refuge is found
in alcohol. How early does he guess? Pg 22,
wants to go to bed… why?
 Can we find evidence of Birling treating him like
a little boy?
 Is he “likeable”? Consider his own description of
his treatment of Eva. “I was in that state when a
chap easily turns nasty”.
 Pg 57 conversation between Birling and Eric.
Who has learnt from the visit? What have they
learnt?
Ghoul
 Or
should I say Goole?
 Does he seem to be enjoying himself?
Justify your opinion.
 Massively powerful, he seems to dominate
easily.
 Where does his knowledge come from?
 Is he real? If not, what is he?
Answers RQs, constantly re-emphasises the ghastliness of the death
A real inspector?
“It doesn’t much matter now, of course –but was
he really a police inspector?” Sheila pg 58
 Does it matter?


Are you with Sheila and Eric or with Mr and Mrs
Birling on this point?
 The Birlings seem obsessed with appearances –
how does this tie in with Goole? Consider
Sheila on pg 65.