Transcript School Funding: Facts and Figures

School Funding: Facts and Figures
A library of PowerPoint slides compiled by
the Association of Metropolitan School Districts
Please contact AMSD Director of Research, Katy Sen with questions
651-999-7327
[email protected]
The Percent of Districts with Operating Referendum has Grown Significantly
87.0%
21.8%
19
80
19
82
19
84
19
86
19
88
19
90
19
92
19
94
19
96
19
98
20
00
20
02
20
04
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Note: The dip in 2003 was caused by a conversion of $415 in referendum authority to $415 in the basic formula.
Sources: 1) Crowe, Greg “A History of the School Operating Levy Referendum,” Money Matters, December 2002. Fiscal Analysis
Department, Minnesota House of Representatives. 2) Minnesota Department of Education.
$900
Of the $800
million in new
funding for
schools, $139
million is
projected to
come from
local levies.
$800
$139
$700
$95
Millions
$600
$500
$400
$300
$566
$200
$100
$0
K-12 Education Omnibus Bill
Aid
Shifts
Levy
$140
$120
$31.7
Millions
$100
$80
$60
$107.3
$40
$20
$0
K-12 Education Omnibus Bill
Projected Revenue from Referendum
Projected Revenue from Other Levies
Of the $139
million in new
levies, the
Minnesota
Department of
Education
expects that
$31.7 million
will come from
the passage of
new referenda.
Change in General Ed Revenue Per Pupil from FY 2004 to FY2007
$7,600
$7,483
$7,400
$7,200
$7,049
$7,000
$6,764
$6,800
$6,798
$6,600
$6,632
$6,400
$6,571
$6,488
$6,200
$6,000
$5,800
FY 2004
Nominal Increase
FY 2005
FY 2006
FY 2007
Inflation Adjusted Increase (IPD)
Change in General Education Revenue per pupil
(excluding referendum) from FY 2004 to FY2007
$6,800
$6,707
$6,600
$6,401
$6,400
$6,149
$6,200
$6,000
$6,115
$6,093
$5,967
$5,898
$5,800
$5,600
$5,400
FY 2004
Nominal Increase
FY 2005
FY 2006
FY 2007
Inflation Adjusted Increase (IPD)
Change in Special Education Revenue per pupil from
FY 2004 to FY2007
$780
$771
$772
$773
$760
$761
$740
$739
$720
$720
$700
$702
$680
$660
FY 2004
Nominal Increase
FY 2005
FY 2006
FY 2007
Inflation Adjusted Increase (IPD)
The Basic Formula Allowance Has Not Kept Pace with Inflation
5500
$204
$336
$452
$4,601
$4,601
$4,601
5000
$332
$208
$288
$226
$4,068
4000
$3,964
4500
$3,205
$3,150
1500
$3,050
2000
$3,740
2500
$4,974
$304
$4,783
$170
$3,530
$91
$3,050
3000
$3,050
$268
$356
$3,581
3500
$365
$3,505
$323
$382
1000
500
0
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Additional amount required for formula to keep pace with inflation and roll-ins since 1992
Actual Basic Formula Allowance
2006 General Education Revenue per AMCPU
Referendum Levy
7000
Referendum Aid
Transition Rev.
6000
Equity
5000
T&E
4000
Op Capital
Transp. Sparsity
3000
Sparsity
2000
LEP
Compensatory
1000
Extended Time
0
Gifted and Talented
Non-Metro
<500
Non-Metro
500 - 1000
Non-Metro
1000 to 2000
Non-Metro
>2000
Other Metro
Districts
AMCPU = Adjusted Marginal Cost Pupil Unit
Source: AMSD Analysis of Department of Education 2006 What If Report
Mpls & St.
Paul
Basic Education
2006 General Education Revenue per AMCPU
Without Basic Education
3000
Referendum Levy
Referendum Aid
2500
Transition Rev.
Equity
2000
T&E
1500
Op Capital
Transp. Sparsity
1000
Sparsity
LEP
500
Compensatory
Extended Time
0
Non-Metro
<500
Non-Metro
500 - 1000
Non-Metro
1000 to 2000
Non-Metro
>2000
Other Metro
Districts
AMCPU = Adjusted Marginal Cost Pupil Unit
Source: AMSD Analysis of Department of Education 2006 What If Report
Mpls & St.
Paul
Gifted and Talented
2006 General Education Revenue per AMCPU
Without Basic Education and Referendum
3000
Transition Rev.
