Transcript 幻灯片 1 - 东方地球物理公司国际部

Monthly HSSE Performance
Analysis for March,2015
BGPI HSSE Department
Contents
1. Statistics
2. Incidents and Analysis
3. RWP Analysis
1. Statistics
Monthly Proactive Indicators
Land & TZ
Marine
2483
67
60
41
Meetings
7663
760
Percentage of RWP Completed
81%
76%
Trainings
32421
1331
Hazard Reporting
3966
185
Unsafe Acts-UA
1560
17
Unsafe Conditions-UC
2406
168
Near Misses
5
1
First Aid Cases – FAC
14
1
HSSE Inspections/Audits/Visits
Emergency Drills
1. Statistics
Monthly Reactive Indicators
Land & TZ
Marine
Fatalities – FAT
0
0
Permanent Total Disability-PTD
0
0
Permanent Partial Disability-PPD
0
0
Lost Work Day Cases-LWC
0
0
Restricted Work Cases – RWC
0
0
Medical Treatment Cases -- MTC
0
1
Damage-DAM
0
1
Fire/Explosion
0
0
Security Incidents -SEC
0
0
Environmental Incidents -ENV
0
0
Health Case ( Medevac to hospital)
0
0
Road Transport Accident-RTA
2
0
1. Statistics
Other Indicators
Land & TZ
Marine
Exposure Hours
4,299,152
213,984
Kilometers Driven
2,857,117
0
0.00
0
0
0
0.70
0
Total Recordable Cases Frequency (monthly)-TRCF
Lost Time Injury Frequency (monthly)-LTIF
Motor Vehicle Accident Frequency (monthly)MVAF
BGP International HSE Performance of 2015(monthly)Land&TZ
10,000,000
2.00
Exposed Manhours
9,000,000
8,000,000
1.50
7,000,000
6,000,000
1.00
5,000,000
0.58
1.00
4,000,000
0.50
0.23
3,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
0
Manhours
LTIF
TRCF
LTIF Target
TRCF Target
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Jan
5,197,260
0.00
0.58
0.10
1.00
Feb
4,404,896
0.00
0.23
0.10
1.00
Mar
4,299,152
0.00
0.00
0.10
1.00
0.50
Total Man-hours
FAR
LTIF
TRCF
13,901,308
0.0
0.0
0.29
LTIF/TRCF Frequency Per Million Manhours
1. Statistics
BGP International HSE Performance of 2015(Accumulated)Land&TZ
2.00
0.30
0.25
1.50
0.20
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.15
0.58
0.42
0.50
0.29
0.10
0.10
0.00
0.50
TRCF Target
TRCF
FAR
LTIF Target
LTIF
0.10
0.10
0.05
0.00
Jan
1.00
0.58
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.00
Feb
1.00
0.42
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.00
Mar
1.00
0.29
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.00
Total Man-hours
FAR
LTIF
TRCF
13,901,308
0.0
0.0
0.29
LTI Frequency Per Million Manhours
TRC Frequency Per Million manhours
1. Statistics
1. Statistics
3.5
6000000
5197260
3
4404896
4299152
2.5
5000000
4000000
2
3000000
1.5
LTI
RWC
MTC
RTA
2000000
1
1000000
0.5
0
0
Jan
Feb
Mar
Month
Jan
Feb
Mar
Total
MTC
2
1
0
3
RWC
1
0
0
1
LTI
0
0
0
0
TRC
3
1
0
4
RTA
0
0
2
2
TRC
Million Hrs
1. Statistics
BGP Marine HSE Performance of 2015 (Monthly)
300,000
4.67
193,296
3.50
200,000
2.50
1.50
100,000
0.84
0.3
0.00
0
Manhours
LTIF
TRCF
FAR
LTIF Target
TRCF Target
0.84
0.3
0.00
1
206,376
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.3
0.84
0.84
0.3
2
193,296
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.3
0.84
0.50
0.50
3
213,984
0.00
4.67
0.00
0.3
0.84
Total Man-hours
FAR
LTIF
TRCF
613,656
0.0
0.0
1.63
LTIF/TRCF
MANHOURS
206,376
4.50
213,984
1. Statistics
BGP HSE Performance of 2015 (Accumulated) -Marine
2.5
215,000
210,000
206,376
205,000
200,000
0.84
195,000
0.3
0.00
190,000
185,000
180,000
0.84
193,296
0.3
0.00
213,984
2
1.63
1.5
1
0.84
0.5
0.3
0
1
2
3
Workhours
206,376
193,296
213,984
LTIF Target
0.3
0.3
0.3
LTIF
0.00
0.00
0.00
TRCF Target
0.84
0.84
0.84
TRCF
0.00
0.00
1.63
FAR
0.00
0.00
0.00
-0.5
Total Man-hours
FAR
LTIF
TRCF
613,656
0.0
0.0
1.63
LTIF/TRCF Per Million manhours
Exposed Manhours
220,000
1. Statistics
BGP Motor Vehicle Accident Analysis of 2015 (Monthly)-Land & TZ
3,300,000
1.00
KM Driven
3,100,000
0.80
0.60
0.70
0.60
0.60
3,000,000
0.40
2,900,000
2,883,965
2,857,117
2,800,000
0.00
2,700,000
2,600,000
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.20
1
2
3
3,230,715
2,883,965
2,857,117
MVAF
0.00
0.00
0.70
MVAF Darget
0.60
0.60
0.60
KM Driven
0.60
Total Km driven
MVAF Target
MVAF
8,971,797
0.60
0.22
Monthly MVAF
3,230,715
3,200,000
1. Statistics
BGP Motor Vehicle Accident Analysis of 2015 (Accumulated)-Land & TZ
6,500,000
1.00
5,500,000
0.80
4,500,000
0.60
3,230,715
2,500,000
0.60
0.60
2,883,965
2,857,117
0.40
0.22
0.20
1,500,000
0.00
500,000
-500,000
0.00
0.00
0.20
1
2
3
3,230,715
2,883,965
2,857,117
MVAF Target
0.60
0.60
0.60
MVAF
0.00
0.00
0.22
Km Driven
Total Km driven
MVAF Target
MVAF
8,971,797
0.60
0.22
MVAF
Km Diven
3,500,000
0.60
1. Statistics
Number of RTA by Month,2015
Total: 2
RTA Statistics
2
2
1
0
0
0
January
February
March
1. Statistics
Number of RTA by Country (Jan-Mar.,2015)
Total: 2
RTA Statistics
5
4
3
2
1
0
1
Congo
1
Iraq(South)
2. Incidents and Analysis
Country
Client
Date
Classification
Congo (Crew 9811)
Wing Wah
March 6, 2015
RTA
Brief description of incident
At about 14:00 on March 6, 2015, one mechanical crew’s pickup (T37) from crew 9811
went back to camp after completing a field repairing work. Before the pickup passing a Tjunction, one local truck coming from opposite direction turned left suddenly to the soil road
of the T-junction without applying indicators and blocked the way of T37 fully. The driver of
T37 used brake immediately, but the short distance (only 15m) was not enough to stop the
pickup completely. Finally, the pickup collided on the rear right side of the local truck. After
investigation, the traffic policemen judged that the local truck was full responsibility.
