Transcript SGX LIMS and XML export
PSI Data Management and Reporting: Expectations, Standards and Utility
J. Michael Sauder Director, Bioinformatics NYSGXRC Project Leader
NIGMS Expectations
• http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-GM-05-001.html
• “… a database for deposition of information on
experimental outcome data (both successful and unsuccessful)
. • “These data include …
cDNA cloning, expression vector construction, protein production and purification, protein biochemical characterizations, crystallization screening
,
synchrotron and NMR data collection, etc
. • “The PSI Research Network centers will be required to provide plans for the
collection, maintenance, and transfer of experimental results into this central data repository
. •
PepcDB
…
will contain information on these important results and provide a platform for cross-center data mining to capitalize on the PSI investment
Protocols vs Results
• General protocols are reported by each PSI Center in PepcDB • General protocols have been published in the literature by several Centers • However, one of the real values of PepcDB lies in the detailed experimental trial results for each target – Which clones were made? (PSI-MR) – Which constructs yield soluble protein? (which don’t?) – – – What are the fermentation conditions? Purification?
What was the protein yield? The final concentration? The experimental molecular weight?
What conditions gave crystals? How many crystal forms? What was the cryoprotectant? Which conditions led to diffraction data? To the structure?
TargetDB/PepcDB Data Mining
• TargetDB status is informative, but far more useful would be data about – Small scale expression/solubility testing – Large scale purification yield, concentration, oligomeric state – Conditions that yielded diffracting crystals • Publications –
Overton et al (2008) Bioinformatics 24:901 (PDB, TargetDB, PepcDB) 907. “ ParCrys: a Parzen window density estimation approach to protein crystallization propensity prediction”
– – – – –
Martin-Galiano et al (2008) Proteins 70:1243 (TargetDB) 1256 “ Predicting experimental properties of integral membrane proteins by a naive Bayes approach” Bannen et al (2007) J Struct Funct Genomics 8:217 226 “ Effect of low-complexity regions on protein structure determination” (TargetDB/PepcDB) Smialowski et al (2007) Bioinformatics 23:2536 2542 “ Protein solubility: sequence based prediction and experimental verification” (TargetDB) Slabinski et al (2007) Bioinformatics 23:3403 3405 “ XtalPred: a web server for prediction of protein crystallizability” (TargetDB) Nair & Rost (2004) Nucl Acids Res 32:W517 W521 “ LOCnet and LOCtarget: sub cellular localization for structural genomics targets” (TargetDB)
Process vs Reporting
Selected 10 Active 110 Mol biol in progress 140 Fail PCR 170 210 Cloning failed Failed transform Failed expresn Failed solubility 270 Clone completed to ferm 390 Purification in progress 370 365
Soluble
320 315 Purification waiting Purification on hold Fermentation waiting Fermentation on hold 310 Fermentation voided 430 440
Soluble
450 Purification technical error Purification failed Purification research unsuccessful 460 Purification research marginal 470 Purification research successful Purified; completed to collaborator 685 665 655 645 640 620 Optimization crystals Optimization microcrystals Optimization grainy ppt Screening grainy ppt Cryst in optimization Cryst in screening Crystallization admitted 710 Crystal waiting collection Crystal examined 730 Crystal abandoned Dataset collected Structure deposited 950 Structure
Need to Consider the Future… Now
• How much data are we capturing in our databases compared to how much we are reporting?
• What will happen to Center data after PSI-2?
• We should ensure that as much as possible of our Center data is publicly accessible in PepcDB
Trial Data Reporting by Center
Center
JCSG MCSG NESGC NYSGXRC
Experimental trial details reported to PepcDB
Protein sequence, cloning vector, fermentation media, purification method, crystallization conditions Protein sequence, cloning vector, expression host, temperature, media Protein sequence DNA and protein sequence, construct boundaries, cloning vector, small scale expression/solubility scores, media, MW, large scale media, volume, induction time/temp, pellet weight, harvest date, SeMet Y/N, purification yield, concentration, purity, MW, oligomeric state, start/end dates, mass spec pass/fail, analysis comments, MW, crystallization conditions, protein concentration, temperature, cryo, harvest/collection dates, anomalous scatterer, diffraction resolution
PepcDB Trial Schema
NYSGXRC
Primers?
Growth Media (small scale): ZYP-5052 Observed molecular Weight (kDa): 46 Sonication buffer: PLB1 Host cells?
Antibiotic resistance?
Purification steps?
Buffers?
Final concentration (mg/ml): 52.3
Observed molecular weight (kDa): 33 Notebook #: 1136 Page: 115 End date: 06/23/2006 Purity (%): 98 Oligomeric state: monomer (1 subunit)
NYSGXRC
Crystal status: D-DATASET COLLECTED Crystal morphology?
Space group?
Proposed Data Reporting
• Molecular biology – DNA source, primers, vector, PSI-MR clone ID, Host, antibiotic resistance – Expression and solubility rating (small scale), media, predicted and observed molecular weight • Fermentation – Media, volume, induction time, temp, selenoMet?
• Purification – Purification steps, final buffer, yield, concentration, molecular weight, purity, oligomeric state – Accurate MW if mass spec done • Crystallization – Temperature, protein concentration, well conditions, cryoprotectant and resolution, if applicable
<…Value>
• Alternative mechanism to report experimental data –
Optional tags
• http://mmcif.pdb.org/sg-data/protprod.html
• PDB-proposed mmCIF-like tags to describe cloning, expression, purification, crystallization, etc.
• Examples – _entity_src_gen_pure.protein_concentration
– – – _entity_src_gen_pure.protein_yield
_entity_src_gen_pure.protein_oligomeric_state
_pdbx_buffer_components.name
– – _pdbx_buffer_components.conc
_exptl_crystal_grow.temp
Recommendation
•
NYSGXRC plans to further improve our reporting of trial results in 2008
•
We encourage all PSI Centers to utilize the PepcDB or tags to report as much experimental trial results as possible in their PepcDB XML updates
•
See associated poster
Acknowledgements
• SGX LIMS development team – Ryan Allis – – – Chris Hansen Peter Hillier Ken Schwinn • AECOM - Veena Venkatagiriyappa (Fiser lab) • Andrei Kouranov (PDB) • LIMS improvements suggested by SGX protein production, crystallization, and beamline staff • This work was supported by SGX Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and NIH Grant U54 GM074945