Equity
2500
T&E
2000
Op Capital
Transp. Sparsity
1500
Sparsity
1000
LEP
500
Compensatory
Extended Time
0
Non-Metro
<500
Non-Metro
500 - 1000
Non-Metro
1000 to 2000
Non-Metro
>2000
Other Metro
Districts
AMCPU = Adjusted Marginal Cost Pupil Unit
Source: AMSD Analysis of Department of Education 2006 What If Report
Mpls & St.
Paul
Gifted and Talented
FY 2005 GENERAL ED FUNDING FOR AMSD DISTRICTS PER AMCPU: AID AND LEVY
BLOOMINGTON
BROOKLYN CENTER
BURNSVILLE
CHASKA
EDEN PRAIRIE
EDINA
ELK RIVER
FRIDLEY
HOPKINS
INVER GROVE HEIGHTS
MAHTOMEDI
MINNEAPOLIS
MINNETONKA
MOUNDS VIEW
NORTH ST. PAUL/ MAPLEWOOD
ORONO
RICHFIELD
ROBBINSDALE
ROSEVILLE
SHAKOPEE
SOUTH ST. PAUL
SPRING LAKE PARK
ST. ANTHONY/ NEW BRIGHTON
ST. LOUIS PARK
ST. PAUL
WAYZATA
WEST ST.PAUL / MENDOTA / EAGAN
TOTAL REVENUE
$5,829.13
$6,288.96
$5,854.58
$5,716.60
$5,688.13
$6,026.89
$5,557.00
$5,888.03
$6,219.55
$5,852.14
$5,434.76
$7,264.89
$6,172.05
$5,869.74
$5,894.59
$5,581.65
$6,198.88
$6,035.24
$6,143.80
$5,726.82
$5,851.90
$5,970.16
$5,636.83
$6,434.31
$6,869.08
$5,690.06
$5,899.98
RANK OUT OF 343 DISTRICTS
117
53
124
164
179
92
213
118
61
125
247
18
66
121
116
203
63
88
71
159
126
102
194
43
26
178
114
FY 2005 GENERAL ED FUNDING FOR AMSD DISTRICTS PER AMCPU: AID ONLY
BLOOMINGTON
BROOKLYN CENTER
BURNSVILLE
CHASKA
EDEN PRAIRIE
EDINA
ELK RIVER
FRIDLEY
HOPKINS
INVER GROVE HEIGHTS
MAHTOMEDI
MINNEAPOLIS
MINNETONKA
MOUNDS VIEW
NORTH ST. PAUL/ MAPLEWOOD
ORONO
RICHFIELD
ROBBINSDALE
ROSEVILLE
SHAKOPEE
SOUTH ST. PAUL
SPRING LAKE PARK
ST. ANTHONY/ NEW BRIGHTON
ST. LOUIS PARK
ST. PAUL
WAYZATA
WEST ST.PAUL / MENDOTA / EAGAN
TOTAL AID
$4,903.35
$5,826.61
$5,014.50
$5,013.55
$4,754.04
$4,723.37
$5,054.00
$5,166.26
$4,830.60
$4,978.50
$4,859.88
$6,586.57
$4,719.61
$4,907.82
$5,053.03
$4,724.15
$5,250.89
$5,159.38
$4,856.28
$5,168.31
$5,142.03
$5,098.21
$4,738.65
$4,898.47
$6,527.79
$4,737.50
$4,888.70
RANK OUT OF 343 DISTRICTS
322
67
289
290
336
341
280
245
335
300
330
21
342
320
281
340
207
250
331
243
258
272
337
325
25
338
328
The number of LEP students has
more than doubled since 1998
56,829
60000
51,275
53,507
47,963
50000
44,360
40000
35,810
31,576
30000
26,936
20000
10000
0
FY
1998
FY
1999
FY
2000
FY
2001
FY
2002
FY
2003
FY
2004
Number of LEP Students in Minnesota
Source: MDE Fall Enrollment Reports, K-12
FY
2005
The number of special education students
has grown by 11% since 1998
106,000
104,000
101,923
102,000
99,727
100,000
102,952 103,516
100,630
98,089
98,000
96,322
96,000
94,000
93,362
92,000
90,000
88,000
FY
1998
FY
1999
FY
2000
FY
2001
FY
2002
FY
2003
FY
2004
FY
2005
Number of Special Education Students in Minnesota
Source: MDE Fall Enrollment Reports, K-12
Between 1998 and 2005, the number of low
income students increased by 10%
250,000
245,638
245,000
238,371
240,000
235,000
231,635
230,000
225,000 223,324
225,372
224,814
221,266
220,000
219,431
215,000
210,000
205,000
FY
1998
FY
1999
FY
2000
FY
2001
FY
2002
FY
2003
FY
2004
FY
2005
Number of Minnesota students receiving free and reduced lunch
Source: MDE Fall Enrollment Reports, K-12
Minnesota’s rank in education spending relative
to income plunged over the past decade
12
12
FY 1995
FY 1996
16
17
FY 1997
FY 1998
26
27
28
31
28
FY 1999
FY 2000
FY 2001
FY 2002
FY 2003
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Minnesota's rank in education spending per $1000 personal income
Source: U.S Census Bureau: Public Education Finances Report, 2003 is the most recent available
Weak Growth in MN Education Funding
Minnesota Ranked 46th in the nation in growth in
inflation adjusted per pupil spending from 1997 to 2002
U.S. Average: 16.8%
Minnesota: 9.4%
Source: Donald J. Boyd, K-12 Education: Still Growing Strongly, June 21, 2004. The
Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government, State Fiscal News Volume 4, No.5.