No injuries happened in both vehicles. The front part of T37 was distorted. The rear right
side of local truck was cracked and scratched slightly. The total estimated loss of T37 was
about 2000USD.
2. Incidents and Analysis
The front part of T37
Sketch 2
The sketch of the incident
The rear part of the local truck
2. Incidents and Analysis
Causes:
 The local truck turn left suddenly and occupied the driving lane of T37.
 The indicator of the local truck was not work.
The light rain cause the road was slippery.
 T37 driver didn’t reduce speed before passing the T-junction.
 Both of the two drivers are lack of defensive driving awareness.
Lessons Learned :
 Be alert with the local drivers’ unsafe behaviors.
 Reduce the speed before T-junction.
 Observe the MOPO procedure while driving in special weather.
 Improve the defensive driving awareness of the crew drivers.
2. Incidents and Analysis
Country
Client
Date
Classification
Iraq South (GIS)
BP
March 19, 2015
RTA
Brief description of incident
At 11:53 on March 19, one subcontractor’s Toyota pickup working for BGP GIS project
drove 62km/h on the blacktop road with two surveyors. One local blue water tanker from
the opposite direction turned to left lane suddenly and rushed toward the Toyota pickup. In
order to avoid collision, the pickup driver turned right emergently, which cause the pickup to
roll over out of the road. After the accident, the local tanker was escaped.
No injuries happened for the driver and passengers. The windscreen was broken, one tyre
was flat and the rear-view mirrors were damaged. The total estimated loss was about
2400USD.
2. Incidents and Analysis
The incident scene
The sketch of the incident
The pickup
2. Incidents and Analysis
Causes:
 The local tanker turned to left suddenly without any indicators.
 The GIS pickup driver didn’t respond properly.
 The GIS pickup driver was lack of the defensive driving awareness to the
local truck.
 The crew didn’t test or assess the driving skill of the subcontractor drivers.
Lessons Learned :
 Be alert with the local drivers’ unsafe behaviors on the main road.
 Improve the drivers to emergency response capability depending on the
potential cases.
 Test or assess the competence of the drivers from the subcontractors.
 The subcontractor’s drivers should receive DDC training as well.
3. RWP Analysis
Hazard Category-Marine
72
60
54
36
18
13
9
0
0
3
4
8
3
0
5
18
10
0
1
6
23
15
0
0
4
1
3. RWP Analysis
Hazard Category-Land&TZ
2000
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
1767
1155
306
72
54
164
62
3. RWP Analysis
Consequence of Hazard-Land&TZ
Asset
17%
Environment
5%
Reputation
2%
People
76%
3. RWP Analysis
Distribution of UA/UC-Land&TZ
Unsafe
condition
61%
Unsafe act
39%
3. RWP Analysis
Distribution of UA/UC-Land&TZ
Unsafe
condition
61%
Unsafe act
39%
3. RWP Analysis
Priority of Remedial Action-Land&TZ
HIGH, 213, 5%
LOW, 1403, 36%
MEDIUM, 2349,
59%
3. RWP Analysis
Reported by-Land&TZ
Visitor/Auditor; 55;
1%
HSE; 1409; 36%
Client; 103; 3%
Employee;
850; 21%
Management;
442; 11%
Supervisor;
1107; 28%
3. RWP Analysis
Reported by Department-Land&TZ
1600
1491
1400
1200
1000
800
600
455
400
200
0
356
294
41
124
29
84 43
6
95
240
183
24
224
2
79
106
8
0
1
81
3. RWP Analysis
Action Party-Land&TZ
1200
1000
800
972
689 711
600
400
196
200
0
41
254
17
2
5
233
223
216
24
80
0
6
3
0
0
0
0
0
2
80
6
1
16
3. RWP Analysis
Source of Hazard-Land&TZ
2500
2157
2000
1500
1400
1000
500
21
0
3
19
138
180
48
Thank you for your effort and
contribution to HSSE!
HSSE is the responsibility of all of us!