School District Revenue
Per Student 1984 to 2003
12,000
10,079
$ per Student
10,000
8,000
6,000
5,673
4,000
3,808
2,000
0
84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99
Total revenue per ADM
0
1
2
Inflation adjusted Total Revenue per ADM
Source: Minnesota House of Representatives Research Department
3
Revenue per Student Less
Building Debt and Special Ed Expenses
12,000
10,079
$ per Student
10,000
8,656
8,000
7,341
6,000
3,808
4,000
3,625
2,000 3,305
0
84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99
0
Total Revenue per adm
Total Revenue Less Building Debt per adm
Total Rev less Debt and Spec Ed per adm
Source: Minnesota House of Representatives Research Department
1
2
3
Inflation Adjusted Revenue per Student
Less Building Debt and Spec Ed Expenses
12,000
$ per Student
10,000
8,000
5,673
6,000
3,808
4,000
4,872
3,625
4,132
2,000 3,305
0
84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99
0
Inflation Adjusted Total Revenue per ADM
Inflation Adjusted Total less Building Debt
Inflation Adjusted Total less Debt and Spec. Ed
Source: Minnesota House of Representatives Research Department
1
2
3
SPECIAL EDUCATION CROSS-SUBSIDY FY 2003
BLOOMINGTON
BROOKLYN CENTER
BURNSVILLE
CHASKA
EDEN PRAIRIE
EDINA
ELK RIVER
FRIDLEY
HOPKINS
INVER GROVE HEIGHTS
MAHTOMEDI
MINNEAPOLIS
MINNETONKA
MOUNDS VIEW
NORTH ST. PAUL/ MAPLEWOOD
ORONO
RICHFIELD
ROBBINSDALE
ROSEVILLE
SHAKOPEE
SOUTH ST. PAUL
SPRING LAKE PARK
ST. ANTHONY/ NEW BRIGHTON
ST. LOUIS PARK
ST. PAUL
WAYZATA
WEST ST.PAUL / MENDOTA / EAGAN
ADJUSTED CROSS SUBSIDY
$4,963,079
$811,239
$5,879,775
$3,488,961
$4,494,974
$3,295,389
$4,008,304
$1,118,309
$4,448,588
$1,740,550
$1,392,534
$25,257,804
$3,783,829
$4,656,745
$5,109,478
$1,095,940
$1,971,769
$7,053,730
$3,174,364
$1,832,557
$1,232,455
$1,535,173
$626,756
$2,655,352
$21,276,217
$4,026,067
$2,351,573
Example of How Declining Enrollment Affects a Metro School
District: Revenue Change Due to Enrollment Decline
2004-05
Projection
Enrollment Est.
General Ed. Rev.
% Change
Simulation
Enrollment
General Ed. Rev.
% Change
Revenue Change
10,734
73,049,744
2005-06
10,466
73,823,339
1.0%
2006-07
10,256
75,197,234
1.9%
10,734
10,734
73,049,744 75,166,698
2.8%
10,734
78,219,810
4.0%
-1,343,359
-3,022,576
Example of How Declining Enrollment Affects a Metro School
District: Expenditure Reductions due to Enrollment Decline
Enrollment Est.
Change
2004-05
2005-06
10,734
10,466
-268
Student/Teacher Ratio
Staff Reduction
Beginning Teacher Compensation
Cost Savings (10.5 x $45,000)
Revenue Loss
Net Loss
25:1
10.7
$45,000
$481,500
$1,343,359
$858,359